N9OGL wrote:
By the way you inbred that's not a model airplane, it's a real
airplane, of course an inbred like you couldn't or don't have the
#####
to fly something like that.

Actually, it's an ultralight...Or it WAS an ultralight until your
illegal modification with a 10 gallon tank which invalidated it's
blanket coverage under Part 103 of the FAA's rules and regulations.

It's not presently licensed as either an "experimental" or as a
"light sport aircraft" either, so if you fly it, you are doing so
illegally.

And you're not licensed either, Todd...as of this morning's ACB
update, there's no "Todd E Daugherty" in their database...No
medical...No airman's certificate...No nothing...

Go figure.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:

N9OGL wrote:

By the way you inbred that's not a model airplane, it's a real
airplane, of course an inbred like you couldn't or don't have the

#####

to fly something like that.


Actually, it's an ultralight...Or it WAS an ultralight until your
illegal modification with a 10 gallon tank which invalidated it's
blanket coverage under Part 103 of the FAA's rules and regulations.

It's not presently licensed as either an "experimental" or as a
"light sport aircraft" either, so if you fly it, you are doing so
illegally.

And you're not licensed either, Todd...as of this morning's ACB
update, there's no "Todd E Daugherty" in their database...No
medical...No airman's certificate...No nothing...

Go figure.

Steve, K4YZ

Kind of fits in with his NO B#### theory you think?

KC8GXW wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

N9OGL wrote:

By the way you inbred that's not a model airplane, it's a real
airplane, of course an inbred like you couldn't or don't have the

#####

to fly something like that.


Actually, it's an ultralight...Or it WAS an ultralight until
your
illegal modification with a 10 gallon tank which invalidated it's
blanket coverage under Part 103 of the FAA's rules and regulations.

It's not presently licensed as either an "experimental" or as
a
"light sport aircraft" either, so if you fly it, you are doing so
illegally.

And you're not licensed either, Todd...as of this morning's
ACB
update, there's no "Todd E Daugherty" in their database...No
medical...No airman's certificate...No nothing...

Go figure.

Steve, K4YZ

Kind of fits in with his NO B#### theory you think?

You got THAT right... ! ! ! !

73

Steve, K4YZ

"K4YZ" wrote

Actually, it's an ultralight...Or it WAS an ultralight until your
illegal modification with a 10 gallon tank which invalidated it's
blanket coverage under Part 103 of the FAA's rules and regulations.

"your rantings have nothing to do with Amateur Radio" -- K4YZ

It's not presently licensed as either an "experimental" or as a
"light sport aircraft" either, so if you fly it, you are doing so
illegally.

"your rantings have nothing to do with Amateur Radio" -- K4YZ

And you're not licensed either, Todd...as of this morning's ACB
update, there's no "Todd E Daugherty" in their database...No
medical...No airman's certificate...No nothing...

"your rantings have nothing to do with Amateur Radio" -- K4YZ

K=D8HB wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote

Actually, it's an ultralight...Or it WAS an ultralight until your
illegal modification with a 10 gallon tank which invalidated it's
blanket coverage under Part 103 of the FAA's rules and regulations.

"your rantings have nothing to do with Amateur Radio" -- K4YZ

I wonder why it is that YOU are the only one who can jerk Lennie's
chain about his "redirections", but when I do it it's subject for
ridcule, Hans...

Could it be a bit of that two-facededness coming out again...???

I bet it is!

Steve, K4YZ