From: K4YZ on Jun 6, 3:00 am

bb wrote:
Leo wrote:
On 5 Jun 2005 05:41:50 -0700, wrote:

Leo, what word would be more appropriate than "bull****" to
describe that claim?

Incorrect? As in "that claim is incorrect...."

I'm with you on that one, Leo.

But instead of "that claim is incorrect," we are treated to LIAR,
and/or Gay Man accusations from Jim's little puppet. Jim IS
Quitefine with it all.


Noooooooooo.......

Yaaasssssssssssssss................

You're treated to "liar" after you've made a claim and then failed
to back it up with at least SOME form of reasonable corroboration.

Tsk, tsk, tsk.

WHERE and WHEN were Stebie's CLAIMED "seven hostile actions"?


Saying "My opinion is..." is one thing. That's black and white.

Okay, now we understand...you no longer CLAIM "seven hostile
actions"...that is just YOUR OPINION. OK.


Saying "ARES is overblown and it's members wontt/can't respond" in
the face of almost weekly evidence to the contrary and then not
acknowledging it is just stupid.

"Wontt"? :-)

"Weekly evidence?" There are large-enough emergencies EVERY
WEEK in the USA that require amateur radio communications
assistance? [I don't think so...not even "almost"...]


Is it YOUR OPINION that you were an "Assistant" NCOIC at a
MARS station 24 years ago?

Do you acknowledge that the U.S. military runs MARS or is it
still YOUR OPINION that "MARS IS amateur radio?"

Temper fry.