RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   Haynie admits to problem, alzheimers victims respond with, "What problem?" (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/72501-haynie-admits-problem-alzheimers-victims-respond-%22what-problem-%22.html)

John Smith June 8th 05 10:50 PM

Haynie admits to problem, alzheimers victims respond with, "What problem?"
 
You would think the ARRL high priest would not abandon these guys--times
must be tough...
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/05/22/1/?nc=1

John
--
Watching the cutting edge of yesterday replay--in virtual reality, right
before my eyes--in real time!
Thirty year old technology--wasn't it amazing?


bb June 9th 05 12:33 AM



John Smith wrote:
You would think the ARRL high priest would not abandon these guys--times
must be tough...
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/05/22/1/?nc=1

John
--
Watching the cutting edge of yesterday replay--in virtual reality, right
before my eyes--in real time!
Thirty year old technology--wasn't it amazing?


Sounds like he's been talking to Len. Refreshing.


[email protected] June 9th 05 12:41 AM

From: John Smith on Jun 8, 5:50 pm

You would think the ARRL high priest would not abandon these guys--times
must be tough...


http://www.arrl.org/news/stori?es/2004/05/22/1/?nc=1


John
--
Watching the cutting edge of yesterday replay--in virtual reality, right
before my eyes--in real time!
Thirty year old technology--wasn't it amazing?


Tsk. It took the League long enough to see the "duhhhh..." :-)

They've had adequate numbers all along. They've been seeing
only what they want to believe.

As of the end of 2004 the League had only 140 thousand members.
That's about 20 percent of all U.S. amateur licensees. [from
QST advertising webpage]

Haynie has said that a "survey" showed fully 1 in 5 hams
actually got on the air? Oh, my, a remarkable coincidence
in the percentage of League membership. :-)

[we now pause to have all loyal league believers vent their
rage against those who defile 'their' organization...]




John Smith June 9th 05 01:21 AM

Well, all the astronauts are no code techs... guess those no-code'ers
are in good and technical company...

Warmest regards,
John
wrote in message
oups.com...
From: John Smith on Jun 8, 5:50 pm

You would think the ARRL high priest would not abandon these
guys--times
must be tough...


http://www.arrl.org/news/stori?es/2004/05/22/1/?nc=1


John
--
Watching the cutting edge of yesterday replay--in virtual reality,
right
before my eyes--in real time!
Thirty year old technology--wasn't it amazing?


Tsk. It took the League long enough to see the "duhhhh..." :-)

They've had adequate numbers all along. They've been seeing
only what they want to believe.

As of the end of 2004 the League had only 140 thousand members.
That's about 20 percent of all U.S. amateur licensees. [from
QST advertising webpage]

Haynie has said that a "survey" showed fully 1 in 5 hams
actually got on the air? Oh, my, a remarkable coincidence
in the percentage of League membership. :-)

[we now pause to have all loyal league believers vent their
rage against those who defile 'their' organization...]






Dan/W4NTI June 9th 05 02:01 AM

Bet the pilots among them know Morse.

Dan/W4NTI

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Well, all the astronauts are no code techs... guess those no-code'ers are
in good and technical company...

Warmest regards,
John
wrote in message
oups.com...
From: John Smith on Jun 8, 5:50 pm

You would think the ARRL high priest would not abandon these guys--times
must be tough...


http://www.arrl.org/news/stori?es/2004/05/22/1/?nc=1


John
--
Watching the cutting edge of yesterday replay--in virtual reality, right
before my eyes--in real time!
Thirty year old technology--wasn't it amazing?


Tsk. It took the League long enough to see the "duhhhh..." :-)

They've had adequate numbers all along. They've been seeing
only what they want to believe.

As of the end of 2004 the League had only 140 thousand members.
That's about 20 percent of all U.S. amateur licensees. [from
QST advertising webpage]

Haynie has said that a "survey" showed fully 1 in 5 hams
actually got on the air? Oh, my, a remarkable coincidence
in the percentage of League membership. :-)

[we now pause to have all loyal league believers vent their
rage against those who defile 'their' organization...]








Cmd Buzz Corey June 9th 05 02:07 AM

John Smith wrote:
Well, all the astronauts are no code techs...


And yet you can't even manage that.

John Smith June 9th 05 02:07 AM

Morse is a ghost language spoken by old men when they do their rants and
name their illnesses--much to the dismay of the vital and youthful
hams...

