| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
From: K4YZ on Jul 8, 11:01 am
b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: b.b. wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Massive snip of usual Brain P Burke deceptions and lies...his kids will have enough to deal with when they get older... Marty McFly flies again in Back To Futureworld! There's a frequency, I think 5.170 off the top of my head, that all amateurs in Alaska are allowed to use for emergencies. Includes Technicians. Oooops. Violates the defunct treaty. Several points: (1) The exact frequency is 5167.5KHz...or 5.1675MHz if you prefer) ... The FCC does not "prefer," it MANDATES in Part 97.401 (c) !!! 5.1675 MHz, J3E or R3E modulation, RF power out 150 W maximum. Source: ARRL's own text on the latest version of Part 97! I can handle either. Would you like to attempt a hertz conversion? I've got a pretty good memory (and can remember most of your lies) Then you've got a lot of unused storage space available. You've not yet substantiated a single one of your "lie" accusations. Tsk, tsk. Again with the LIE! LIE! LIE! :-) it was previously posted in Part 97 as 5.170 MHz. Not in recent history...recent being back into the 80's when I first remember seeing it. Tsk, tsk, the CURRENT issue of Part 97 on the ARRL website is a gasp! "LIE?" :-) The regs have been rewritten to allow for people who don't understand the bandwidth of an J3E or R3E emission. Congratulations. You qualify. Don't believe me? Ask amateur historian Jim. [...that's "renowned" amateur historian...] No, I don't believe you. You're a chronic liar. And what you don't lie about, you manage to get wrong as a consequence of inadequate experience or research. Poor baby...mad as hell and can't take it anymore! EVERYBODY ELSE *LIES* *LIES* *LIES* ! ! ! :-) Either way, a "bet" on information provided by you would be money lost. Guess that's why the ARRL BoD doesn't meet much in Las Vegas, NV, huh? :-) Yawn... |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Why? Because it is a NoCode band and logicaly should not require a code test to use it if code is forbidden (A) It's not a "band". It's five discreet channels. Why is it called 60 Meters? is 60 meters a discrete frequency? (B) The mode restriction is due to other adjacent channel users that we must dovetail with...Not due to any altruistic debate over Morse Code use or testing. Wrong answer. A CW signal would dovetail nicely given the allocated bandwidth. So why not CW? The 5Mhz channels still fall below 30Mhz. So what? Is it a newsflash to you that S25.2 has changed? There is NO LEGAL magic at 30Mhz there was but no more Sure there is. YOU need to read how it's worded. The international treat gives individual administrations the OPTION of requiring code testing. Gotta love those International "Treats." Better than smores. The FCC's reply to the question was that S25.2 required it. The PCTA's answer to the question was that S25.2 required it. Guess what...?!?! The United States is in compliance with the treaty. Arbitrary licensing requirements are still a problem. The treaty no longer requires such arbitrary licensing requirements. More Robeson Wrongness snipped. |
K4YZ wrote: b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: b.b. wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Hmm Brain responding to a post i haven't seen yet Ya gotta love seeing Markie responding to Burke's posts calling him "Brain"... Only Robber's Son would enjoy making fun of a disabled person's disability. He's not disabled. He's lazy. You're crazy. There's a frequency, I think 5.170 off the top of my head, that all amateurs in Alaska are allowed to use for emergencies. Includes Technicians. Oooops. Violates the defunct treaty. Several points: (1) The exact frequency is 5167.5KHz...or 5.1675MHz if you prefer) ... I can handle either. Would you like to attempt a hertz conversion? I've got a pretty good memory (and can remember most of your lies) Then you've got a lot of unused storage space available. Everyone does. It's said that we use only 10% of our brain. You use less than 10% emotional maturity. |
wrote: From: K4YZ on Jul 8, 11:01 am b.b. wrote: (1) The exact frequency is 5167.5KHz...or 5.1675MHz if you prefer) ... The FCC does not "prefer," it MANDATES in Part 97.401 (c) !!! 5.1675 MHz, J3E or R3E modulation, RF power out 150 W maximum. Source: ARRL's own text on the latest version of Part 97! I suppose there was a point to that, but then again, considering the author, I'd be wrong..... Big snip of ususal LennieRant Diversions Yawn... Lay off the Geritol and you'll be a bit less drowsy, Lennie... Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: b.b. (Brian P Burke, N0IMD) wrote: an_old_friend (Mark C Morgan, KB9RQZ) wrote: Hmm Brain responding to a post i haven't seen yet Ya gotta love seeing Markie responding to Burke's posts calling him "Brain"... he doesn't mind Sure he does. BB say he oesn't BTW nobody gotta love Stevie just because you say so And where did I say so, Markie? never said you said it you hacked up the post enough so that I not sure but I think BB said you gotta love Stevie I disagreed I do disagree with more folks that just yourself Stevie The FCC could of course have allowed it to techs and frankly they should have Why? Because it is a NoCode band and logicaly should not require a code test to use it if code is forbidden (A) It's not a "band". It's five discreet channels. so? (B) The mode restriction is due to other adjacent channel users that we must dovetail with...Not due to any altruistic debate over Morse Code use or testing. and I am as cappable as they are or you are of using USB on the bands or channels or whatever you care to call em since Morse Code is forbidden there there is NO logical reason that Morse Code test should be required in order to operate there, or at worst a tech liecnsee with CSSE for the general writen test, should be able to operate there The 5Mhz channels still fall below 30Mhz. So what? Is it a newsflash to you that S25.2 has changed? There is NO LEGAL magic at 30Mhz there was but no more Sure there is. Nope YOU need to read how it's worded. The international treat gives individual administrations the OPTION of requiring code testing. yes I know that but given the only legal barriar to assgining freqs was the treaty the FCC was free to