bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Len will be pleased to here that.

"Len will be pleased to here that."...?!?!

(Since you seem to enjoy busting me for typos....)

Only when it's obvious that you're hallucinating.

Who's hallucinating?

You can't seem to get through your own fantasies, Brain...

I don't think you were paying attention, Brain...(Like THAT'S
new...)

Such baseless accusations (lies) you're always making.

It's not baseless.

IE: Unlicesed Devices, ARES, MARS, Lawful Operating from Foreign
Soil, etc.

You've been proven wrong on every single one.

Re-read what was written...Lennie will NOT be pleased...(Like
THAT'S new either!!!)

Steve, K4YZ

Pull your head out and re-read it yourself. You won't be pleased.

Nothing to re-read. Yuo got it wrong. Now you've gotten it wrong
twice.

Christy said that the longer the reply, the more likely it is that the
original opinion was correct.

Uh huh.

I say Lennie's an idiot.

Lennie takes six paragraphs to tell us how he knows everything and
how his years at ADA make him ultimately qulified to be an idiot.

I retort and call Lennie a BIG idiot.

He comes back with 12 paragraphs. Proves Christy's Law that my
original assertion (he's an idiot) was correct.

Christy's Law. It works

Len has long replies. Sometimes really, really long replies. Do you
want to argue that, too?

What's to argue? Lennie uses his verbostiy to hide his failings
and inadequacies. It's legend.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Len will be pleased to here that.

"Len will be pleased to here that."...?!?!

(Since you seem to enjoy busting me for typos....)

Only when it's obvious that you're hallucinating.

Who's hallucinating?

You can't seem to get through your own fantasies, Brain...

Any fantasy of mine cannot influence your ability to string together a
sentence.

I don't think you were paying attention, Brain...(Like THAT'S
new...)

Such baseless accusations (lies) you're always making.

It's not baseless.

IE: Unlicesed Devices, ARES, MARS, Lawful Operating from Foreign
Soil, etc.

You've been proven wrong on every single one.

Yet we're talking about What Christy has written, and you've been shown
to be wrong. Again.

Re-read what was written...Lennie will NOT be pleased...(Like
THAT'S new either!!!)

Steve, K4YZ

Pull your head out and re-read it yourself. You won't be pleased.

Nothing to re-read. Yuo got it wrong. Now you've gotten it wrong
twice.

I asked for clarification. Christy gave it. You're wrong.

Christy said that the longer the reply, the more likely it is that the
original opinion was correct.

Uh huh.

I say Lennie's an idiot.

It's not about you. It's about what Christy said that would please
Len.

Too bad for you.

bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

You can't seem to get through your own fantasies, Brain...

Any fantasy of mine cannot influence your ability to string together a
sentence.

Why would I want to "string together a sentence" based on any
fantasy of yours, Brain?

You're a discredited liar. I have no desire to emulate that.

I don't think you were paying attention, Brain...(Like THAT'S
new...)

Such baseless accusations (lies) you're always making.

It's not baseless.

IE: Unlicesed Devices, ARES, MARS, Lawful Operating from Foreign
Soil, etc.

You've been proven wrong on every single one.

Yet we're talking about What Christy has written, and you've been shown
to be wrong. Again.

Nope.

Re-read what was written...Lennie will NOT be pleased...(Like
THAT'S new either!!!)

Steve, K4YZ

Pull your head out and re-read it yourself. You won't be pleased.

Nothing to re-read. Yuo got it wrong. Now you've gotten it wrong
twice.

I asked for clarification. Christy gave it. You're wrong.

No, I'm not.

Christy said that the longer the reply, the more likely it is that the
original opinion was correct.

Uh huh.

I say Lennie's an idiot.

It's not about you. It's about what Christy said that would please
Len.

Too bad for you.

Too bad I was right?

Why?

QUOTE:

On 31 May 2005 15:40:05 -0700, bb wrote:

Christy D wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2005 12:07:05 GMT, Kim wrote:
[102 lines snipped]

The correctness of the original opinion is directly proportional to
the length of the attempted rebuttal.

inversely proportional?

No. The longer the rebuttal attempt, the more likely it is that the
original opinion was correct. Hence the direct proportionality.

