Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why not more young'uns in Ham radio
Many people lament that there is not enough interest in Ham radio by
young people. There are often many reasons given for this deficiency, and somewhat less "fixes". One of the reasons that is given very often is that Amateur radio is in some sort of competition with the Internet. Let us look at this theory. What is the competition between the two? In order to use the internet, one must of course have a computer. It must be connected to the internet, through one of several methods. Once the person has learned to turn on the computer, open a few programs or so, they have the necessary skills to work the internet. Amateur radio on the other hand, requires that a radio be used, which requires some skill in operating. An antenna system needs to be connected to this radio. Whereas it is possible to have everything set up for the Ham, most young people do not have the resources to have someone set up their system. Coupled with the possibility of putting an antenna in operation that only costs a few dollars, or even less if the youngster has good scrounging skills, the likelihood is that they would design and put up their own antenna, another skill needed. So there is a large difference in the skills needed for the two hobbies. Cell phones as competition? While there is a temptation to snipe "Get Real!", I'll address those too. What would make a person decide to take up Cell phone use as a hobby? Cell phones allow you to talk to people that you know (for the most part) and operate in the same manner as a regular telephone, save that you take the cell with you, and you are generally tied in the same building with a standard telephone. It's hard to imagine someone doing that as a hobby, although there are a lot of people who spend a lot of time using them. So what makes a youngster decide to become a Ham? We can try using the input of those who became Hams at a young age. Most of what I have heard is that the person was very interested in the technical aspects involved with getting on the air. Making antennas, building rigs, and getting them on the air was a big part of the attraction. In the end, I believe that it is young people that have a technical interest that will likely become Hams. And that, I believe, is the crux of the issue. America is not a place that encourages those who might be thinking of a technical career. We have a tendency to encourage a more "pop culture" outlook, which as often as not discounts actual learning for "street cred", and actually turns the smart person into an object of ridicule. There are levels, and there are levels. If a person is intelligent, and wants a good livelihood, you will find careers that are acceptable. You can be a movie star, or perhaps a lawyer. A whole spectrum follows, but engineering and the technical fields are not very high on that list. How often is the Techie portrayed as a sort of Bill Nye, the science guy type (at best). How about the smart woman who takes off her glasses and suddenly becomes the hot babe? Professor Frink on "The Simpsons"? Pop culture is not kind to the technical types. My experiences with programs like "bring your sons and daughters to work day" shows that almost none of the kids is even thinking of a technical field. A lot want to be lawyers. Once in the past, we were scared into thinking that maybe science and technology was maybe not such a bad thing. That happened when the commies launched Sputnik. Suddenly it seemed important that at least some of our kids decided to work in the sciences. Hopefully we will decide that again without having to be shocked into it. I am pretty firmly convinced that until we stop catering to the least common denominator, until we stop marginalizing the technically and scientifically inclined, we will not find many youngsters who want to come into our hobby. - Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|