K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

You can't seem to get through your own fantasies, Brain...

Any fantasy of mine cannot influence your ability to string together a
sentence.

Why would I want to "string together a sentence" based on any
fantasy of yours, Brain?

You're a discredited liar. I have no desire to emulate that.

I stand corrected. I should have said, "...your inability..."

I don't think you were paying attention, Brain...(Like THAT'S
new...)

Such baseless accusations (lies) you're always making.

It's not baseless.

IE: Unlicesed Devices, ARES, MARS, Lawful Operating from Foreign
Soil, etc.

You've been proven wrong on every single one.

Yet we're talking about What Christy has written, and you've been shown
to be wrong. Again.

Nope.

...

Re-read what was written...Lennie will NOT be pleased...(Like
THAT'S new either!!!)

Steve, K4YZ

Pull your head out and re-read it yourself. You won't be pleased.

Nothing to re-read. Yuo got it wrong. Now you've gotten it wrong
twice.

I asked for clarification. Christy gave it. You're wrong.

No, I'm not.

...

Christy said that the longer the reply, the more likely it is that the
original opinion was correct.

Uh huh.

I say Lennie's an idiot.

It's not about you. It's about what Christy said that would please
Len.

Too bad for you.

Too bad I was right?

Why?

...

QUOTE:

On 31 May 2005 15:40:05 -0700, bb wrote:

Christy D wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2005 12:07:05 GMT, Kim wrote:
[102 lines snipped]

The correctness of the original opinion is directly proportional to
the length of the attempted rebuttal.

inversely proportional?

No. The longer the rebuttal attempt, the more likely it is that the
original opinion was correct. Hence the direct proportionality.

UNQUOTE

Sorry, Brain...You've screwed the pooch...Again...

"Screwed the pooch?" It that a marine corps thing?

And why can't you explain why you posted my street address on RRAP?

bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

No. The longer the rebuttal attempt, the more likely it is that the
original opinion was correct. Hence the direct proportionality.

Sorry, Brain...You've screwed the pooch...Again...

"Screwed the pooch?" It that a marine corps thing?

Marine Corps is capitalized, just like Air Force, Brain...

And why can't you explain why you posted my street address on RRAP?

I didn't post your "street address" on RRAP, Brain...

A street address consists of a house number, apartment or suite if
applicable, and the name or number of the street.

EG: 151 12th Avenue Northwest. That is a "street address, albeit
not a complete "mailing address".

A "mailing address" consists of a full street address or
appropriate box number, a city, state and postal code where postal
codes are employed. The name of the country of the destination address
is the last line if different from the originating address.

I'd think after having been deployed overseas and, I assume,
having mailed things home before that you'd kow this bit of
information.

So...you want to try again...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

"K4YZ" wrote


A "mailing address" consists of a full street address or
appropriate box number, a city, state and postal code where postal
codes are employed. The name of the country of the destination address
is the last line if different from the originating address.


Thank you, Captain Obvious. Perhaps that information was useful to someone.
Out in the barn.

dit dit
de Hans, K0HB

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

No. The longer the rebuttal attempt, the more likely it is that the
original opinion was correct. Hence the direct proportionality.

Sorry, Brain...You've screwed the pooch...Again...

"Screwed the pooch?" It that a marine corps thing?

Marine Corps is capitalized, just like Air Force, Brain...

Who could tell? You usually capitalize every other word.

And why can't you explain why you posted my street address on RRAP?

I didn't post your "street address" on RRAP, Brain...

A street address consists of a house number, apartment or suite if
applicable, and the name or number of the street.

EG: 151 12th Avenue Northwest. That is a "street address, albeit
not a complete "mailing address".

A "mailing address" consists of a full street address or
appropriate box number, a city, state and postal code where postal
codes are employed. The name of the country of the destination address
is the last line if different from the originating address.

I'd think after having been deployed overseas and, I assume,
having mailed things home before that you'd kow this bit of
information.

So...you want to try again...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

"Lessee....430"

What was that supposed to mean?

Why must you dodge? Why must you use weasle words? Why can't you
answer the question?

K=D8HB wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote


A "mailing address" consists of a full street address or
appropriate box number, a city, state and postal code where postal
codes are employed. The name of the country of the destination address
is the last line if different from the originating address.


Thank you, Captain Obvious. Perhaps that information was useful to someo=
ne.
Out in the barn.

dit dit
de Hans, K0HB

Steve won't answer my question, won't "educate" me. Steve won't say
what he meant by "Lessee....430." Steve dodges. Steve won't be a
"man" about it and accept responsibility for his actions. It's like
he's anonymous WRT "Lessee....430." =20

Steve fears something.

wrote:
From: "bb" on Fri 3 Jun 2005 03:51

wrote:
From: bb on Jun 2, 6:27 pm

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:

Christy said that the longer the reply, the more likely it is that the
original opinion was correct.