assign them to tech's If they can do that then there is NO legal magic Indeed as BB has pointed out Techs are allowed to operate below 30mhz NOW which you claim is illegal You go read the rules before you lecture others Guess what...?!?! The United States is in compliance with the treaty. Never said otherwise There's a frequency, I think 5.170 off the top of my head, that all amateurs in Alaska are allowed to use for emergencies. Includes Technicians. Oooops. Violates the defunct treaty. Several points: (1) The exact frequency is 5167.5KHz...or 5.1675MHz if you prefer) ...However it's restricted to stations (ALL FCC licensed stations...) in or within 50 miles of the State of Alaska, and is strictly for Emergency use only. One discreet channel. And it's not an "Amateur" channel. Amateurs are allowed on this frequency as an accomodation to safety. A real stretch to cite it as a "violation" of any treaty. (2) The treaty you refer to is NOT "defunct". It is still very much in force. It HAS been ammended, however present United States rules and regulations as they pertain to the treaty are in compliance with said treaty. so he should have defunct provision What? Huh? defunct provision grow up I have. And someday you will too. But not today, apparently. nope you haven't the United States STILL requires that an Amateur licensee to have passed Element 1 to operate below 30Mhz. No it does not Yes, it does. nope Oh? nope Markie...You're either disagreeing for arguments sake, or you are again demonstrating your absolute ignorance of United States policy as it pertains to the Amateur Radio service. niether of course I am disagreeing with YOUR despection of the LAWS of the US Or just lying again. nope it requires them to be tested on bands assigned to the general and extra bands Uh huh....Which are...?!?! well known to you. till they are avalable to me I'll not bother to learn So...Got slapped around and now you gonna schlep away with your tail between your legs! Nursie learn anatomy I don't know or care except in general terms what HF bands exist at present those rules will likely change before i make any use of them BBBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! crybaby BELOW 30MHZ ! ! ! ! ! So what So you're patently wrong again. No I am not QUICK, MARKIE! REVIEW TIME! What are the four exceptions that allow a "Technician" to act as control operator of an Amateur Radio station below 30MHz...?!?!? none that apply to me Absolutely correct. and what I think you are referring isbad decision of the FCCto end thech vs thech plus license They only eneded their admistrative tracking of it. The license, in practice, still exisits. That is one way of looking at it. BTW do you agree or disagree that whatever you said they did was a mistake? hopefully that mistake will be fixed The FCC has clarly demonstrated that they are all about "less" regulation and administrative burden...not more. Then of course FCC should (from it's own point of view) go a one license soloutaion which would fix what I call a mistake as would (as I understand the ARRL's proposal) the ARRL would fix this by making all tech inclduing myself General License holder. Thus I have hopes that this mistake will be fixed in some fashion And WHAT common thread do each of those exceptions have in common with the present Novice, General, Advanced and Extra class licensees? so? "so?" was the wrong answer. You lose. no it wasn't but you don't know that Now on to turth Turth? Is that near Intercourse, Pennsylvania? Nothing prevents the FCC from allowing hambands anywhere in the spectrum and assigning them to Tech class, and allowing techs without code tests to use them NOTHING but tradition perhaps And nothing but it's current policy that takes advantage of treaty language that gives administrations the priviledge of determining their own course. Current Policy? You have reason to believe that S25.2 will be put back into something like it older form The treaty is LAW a part of the hisest law of the Land in the US (to forgeiners well YMMV) I DO agree that the FCC COULD have immediately enacted interim "policy" that could have allowed licensees who pass the higher class WRITTEN exams to exercise those privileges without the benefit of passing Element 1 until it had been "officially" dealt with. But they didn't, so it's still here. Oh well. which misses the point of course 60m was a new (to us band or set of reqs or whatever) in setting the rules they could have assigned to the tech class if they choose Techs can use Morse Code on VHF and above. I knew one who did Quitefine at it. Techs can use Morse Code on HF, too. But hey, I thought YOU insisted that SOMEone has chased all the Techs away...?!?! indeed he has you chase them away not all stay away I haven't chased anyone away, Markie. My VHF log has many, many NCT's on 6 and 2M SSB. liar you chssed me of for awhile Another QuiteWrongLie it seems. nope Yep. nope Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: b.b. (Brian P Burke, N0IMD) wrote: an_old_friend (Mark C Morgan, KB9RQZ) wrote: Hmm Brain responding to a post i haven't seen yet Ya gotta love seeing Markie responding to Burke's posts calling him "Brain"... he doesn't mind Sure he does. BB say he oesn't The very, very small mind of Robeson thinks it's a baaad thing to call me. He lies awake at night thinking of names to call people. BTW nobody gotta love Stevie just because you say so And where did I say so, Markie? never said you said it you hacked up the post enough so that I not sure but I think BB said you gotta love Stevie I disagreed I do disagree with more folks that just yourself Stevie The prozac people gotta love Steve. The FCC could of course have allowed it to techs and frankly they should have Why? Because it is a NoCode band and logicaly should not require a code test to use it if code is forbidden (A) It's not a "band". It's five discreet channels. so? Mark's logic is perfect. Steve's reply is not applicable. (B) The mode restriction is due to other adjacent channel users that we must dovetail with...Not due to any altruistic debate over Morse Code use or testing. and I am as cappable as they are or you are of using USB on the bands or channels or whatever you care to call em since Morse Code is forbidden there there is NO logical reason that Morse Code test should be required in order to operate there, or at