The new 5 WPM test for all classes will guarantee you will NOT be
speaking morse to any young men--they will pass the 5 WPM to get the
extra license... then you will never see them again--except on phone and
modem...

John
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
nk.net...
Bet the pilots among them know Morse.

Dan/W4NTI

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Well, all the astronauts are no code techs... guess those
no-code'ers are in good and technical company...

Warmest regards,
John
wrote in message
oups.com...
From: John Smith on Jun 8, 5:50 pm

You would think the ARRL high priest would not abandon these
guys--times
must be tough...

http://www.arrl.org/news/stori?es/2004/05/22/1/?nc=1

John
--
Watching the cutting edge of yesterday replay--in virtual reality,
right
before my eyes--in real time!
Thirty year old technology--wasn't it amazing?

Tsk. It took the League long enough to see the "duhhhh..." :-)

They've had adequate numbers all along. They've been seeing
only what they want to believe.

As of the end of 2004 the League had only 140 thousand members.
That's about 20 percent of all U.S. amateur licensees. [from
QST advertising webpage]

Haynie has said that a "survey" showed fully 1 in 5 hams
actually got on the air? Oh, my, a remarkable coincidence
in the percentage of League membership. :-)

[we now pause to have all loyal league believers vent their
rage against those who defile 'their' organization...]










Dee Flint June 9th 05 03:12 AM


"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Morse is a ghost language spoken by old men when they do their rants and
name their illnesses--much to the dismay of the vital and youthful hams...

The new 5 WPM test for all classes will guarantee you will NOT be speaking
morse to any young men--they will pass the 5 WPM to get the extra
license... then you will never see them again--except on phone and
modem...

John


Not so. I've worked several licensees in the CW November Sweeps who gave
their year of license as 2000 and AFTER. I currently know several people
who have passed their 5wpm so they never have to take the test again but
continue to work diligently to get up to both conversational and contest
speeds.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE



John Smith June 9th 05 03:13 AM

.... as always, there will be exceptions to ANY rule... I think both
Haynie and I would be surprised if this becomes anywhere near a
"remarkable" number...

John

"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Morse is a ghost language spoken by old men when they do their rants
and name their illnesses--much to the dismay of the vital and
youthful hams...

The new 5 WPM test for all classes will guarantee you will NOT be
speaking morse to any young men--they will pass the 5 WPM to get the
extra license... then you will never see them again--except on phone
and modem...

John


Not so. I've worked several licensees in the CW November Sweeps who
gave their year of license as 2000 and AFTER. I currently know
several people who have passed their 5wpm so they never have to take
the test again but continue to work diligently to get up to both
conversational and contest speeds.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE




KØHB June 9th 05 03:14 AM


wrote


Haynie has said that a "survey" showed fully 1 in 5 hams
actually got on the air?


Dammit Len, your reading comprehension really is badly deteriorated. See a
specialist quickly.

What Haynie said was that the survey revealed that "more than one-fifth of new
amateur licensees never get on the air."

dit dit
de Hans, K0HB
--
http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb



John Smith June 9th 05 03:16 AM

Yes, that is correct... and probaby only 1/5 of THOSE 4/5 will bother
with the ARRL...

John

"KØHB" wrote in message
nk.net...

wrote


Haynie has said that a "survey" showed fully 1 in 5 hams
actually got on the air?


Dammit Len, your reading comprehension really is badly deteriorated.
See a specialist quickly.

What Haynie said was that the survey revealed that "more than
one-fifth of new amateur licensees never get on the air."

dit dit
de Hans, K0HB
--
http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb




Cmd Buzz Corey June 9th 05 03:16 AM

John Smith wrote:
Probably the least thing I have done in life is to get a ham license...
except for a few locals on 10 meters here, there is little left for
me... well, the aussies and brits still have some interesting folks to
chat with...

John


Then why don't you turn in your license, get out of ham radio and then
there will be one less 'old fart' that you despise so much killing off
ham radio.

Jim Hampton June 9th 05 03:50 AM


"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Morse is a ghost language spoken by old men when they do their rants and
name their illnesses--much to the dismay of the vital and youthful
hams...

The new 5 WPM test for all classes will guarantee you will NOT be
speaking morse to any young men--they will pass the 5 WPM to get the
extra license... then you will never see them again--except on phone and
modem...

John



Hello, John

There are more than a few folks that can send and receive cw faster than a
lot of folks can type. I am not talking 20 words per minute here, nor am I
talking a leisurely 30 words per minute.