"Christy," singing like a New Minstrel, might belong to that
irritated group that gets tired tracing out more than 50
words with their finger... :-)

Who's to say?

I know...:-) But, we have the solitary tomb sentinel busy
"guarding" the territory for ANY opinions other than his own.

We are stuck with the Avenging Angle of Dearth. Ho hum.

Eventually the "pop" will be an artery and he will become
the usual vegetable garden typical to stroke victims. We
will be able to see that while we are still alive. :-)

That is going to put a damper on his Class A behavior and
incessant machismo attitude of always "being right" (in his
own mind). His stress is building. Tsk.

Notice how the coward won't explain what he meant by "Lessee...430." I
need to start tabulating the dodges like the time I kept track of his
new lies for three weeks.

Len has long replies. Sometimes really, really long replies. Do you
want to argue that, too?

The Avenging Angle of Dearth will ARGUE-FIGHT-INSULT anything
I write in here. :-)

I tire of Steve's incessant lying. I tire of his peers always giving
him a pass on his tirades. They're all a pretty useless assembly of
Extras.

Understand fully. They aren't ever going to be role models
of anything they way they act and posture in here.

Steven J. Robeson has soiled his father's name.

Many years ago at a division of a national corporation there
was a long-time Amateur Extra near retirement age. He was a
good sort, knew his stuff, never tried to put his hobby into
the forefront as a Lifestyle. He also had a mischevious
sense of humor and was quite tolerant of younger staff getting
way too overworked over their hobby discussions. When he
found a couple of radio amateurs engaged in a heated argument
he would listen a minute or so, then casually interrupt with
"Say, did you know that ham is the butchered meat of swine?"

The arguers would be momentarily stunned. He would grin
slightly and amble away, the grin growing. He had the right
balance of priorities. He retired and showed up at some L.A.
Council meetings since. Lost track of him. I've never
forgotten that (correct) statement he made more than once.
:-)



Careful, now. You might upset the mighty machismo morsemen, especially
"Jimmy the Riveter."

bb wrote:
wrote:
From: "bb" on Fri 3 Jun 2005 03:51

wrote:
From: bb on Jun 2, 6:27 pm

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:

Christy said that the longer the reply, the more likely it is that the
original opinion was correct.

"Christy," singing like a New Minstrel, might belong to that
irritated group that gets tired tracing out more than 50
words with their finger... :-)

Who's to say?

I know...:-) But, we have the solitary tomb sentinel busy
"guarding" the territory for ANY opinions other than his own.

We are stuck with the Avenging Angle of Dearth. Ho hum.

Eventually the "pop" will be an artery and he will become
the usual vegetable garden typical to stroke victims. We
will be able to see that while we are still alive. :-)

That is going to put a damper on his Class A behavior and
incessant machismo attitude of always "being right" (in his
own mind). His stress is building. Tsk.

Notice how the coward won't explain what he meant by "Lessee...430." I
need to start tabulating the dodges like the time I kept track of his
new lies for three weeks.

None of those added up to "1". You claimed there were lies
present, but never substantiated a single claim.

So start in on this if you'd care to...It will just keep you from
bothering others.

Len has long replies. Sometimes really, really long replies. Do you
want to argue that, too?

The Avenging Angle of Dearth will ARGUE-FIGHT-INSULT anything
I write in here. :-)

I tire of Steve's incessant lying. I tire of his peers always giving
him a pass on his tirades. They're all a pretty useless assembly of
Extras.

Understand fully. They aren't ever going to be role models
of anything they way they act and posture in here.

Steven J. Robeson has soiled his father's name.

No, I've not.

However YOU have a lot of explaining to do to your Son and Spouse.


Documented. Archived.

Steve, K4YZ

From: "bb" on Sat 4 Jun 2005 05:54


wrote:
From: "bb" on Fri 3 Jun 2005 03:51

wrote:
From: bb on Jun 2, 6:27 pm

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:

I know...:-) But, we have the solitary tomb sentinel busy
"guarding" the territory for ANY opinions other than his own.

We are stuck with the Avenging Angle of Dearth. Ho hum.

Eventually the "pop" will be an artery and he will become
the usual vegetable garden typical to stroke victims. We
will be able to see that while we are still alive. :-)

That is going to put a damper on his Class A behavior and
incessant machismo attitude of always "being right" (in his
own mind). His stress is building. Tsk.

Notice how the coward won't explain what he meant by "Lessee...430." I
need to start tabulating the dodges like the time I kept track of his
new lies for three weeks.

Well, don't expect him to change any time soon. He's tried
the same thing with me (10048 being my house number) except
that my entire mailing address has been printed in HR in
every article (common procedure in amateur radio periodicals).

The solitary tomb sentinel has an ugly habit of bullying
others to "gain supremacy" or something similar. He can do
so in relative "safety" from the time-distance isolation of
this medium. Bullies take advantage of that "protection"
(and usually act a lot "tougher") but all it shows is ordinary
cowardice.