worst a tech liecnsee with CSSE for the general writen test, should be able to operate there Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner!!! The 5Mhz channels still fall below 30Mhz. So what? Is it a newsflash to you that S25.2 has changed? There is NO LEGAL magic at 30Mhz there was but no more Sure there is. Nope It's all PFM for the followers of St. Hiram. YOU need to read how it's worded. The international treat gives individual administrations the OPTION of requiring code testing. yes I know that but given the only legal barriar to assgining freqs was the treaty the FCC was free to assign them to tech's If they can do that then there is NO legal magic Indeed as BB has pointed out Techs are allowed to operate below 30mhz NOW which you claim is illegal You go read the rules before you lecture others Hmmm? I don't think so. Tech's with a 5WPM Farnsworth CSCE can. Guess what...?!?! The United States is in compliance with the treaty. Never said otherwise I didn't see you say otherwise either. There's a frequency, I think 5.170 off the top of my head, that all amateurs in Alaska are allowed to use for emergencies. Includes Technicians. Oooops. Violates the defunct treaty. Several points: (1) The exact frequency is 5167.5KHz...or 5.1675MHz if you prefer) ...However it's restricted to stations (ALL FCC licensed stations...) in or within 50 miles of the State of Alaska, and is strictly for Emergency use only. One discreet channel. And it's not an "Amateur" channel. Amateurs are allowed on this frequency as an accomodation to safety. A real stretch to cite it as a "violation" of any treaty. (2) The treaty you refer to is NOT "defunct". It is still very much in force. It HAS been ammended, however present United States rules and regulations as they pertain to the treaty are in compliance with said treaty. so he should have defunct provision What? Huh? defunct provision grow up I have. And someday you will too. But not today, apparently. nope you haven't He's the Dick Clark of Amateur Radio. The USA's most immature Extra. |
b.b. wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: BB say he oesn't The very, very small mind of Robeson thinks it's a baaad thing to call me. He lies awake at night thinking of names to call people. Nope. You just fit a mold, Brain. you hacked up the post enough so that I not sure but I think BB said you gotta love Stevie I disagreed I do disagree with more folks that just yourself Stevie The prozac people gotta love Steve. Why? The FCC could of course have allowed it to techs and frankly they should have Why? Because it is a NoCode band and logicaly should not require a code test to use it if code is forbidden (A) It's not a "band". It's five discreet channels. so? Mark's logic is perfect. Steve's reply is not applicable. No his isn't and yer mine is. (B) The mode restriction is due to other adjacent channel users that we must dovetail with...Not due to any altruistic debate over Morse Code use or testing. and I am as cappable as they are or you are of using USB on the bands or channels or whatever you care to call em since Morse Code is forbidden there there is NO logical reason that Morse Code test should be required in order to operate there, or at worst a tech liecnsee with CSSE for the general writen test, should be able to operate there Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner!!! Not until the FCC says otehrwise, Brain. The 5Mhz channels still fall below 30Mhz. So what? Is it a newsflash to you that S25.2 has changed? There is NO LEGAL magic at 30Mhz there was but no more Sure there is. Nope It's all PFM for the followers of St. Hiram. I follow the FCC, and they say it requires an Amateur license to operate on those "channels". Those channels fall below 30Mhz. The present ITU document that facilitates international amateur radio regulations permits individual administrations to test for Morse Code competency for access to HF. The United States still requires Morse Code testing for access to HF. YOU need to read how it's worded. The international treat gives individual administrations the yes I know that Obviously not. You've made statements that indicate you don't understand. but given the only legal barriar to assgining freqs was the treaty the FCC was free to assign them to tech's If they can do that then there is NO legal magic Indeed as BB has pointed out Techs are allowed to operate below 30mhz NOW which you claim is illegal There you go lying again. I very specifically delineated under what circumstances "Techs" may operate on HF. You go read the rules before you lecture others I have. You're the one with the comprehension deficit. Hmmm? I don't think so. Tech's with a 5WPM Farnsworth CSCE can. There's no "Farnsworth CSCE" in existance, Brain. Guess what...?!?! The United States is in compliance with the treaty. Never said otherwise I didn't see you say otherwise either. Sure he did. When he said that there was no longer a treaty that permitted code testing. He was wrong. There's a frequency, I think 5.170 off the top of my head, that all amateurs in Alaska are allowed to use for emergencies. Includes Technicians. Oooops. Violates the defunct treaty. Several points: (1) The exact frequency is 5167.5KHz...or 5.1675MHz if you prefer) ...However it's restricted to stations (ALL FCC licensed stations...) in or within 50 miles of the State of Alaska, and is strictly for Emergency use only. One discreet channel. And it's not an "Amateur" channel. Amateurs are allowed on this frequency as an accomodation to safety. A real stretch to cite it as a "violation" of any treaty. (2) The treaty you refer to is NOT "defunct". It is still very much in force. It HAS been ammended, however present United States rules and regulations as they pertain to the treaty are in compliance with said treaty. so he should have defunct provision What? Huh? defunct provision grow up I have. And someday you will too. But not today, apparently. nope you haven't He's the Dick Clark of Amateur Radio. The USA's most immature Extra. Nope....we'll hold that "honor" for you, Brain. Brain and Markie on the same "team"...A gene pool that still doesn't come up to a 2 digit number... Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: b.b. wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: BB say he oesn't The very, very small mind of Robeson thinks it's a baaad thing to call me. He lies awake at night thinking of names to call people. Nope. You just fit a mold, Brain. ... you hacked up the post enough so that I not sure but I think BB said you gotta love Stevie I disagreed I do disagree with more folks that just yourself Stevie The prozac people gotta love Steve. Why? Sales. The FCC could of course have allowed it to techs and frankly they should have Why? Because it is a NoCode band and logicaly should not require a code test to use it if code is forbidden (A) It's not a "band". It's five discreet channels. so? Mark's logic is perfect. Steve's reply is not applicable. No his isn't and yer mine is. Hi! (B) The mode restriction is due to other adjacent channel users that we must dovetail with...Not due to any altruistic debate over Morse Code use or testing. and I am as cappable as they are or you are of using USB on the bands or channels or whatever you care to call em since Morse Code is forbidden there there is NO logical reason that Morse Code test should be required in order to operate there, or at worst a tech liecnsee with CSSE for the general writen test, should be able to operate there Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner!!! Not until the FCC says otehrwise, Brain. The FCC has failed so many logic tests already. The 5Mhz channels still fall below 30Mhz. So what? Is it a newsflash to you that S25.2 has changed? There is NO LEGAL magic at 30Mhz there was but no more Sure there is. Nope It's all PFM for the followers of St. Hiram. I follow the FCC, and they say it requires an Amateur license to operate on those "channels". Those channels fall below 30Mhz. The present ITU document that facilitates international amateur radio regulations permits individual administrations to test for Morse Code competency for access to HF. The United States still requires Morse Code testing for access to HF. For now. And it doesn't have to make sense or be consistent with other regulations. That's why it is arbitrary. YOU need to read how it's worded. The international treat gives individual administrations the yes I know that Obviously not. You've made statements that indicate you don't understand. but given the only legal barriar to assgining freqs was the treaty the FCC was free to assign them to tech's If they can do that then there is NO legal magic Indeed as BB has pointed out Techs are allowed to operate below 30mhz NOW which you claim is illegal There you go lying again. I very specifically delineated under what circumstances "Techs" may operate on HF. You go read the rules before you lecture others I have. You're the one with the comprehension deficit. Hmmm? I don't think so. Tech's with a 5WPM Farnsworth CSCE can. There's no "Farnsworth CSCE" in existance, Brain. Hi! Tell it to the ARRL VEC. Guess what...?!?! The United States is in compliance with the treaty. Never said otherwise I didn't see you say otherwise either. Sure he did. When he said that there was no longer a treaty that permitted code testing. He was wrong. There's a frequency, I think 5.170 off the top of my head, that all amateurs in Alaska are allowed to use for emergencies. Includes Technicians. Oooops. Violates the defunct treaty. Several points: (1) The exact frequency is 5167.5KHz...or 5.1675MHz if you prefer) ...However it's restricted to stations (ALL FCC licensed stations...) in or within 50 miles of the State of Alaska, and is strictly for Emergency use only. One discreet channel. And it's not an "Amateur" channel. Amateurs are allowed on this frequency as an accomodation to safety. A real stretch to cite it as a "violation" of any treaty. (2) The treaty you refer to is NOT "defunct". It is still very much in force. It HAS been ammended, however present United States rules and regulations as they pertain to the treaty are in compliance with said treaty. so he should have defunct provision What? Huh? defunct provision grow up I have. And someday you will too. But not today, apparently. nope you haven't He's the Dick Clark of Amateur Radio. The USA's most immature Extra. Nope....we'll hold that "honor" for you, Brain. I'm no Extra. Brain and Markie on the same "team"...A gene pool that still doesn't come up to a 2 digit number... Steve, K4YZ Steve and Bruce on the same team. |
b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: The prozac people gotta love Steve. Why? Sales. Why? since Morse Code is forbidden there there is NO logical reason that Morse Code test should be required in order to operate there, or at worst a tech liecnsee with CSSE for the general writen test, should be able to operate there Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner!!! Not until the FCC says otehrwise, Brain. The FCC has failed so many logic tests already. So have you. Like why does a married Veteran with small children lie repeatedly and prolifically in a public forum...?!?! The United States still requires Morse Code testing for access to HF. For now. And it doesn't have to make sense or be consistent with other regulations. That's why it is arbitrary. It's not "arbitrary". That's an "out" that people try to use when they want to avoid facing reality. There's no "Farnsworth CSCE" in existance, Brain. Hi! Tell it to the ARRL VEC. I'll tell it to them all. There's no "Farnsworth CSCE". Not in the ARRL VEC, the W%YI, VEC, or any of the others. It doesn't exist. He's the Dick Clark of Amateur Radio. The USA's most immature Extra. Nope....we'll hold that "honor" for you, Brain. I'm no Extra. So right on so many levels. Brain and Markie on the same "team"...A gene pool that still doesn't come up to a 2 digit number... Steve and Bruce on the same team. Bruce who? If you're refering to N8DOS (SK), why shouldn't we be? He was my father. If you refer to ULX, well, there's yet another silly assertion on YOUR part that will never stand the test of scrutiny... Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: The prozac people gotta love Steve. Why? Sales. Why? since Morse Code is forbidden there there is NO logical reason that Morse Code test should be required in order to operate there, or at worst a tech liecnsee with CSSE for the general writen test, should be able to operate there Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner!!! Not until the FCC says otehrwise, Brain. The FCC has failed so many logic tests already. So have you. Agreeing that the FCC is not always logical progress Boyo Like why does a married Veteran with small children lie repeatedly and prolifically in a public forum...?!?! Why do you lie so much Stevie I can't undersatnd it, either an example like Saying the Borther Grimm were not linguists The United States still requires Morse Code testing for access to HF. For now. And it doesn't have to make sense or be consistent with other regulations. That's why it is arbitrary. It's not "arbitrary". It sure is That's an "out" that people try to use when they want to avoid facing reality. BTW the FCC does not require Morse testing in all cases for HF use. There's no "Farnsworth CSCE" in existance, Brain. Hi! Tell it to the ARRL VEC. I'll tell it to them all. There's no "Farnsworth CSCE". Not in the ARRL VEC, the W%YI, VEC, or any of the others. can't even give W5YI the proper speling Stevie It doesn't exist. All hail Stevie He's the Dick Clark of Amateur Radio. The USA's most immature Extra. Nope....we'll hold that "honor" for you, Brain. I'm no Extra. So right on so many levels. if you are an example then it hardly much to aspire too Brain and Markie on the same "team"...A gene pool that still doesn't come up to a 2 digit number... Steve and Bruce on the same team. Bruce who? If you're refering to N8DOS (SK), why shouldn't we be? He was my father. because he is dead and I hope burried (please if you are keeping him round the house don't tell us) If you refer to ULX, well, there's yet another silly assertion on YOUR part that will never stand the test of scrutiny... Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: The FCC has failed so many logic tests already. So have you. Agreeing that the FCC is not always logical progress Boyo "Boyo"..?!?! Fixation with kids, Markie? You've been claiming the opposite this week. Like why does a married Veteran with small children lie repeatedly and prolifically in a public forum...?!?! Why do you lie so much Stevie I can't undersatnd it, either But I don't. That's what confuses you. You can't understand why someone would tell the truth when lying and making stuff up is so much "fun". an example like Saying the Borther Grimm were not linguists They're not. They're dead. The United States still requires Morse Code testing for access to HF. For now. And it doesn't have to make sense or be consistent with other regulations. That's why it is arbitrary. It's not "arbitrary". It sure is Nope. That's an "out" that people try to use when they want to avoid facing reality. BTW the FCC does not require Morse testing in all cases for HF use. Of course not. But it does for Amateur use. There's no "Farnsworth CSCE" in existance, Brain. Hi! Tell it to the ARRL VEC. I'll tell it to them all. There's no "Farnsworth CSCE". Not in the ARRL VEC, the W%YI, VEC, or any of the others. can't even give W5YI the proper speling Stevie Doesn't matter. There's still no "Farnsworth CSCE". It doesn't exist. All hail Stevie For making a point about the truth? He's the Dick Clark of Amateur Radio. The USA's most immature Extra. Nope....we'll hold that "honor" for you, Brain. I'm no Extra. So right on so many levels. if you are an example then it hardly much to aspire too Good. Then I don't have to worry about you drecking up the phone OR CW subbands anytime soon. Brain and Markie on the same "team"...A gene pool that still doesn't come up to a 2 digit number... Steve and Bruce on the same team. Bruce who? If you're refering to N8DOS (SK), why shouldn't we be? He was my father. because he is dead and I hope burried (please if you are keeping him round the house don't tell us) He was "burried" with something YOU will never have, Markie... Military Honors. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: The FCC has failed so many logic tests already. So have you. Agreeing that the FCC is not always logical progress Boyo "Boyo"..?!?! an irish expresion Fixation with kids, Markie? more implacation of pedophilia stevie You've been claiming the opposite this week. Indeed No I have not that is lie on your part I have neither confirmed nor denied pedophilia, that was neevr the topic What I have been claiming and what you are proving as fact is that YOU are impling I am a pedophile so Another Stevie lie Like why does a married Veteran with small children lie repeatedly and prolifically in a public forum...?!?! Why do you lie so much Stevie I can't undersatnd it, either But I don't. That's what confuses you. yes you do you have lied in the post I am repleing to You can't understand why someone would tell the truth when lying and making stuff up is so much "fun". another lie. never said lying was fun. you seem to enjoy making up stuff an example like Saying the Borther Grimm were not linguists They're not. They're dead. they still were can't be a man and admit error have to bluster and evade and lie The United States still requires Morse Code testing for access to HF. For now. And it doesn't have to make sense or be consistent with other regulations. That's why it is arbitrary. It's not "arbitrary". It sure is Nope. sure is entirely arbitary That's an "out" that people try to use when they want to avoid facing reality. BTW the FCC does not require Morse testing in all cases for HF use. Of course not. But it does for Amateur use. currently yes There's no "Farnsworth CSCE" in existance, Brain. Hi! Tell it to the ARRL VEC. I'll tell it to them all. There's no "Farnsworth CSCE". Not in the ARRL VEC, the W%YI, VEC, or any of the others. can't even give W5YI the proper speling Stevie Doesn't matter. There's still no "Farnsworth CSCE". sure does show you can't even respect folks that have never to my knowledge psted here that you have never meet to my knowledge It doesn't exist. All hail Stevie For making a point about the truth? for your bluster He's the Dick Clark of Amateur Radio. The USA's most immature Extra. Nope....we'll hold that "honor" for you, Brain. I'm no Extra. So right on so many levels. if you are an example then it hardly much to aspire too Good. Then I don't have to worry about you drecking up the phone OR CW subbands anytime soon. well as I undestand it there are no CW subbands except at VHF there are CW/data subbands and you may have even heard me on field day Brain and Markie on the same "team"...A gene pool that still doesn't come up to a 2 digit number... Steve and Bruce on the same team. Bruce