|
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: an_old_friend wrote: I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public airwaves Translation: "I don't want to learn anything technical, or anything about regulations, or take a test to determine if I am half-way capable of operating a transmitter responsibably on the ham bands". guess you failed english Looks like the Childrens Band is a perfect fit for you. |
Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: I can any definifation I care to I don't have to choose the same one as you do When your "definifations" mean something other than what is commonly accepted, you make it impossible to communicate with others. Of course you've pretty much done that with your misspellings and grammatical abortions. only to narrow minded people that everything spoon fed to them Gee, Mark, don't you get it? You are one of the narrow minded people who wants to be spoon fed. You want amateur radio to be easier in order No not at all, I want the ARs to respect the liberites of all Americans myself included Manure! Nothing in amateur radio takes away any of the "liberites" granted by the Constitution. the code test does indeed do so As with any number of things of late, you're simply wrong. IYO opinion doesn't make it so you want to deprive american of their rights if they don't jump though the same hoops you did You have no Constitutional right to an amateur radio license. I have a right to anything not denied to me by the constition of the USa unless regulated by treaty since the constitution of the US and the treaties we sign are the supreme law of the land Oh, you have a right to attempt to pass an amateur radio exam but you aren't guaranteed success. The "constition" doesn't address or regulate motor car licensing but you still have to pass a test in order to obtain a driving license. It can be revoked by your state or denied if you have a medical or mental condition rendering you a hazard to others. Deal with the fact that you don't a right to something simply because you want to do it. But to use your analogy I am propected from making me take a test on the use of the Buggy whip in order to drive Nothing in the Consittution allows the FCC to cintinue codetesting , and nothing in the treaty gives it that power there the power does not exist in law Nothing in the U.S. Constitution prevents the FCC from administering a morse code test for amateur radio licensing. You have no right to an amateur radio license. Nothing gives it he power to impose an uneeded test I have a right to a fair test I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public airwaves I opossum your view. and the Constitution of the US Okay, I opossum the Constitution. You support frat boy **** and don't bother to use language as you demand I do to accomodate you. You want explanations about 5 MHz modes to be in No I want people to answer questions aksed instaed of droning on about irelavant garbage Everything you needed for an answer was right before you--spelled out. That, of course, might have been the problem. Next time, ask Hans for the aural version. not it wasn't Yes, Mark, it was. Your repeated denials of reality are just making you look stupid. He did not answer the question of wether CW was premitted Hans has spent a couple of weeks ont eh suject of what is a band that is waste To try explaining it to you was certainly a waste. do understand what I am saying when I type 60m Band or not? Yes, you mean the spot frequencies which are not a band at all. then stop your whining becuase that is all it is whining Mark-sized chunks. You want all others to have to try to decipher your can't you read it is a matter of indifference to me read or don't read at your pleasure hieroglyphs rather than you doing the work to post messages in properly-spelled and grammatically correct English. You'd like folks to guess as to how you'll define terms which have a specific meaning to all the rest of us. Really then form Stevie the NBA and NFL are lying ervy years when they say they are holding a draft Do you know the difference between a military draft and an NFL or NBA draft? Were you being drafted by either the NFL or NBA? The definition of both types of draft is the same, by the way. nope it isn't at least ot according to Stevie I don't know Steve's views on the NBA or NFL draft. I do know what you've written previously about being drafted. Now we're to understand that you didn't actually mean "drafted". never said that either as I then a year later , and a few days ago I using the word in other senses. That you and Stevie are hung out on one meaning is not my fault. I have also admitted the use was unforunate but you are just in attacking no one has yet to come up with a term other than band to describe 60 m doesn't stop setvie and hans from going on and on about how wrong it is Hans gave you a term to use. There is no 60m band by definition. and yet you, steve and Hans know better than the ARRL and W5YI Yeah, it surely looks that way. It certainly won't be the first time. such humility Dave K8MN |
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: I can any definifation I care to I don't have to choose the same one as you do When your "definifations" mean something other than what is commonly accepted, you make it impossible to communicate with others. Of course you've pretty much done that with your misspellings and grammatical abortions. only to narrow minded people that everything spoon fed to them Gee, Mark, don't you get it? You are one of the narrow minded people who wants to be spoon fed. You want amateur radio to be easier in order No not at all, I want the ARs to respect the liberites of all Americans myself included Manure! Nothing in amateur radio takes away any of the "liberites" granted by the Constitution. the code test does indeed do so As with any number of things of late, you're simply wrong. IYO opinion doesn't make it so Here's a plain, simple fact: The license requirements are determined almost entirely by someone's opinion. For example, why is the written test for Extra 50 questions rather than, say, 100? Or 25? For that matter, why do Advanceds an Generals have to take the same test to upgrade to Extra? The Advanced and Extra licenses don't add any