Of course, cut and paste doesn't count (and I've had a few college grads
tell me that is how they did some of "their" papers LOL. Future CEOs, I'm
sure. Enron and the like).

I'd be interested in an SSB contact on 24 GHz via moonbounce. 85 watts.
That might prove interesting.

All said and done, there are modes that can do it better (PSK comes to
mind) - but most won't and cw is one that can. It doesn't mean it is the
best, but ... again ... there are a number of ops that can send and receive
cw faster than a lot of folks can type. And if some enjoy it, why worry?
It is like arguing that country-western music is terrible. Not all would
agree.

May I assume that you cut and paste very quickly? ;)


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA




[email protected] June 9th 05 03:53 AM

From: "John Smith" on Wed 8 Jun 2005 17:21

Well, all the astronauts are no code techs... guess those no-code'ers
are in good and technical company...


Not "all." :-)

Having a Tech license is part of their JOB. The JOB is
basically PR work, keeping civilians feeling good about
NASA (which needs all the public support it can get).

Astronauts have all the NASA comms they need, don't need
any ham bands via HTs to do their primary mission. :-)




John Smith June 9th 05 03:56 AM

I don't think there is a ham alive which can beat my keyboard, hooked to
a "electronic key" and sending morse, nor my sound card doubling as a
"code reader" and producing text on screen from cw...
You mean to tell me people actually use "real keys" still--gawd, I
thought all those sk tongue-in-cheek

Warmest regards,
John
"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Morse is a ghost language spoken by old men when they do their rants
and
name their illnesses--much to the dismay of the vital and youthful
hams...

The new 5 WPM test for all classes will guarantee you will NOT be
speaking morse to any young men--they will pass the 5 WPM to get the
extra license... then you will never see them again--except on phone
and
modem...

John



Hello, John

There are more than a few folks that can send and receive cw faster
than a
lot of folks can type. I am not talking 20 words per minute here, nor
am I
talking a leisurely 30 words per minute.

Of course, cut and paste doesn't count (and I've had a few college
grads
tell me that is how they did some of "their" papers LOL. Future CEOs,
I'm
sure. Enron and the like).

I'd be interested in an SSB contact on 24 GHz via moonbounce. 85
watts.
That might prove interesting.

All said and done, there are modes that can do it better (PSK comes to
mind) - but most won't and cw is one that can. It doesn't mean it is
the
best, but ... again ... there are a number of ops that can send and
receive
cw faster than a lot of folks can type. And if some enjoy it, why
worry?
It is like arguing that country-western music is terrible. Not all
would
agree.

May I assume that you cut and paste very quickly? ;)


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA






[email protected] June 9th 05 03:58 AM

From: bb on Jun 8, 7:33 pm

John Smith wrote:
You would think the ARRL high priest would not abandon these guys--times
must be tough...
http://www.arrl.org/news/stori?es/2004/05/22/1/?nc=1


John
--
Watching the cutting edge of yesterday replay--in virtual reality, right
before my eyes--in real time!
Thirty year old technology--wasn't it amazing?


Sounds like he's been talking to Len. Refreshing.


Sorry, the last time Jim Haynie and I "talked" (via e-mail)
was over three years ago. Haynie struck up the convo then,
not me.




John Smith June 9th 05 03:59 AM

I meant the astronauts "with" licenses... the ones who put on a good
show chatting with hams for the media...

Warmest regards,
John
wrote in message
oups.com...
From: "John Smith" on Wed 8 Jun 2005 17:21

Well, all the astronauts are no code techs... guess those no-code'ers
are in good and technical company...


Not "all." :-)

Having a Tech license is part of their JOB. The JOB is
basically PR work, keeping civilians feeling good about
NASA (which needs all the public support it can get).

Astronauts have all the NASA comms they need, don't need
any ham bands via HTs to do their primary mission. :-)






[email protected] June 9th 05 04:19 AM

From: John Smith on Jun 8, 10:16 pm

Yes, that is correct... and probaby only 1/5 of THOSE 4/5 will bother
with the ARRL...

John


John, Hans just doesn't understand. When he gets like that
he is extremely touchy-grouchy.

Regardless, the League still doesn't have but about 1 out of
every 5 U.S. amateur radio licensees as members. The League
can't seem to "raise" that much. A couple years ago they
got to about 23%, then it fell off.


"K0HB" wrote in message
ink.net...


wrote


Haynie has said that a "survey" showed fully 1 in 5 hams
actually got on the air?


Dammit Len, your reading comprehension really is badly deteriorated.
See a specialist quickly.


