"Dee Flint" wrote

And human nature being what it is, there needs to be
some type of discipline on the bands as to what goes where.

Sounds like an excerpt from a religious catechism!

Is "human nature" different in the USA? For that matter, is "human nature"
different between 1.8 and 2.0 MHz, where US hams themselves provide the "type of
discipline" to sort things out without FCC micromanaging it?

73, de Hans, K0HB

K=D8HB wrote:
"Dee Flint" wrote

And human nature being what it is, there needs to be
some type of discipline on the bands as to what goes where.

Sounds like an excerpt from a religious catechism!

Is "human nature" different in the USA? For that matter, is "human natur=
e"
different between 1.8 and 2.0 MHz, where US hams themselves provide the "=
type of
discipline" to sort things out without FCC micromanaging it?

The FCC dumped micromanaging 160 on the ARRL, less work and flak for
the FCC. =20

73, de Hans, K0HB

w3rv

wrote in message
oups.com...


KØHB wrote:
"Dee Flint" wrote

And human nature being what it is, there needs to be
some type of discipline on the bands as to what goes where.

Sounds like an excerpt from a religious catechism!

Is "human nature" different in the USA? For that matter, is "human
nature"
different between 1.8 and 2.0 MHz, where US hams themselves provide the
"type of
discipline" to sort things out without FCC micromanaging it?

The FCC dumped micromanaging 160 on the ARRL, less work and flak for
the FCC.

73, de Hans, K0HB

w3rv


The illegal and unethical relationship between FCC & ARRL is
one point of several which will enable K1MAN to prevail over
the FCC.

Ginger Raveir wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


K=D8HB wrote:
"Dee Flint" wrote

And human nature being what it is, there needs to be
some type of discipline on the bands as to what goes where.

Sounds like an excerpt from a religious catechism!

Is "human nature" different in the USA? For that matter, is "human
nature"
different between 1.8 and 2.0 MHz, where US hams themselves provide the
"type of
discipline" to sort things out without FCC micromanaging it?

The FCC dumped micromanaging 160 on the ARRL, less work and flak for
the FCC.

73, de Hans, K0HB

w3rv


The illegal and unethical relationship between FCC & ARRL is
one point of several which will enable K1MAN to prevail over
the FCC.

Dearie I have yet to run into a Real Ham who could possibly give a
rat's ass about the goofy flap over K1MAN. That "thread" is for you
bottom echelon types to obsess upon. Enjoy but kindly if you please
don't bore the rest of us with it.

w3rv

wrote in message
oups.com...


Ginger Raveir wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


KØHB wrote:
"Dee Flint" wrote

And human nature being what it is, there needs to be
some type of discipline on the bands as to what goes where.

Sounds like an excerpt from a religious catechism!

Is "human nature" different in the USA? For that matter, is "human
nature"
different between 1.8 and 2.0 MHz, where US hams themselves provide the
"type of
discipline" to sort things out without FCC micromanaging it?

The FCC dumped micromanaging 160 on the ARRL, less work and flak for
the FCC.

73, de Hans, K0HB

w3rv


The illegal and unethical relationship between FCC & ARRL is
one point of several which will enable K1MAN to prevail over
the FCC.

Dearie I have yet to run into a Real Ham who could possibly give a
rat's ass about the goofy flap over K1MAN. That "thread" is for you
bottom echelon types to obsess upon. Enjoy but kindly if you please
don't bore the rest of us with it.

w3rv


Oh my, po wittle W3RV got upset.
BWAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
When are you going to upgrade from that no-code
tech license you have had for years?

wrote in news:1120209440.081173.230080
@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:



Ginger Raveir wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


KØHB wrote:
"Dee Flint" wrote

And human nature being what it is, there needs to be some type of
discipline on the bands as to what goes where.

Sounds like an excerpt from a religious catechism!

Is "human nature" different in the USA? For that matter, is "human
nature" different between 1.8 and 2.0 MHz, where US hams themselves
provide the "type of
discipline" to sort things out without FCC micromanaging it?

The FCC dumped micromanaging 160 on the ARRL, less work and flak for
the FCC.

73, de Hans, K0HB

w3rv


The illegal and unethical relationship between FCC & ARRL is
one point of several which will enable K1MAN to prevail over the FCC.

Dearie I have yet to run into a Real Ham who could possibly give a
rat's ass about the goofy flap over K1MAN. That "thread" is for you
bottom echelon types to obsess upon. Enjoy but kindly if you please
don't bore the rest of us with it.

w3rv



For once, I agree. I couldn't care less about a few news bulletins, and I
don't distinguish beyween him and the league, since I don't belong to that
either.

"KØHB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Dee Flint" wrote

And human nature being what it is, there needs to be
some type of discipline on the bands as to what goes where.

Sounds like an excerpt from a religious catechism!

Is "human nature" different in the USA? For that matter, is "human
nature" different between 1.8 and 2.0 MHz, where US hams themselves
provide the "type of discipline" to sort things out without FCC
micromanaging it?

73, de Hans, K0HB


While human nature is the same, the higher number of hams means you will see
more of it.

160 meters has the self limiting factor of the size of workable antennas.
Many hams simply can manage to get anything reasonable in the air.

And the European system of self imposed band plans doesn't work as well as
you seem to think. Just listen to them during one of their European
contests. They are supposed to follow the band plans but don't since the
rules generally only suggest they follow the band plans rather than
requiring them to do so. They are every bit as bad as the US hams.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

K=D8HB wrote:

Is "human nature" different in the USA?

Probably not - but "culture" sure is!

For that matter, is "human nature"
different between 1.8 and 2.0 MHz, where US hams themselves
provide the "type of
discipline" to sort things out without FCC micromanaging it?

There have already been problems on 160 because some folks won't follow
the voluntary bandplan. Already been a proposal to FCC that would
impose subbands-by-mode on 160.

73 de Jim, N2EY

wrote

Already been a proposal to FCC that would
impose subbands-by-mode on 160.

And, to their credit, the Commission declined to act on that frivolous proposal
stating that we could work it out among ourselves. Seems we've done just that,
and the 160M band is working just fine, letting dynamic market forces determine
usage patterns.

Sunuvagun!

73, de Hans, K0HB

"KØHB" wrote in message
link.net...

wrote

Already been a proposal to FCC that would
impose subbands-by-mode on 160.

And, to their credit, the Commission declined to act on that frivolous
proposal stating that we could work it out among ourselves. Seems we've
done just that, and the 160M band is working just fine, letting dynamic
market forces determine usage patterns.

Sunuvagun!

73, de Hans, K0HB



The 160m band is becoming more popular with a.m. pirates.
Last time I was in Cincinatti & Atlanta, I heard pirates in the
160m band broadcasting most of the night.