bands, modes or power level to General privileges. Why is more testing required for those licenses? Etc. In all cases the reason is the same: FCC's opinion says it's a good idea. you want to deprive american of their rights if they don't jump though the same hoops you did You have no Constitutional right to an amateur radio license. I have a right to anything not denied to me by the constition of the USa unless regulated by treaty since the constitution of the US and the treaties we sign are the supreme law of the land An amateur radio license is a privilige, not a right. Oh, you have a right to attempt to pass an amateur radio exam but you aren't guaranteed success. Exactly. The "constition" doesn't address or regulate motor car licensing but you still have to pass a test in order to obtain a driving license. It can be revoked by your state or denied if you have a medical or mental condition rendering you a hazard to others. Deal with the fact that you don't a right to something simply because you want to do it. But to use your analogy I am propected from making me take a test on the use of the Buggy whip in order to drive That's true - but buggy whips aren't used much on the roads of America by people driving cars. Morse Code is very extensively used on the MF/HF amateur bands by radio amateurs operating amateur radio stations. The "buggy whip" argument just doesn't hold up. A more valid argument would be that you don't want to have to answer questions on driving at night, because you only intend to drive in the daytime, nor questions on driving in ice and snow because you live in a place that rarely if ever has those weather conditions. Nothing in the Consittution allows the FCC to cintinue codetesting , and nothing in the treaty gives it that power there the power does not exist in law Nothing in the U.S. Constitution prevents the FCC from administering a morse code test for amateur radio licensing. You have no right to an amateur radio license. Nothing gives it he power to impose an uneeded test Whether a test is "needed" or "unneeded" is a matter of opinion. Nothing more or less. I have a right to a fair test That's true. "A fair test" means that everyone applying for a license at a particular time has to meet the same basic test requirements. IOW, if someone has a Ph.D in EE, or is a member of some organization or other, they don't get a pass on the exam. I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public airwaves I opossum your view. and the Constitution of the US Okay, I opossum the Constitution. You support frat boy **** and don't bother to use language as you demand I do Your example is not one to be emulated. to accomodate you. You want explanations about 5 MHz modes to be in No I want people to answer questions aksed instaed of droning on about irelavant garbage Sounds like "internet disease" to me - the desire to have everything spelled out in custom-made explanations rather than having to look anything up or exert some mental effort to understand the available information. The refusal to use a spellchecker when one is obviouslysorely needed is a clear symptom. Everything you needed for an answer was right before you--spelled out. That, of course, might have been the problem. Next time, ask Hans for the aural version. not it wasn't Yes, Mark, it was. Your repeated denials of reality are just making you look stupid. He did not answer the question of wether CW was premitted Yes, he did. By direct quote of the relevant sections of Part 97. If you won't make the effort to use correct grammar, spelling, punctuation and capitalization, why should anyone make the effort to answer your questions? If you won't make the effort to look up the relevant rules and understand them, why should anyone make the effort to answer your questions? |
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
You failed English and spelling. Like I say, you would fit perfectly on the Chicken Band, they are all on just about your level. You're no netter than him jj, your drivel is worse than what's on CB. hth |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: You have agreed that I am deffeent and that I have the right to be defferent therfore I all right or at least not wroug You can be "deffeent" and wrong too. You keep insisting that I am "agreeing" with you. you seem tobut then it like Senator Kerry you flipflop very fast Nope. No. Rude for treating Hans the way you did for ANSWERING your question. stevie you are flaimng me for reareaching part 97 which you complained I wasn't doing No...I was complaining that you're lying. prove it See all under "an_old_friend" Pretty hillarious stuff there. i was rading the sections of part 97 and noticed this hole in the stuff from the FCC There's no hole. Other than in your head, that is...... and decided to coment on it And made a fool out of yourself in the process. you claim everything I do is some of plot to confuse you and now Hans The only thing confusing about you is your broken grammar and illogical expressive patterns. get over your self Get over WHAT about myself? When was you last post on Radio here Which was evident in your post. lie making up wityhput eveident that I am trying to decieve folks "wityhput eveident"...?!?! What the heck is that? what you are engaged in attacks with nothing to back em up You didn't answer the question. WhatEVER that was, it wasn't English. Try again. You suggested intercourse. We are the same gender, and that's deviant. not according to medical authority Sure it is. What "medical authority" are YOU refering to? Jack Kevorkian? nor did I suggest I would #### you Good thing. Or you WOULD have something to worry about. And I've never seen the word "truthfull" either. lie Nope. and you cut stuff out again I see no need to re-post things that are three or more posts old, Mark. I have used the word before therefore you have seen therefore you are lieing about not having seen it "Truthfull" is not correct, Mark. That YOU spell "mistruthful" taht way does NOT make it right. never seen it before Maybe because Webster's isn't written in crayon...?!?! doubt that why are you so obsessed with crayons? Because I am certain that writing with crayons is about your developmental level. You act childish, so I assume you function better at a