Tsk, tsk, master super chief of all. Didn't you notice a
little QUESTION MARK I put at the end of my sentence?
You quoted it and STILL didn't see it! YOUR problem, not
mine. Read it again and RECOGNIZE the punctuation.

Sigh.

What Haynie said was that the survey revealed that "more than
one-fifth of new amateur licensees never get on the air."


Go uncork a fifth and go for stupor-ville, mighty super
master chief. You will feel better...but not in the morning.

Good luck on this one, now...




Dave Heil June 9th 05 05:17 AM

John Smith wrote:
Morse is a ghost language spoken by old men when they do their rants and
name their illnesses--much to the dismay of the vital and youthful
hams...


"Vital and youthful hams", "old men", "rants"--I'm writing you off as
just another troll, "John".

Dave K8MN

John Smith June 9th 05 06:00 AM

Well, I will be there standing beside Haynie!!!

John

"Dave Heil" wrote in message
ink.net...
John Smith wrote:
Morse is a ghost language spoken by old men when they do their rants
and name their illnesses--much to the dismay of the vital and
youthful hams...


"Vital and youthful hams", "old men", "rants"--I'm writing you off as
just another troll, "John".

Dave K8MN




John Smith June 9th 05 06:03 AM

Probably the least thing I have done in life is to get a ham license...
except for a few locals on 10 meters here, there is little left for
me... well, the aussies and brits still have some interesting folks to
chat with...

John

"Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message
...
John Smith wrote:
Well, all the astronauts are no code techs...


And yet you can't even manage that.




John Smith June 9th 05 06:07 AM

Well, I didn't come here to make any friends, they bother me not... I
don't think we need be standing on pomp and circumstance in these
times...
My skin is about as thick as ones can get, and I darn well know how to
call a spade a spade--still deal with jr college kids two nights a
week... these old guys aren't anything next to them...

Warmest regards,
John
wrote in message
oups.com...
From: John Smith on Jun 8, 10:16 pm

Yes, that is correct... and probaby only 1/5 of THOSE 4/5 will bother
with the ARRL...

John


John, Hans just doesn't understand. When he gets like that
he is extremely touchy-grouchy.

Regardless, the League still doesn't have but about 1 out of
every 5 U.S. amateur radio licensees as members. The League
can't seem to "raise" that much. A couple years ago they
got to about 23%, then it fell off.


"K0HB" wrote in message
link.net...


wrote


Haynie has said that a "survey" showed fully 1 in 5 hams
actually got on the air?


Dammit Len, your reading comprehension really is badly deteriorated.
See a specialist quickly.


Tsk, tsk, master super chief of all. Didn't you notice a
little QUESTION MARK I put at the end of my sentence?
You quoted it and STILL didn't see it! YOUR problem, not
mine. Read it again and RECOGNIZE the punctuation.

Sigh.

What Haynie said was that the survey revealed that "more than
one-fifth of new amateur licensees never get on the air."


Go uncork a fifth and go for stupor-ville, mighty super
master chief. You will feel better...but not in the morning.

Good luck on this one, now...






John Smith June 9th 05 06:23 AM

You are just a nasty tempered old man which knows some cheap tricks and
sits here attacking peoples character while denying all but which you
want to hear...
If you want to argue do it openly and honestly do so without worry, my
skin is thick--if all you want to do is make cheap personal attacks on
personalities you just consume time....

John
"Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message
...
John Smith wrote:
Probably the least thing I have done in life is to get a ham
license... except for a few locals on 10 meters here, there is little
left for me... well, the aussies and brits still have some
interesting folks to chat with...

John


Then why don't you turn in your license, get out of ham radio and then
there will be one less 'old fart' that you despise so much killing off
ham radio.




Michael Coslo June 9th 05 05:35 PM

John Smith wrote:
Morse is a ghost language spoken by old men when they do their rants and
name their illnesses--much to the dismay of the vital and youthful
hams...


? I've heard a lot of that on phone, but very little on CW.

The new 5 WPM test for all classes will guarantee you will NOT be
speaking morse to any young men--they will pass the 5 WPM to get the
extra license... then you will never see them again--except on phone and
modem...


That is true to a fair extent.


My own personal assessment of Haynie's talk is that he is correct to a
large extent.

The olde questions were not harder, they were different. Someone posed
a couple of likely candidate old time q's to me, and it took me just a
few minutes to find the answers.

I think the main problem with the older hams being "better" than folks
like me is the ability of many middle-aged and older men to get
incredibly worked up about almost nothing, forecasting doom from
inconsequential things.