I tire of Steve's incessant lying. I tire of his peers always giving
him a pass on his tirades. They're all a pretty useless assembly of
Extras.

Understand fully. They aren't ever going to be role models
of anything they way they act and posture in here.

Steven J. Robeson has soiled his father's name.

Yes, and probably soiled his pants on encountering some who
don't feel threatened by his bullying machismo. :-)

way too overworked over their hobby discussions. When he
found a couple of radio amateurs engaged in a heated argument
he would listen a minute or so, then casually interrupt with
"Say, did you know that ham is the butchered meat of swine?"

The arguers would be momentarily stunned. He would grin
slightly and amble away, the grin growing. He had the right

Careful, now. You might upset the mighty machismo morsemen, especially
"Jimmy the Riveter."

Heh heh heh. I'm not worried about Jimmie. He gets upset so
easily, thinks I am "calling him names."

Tsk, tsk. I've called him all sorts of names: James, Jim,
Jimmy, Jimmie, James Miccolis, and just Miccolis. He feels
so "insulted" now about being called all those NAMES that he
just wastes everyone's time.

Ham radio has certainly changed since I first heard about it
back in the 40s. So many uptight folks in it now, so easily
bruised, some wanting to bully, terrorize, and FIGHT! :-)

wrote:
From: "bb" on Sat 4 Jun 2005 05:54


wrote:
From: "bb" on Fri 3 Jun 2005 03:51

wrote:
From: bb on Jun 2, 6:27 pm

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:

I know...:-) But, we have the solitary tomb sentinel busy
"guarding" the territory for ANY opinions other than his own.

We are stuck with the Avenging Angle of Dearth. Ho hum.

Eventually the "pop" will be an artery and he will become
the usual vegetable garden typical to stroke victims. We
will be able to see that while we are still alive. :-)

That is going to put a damper on his Class A behavior and
incessant machismo attitude of always "being right" (in his
own mind). His stress is building. Tsk.

Notice how the coward won't explain what he meant by "Lessee...430." I
need to start tabulating the dodges like the time I kept track of his
new lies for three weeks.

Well, don't expect him to change any time soon. He's tried
the same thing with me (10048 being my house number) except
that my entire mailing address has been printed in HR in
every article (common procedure in amateur radio periodicals).

The solitary tomb sentinel has an ugly habit of bullying
others to "gain supremacy" or something similar. He can do
so in relative "safety" from the time-distance isolation of
this medium. Bullies take advantage of that "protection"
(and usually act a lot "tougher") but all it shows is ordinary
cowardice.


I tire of Steve's incessant lying. I tire of his peers always giving
him a pass on his tirades. They're all a pretty useless assembly of
Extras.

Understand fully. They aren't ever going to be role models
of anything they way they act and posture in here.

Steven J. Robeson has soiled his father's name.

Yes, and probably soiled his pants on encountering some who
don't feel threatened by his bullying machismo. :-)

way too overworked over their hobby discussions. When he
found a couple of radio amateurs engaged in a heated argument
he would listen a minute or so, then casually interrupt with
"Say, did you know that ham is the butchered meat of swine?"

The arguers would be momentarily stunned. He would grin
slightly and amble away, the grin growing. He had the right

Careful, now. You might upset the mighty machismo morsemen, especially
"Jimmy the Riveter."

Heh heh heh. I'm not worried about Jimmie. He gets upset so
easily, thinks I am "calling him names."

Tsk, tsk. I've called him all sorts of names: James, Jim,
Jimmy, Jimmie, James Miccolis, and just Miccolis. He feels
so "insulted" now about being called all those NAMES that he
just wastes everyone's time.

Ham radio has certainly changed since I first heard about it
back in the 40s. So many uptight folks in it now, so easily
bruised, some wanting to bully, terrorize, and FIGHT! :-)



These are certainly not the good people that I first met when I became
a ham. The trouble with amateur radio started with the advent of the
no-code license. People began entering the service that did not
worship at the altar of St. Hiram, and did not kneel and kisst the feet
of Extras.

bb wrote:
wrote:

Ham radio has certainly changed since I first heard about it
back in the 40s. So many uptight folks in it now, so easily
bruised, some wanting to bully, terrorize, and FIGHT!

Perhaps, Lennie, if certain mischevious scumbags weren't
looking to "bruise" people there wouldn't be such a propensity to be as defensive.

Such as the deceitful and misleading barbs YOU disseminate in this
forum.

Guess you now think it's wrong for one to defend one's self?

These are certainly not the good people that I first met when I became
a ham. The trouble with amateur radio started with the advent of the
no-code license. People began entering the service that did not
worship at the altar of St. Hiram, and did not kneel and kisst the feet
of Extras.

The problem didn't start with the No Code test...It started almost
20 years before that with the influx of 11 meter operators via the Bash
Book route and the subsequent codification of the "open pools".

Steve, K4YZ