child-like level. which does not alter its threatening nature esp from a guy saying "one shot one Kill even in illiopolis" More out-of-context quotes, Markie! nope Yep. Sure is. Just like Brain keeps trying to insinuate that I allegedly threatened to "slash tires" and "terrorize wives". you typed it And Brain snipped it and quoted it out of context. Forgot your "Is that your best shot" comment that inspired the response? nope Obviously you did. nope you just think you are above the law, fortunately for you it doesn't seem to bother with usenet So...it's OK for YOU to choose words that can be misconstrued to a violent intent, but if anyone else uses such words, it's "above the law"... Uh huh.... What "shot" were YOU suggesting, Markie...?!?! I was not suggesting a gunshot That's not what I asked you. I asked you what "shot" were YOU suggesting. Do you not understand the question? I have 100% Hukman DNA ROTMFFLMMFAO...AGAIN ! ! ! ! so So what is "Hukman DNA"...?!?! Is that some distant alien race that seeded the Earth...?!?!? There's no "distorted uses" I can apply to words that YOU won't print clearly. Stevie you didtort my words wether I type them clearly or not How can I "didtort" your words any worse than YOU do...?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!? An absolute lie, Markie. You were MONTHS with that song-and-dance! nope you just did not bother to read it so I had to repate it You're lying, Morgan. You lied about being in the Army. You lied aboout being threatened. You continue to lie about being "stalked". Why not just TRY being truthful for ONE WEEK and see if you aren't accepted just a wee bit better than what you are now. and then these years later you claim I never did at all which lie is your final answer? There's no lie on my part, ergo no final answer. You needed reapeated a year later and again 6 years later Nope. YOU needed to be reminded that there is only ONE meaning of the word "drafted" as applied to military service. the choie of the word was alas unforunate, but I am not bound by your narrowminded vision It isn't MY "vision". YOU chose to represent yourself as a commissioned officer in the Armed Forces, ergo YOUR "choie" of words could only be construed as being in the military vernacular. More lies! Sheesh, Morgan, where DO you get this stuff...?!?! you sent those email I remember them well I am sure you "remember" a lot of things in your few lucid moments. None of it correct, but I am sure you THINK it is. What time? What money? You're a useless layabout. What have YOU got to do? Stevie I run my own company. a small one, I take care of a Terminal ill man, I am active in politics. I even try to get on the air Oh God...that's scary.... Bad enough the poor fellow is ill, but to have to wake up and see YOUR mug... my income is the range of about 30K a year, and I own my home (not me and the bank but me) I have a family Congratulations. Most sexual deviants live in the middle of "Middle America", and everyone is aghast when the news hits the presses. that you are bigoted enough to judge a person by his typing is not my fault It's not just your "typing", Mark. It's your ignorance. It's your behaviour. It's your arrogance. But most of all, it's the lying. Note that Lennie Anderson is quite verbose...bordering poetic on rare occassion, yet I despise him. I despise him because he's a liar...And he doesn't take too great care to hide his misrepresentations, either. You don't humilate me. No, I don't. progress boyo But not what you think wusso. anoy harrass stalker threaten me yes No. No. No. No. yes yes yes Three out of four. "Progress boyo" you dare to claim you don't anoy me? Do I? I hadn't noticed. Jesus Mary and Joeseph Peter, Paul and Mary. yes all in that #### brains head of yours that #### for brains of yours Have you been taking Toiddie's correspondence course for online cussing? talking about killing people is always a threat and never justified on usenet Then why did you start it? and anyne who make the threats you do over Ham radio must be unblanced, not sure exactly how, but you must be What threats have I made "...over Ham Radio..." to kill me I've NEVER discussed you over Ham Radio, Mark. of course you are distring the context again I gues I shoudl have said over the subject of Ham radio but that would hardly help since youd just find some other way to twist my words No twisting needed, Mark. If you'd learn PROPER ENGLISH instead of exepcting the rest of the world to adapt to you, you'd find life a lot more pleasant. Speaking the same language as those around you does NOT detract from your individuality or "freedom", Mark. It enhances it. I don't discuss you on the air. I wouldn't be able to stop laughing long enough to get my call and QTH across... never said you did another of your distortions No distortion. YOU said that I threatened to harm you "..over Ham Radio"... In the COMPLETE context of the sentence, any reasonable person competent in English would ahve drawn the same conclusion Please, Markie... Tell us of YOUR credentials to determine mental instability...! years of reading your posts Then you are acknowledging that you ahve NO credentials. i don't ahve anything nor does anyone else yes a cheap shot at your spelling, but I pass on most of them Don't use the letter transposition as an excuse to ignore the question, Mark. What are YOUR credentials for determining mental instability? Do you have any? Yes or no will suffice. If you understood English well, you'd have a better than average likelyhood of spelling it correctly. not realy proves you don't know much about dyslexia I know it can be treated. Yes according to Tom Cruise where did he get his MD? Tom Cruise needs an MD in order to tell people he had a dysfunction that he got help for? Steve, K4YZ |
Steveo wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: You failed English and spelling. Like I say, you would fit perfectly on the Chicken Band, they are all on just about your level. You're no netter than him jj, your drivel is worse than what's on CB. hth Stick to the Childrens Band with the rest of the scum of radio land, you are way out classed here steveio. |