- Mike KB3EIA -


John Smith June 9th 05 07:38 PM

Michael:

Good point, never hurts to "boil the blood" a bit though, long as in the
end hands can be shook and everyone walks away a bit wiser...

The old hams have valuable info and history, I would never even be such
a fool as to debate that--however, this ship needs a younger captain...

Warmest regards,
John

"Michael Coslo" wrote in message
...
John Smith wrote:
Morse is a ghost language spoken by old men when they do their rants
and name their illnesses--much to the dismay of the vital and
youthful hams...


? I've heard a lot of that on phone, but very little on CW.

The new 5 WPM test for all classes will guarantee you will NOT be
speaking morse to any young men--they will pass the 5 WPM to get the
extra license... then you will never see them again--except on phone
and modem...


That is true to a fair extent.


My own personal assessment of Haynie's talk is that he is correct to a
large extent.

The olde questions were not harder, they were different. Someone posed
a couple of likely candidate old time q's to me, and it took me just
a few minutes to find the answers.

I think the main problem with the older hams being "better" than folks
like me is the ability of many middle-aged and older men to get
incredibly worked up about almost nothing, forecasting doom from
inconsequential things.

- Mike KB3EIA -




Cmd Buzz Corey June 9th 05 08:06 PM

Dan/W4NTI wrote:
And your speed is what "John Smith". What makes you qualified to even
comment on this? Do you operate on CW? Save you the time. Your a big
mouth know nothing about the subject. Damn...it may be Lennie.

Dan/W4NTI


He's a cber, couldn't copy code if his life depended upon it.

KØHB June 9th 05 09:14 PM


"Michael Coslo" wrote


I think the main problem with the older hams being "better" than folks like me
is the ability of many middle-aged and older men to get incredibly worked up
about almost nothing, forecasting doom from inconsequential things.


~~~
Beware of the man who works hard to learn something,
learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before.


He is full of murderous resentment of people who
are ignorant without having come by their ignorance
the hard way.
~~~ Bokonon











[email protected] June 9th 05 09:33 PM

From: "John Smith" on Wed 8 Jun 2005 22:07

Well, I didn't come here to make any friends, they bother me not... I
don't think we need be standing on pomp and circumstance in these
times...


Understood and agree with you.

But, to most in here, there IS a "pomp and circumstance"
going on in their imaginations. Mostly stuffed in there by
dilligent and effective brainwashing of the big publishing
house in Newington.

"Amateur radio is a SERVICE" crow some. Their imaginations
conjur up a military service with rigid rules/regulations
which MUST be adhered to at all times. All SHALL march to
the same drum-beat. Everyone MUST think alike. Dumb for
a hobby activity which is supposed to be fun, a recreation.

My skin is about as thick as ones can get, and I darn well know how to
call a spade a spade--still deal with jr college kids two nights a
week... these old guys aren't anything next to them...


Heh heh heh. After 20 1/2 years of doing computer-modem
communications, I've got armor plate for skin as well.
Being a co-sysop on a BBS was an interesting experience,
that of seeing both the private and public text "life' of
some participants. More like a lab class in advanced
clinical psychology. Morbidly fascinating.

The main theme of most "regulars" in here (mental olde-fahrts
all) is SELF-IMPORTANCE. Further, each one is ALWAYS RIGHT.
None may be corrected for that is an outrageous "insult" on
their very being...and that calls for Flame War! FIGHT!
FIGHT! FIGHT! [gotta love it sometimes...:-) ]

If they don't have anything specific to FIGHT about, some
will MANUFACTURE things in order to misdirect "blame" from
them to the challenger. See this Stebie-manufactured
"Motorola didn't exist in WW2" thread. Has NOTHING to do
with amateur radio but he deems it "necessary" in order
to "prove" his "enemy" is "wrong." :-)

Never mind that the MOTOROLA logo and brand name identity
was known to the public prior to WW2, the deluded one has
to show the "total wrongness" of one in a previous
statement! Never mind that the existance consisted of
some legal statements and a lot of corporate letter heads
being changed in Chicago..."Motorola did not exist prior to
1947!" Terrible "wrongness." :-)

The silliness of some of those statements of accusation is
marvelous to behold. That human beans get so wrought up in
damnation of others is fascinating. Transparent to any
sane person reading all this. So is that "No kids, lids,
or space cadets" supposedly remarked by an old ham once. :-)

Some of the denizens of this din of inequity are just nuts.