who? If you're refering to N8DOS (SK), why shouldn't we be? He was my father. because he is dead and I hope burried (please if you are keeping him round the house don't tell us) He was "burried" with something YOU will never have, Markie... then in saying nothing wrong with teaming up with him you are sick he is a corpse Military Honors. right stevie keep believeing that Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: The FCC has failed so many logic tests already. So have you. Agreeing that the FCC is not always logical progress Boyo "Boyo"..?!?! an irish expresion Uh huh... Fixation with kids, Markie? more implacation of pedophilia stevie Nope. You've been claiming the opposite this week. Indeed No I have not that is lie on your part I have neither confirmed nor denied pedophilia, that was neevr the topic No...you just "confirm" being a liar and sexual deviant. What I have been claiming and what you are proving as fact is that YOU are impling I am a pedophile Nope. You're still having trouble with the English, Markie. I said you're dangerous (and rightly so) to leave kids around. so Another Stevie lie Nope. Like why does a married Veteran with small children lie repeatedly and prolifically in a public forum...?!?! Why do you lie so much Stevie I can't undersatnd it, either But I don't. That's what confuses you. yes you do you have lied in the post I am repleing to No, I've not. You can't understand why someone would tell the truth when lying and making stuff up is so much "fun". another lie. never said lying was fun. Sure you have. you seem to enjoy making up stuff I couldn't make up the silliness you do, Markie. It comes from a very deep and troubled mind. an example like Saying the Borther Grimm were not linguists They're not. They're dead. they still were can't be a man and admit error What error? They're not dead? have to bluster and evade and lie They're not dead? The United States still requires Morse Code testing for access to HF. For now. And it doesn't have to make sense or be consistent with other regulations. That's why it is arbitrary. It's not "arbitrary". It sure is Nope. sure is entirely arbitary Only to you and Lennie. Lennie won't do it because it would somehow "minimize" him in his own eyes...taking a test that "mere mortals" all take. You won't do it because you're lazy and unmotivated. That's an "out" that people try to use when they want to avoid facing reality. BTW the FCC does not require Morse testing in all cases for HF use. Of course not. But it does for Amateur use. currently yes Well well...speaking of admitting an error...Finally got tired of getting spanked, eh? There's no "Farnsworth CSCE" in existance, Brain. Hi! Tell it to the ARRL VEC. I'll tell it to them all. There's no "Farnsworth CSCE". Not in the ARRL VEC, the W%YI, VEC, or any of the others. can't even give W5YI the proper speling Stevie Doesn't matter. There's still no "Farnsworth CSCE". sure does show you can't even respect folks that have never to my knowledge psted here that you have never meet to my knowledge Huh? Who are you talking about? W5YI? Read the context, Markie...It's about code testing. "W5YI" is a VEC that administers code tests. Brain claims there's a "Farnsworth" code test. I've dared him to show evidence of one, but that's heaped up on his pile of "things I won't do because it will prove me wrong" stack. It doesn't exist. All hail Stevie For making a point about the truth? for your bluster The truth is bluster? Good. Then I don't have to worry about you drecking up the phone OR CW subbands anytime soon. well as I undestand it there are no CW subbands except at VHF there are CW/data subbands And I won't ahve to worry about you on any of THOSE, eitehr. and you may have even heard me on field day I doubt it. Brain and Markie on the same "team"...A gene pool that still doesn't come up to a 2 digit number... Steve and Bruce on the same team. Bruce who? If you're refering to N8DOS (SK), why shouldn't we be? He was my father. because he is dead and I hope burried (please if you are keeping him round the house don't tell us) He was "burried" with something YOU will never have, Markie... then in saying nothing wrong with teaming up with him you are sick he is a corpse Now THAT is sick, Mark...Even for you. More evidence of why it's unsafe to leave kids around you. Military Honors. right stevie keep believeing that. I do believe it. And so do you...... Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: The FCC has failed so many logic tests already. So have you. Agreeing that the FCC is not always logical progress Boyo "Boyo"..?!?! an irish expresion Uh huh... yes Fixation with kids, Markie? more implacation of pedophilia stevie Nope. yes it is You've been claiming the opposite this week. Indeed No I have not that is lie on your part I have neither confirmed nor denied pedophilia, that was neevr the topic No...you just "confirm" being a liar and sexual deviant. nope I do not confirm being a sexual deviant What I have been claiming and what you are proving as fact is that YOU are impling I am a pedophile Nope. yes You're still having trouble with the English, Markie. nope you are I said you're dangerous (and rightly so) to leave kids around. prove it your claim is what ever else Libel so Another Stevie lie Nope. can't tell after you editing Like why does a married Veteran with small children lie repeatedly and prolifically in a public forum...?!?! Why do you lie so much Stevie I can't undersatnd it, either But I don't. That's what confuses you. yes you do you have lied in the post I am repleing to No, I've not. yes you have You can't understand why someone would tell the truth when lying and making stuff up is so much "fun". another lie. never said lying was fun. Sure you have. where? you seem to enjoy making up stuff I couldn't make up the silliness you do, Markie. you make your silliness and attribute it to me which is another matter It comes from a very deep and troubled mind. not bad I deep mind I have that, and yes It is troubled by many things esp lately by the rising hate in society of which you are a great example of an example like Saying the Borther Grimm were not linguists They're not. They're dead. they still were can't be a man and admit error What error? saying they weren't lingugists They're not dead? already answered apoligize for slight them be a man