Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: "Kim" on Tues 31 May 2005 12:07
I don't think you're the slightest bit interested in whether you are alienating me or not, Hans. So, your feeble attempt to reconcile the angst of your original response to mine is lost, since I'm sure you're more interested in the fact that Dee (someone who you are probably more inclined to want to pat on the head) aligned herself along the lines of what I was thinking. ... Well said, Kim. There's a strong undertone (perhaps "undertow") of unwanted machismo present in this group of "mighty warriors." In the morning edition of the Los Angeles Times, 30 May 2005, was the story of Marie Michell Robinson, a 20 year old WASP (Womens Air force Service Pilots) who died in the October 1944 crash of a B-25 twin-engine bomber she was co-piloting in the Mojave Desert region of California. WASPs were not military members but neither were they exactly ciivlians. They earned a base pay of $250 a month but had to pay all of the meal and lodging costs out of that (even if stationed at military bases) and had to pay for their own uniforms. Marie had been married just two weeks to Major Hampton Robinson, an Army medical doctor. The crash site was re-found by a trio of amateur aviation "archaeologists" in southern California who had (on their own time) searched for over a year to relocate the crash site. The trio found it in early May. While Marie's body had been recovered over a half century before, the trio uncovered her personal belongings: A wedding band, bracelet (with name and wings emblem), a WASP pin, nail file, and a wris****ch whose hands had stopped at 1:40 PM, the time of the crash. Personal items of the other two crew members were recovered and all are being returned to their surviving family members. WASPs were not given veterans' status until 1979. Source: LA Times, 30 May 2005, Valley Edition, Section B, page 1, written by H. G. Resa, Times Staff Writer; includes photos of personal articles and one of the amateur aviation archaeologists. In addition, no matter what the "original" Memorial Day was intended for. We've come a long way in this country. As you mention, there are days specifically angled at the military (Veterans Day, Armed Forces Day) wherein it may be more appropriate to remember "just" our military heroes. During World War II the WASPs weren't military, weren't civilian, yet they served the nation by giving up their time to aid the war effort. Some gave everything: 38 WASPs died in that service. They were not acknowledged as "veterans" by the U.S. government until 25 years later. This country is a bit late on following-through about "coming a long way" but it just barely manages to keep up. Three civilians, on their own voluntary time and not members of the military or government, relocated the crash site and uncovered personal belongings, found and notified remaining family members. They honored the true spirit of Memorial Day. Several individuals in here do NOT keep up and they pervert the meaning of Memorial Day to serve their own egos. Most of those were not even born when World War II ended...yet they seem to demand strict adherence to Their "Rules" of memorialism. Some have rather insane definitions of honoring the fallen such as remembrance and honor being classified as a "dishonor." All that in a newgroup supposedly about policies in a HOBBY radio activity. Tsk. ex-RA16408336, U.S. Army 1952-1960, Signal Corps, Sgt (E=5) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
KØHB wrote:
"Kim" wrote in message news ![]() I thought of today and what it means and came across this article. I'm sure the fine lady was an excellend riveter, but the copyrighted article (you had permission to reproduce it?) has NOTHING to do with Memorial Day, when we honor those who made the ultimate sacrifice. As Charlie Brown would say, 'good grief!!" Don't you have something to do today Hans? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "KØHB" wrote in message ink.net... "Kim" wrote in message news ![]() I thought of today and what it means and came across this article. I'm sure the fine lady was an excellend riveter, but the copyrighted article (you had permission to reproduce it?) has NOTHING to do with Memorial Day, when we honor those who made the ultimate sacrifice. That is typical W5TWIT, totally bassackwards thought pattern. Dan/W4NTI |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message link.net... "KØHB" wrote in message ink.net... "Kim" wrote in message news ![]() I thought of today and what it means and came across this article. I'm sure the fine lady was an excellend riveter, but the copyrighted article (you had permission to reproduce it?) has NOTHING to do with Memorial Day, when we honor those who made the ultimate sacrifice. That is typical W5TWIT, totally bassackwards thought pattern. Dan/W4NTI Sorry, Dan I will respond on group to this. Thanks for your non-thoughts. ZBM-2, Jim AA2QA |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lies... | Shortwave | |||
Armistice Day was Happy Vets Day | Policy |