Dan/W4NTI June 9th 05 10:26 PM

Oh really? Then how do we explain the young contesters out there? Or the
many QSOs I have with hams on CW in their 20s and 30s? And I don't operate
at 5wpm. Neither do they...think maybe they picked up some speed, eh?

Dan/W4NTI

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Morse is a ghost language spoken by old men when they do their rants and
name their illnesses--much to the dismay of the vital and youthful hams...

The new 5 WPM test for all classes will guarantee you will NOT be speaking
morse to any young men--they will pass the 5 WPM to get the extra
license... then you will never see them again--except on phone and
modem...

John
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
nk.net...
Bet the pilots among them know Morse.

Dan/W4NTI

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Well, all the astronauts are no code techs... guess those no-code'ers
are in good and technical company...

Warmest regards,
John
wrote in message
oups.com...
From: John Smith on Jun 8, 5:50 pm

You would think the ARRL high priest would not abandon these
guys--times
must be tough...

http://www.arrl.org/news/stori?es/2004/05/22/1/?nc=1

John
--
Watching the cutting edge of yesterday replay--in virtual reality,
right
before my eyes--in real time!
Thirty year old technology--wasn't it amazing?

Tsk. It took the League long enough to see the "duhhhh..." :-)

They've had adequate numbers all along. They've been seeing
only what they want to believe.

As of the end of 2004 the League had only 140 thousand members.
That's about 20 percent of all U.S. amateur licensees. [from
QST advertising webpage]

Haynie has said that a "survey" showed fully 1 in 5 hams
actually got on the air? Oh, my, a remarkable coincidence
in the percentage of League membership. :-)

[we now pause to have all loyal league believers vent their
rage against those who defile 'their' organization...]












Dan/W4NTI June 9th 05 10:28 PM

And your speed is what "John Smith". What makes you qualified to even
comment on this? Do you operate on CW? Save you the time. Your a big
mouth know nothing about the subject. Damn...it may be Lennie.

Dan/W4NTI

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
... as always, there will be exceptions to ANY rule... I think both
Haynie and I would be surprised if this becomes anywhere near a
"remarkable" number...

John

"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Morse is a ghost language spoken by old men when they do their rants and
name their illnesses--much to the dismay of the vital and youthful
hams...

The new 5 WPM test for all classes will guarantee you will NOT be
speaking morse to any young men--they will pass the 5 WPM to get the
extra license... then you will never see them again--except on phone and
modem...

John


Not so. I've worked several licensees in the CW November Sweeps who gave
their year of license as 2000 and AFTER. I currently know several people
who have passed their 5wpm so they never have to take the test again but
continue to work diligently to get up to both conversational and contest
speeds.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE






Dan/W4NTI June 9th 05 10:30 PM

A keyboard and a morse reader.....BWAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH !!!!!

Dan/W4NTI

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
I don't think there is a ham alive which can beat my keyboard, hooked to a
"electronic key" and sending morse, nor my sound card doubling as a "code
reader" and producing text on screen from cw...
You mean to tell me people actually use "real keys" still--gawd, I thought
all those sk tongue-in-cheek

Warmest regards,
John
"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Morse is a ghost language spoken by old men when they do their rants and
name their illnesses--much to the dismay of the vital and youthful
hams...

The new 5 WPM test for all classes will guarantee you will NOT be
speaking morse to any young men--they will pass the 5 WPM to get the
extra license... then you will never see them again--except on phone and
modem...

John



Hello, John

There are more than a few folks that can send and receive cw faster than
a
lot of folks can type. I am not talking 20 words per minute here, nor am
I
talking a leisurely 30 words per minute.

Of course, cut and paste doesn't count (and I've had a few college grads
tell me that is how they did some of "their" papers LOL. Future CEOs,
I'm
sure. Enron and the like).

I'd be interested in an SSB contact on 24 GHz via moonbounce. 85 watts.
That might prove interesting.

All said and done, there are modes that can do it better (PSK comes to
mind) - but most won't and cw is one that can. It doesn't mean it is the
best, but ... again ... there are a number of ops that can send and
receive
cw faster than a lot of folks can type. And if some enjoy it, why worry?
It is like arguing that country-western music is terrible. Not all would
agree.

May I assume that you cut and paste very quickly? ;)


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA








John Smith June 9th 05 11:47 PM

I learned code to get my license, never since--I live what I claim is
fact...