if you can have to bluster and evade and lie They're not dead? more bluster The United States still requires Morse Code testing for access to HF. For now. And it doesn't have to make sense or be consistent with other regulations. That's why it is arbitrary. It's not "arbitrary". It sure is Nope. sure is entirely arbitary Only to you and Lennie. anyone else with a brain, which let you out all the rules are arbitary Why 50mhz for 6 m instead of 49mhz no logic there just arbitary choices made Lennie won't do it because it would somehow "minimize" him in his own eyes...taking a test that "mere mortals" all take. all take ah I see you don't onsider me a mere mortal I gues that is sort of compliment certainly nicer than anything you normaly say You won't do it because you're lazy and unmotivated. did not last That's an "out" that people try to use when they want to avoid facing reality. BTW the FCC does not require Morse testing in all cases for HF use. Of course not. But it does for Amateur use. currently yes Well well...speaking of admitting an error...Finally got tired of getting spanked, eh? gee havve been spanked in weeks but why do you complain of alternitve sexauly and then invoke it but I am not addmitting error at all There's no "Farnsworth CSCE" in existance, Brain. Hi! Tell it to the ARRL VEC. I'll tell it to them all. There's no "Farnsworth CSCE". Not in the ARRL VEC, the W%YI, VEC, or any of the others. can't even give W5YI the proper speling Stevie Doesn't matter. There's still no "Farnsworth CSCE". sure does show you can't even respect folks that have never to my knowledge psted here that you have never meet to my knowledge Huh? Who are you talking about? your refusal to show respect for W5YI a amn as far I know you have never met he wasn't her you mangled his call and says it does not atter that you mangled his call, That was rude you should apologize W5YI? Read the context, Markie...It's about code testing. "W5YI" is a VEC that administers code tests. so that means you don't treat him and his call with respect Brain claims there's a "Farnsworth" code test. as I understand the matter so does the ARRL but what has that got to do with your disrepect for w5yi I've dared him to show evidence of one, but that's heaped up on his pile of "things I won't do because it will prove me wrong" stack. no he has put it on his stack of "not carring stevie frieght" I am guessing of course and not speaking for Brain It doesn't exist. All hail Stevie For making a point about the truth? for your bluster The truth is bluster? what truth you don't post truth mainly lie inuendo evasion and distortions Good. Then I don't have to worry about you drecking up the phone OR CW subbands anytime soon. well as I undestand it there are no CW subbands except at VHF there are CW/data subbands And I won't ahve to worry about you on any of THOSE, eitehr. but you still can't state without correction by me the facts about HF rules and you may have even heard me on field day I doubt it. I would not know after all I don't know if you even do feild day but you might. you may have even worked me without knowing it. Brain and Markie on the same "team"...A gene pool that still doesn't come up to a 2 digit number... Steve and Bruce on the same team. Bruce who? If you're refering to N8DOS (SK), why shouldn't we be? He was my father. because he is dead and I hope burried (please if you are keeping him round the house don't tell us) He was "burried" with something YOU will never have, Markie... then in saying nothing wrong with teaming up with him you are sick he is a corpse Now THAT is sick, Mark...Even for you. you said "If you're refering to N8DOS (SK), why shouldn't we be? He was my father" it was all right for you to team up with a corpse, you are the sicko More evidence of why it's unsafe to leave kids around you. maybe I should call child welfare about your daughter Military Honors. right stevie keep believeing that. I do believe it. I know And so do you...... no I don't Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: The FCC has failed so many logic tests already. So have you. Agreeing that the FCC is not always logical progress Boyo "Boyo"..?!?! an irish expresion Uh huh... yes OK, Wusso... That's an American expression for a spineless wimp. You've been claiming the opposite this week. Indeed No I have not that is lie on your part I have neither confirmed nor denied pedophilia, that was neevr the topic No...you just "confirm" being a liar and sexual deviant. nope I do not confirm being a sexual deviant Sure you have. You've claimed that you sleep with men. You are yourself male. A deviation of the norm. Deviant. It comes from a very deep and troubled mind. not bad I deep mind I have that...(SNIP) Your mind's "deep", alright...an empty shaft. and yes It is troubled by many things esp lately by the rising hate in society of which you are a great example of Nope. I just don't tolerate liars. You're a liar. apoligize for slight them When one of the "Brothers Grimm" show up at my door and request an apology, I'll tell them their stories suck and their "lingusitics" were lame. Lennie won't do it because it would somehow "minimize" him in his own eyes...taking a test that "mere mortals" all take. all take ah I see you don't onsider me a mere mortal I gues that is sort of compliment certainly nicer than anything you normaly say Did you take an Amateur Radio exam, Markie? Then you ARE one of the mortals. Well well...speaking of admitting an error...Finally got tired of getting spanked, eh? gee havve been spanked in weeks but why do you complain of alternitve sexauly and then invoke it I don't "invoke it" in sexual innuendo, Markie. Funny you did after insisting that you're not a sexual deviant. Huh? Who are you talking about? your refusal to show respect for W5YI a amn as far I know you have never met he wasn't her you mangled his call and says it does not atter that you mangled his call, That was rude you should apologize For dragging my finger for a split second longer on the shift key...?!?! W5YI? Read the context, Markie...It's about code testing. "W5YI" is a VEC that administers code tests. so that means you don't treat him and his call with respect Very little. Which VEC has been cited for more than 80% of all FCC-mandated retests of exams administered under their cogniznece? Brain claims there's a "Farnsworth" code