an_old_friend wrote: Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: an_old_friend wrote: I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public airwaves Translation: "I don't want to learn anything technical, or anything about regulations, or take a test to determine if I am half-way capable of operating a transmitter responsibably on the ham bands". guess you failed english Better to "fail" it than bend it over and rape it in broad daylight. And let's face it, Mark...That IS what you suggest. For the past week you've been refusing to apologize to Hans because he had the temerity to use proper emission designators in response to an inquiry BY you... He provided you specific information, but you've since made a "federal case" out of having been "forced" to learn something. Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: Manure! Nothing in amateur radio takes away any of the "liberites" granted by the Constitution. the code test does indeed do so As with any number of things of late, you're simply wrong. IYO opinion doesn't make it so But in this case he's right. Neither you or any other person has been denied their Constitutional rights due to ANY Amateur examination. Nothing in the U.S. Constitution prevents the FCC from administering a morse code test for amateur radio licensing. You have no right to an amateur radio license. Nothing gives it he power to impose an uneeded test Uneeded in YOUR opinion. I have a right to a fair test It IS fair. The FCC will allow almost ANY accomodation for the test other than just paying someone to tkae it for you. I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public airwaves I opossum your view. and the Constitution of the US Okay, I opossum the Constitution. You support frat boy #### and don't bother to use language as you demand I do He was using YOUR style, Mark. What's a matter? Having trouble understanding it? Everything you needed for an answer was right before you--spelled out. That, of course, might have been the problem. Next time, ask Hans for the aural version. not it wasn't Yes, Mark, it was. Your repeated denials of reality are just making you look stupid. He did not answer the question of wether CW was premitted Yes he did. Why do you continue to blatantly lie when Hans' post is archived for all to see? do understand what I am saying when I type 60m Band or not? Yes, you mean the spot frequencies which are not a band at all. then stop your whining becuase that is all it is whining No, it's correcting your misconceptions. I don't know Steve's views on the NBA or NFL draft. I do know what you've written previously about being drafted. Now we're to understand that you didn't actually mean "drafted". never said that either as I then a year later , and a few days ago I using the word in other senses. That you and Stevie are hung out on one meaning is not my fault. I have also admitted the use was unforunate but you are just in attacking It's not "one meaning". It's that you lied. Ask any American citizen what "drafted" means in military terms, and they will tell you it means involuntary conscription, or words to that effect. no one has yet to come up with a term other than band to describe 60 m doesn't stop setvie and hans from going on and on about how wrong it is Hans gave you a term to use. There is no 60m band by definition. and yet you, steve and Hans know better than the ARRL and W5YI Yeah, it surely looks that way. It certainly won't be the first time. such humility Facts are facts. If I (or any person, for that matter...) is "right" but not part of some "organization", does it make it any LESS "true"...?!?! Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: You have agreed that I am deffeent and that I have the right to be defferent therfore I all right or at least not wroug You can be "deffeent" and wrong too. ture a little progress Boyo However I can't be wroung about a matter of opinion You keep insisting that I am "agreeing" with you. you seem tobut then it like Senator Kerry you flipflop very fast Nope. sure do No. Rude for treating Hans the way you did for ANSWERING your question. stevie you are flaimng me for reareaching part 97 which you complained I wasn't doing No...I was complaining that you're lying. prove it See all under "an_old_friend" Pretty hillarious stuff there. funny to you prehaps but no proof of lying i was rading the sections of part 97 and noticed this hole in the stuff from the FCC There's no hole. Other than in your head, that is...... more lies and decided to coment on it And made a fool out of yourself in the process. nope according to you I can't make a fool of myself you claim everything I do is some of plot to confuse you and now Hans The only thing confusing about you is your broken grammar and illogical expressive patterns. then you are lieing in saying i saying I was ploting to confuse/divert you get over your self Get over WHAT about myself? get over yourself When was you last post on Radio here again whenwas YOUR last port on Radio 1998 Which was evident in your post. lie making up wityhput eveident that I am trying to decieve folks "wityhput eveident"...?!?! What the heck is that? what you are engaged in attacks with nothing to back em up You didn't answer the question. nope I didn't I have the same rights as you do WhatEVER that was, it wasn't English. Try again. You suggested intercourse. We are the same gender, and that's deviant. not according to medical authority Sure it is. What "medical authority" are YOU refering to? Jack Kevorkian? The standard refernces of the mental health feild disagree nor did I suggest I would #### you Good thing. Or you WOULD have something to worry about. You should be worring about your obsession with sex And I've never seen the word "truthfull" either. lie Nope. and you cut stuff out again I see no need to re-post things that are three or more posts old, Mark. no you cut stuff inorder to build a stawman to nock down I have used the word before therefore you have seen therefore you are lieing about not having seen it "Truthfull" is not correct, Mark. sure is That YOU spell "mistruthful" taht way does NOT make it right. does not make it wroung either never seen it before Maybe because Webster's isn't written in crayon...?!?! doubt that why are you so obsessed with crayons? Because I am certain that writing with crayons is about your developmental level. then you are simply stupid