.... if I do code it is though an automatic key and keyboard and
cw-to-text reader, all of my own design and construction... being a
software engineer I really enjoy hardware projects, experimentation and
antenna construction--I never get to get my hands dirty in the "real
world."

John

"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
ink.net...
And your speed is what "John Smith". What makes you qualified to even
comment on this? Do you operate on CW? Save you the time. Your a
big mouth know nothing about the subject. Damn...it may be Lennie.

Dan/W4NTI

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
... as always, there will be exceptions to ANY rule... I think both
Haynie and I would be surprised if this becomes anywhere near a
"remarkable" number...

John

"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Morse is a ghost language spoken by old men when they do their
rants and name their illnesses--much to the dismay of the vital and
youthful hams...

The new 5 WPM test for all classes will guarantee you will NOT be
speaking morse to any young men--they will pass the 5 WPM to get
the extra license... then you will never see them again--except on
phone and modem...

John

Not so. I've worked several licensees in the CW November Sweeps who
gave their year of license as 2000 and AFTER. I currently know
several people who have passed their 5wpm so they never have to take
the test again but continue to work diligently to get up to both
conversational and contest speeds.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE








John Smith June 9th 05 11:48 PM

.... I think anyone not agreeing with you is a "chicken bander" and
"troll", now surely you must agree!

John

"Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message
...
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
And your speed is what "John Smith". What makes you qualified to
even comment on this? Do you operate on CW? Save you the time.
Your a big mouth know nothing about the subject. Damn...it may be
Lennie.

Dan/W4NTI


He's a cber, couldn't copy code if his life depended upon it.




John Smith June 9th 05 11:49 PM

.... yep, and look at key men as I do musicians, they are ok, but don't
wanna be one...

John

"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
nk.net...
A keyboard and a morse reader.....BWAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH !!!!!

Dan/W4NTI

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
I don't think there is a ham alive which can beat my keyboard, hooked
to a "electronic key" and sending morse, nor my sound card doubling as
a "code reader" and producing text on screen from cw...
You mean to tell me people actually use "real keys" still--gawd, I
thought all those sk tongue-in-cheek

Warmest regards,
John
"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Morse is a ghost language spoken by old men when they do their
rants and
name their illnesses--much to the dismay of the vital and youthful
hams...

The new 5 WPM test for all classes will guarantee you will NOT be
speaking morse to any young men--they will pass the 5 WPM to get
the
extra license... then you will never see them again--except on
phone and
modem...

John


Hello, John

There are more than a few folks that can send and receive cw faster
than a
lot of folks can type. I am not talking 20 words per minute here,
nor am I
talking a leisurely 30 words per minute.

Of course, cut and paste doesn't count (and I've had a few college
grads
tell me that is how they did some of "their" papers LOL. Future
CEOs, I'm
sure. Enron and the like).

I'd be interested in an SSB contact on 24 GHz via moonbounce. 85
watts.
That might prove interesting.

All said and done, there are modes that can do it better (PSK comes
to
mind) - but most won't and cw is one that can. It doesn't mean it
is the
best, but ... again ... there are a number of ops that can send and
receive
cw faster than a lot of folks can type. And if some enjoy it, why
worry?
It is like arguing that country-western music is terrible. Not all
would
agree.

May I assume that you cut and paste very quickly? ;)


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA










John Smith June 9th 05 11:50 PM

.... I think when men are gone from the earth--you will find that written
on tombstone of the human race...

John

"KØHB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Michael Coslo" wrote


I think the main problem with the older hams being "better" than
folks like me is the ability of many middle-aged and older men to get
incredibly worked up about almost nothing, forecasting doom from
inconsequential things.


~~~
Beware of the man who works hard to learn something,
learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before.


He is full of murderous resentment of people who
are ignorant without having come by their ignorance
the hard way.
~~~ Bokonon













John Smith June 9th 05 11:53 PM

.... let's reset back to reality, there are fewer hams in the world--than
illegal aliens in the state of california (and about 41 million illegals
in the nation)...
a true minority... the number of new keys are simply not worth
mentioning in comparison... hams must be THE smallest minority wanting
special privileges for a damn hobby! ... if you haven't thought of it
like that before--think of it now--not all are fools...

John

"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
ink.net...
Oh really? Then how do we explain the young contesters out there? Or
the many QSOs I have with hams on CW in their 20s and 30s? And I
don't operate at 5wpm. Neither do they...think maybe they picked up
some speed, eh?

Dan/W4NTI

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Morse is a ghost language spoken by old men when they do their rants
and name their illnesses--much to the dismay of the vital and
youthful hams...