UNQUOTE

Sorry, Brain...You've screwed the pooch...Again...

Steve, K4YZ

From: "K4YZ" on Thurs 2 Jun 2005 17:48


bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Len will be pleased to here that.

"Len will be pleased to here that."...?!?!

(Since you seem to enjoy busting me for typos....)

Only when it's obvious that you're hallucinating.

Who's hallucinating?

Stebie.

You can't seem to get through your own fantasies, Brain...

Stebie brain got SOP for everbody's fantasies? :-)

Pass the peyote, Stebie-san, high-high. :-)


I don't think you were paying attention, Brain...(Like THAT'S
new...)

Such baseless accusations (lies) you're always making.

It's not baseless.

Stebie stole 4th base, claims it his. Stebie not in ball park.

IE: Unlicesed Devices, ARES, MARS, Lawful Operating from Foreign
Soil, etc.

You've been proven wrong on every single one.

Stebie high honcho in gubmint? Ober FCC? Uber FCC? :-)

Stebie be Riley Robeson? Stebie be Sevie Hollingsworth?

Stebie have ham shield in wallet, show and make arrests?


Re-read what was written...Lennie will NOT be pleased...(Like
THAT'S new either!!!)

Steve, K4YZ

Pull your head out and re-read it yourself. You won't be pleased.

Nothing to re-read. Yuo got it wrong. Now you've gotten it wrong
twice.

Who "Yuo?" New basketball player for Texas team? Dey got Yao.

Christy said that the longer the reply, the more likely it is that the
original opinion was correct.

Uh huh.

I say Lennie's an idiot.

Stebie Einstein? Stebie make General law of Relatives?

Stebie go Switzerland, be patent clerk? Stebie a freud?

Stebie give yodel lessons?

Lennie takes six paragraphs to tell us how he knows everything and
how his years at ADA make him ultimately qulified to be an idiot.

I retort and call Lennie a BIG idiot.

Stebie forget "PUTZ," "gutless coward," etc. :-)

He comes back with 12 paragraphs. Proves Christy's Law that my
original assertion (he's an idiot) was correct.

Christy's Law. It works

Who "Christy?" Musical group? New holiday? Stebie change
gender and be "Christy?"

Stebie not say. Stebie need "sked?" Good name be "Rosebud"
for snow sked. Fits.

Len has long replies. Sometimes really, really long replies. Do you
want to argue that, too?

What's to argue? Lennie uses his verbostiy to hide his failings
and inadequacies. It's legend.

Stebie have legend. Stebie be legend. Stebie is legend in his
own mind.

Stebie have myth? Wifie#2 find out, bye-bye Mithter Stebie.



...the sun sets on the Tomb of the Unknown Solder as a solitary
figure in a patch-adorned flight suit slowly paces out his lonely
path of anger, J-38 in one hand, bayonetted USMC soldering iron
in the other. Pre-recorded marine marches softly fill the air,
interspersed with dits and dahs of a few PCTA morsebirds not yet
extinct. The Tomb of the Unknown Solder is a lonely place, deep
in the valley of neuroses, anger, and frustration. The single
sentinel counts cadennce to himself, muttering "flux you, flux
you" between the slow steps. His fists are clenched, eager to do
bottle but only sipping a cup of unkindness. It is sad but the
sentinel at the Tomb of the Unknown Solder keeps going. He does
not know why and that is the tragedy. The sun slowly sets on the
Tomb of the Unknown Solder leaving only the red light of fire in
the eyes of the muttering sentinel. Those glow in the dark like
LED pilot lights. Hatred lives on in his twilight of despair.

Temper fry.

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

You can't seem to get through your own fantasies, Brain...

Any fantasy of mine cannot influence your ability to string together a
sentence.

Why would I want to "string together a sentence" based on any
fantasy of yours, Brain?

You're a discredited liar. I have no desire to emulate that.

I stand corrected. I should have said, "...your inability..."

I don't think you were paying attention, Brain...(Like THAT'S
new...)

Such baseless accusations (lies) you're always making.

It's not baseless.

IE: Unlicesed Devices, ARES, MARS, Lawful Operating from Foreign
Soil, etc.