You act childish, so I assume you function better at a child-like level. more personal attack boring which does not alter its threatening nature esp from a guy saying "one shot one Kill even in illiopolis" More out-of-context quotes, Markie! nope Yep. Sure is. Just like Brain keeps trying to insinuate that I allegedly threatened to "slash tires" and "terrorize wives". you typed it And Brain snipped it and quoted it out of context. Why do you claim that only you may decide how you are quoted The context looked pretty clear to me Forgot your "Is that your best shot" comment that inspired the response? nope Obviously you did. nope you just think you are above the law, fortunately for you it doesn't seem to bother with usenet So...it's OK for YOU to choose words that can be misconstrued to a violent intent, but if anyone else uses such words, it's "above the law"... what violent intent are you talking about and "One shot one kill.." can ONLY be taken as a violent intent Uh huh.... What "shot" were YOU suggesting, Markie...?!?! I was not suggesting a gunshot That's not what I asked you. I was refering to some now forgottn cheap retorical shot you made just before that as you well knew I asked you what "shot" were YOU suggesting. Do you not understand the question? simply don't remeber enough from 5 years ago I have 100% Hukman DNA ROTMFFLMMFAO...AGAIN ! ! ! ! so So what is "Hukman DNA"...?!?! Is that some distant alien race that seeded the Earth...?!?!? There's no "distorted uses" I can apply to words that YOU won't print clearly. Stevie you didtort my words wether I type them clearly or not How can I "didtort" your words any worse than YOU Stevie I don't know how can do it? esp and make the claim that you are upholding some kind of civlized standard, but you do do...?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!? An absolute lie, Markie. You were MONTHS with that song-and-dance! nope you just did not bother to read it so I had to repate it You're lying, Morgan. nope You lied about being in the Army. nope You lied aboout being threatened. nope You continue to lie about being "stalked". nope Why not just TRY being truthful for ONE WEEK and see if you aren't accepted just a wee bit better than what you are now. why don't you try being truthfull for even one post and then these years later you claim I never did at all which lie is your final answer? There's no lie on my part, ergo no final answer. mases of lies to many to sort out You needed reapeated a year later and again 6 years later Nope. YOU needed to be reminded that there is only ONE meaning of the word "drafted" as applied to military service. the choie of the word was alas unforunate, but I am not bound by your narrowminded vision It isn't MY "vision". yes it is YOU chose to represent yourself as a commissioned officer in the Armed Forces, ergo YOUR "choie" of words could only be construed as being in the military vernacular. bull**** nor is selected service the only use of drafted in military vernacular More lies! Sheesh, Morgan, where DO you get this stuff...?!?! you sent those email I remember them well I am sure you "remember" a lot of things in your few lucid moments. and you are not man enough to admit your crimes None of it correct, but I am sure you THINK it is. What time? What money? You're a useless layabout. What have YOU got to do? Stevie I run my own company. a small one, I take care of a Terminal ill man, I am active in politics. I even try to get on the air Oh God...that's scary.... what is scary. that you are stupid Bad enough the poor fellow is ill, but to have to wake up and see YOUR mug... it was bad enough that your daughter had to see your till she died many that had something to do with her death my income is the range of about 30K a year, and I own my home (not me and the bank but me) I have a family Congratulations. your welcome Most sexual deviants live in the middle of "Middle America", and everyone is aghast when the news hits the presses. not a sexual deviant according the satndrads of mental health that you are bigoted enough to judge a person by his typing is not my fault It's not just your "typing", Mark. yes it is It's your ignorance. It's your behaviour. It's your arrogance. arogance you are far more aroagnt than I and more childish to be carrying on about th facts I don't choose to use words as narowwly as you do for 5 ****ing years But most of all, it's the lying. then grow and face facts, "everyone lies"(B5) Note that Lennie Anderson is quite verbose...bordering poetic on rare occassion, yet I despise him. I was under no impression you like him I despise him because he's a liar...And he doesn't take too great care to hide his misrepresentations, either. again then grow and face facts, "everyone lies"(B5) You don't humilate me. No, I don't. progress boyo But not what you think wusso. Like i said progress not sucesss anoy harrass stalker threaten me yes No. No. No. No. yes yes yes Three out of four. progress boyo "Progress boyo" you dare to claim you don't anoy me? Do I? yes right above you did you dening it now get yoour stories striaght I hadn't noticed. Jesus Mary and Joeseph Peter, Paul and Mary. yes all in that #### brains head of yours that #### for brains of yours Have you been taking Toiddie's correspondence course for online cussing? nope just excerising my free speech rights talking about killing people is always a threat and never justified on usenet Then why did you start it? another lie One shot one kill even in Illiolpolis" were your words not mine and anyne who make the threats you do over Ham radio must be unblanced, not sure exactly how, but you must be What threats have I made "...over Ham Radio..." to kill me I've NEVER discussed you over Ham Radio, Mark. and as normal you chosee to distort the meaning of course you are distring the context again I gues I shoudl have said over the subject of Ham radio but that would hardly help since youd just find some other way to twist my words No twisting needed, Mark. yep right you threaten me over the subject of ham radio and can't even accept that If you'd learn PROPER ENGLISH instead of exepcting the rest of the world to adapt to you, you'd find life a lot more pleasant. Speaking the same language as those around you does NOT detract from your