The new 5 WPM test for all classes will guarantee you will NOT be
speaking morse to any young men--they will pass the 5 WPM to get the
extra license... then you will never see them again--except on phone
and modem...

John
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
nk.net...
Bet the pilots among them know Morse.

Dan/W4NTI

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Well, all the astronauts are no code techs... guess those
no-code'ers are in good and technical company...

Warmest regards,
John
wrote in message
oups.com...
From: John Smith on Jun 8, 5:50 pm

You would think the ARRL high priest would not abandon these
guys--times
must be tough...

http://www.arrl.org/news/stori?es/2004/05/22/1/?nc=1

John
--
Watching the cutting edge of yesterday replay--in virtual reality,
right
before my eyes--in real time!
Thirty year old technology--wasn't it amazing?

Tsk. It took the League long enough to see the "duhhhh..." :-)

They've had adequate numbers all along. They've been seeing
only what they want to believe.

As of the end of 2004 the League had only 140 thousand members.
That's about 20 percent of all U.S. amateur licensees. [from
QST advertising webpage]

Haynie has said that a "survey" showed fully 1 in 5 hams
actually got on the air? Oh, my, a remarkable coincidence
in the percentage of League membership. :-)

[we now pause to have all loyal league believers vent their
rage against those who defile 'their' organization...]














KØHB June 10th 05 12:27 AM


"John Smith" wrote

... I think when men are gone from the earth--you will find that written on
tombstone of the human race...


No, I think we'll find:

"Bergeron's epitaph for the planet, I remember, which he said should be carved
in big letters in a wall of the Grand Canyon for the flying-saucer people to
find, was this:


WE COULD HAVE SAVED IT
BUT WE WERE TOO DOGGONE CHEAP

Only he didn't say 'doggone.'"

-- Kurt Vonnegut in "Hocus Pocus"



73, de Hans, K0HB
--
Come sit by the fire and warm your bones. Let's enjoy a warm bracing drink and a
few tales.

"The wind was picking up, clouds were rolling in, my hands were numb, nose was
running, I had to pee, and I was thinking of heading for the dock when..."




Dee Flint June 10th 05 01:21 AM


"John Smith" wrote in message
...
I don't think there is a ham alive which can beat my keyboard, hooked to a
"electronic key" and sending morse, nor my sound card doubling as a "code
reader" and producing text on screen from cw...
You mean to tell me people actually use "real keys" still--gawd, I thought
all those sk tongue-in-cheek

Warmest regards,
John


When conditions are poor, even some one as poor at morse code as I am can
beat a "code reader" sound card/computer.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE



John Smith June 10th 05 02:01 AM

.... actually, the only thing I have found that I can't allow for is
someone's sloppy key (you must decide what range of microseconds is a
dit, and what is the dah-- I have been kicking around the idea of a
piece of code to "sample" the senders "style" and automatically
adjust--but that is for tomorrow--and would be great if the code could
automatically duplicate his "sloppy style" and feed it back to him
grin) but then--sloppy key is no easier to copy with ear then by
reader...

John

"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
I don't think there is a ham alive which can beat my keyboard, hooked
to a "electronic key" and sending morse, nor my sound card doubling as
a "code reader" and producing text on screen from cw...
You mean to tell me people actually use "real keys" still--gawd, I
thought all those sk tongue-in-cheek

Warmest regards,
John


When conditions are poor, even some one as poor at morse code as I am
can beat a "code reader" sound card/computer.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE




Dee Flint June 10th 05 02:16 AM


"John Smith" wrote in message
...
... actually, the only thing I have found that I can't allow for is
someone's sloppy key (you must decide what range of microseconds is a dit,
and what is the dah-- I have been kicking around the idea of a piece of
code to "sample" the senders "style" and automatically adjust--but that is
for tomorrow--and would be great if the code could automatically duplicate
his "sloppy style" and feed it back to him grin) but then--sloppy key
is no easier to copy with ear then by reader...

John


Depends on how you define easier. The ear can copy code so sloppy that no
computer/soundcard/software would ever decipher it.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
I don't think there is a ham alive which can beat my keyboard, hooked to
a "electronic key" and sending morse, nor my sound card doubling as a
"code reader" and producing text on screen from cw...
You mean to tell me people actually use "real keys" still--gawd, I
thought all those sk tongue-in-cheek

Warmest regards,
John


When conditions are poor, even some one as poor at morse code as I am can
beat a "code reader" sound card/computer.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE







All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com