LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17   Report Post  
Old July 2nd 05, 07:08 PM
OW
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"KØHB" wrote in message
link.net...

wrote

'Bandplan? We don't need no steenkin' bandplan!'


I think bandplans are great, Jim. A bandplan is a dynamic construct,
generally agreed by the band users, which adapts to "market forces".

But FCC doesn't hand out dynamic bandplans; they hand out static
band-mandates which tend to remain unchanged for multiple decades (a
geologic age in a hobby which is charged by regulation to "contribute to
the advancement of the radio art").

73, de Hans, K0HB



The FCC hands out whatever will cover their own ass. Meaning,
top priority at the commission is job preservation, not the advancement
of communciations. FCC bureaucrats do whatever is necessary to
preserve their paycheck, while continually hiding the fact that the
commission is a dinosaur in an advanced age.





 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1412 ­ September 3, 2004 Radionews CB 0 September 4th 04 08:37 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1412 ­ September 3, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 September 4th 04 08:34 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1412 ­ September 3, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 September 4th 04 08:34 PM
My restructuring proposal Jason Hsu Policy 0 January 20th 04 06:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017