individuality or "freedom", Mark. It enhances it. yes it does detract from my freedom if it forced upon me, the very use of force denies freedom I don't discuss you on the air. I wouldn't be able to stop laughing long enough to get my call and QTH across... never said you did another of your distortions No distortion. yes another distortion YOU said that I threatened to harm you "..over Ham Radio"... then when you did not "understand" that I corrected to over the subject of ham radio and you continue to ignore the corection sthereby dieffecting a distortion In the COMPLETE context of the sentence, any reasonable person competent in English would ahve drawn the same conclusion nope Please, Markie... Tell us of YOUR credentials to determine mental instability...! years of reading your posts Then you are acknowledging that you ahve NO credentials. i don't ahve anything nor does anyone else yes a cheap shot at your spelling, but I pass on most of them Don't use the letter transposition as an excuse to ignore the question, Mark. why not you do all the time I try to keep it to just once a week What are YOUR credentials for determining mental instability? don't claim any don't need any to repeat the words of a professional who in my case knows enough about me to make a pronouncement Do you have any? Yes or no will suffice. If you understood English well, you'd have a better than average likelyhood of spelling it correctly. not realy proves you don't know much about dyslexia I know it can be treated. Yes according to Tom Cruise where did he get his MD? Tom Cruise needs an MD in order to tell people he had a dysfunction that he got help for? he needs to say it can simply be cured you are claiming I need credencails to repeat my word of my own therapist Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: You have agreed that I am deffeent and that I have the right to be defferent therfore I all right or at least not wroug You can be "deffeent" and wrong too. not over a matter of opinion You keep insisting that I am "agreeing" with you. you seem tobut then it like Senator Kerry you flipflop very fast Nope. yep No. Rude for treating Hans the way you did for ANSWERING your question. stevie you are flaimng me for reareaching part 97 which you complained I wasn't doing No...I was complaining that you're lying. prove it See all under "an_old_friend" Pretty hillarious stuff there. what proof? nothing as normal for stevie claims everyone should do his work for him i was rading the sections of part 97 and noticed this hole in the stuff from the FCC There's no hole. Other than in your head, that is...... yes there is Indeed the FCC adknowleds the proble with them refering people to both an out of date copy and a corect one and decided to coment on it And made a fool out of yourself in the process. accroding to you that is not possibe, so another lie Stevie you claim everything I do is some of plot to confuse you and now Hans The only thing confusing about you is your broken grammar and illogical expressive patterns. get over your self Get over WHAT about myself? get over yourself is comon expression corretly used so get over yourself When was you last post on Radio here when was it BTW Which was evident in your post. lie making up wityhput eveident that I am trying to decieve folks "wityhput eveident"...?!?! What the heck is that? what you are engaged in attacks with nothing to back em up You didn't answer the question. no I did not WhatEVER that was, it wasn't English. Try again. You suggested intercourse. We are the same gender, and that's deviant. not according to medical authority Sure it is. What "medical authority" are YOU refering to? Jack Kevorkian? members of AMA nor did I suggest I would #### you Good thing. Or you WOULD have something to worry about. And I've never seen the word "truthfull" either. lie Nope. and you cut stuff out again I see no need to re-post things that are three or more posts old, Mark. no you choose to change context I have used the word before therefore you have seen therefore you are lieing about not having seen it "Truthfull" is not correct, Mark. That YOU spell "mistruthful" taht way does NOT make it right. doesn't make it worung either never seen it before Maybe because Webster's isn't written in crayon...?!?! doubt that why are you so obsessed with crayons? Because I am certain that writing with crayons is about your developmental level. proves you are stupid then You act childish, so I assume you function better at a child-like level. which does not alter its threatening nature esp from a guy saying "one shot one Kill even in illiopolis" More out-of-context quotes, Markie! nope Yep. Sure is. Just like Brain keeps trying to insinuate that I allegedly threatened to "slash tires" and "terrorize wives". you typed it And Brain snipped it and quoted it out of context. no out of context quote either by Brain or me Forgot your "Is that your best shot" comment that inspired the response? nope Obviously you did. nope you just think you are above the law, fortunately for you it doesn't seem to bother with usenet So...it's OK for YOU to choose words that can be misconstrued to a violent intent, but if anyone else uses such words, it's "above the law"... you though I was threantening you with give my your best shot Uh huh.... What "shot" were YOU suggesting, Markie...?!?! I was not suggesting a gunshot That's not what I asked you. I asked you what "shot" were YOU suggesting. Do you not understand the question? not really and more to the point it has been 5 years I have 100% Hukman DNA ROTMFFLMMFAO...AGAIN ! ! ! ! so So what is "Hukman DNA"...?!?! Is that some distant alien race that seeded the Earth...?!?!? There's no "distorted uses" I can apply to words that YOU won't print clearly. Stevie you didtort my words wether I type them clearly or not How can I "didtort" your words any worse than YOU do...?