test. as I understand the matter so does the ARRL but what has that got to do with your disrepect for w5yi W5YI is a snake oil salesman. See the above. well as I undestand it there are no CW subbands except at VHF there are CW/data subbands And I won't have to worry about you on any of THOSE, either. but you still can't state without correction by me the facts about HF rules Sure I can. And have. You still can't deal with your ineptness and incompetence with Part 97. and you may have even heard me on field day I doubt it. I would not know after all I don't know if you even do feild day but you might. you may have even worked me without knowing it. I doubt it. How proficient are you at CW? More evidence of why it's unsafe to leave kids around you. maybe I should call child welfare about your daughter Maybe you should. Do you know the consequences for filing a false report? You'll find out. Military Honors. right stevie keep believeing that. I do believe it. I know And so do you...... no I don't Then you're lying to yourself, too. Now you've REALLY lied to EVERYone... Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: The FCC has failed so many logic tests already. So have you. Agreeing that the FCC is not always logical progress Boyo "Boyo"..?!?! an irish expresion Uh huh... yes Uh huh.... Fixation with kids, Markie? more implacation of pedophilia stevie Nope. yes it is You're the one talking about "boyo". Sounds like a fixation to me. You've been claiming the opposite this week. Indeed No I have not that is lie on your part I have neither confirmed nor denied pedophilia, that was neevr the topic No...you just "confirm" being a liar and sexual deviant. nope I do not confirm being a sexual deviant Sure you do. You've already stated it clearly. You're male and have sex with men. That's all it took. I said you're dangerous (and rightly so) to leave kids around. prove it your claim is what ever else Libel No it's not. Go tell your local DHS Agent about your sexual preferences and see what s/he has to say about your fitness to care for children unsupervised... so Another Stevie lie Nope. can't tell after you editing Sure you can. I'm just trying to keep these things from having 30 . If you get TOO confused, Markie, back up the thread. You can't understand why someone would tell the truth when lying and making stuff up is so much "fun". another lie. never said lying was fun. Sure you have. where? Over and over again, Markie. And why would you do something if it wasn't fun? you seem to enjoy making up stuff I couldn't make up the silliness you do, Markie. you make your silliness and attribute it to me which is another matter Nope. Everything I cite is quoted from YOU. Take a bow. It comes from a very deep and troubled mind. not bad I deep mind I have that, and yes It is troubled by many things esp lately by the rising hate in society of which you are a great example of Nope. Big snip of usual Markie Dreck.... More evidence of why it's unsafe to leave kids around you. maybe I should call child welfare about your daughter You made that statement two days ago and I asked you if you knew what the penalties were for filing false accusations with DHS...And I'll extend that to CPS, or Child Protective Services. Go right ahead...Make my Millenium! Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: The FCC has failed so many logic tests already. So have you. Agreeing that the FCC is not always logical progress Boyo "Boyo"..?!?! break an irish expresion Uh huh... yes Uh huh.... I'll get back this Fixation with kids, Markie? more implacation of pedophilia stevie Nope. yes it is You're the one talking about "boyo". I refer you above Sounds like a fixation to me. maybe it does to you You've been claiming the opposite this week. Indeed No I have not that is lie on your part I have neither confirmed nor denied pedophilia, that was neevr the topic No...you just "confirm" being a liar and sexual deviant. nope I do not confirm being a sexual deviant Sure you do. You've already stated it clearly. no I have not more lies on your part You're male and have sex with men. not according to the sandard reference in the feild of mental health That's all it took. nope I said you're dangerous (and rightly so) to leave kids around. prove it your claim is what ever else Libel No it's not. it sure is Libel Go tell your local DHS Agent about your sexual preferences and see what s/he has to say about your fitness to care for children unsupervised... i am sure you can find bigots in socail services, but no one believing in the standards of the field would so Another Stevie lie Nope. can't tell after you editing Sure you can. No i can't I'm just trying to keep these things from having 30 . If you get TOO confused, Markie, back up the thread. with volume of **** you spew You can't understand why someone would tell the truth when lying and making stuff up is so much "fun". another lie. never said lying was fun. Sure you have. where? Over and over again, Markie. never And why would you do something if it wasn't fun? because it suited my prupose that being improving the safety of my family form freaks like you and those even worse than you. I do regret that the world is in a state that I find it neccasary to lie you seem to enjoy making up stuff I couldn't make up the silliness you do, Markie. you make your silliness and attribute it to me which is another matter Nope. yep Everything I cite is quoted from YOU. nope Take a bow. no it is your bow It comes from a very deep and troubled mind. not bad I deep mind I have that, and yes It is troubled by many things esp lately by the rising hate in society of which you are a great example of Nope. yes it is Big snip of usual Markie Dreck.... big cut into context More evidence of why it's unsafe to leave kids around you. maybe I should call child welfare about your daughter You made that statement two days ago and I asked you if you knew what the penalties were for filing false accusations with DHS...And I'll extend that to CPS, or Child Protective Services. did not see it but you are discusing what are the penalities for making false statements Go right ahead...Make my Millenium! you certainly make me wonder if it is safe to leave her in your care Steve, K4YZ |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:48 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com