You've been proven wrong on every single one.

Yet we're talking about What Christy has written, and you've been shown
to be wrong. Again.

Nope.

...

Re-read what was written...Lennie will NOT be pleased...(Like
THAT'S new either!!!)

Steve, K4YZ

Pull your head out and re-read it yourself. You won't be pleased.

Nothing to re-read. Yuo got it wrong. Now you've gotten it wrong
twice.

I asked for clarification. Christy gave it. You're wrong.

No, I'm not.

...

Christy said that the longer the reply, the more likely it is that the
original opinion was correct.

Uh huh.

I say Lennie's an idiot.

It's not about you. It's about what Christy said that would please
Len.

Too bad for you.

Too bad I was right?

Why?

...

QUOTE:

On 31 May 2005 15:40:05 -0700, bb wrote:

Christy D wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2005 12:07:05 GMT, Kim wrote:
[102 lines snipped]

The correctness of the original opinion is directly proportional to
the length of the attempted rebuttal.

inversely proportional?

No. The longer the rebuttal attempt, the more likely it is that the
original opinion was correct. Hence the direct proportionality.

UNQUOTE

Sorry, Brain...You've screwed the pooch...Again...

"Screwed the pooch?" It that a marine corps thing?

And why can't you explain why you posted my street address on RRAP?

bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

No. The longer the rebuttal attempt, the more likely it is that the
original opinion was correct. Hence the direct proportionality.

Sorry, Brain...You've screwed the pooch...Again...

"Screwed the pooch?" It that a marine corps thing?

Marine Corps is capitalized, just like Air Force, Brain...

And why can't you explain why you posted my street address on RRAP?

I didn't post your "street address" on RRAP, Brain...

A street address consists of a house number, apartment or suite if
applicable, and the name or number of the street.

EG: 151 12th Avenue Northwest. That is a "street address, albeit
not a complete "mailing address".

A "mailing address" consists of a full street address or
appropriate box number, a city, state and postal code where postal
codes are employed. The name of the country of the destination address
is the last line if different from the originating address.

I'd think after having been deployed overseas and, I assume,
having mailed things home before that you'd kow this bit of
information.

So...you want to try again...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

"K4YZ" wrote


A "mailing address" consists of a full street address or
appropriate box number, a city, state and postal code where postal
codes are employed. The name of the country of the destination address
is the last line if different from the originating address.


Thank you, Captain Obvious. Perhaps that information was useful to someone.
Out in the barn.

dit dit
de Hans, K0HB

K=D8HB wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote


A "mailing address" consists of a full street address or
appropriate box number, a city, state and postal code where postal
codes are employed. The name of the country of the destination address
is the last line if different from the originating address.


Thank you, Captain Obvious. Perhaps that information was useful to someo=
ne.
Out in the barn.

dit dit
de Hans, K0HB

Steve won't answer my question, won't "educate" me. Steve won't say
what he meant by "Lessee....430." Steve dodges. Steve won't be a
"man" about it and accept responsibility for his actions. It's like
he's anonymous WRT "Lessee....430." =20

Steve fears something.

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

No. The longer the rebuttal attempt, the more likely it is that the
original opinion was correct. Hence the direct proportionality.

Sorry, Brain...You've screwed the pooch...Again...

"Screwed the pooch?" It that a marine corps thing?

Marine Corps is capitalized, just like Air Force, Brain...

Who could tell? You usually capitalize every other word.

And why can't you explain why you posted my street address on RRAP?

I didn't post your "street address" on RRAP, Brain...

A street address consists of a house number, apartment or suite if
applicable, and the name or number of the street.

EG: 151 12th Avenue Northwest. That is a "street address, albeit
not a complete "mailing address".

A "mailing address" consists of a full street address or
appropriate box number, a city, state and postal code where postal
codes are employed. The name of the country of the destination address
is the last line if different from the originating address.

I'd think after having been deployed overseas and, I assume,
having mailed things home before that you'd kow this bit of
information.

So...you want to try again...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

"Lessee....430"

What was that supposed to mean?

Why must you dodge? Why must you use weasle words? Why can't you
answer the question?