LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #30   Report Post  
Old July 1st 05, 10:26 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

K=D8HB wrote:

Is "human nature" different in the USA?


Probably not - but "culture" sure is!

For that matter, is "human nature"
different between 1.8 and 2.0 MHz, where US hams themselves
provide the "type of
discipline" to sort things out without FCC micromanaging it?


There have already been problems on 160 because some folks won't follow
the voluntary bandplan. Already been a proposal to FCC that would
impose subbands-by-mode on 160.

73 de Jim, N2EY



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1412 ­ September 3, 2004 Radionews CB 0 September 4th 04 08:37 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1412 ­ September 3, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 September 4th 04 08:34 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1412 ­ September 3, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 September 4th 04 08:34 PM
My restructuring proposal Jason Hsu Policy 0 January 20th 04 06:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017