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!? An absolute lie, Markie. You were MONTHS with that song-and-dance! nope you just did not bother to read it so I had to repate it You're lying, Morgan. You lied about being in the Army. You lied aboout being threatened. You continue to lie about being "stalked". Why not just TRY being truthful for ONE WEEK and see if you aren't accepted just a wee bit better than what you are now. and then these years later you claim I never did at all which lie is your final answer? There's no lie on my part, ergo no final answer. You needed reapeated a year later and again 6 years later Nope. YOU needed to be reminded that there is only ONE meaning of the word "drafted" as applied to military service. the choie of the word was alas unforunate, but I am not bound by your narrowminded vision It isn't MY "vision". YOU chose to represent yourself as a commissioned officer in the Armed Forces, ergo YOUR "choie" of words could only be construed as being in the military vernacular. More lies! Sheesh, Morgan, where DO you get this stuff...?!?! you sent those email I remember them well I am sure you "remember" a lot of things in your few lucid moments. None of it correct, but I am sure you THINK it is. What time? What money? You're a useless layabout. What have YOU got to do? Stevie I run my own company. a small one, I take care of a Terminal ill man, I am active in politics. I even try to get on the air Oh God...that's scary.... Bad enough the poor fellow is ill, but to have to wake up and see YOUR mug... my income is the range of about 30K a year, and I own my home (not me and the bank but me) I have a family Congratulations. Most sexual deviants live in the middle of "Middle America", and everyone is aghast when the news hits the presses. that you are bigoted enough to judge a person by his typing is not my fault It's not just your "typing", Mark. It's your ignorance. It's your behaviour. It's your arrogance. But most of all, it's the lying. Note that Lennie Anderson is quite verbose...bordering poetic on rare occassion, yet I despise him. I despise him because he's a liar...And he doesn't take too great care to hide his misrepresentations, either. You don't humilate me. No, I don't. progress boyo But not what you think wusso. anoy harrass stalker threaten me yes No. No. No. No. yes yes yes Three out of four. "Progress boyo" you dare to claim you don't anoy me? Do I? I hadn't noticed. Jesus Mary and Joeseph Peter, Paul and Mary. yes all in that #### brains head of yours that #### for brains of yours Have you been taking Toiddie's correspondence course for online cussing? talking about killing people is always a threat and never justified on usenet Then why did you start it? and anyne who make the threats you do over Ham radio must be unblanced, not sure exactly how, but you must be What threats have I made "...over Ham Radio..." to kill me I've NEVER discussed you over Ham Radio, Mark. of course you are distring the context again I gues I shoudl have said over the subject of Ham radio but that would hardly help since youd just find some other way to twist my words No twisting needed, Mark. If you'd learn PROPER ENGLISH instead of exepcting the rest of the world to adapt to you, you'd find life a lot more pleasant. Speaking the same language as those around you does NOT detract from your individuality or "freedom", Mark. It enhances it. I don't discuss you on the air. I wouldn't be able to stop laughing long enough to get my call and QTH across... never said you did another of your distortions No distortion. YOU said that I threatened to harm you "..over Ham Radio"... In the COMPLETE context of the sentence, any reasonable person competent in English would ahve drawn the same conclusion Please, Markie... Tell us of YOUR credentials to determine mental instability...! years of reading your posts Then you are acknowledging that you ahve NO credentials. i don't ahve anything nor does anyone else yes a cheap shot at your spelling, but I pass on most of them Don't use the letter transposition as an excuse to ignore the question, Mark. What are YOUR credentials for determining mental instability? Do you have any? Yes or no will suffice. If you understood English well, you'd have a better than average likelyhood of spelling it correctly. not realy proves you don't know much about dyslexia I know it can be treated. Yes according to Tom Cruise where did he get his MD? Tom Cruise needs an MD in order to tell people he had a dysfunction that he got help for? Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: an_old_friend wrote: I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public airwaves Translation: "I don't want to learn anything technical, or anything about regulations, or take a test to determine if I am half-way capable of operating a transmitter responsibably on the ham bands". guess you failed english Better to "fail" it than bend it over and rape it in broad daylight. break And let's face it, Mark...That IS what you suggest. no it is not that is another Stevie lie Morse code test proves nothing about anything technical or any way determine my ability to operate a tranmitter Morse Code testing is simply a hazing ritual a frat house game, and you support becuase it is that. For the past week you've been refusing to apologize to Hans because he had the temerity to use proper emission designators in response to an inquiry BY you... right I refuse, and you like junkyard dog think you can bully me into doing so He provided you specific information, but you've since made a "federal case" out of having been "forced" to learn something. "Auf Anglish bitte" is making a "federal case" of it. You lying sack of ****, you are the one making a 'federal case' of it Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: an_old_friend wrote: I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public airwaves Translation: "I don't want to learn anything technical, or anything about regulations, or take a test to determine if I am half-way capable of operating a transmitter responsibably on the ham bands". guess you failed english Better to "fail" it than bend it over and rape it in broad daylight. break And let's face it, Mark...That IS what you suggest. no it is not that is another Stevie lie No, it's not. Everything you post about Amateur Radio licensing is about "how can I get more without doing anything"... Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics! Morse code test proves nothing about anything technical or any way determine my ability to operate a tranmitter Sure it does. It shows you know how to operate an Amateur Radio transmitter in the CW mode. Morse Code testing is simply a hazing ritual a frat house game, and you support becuase it is that. Nope. I support it becasue it's the simplest mode to get on the air and acts as a "level playing field" for Amateurs of all nations and all tongues. For the past week you've been refusing to apologize to Hans because he had the temerity to use proper emission designators in response to an inquiry BY you... right I refuse, and you like junkyard dog think you can bully me into doing so You refuse because you're an immoral, selfish, self-centered punk. He provided you specific information, but you've since made a "federal case" out of having been "forced" to learn something. "Auf Anglish bitte" is making a "federal case" of it. Your whinings about how he was "condescending" to you by using the very same language the FCC uses was... You lying sack of ####, you are the one making a 'federal case' of it Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: Manure! Nothing in amateur radio takes away any of the "liberites" granted by the Constitution. the code test does indeed do so As with any number of things of late, you're simply wrong. IYO opinion doesn't make it so But in this case he's right. nope Neither you or any other person has been denied their Constitutional rights due to ANY Amateur examination. Nothing in the U.S. Constitution prevents the FCC from administering a morse code test for amateur radio licensing. You have no right to an amateur radio license. Nothing gives it he power to impose an uneeded test Uneeded in YOUR opinion. then defend it as needed I have a right to a fair test It IS fair. nope no fairer than a buggy whip test The FCC will allow almost ANY accomodation for the test other than just paying someone to tkae it for you. I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public airwaves I opossum your view. and the Constitution of the US Okay, I opossum the Constitution. You support frat boy #### and don't bother to use language as you demand I do He was using YOUR style, Mark. not realy What's a matter? Having trouble understanding it? no Everything you needed for an answer was right before you--spelled out. That, of course, might have been the problem. Next time, ask Hans for the aural version. not it wasn't Yes, Mark, it was. Your repeated denials of reality are just making you look stupid. He did not answer the question of wether CW was premitted Yes he did. nope Why do you continue to blatantly lie when Hans' post is archived for all to see? why do you lie about my reply do understand what I am saying when I type 60m Band or not? Yes, you mean the spot frequencies which are not a band at all. then stop your whining becuase that is all it is whining No, it's correcting your misconceptions. no misconceptions I don't know Steve's views on the NBA or NFL draft. I do know what you've written previously about being drafted. Now we're to understand that you didn't actually mean "drafted". never said that either as I then a year later , and a few days ago I using the word in other senses. That you and Stevie are hung out on one meaning is not my fault. I have also admitted the use was unforunate but you are just in attacking It's not "one meaning". It's that you lied. Ask any American citizen what "drafted" means in military terms, and they will tell you it means involuntary conscription, or words to that effect. as an american citzen myself your staement falls down no one has yet to come up with a term other than band to describe 60 m doesn't stop setvie and hans from going on and on about how wrong it is Hans gave you a term to use. There is no 60m band by definition. and yet you, steve and Hans know better than the ARRL and W5YI Yeah, it surely looks that way. It certainly won't be the first time. such humility Facts are facts. but only if they are facts If I (or any person, for that matter...) is "right" but not part of some "organization", does it make it any LESS "true"...?!?! your point? Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: an_old_friend wrote: I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public airwaves Translation: "I don't want to learn anything technical, or anything about regulations, or take a test to determine if I am half-way capable of operating a transmitter responsibably on the ham bands". guess you failed english Better to "fail" it than bend it over and rape it in broad daylight. break And let's face it, Mark...That IS what you suggest. break no it is not that is another Stevie lie No, it's not. Everything you post about Amateur Radio licensing is about "how can I get more without doing anything"... nope Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics! i may well yet take part in such a suit Morse code test proves nothing about anything technical or any way determine my ability to operate a tranmitter Sure it does. nope It shows you know how to operate an Amateur Radio transmitter in the CW mode. no it does not I can do that right now, and have done so for providing code pratice, I use comptuer to encode and decode Morse Code testing is simply a hazing ritual a frat house game, and you support becuase it is that. Nope. yes it is I support it becasue it's the simplest mode to get on the air and acts as a "level playing field" for Amateurs of all nations and all tongues. so? and withdrwaing your remarks about needing work to earn the license? For the past week you've been refusing to apologize to Hans because he had the temerity to use proper emission designators in response to an inquiry BY you... right I refuse, and you like junkyard dog think you can bully me into doing so You refuse because you're an immoral, selfish, self-centered punk. no I refuse becuase I don't owe one, and I will not be bullied into one even if you had gotten the reason right, doesn't alter the facts you have beentrying to harass and bully me into making it He provided you specific information, but you've since made a "federal case" out of having been "forced" to learn something. "Auf Anglish bitte" is making a "federal case" of it. Your whinings about how he was "condescending" to you by using the very same language the FCC uses was... that was after you made the federal case, he was condsending (as is the FCC and almost the entire govt) You lying sack of ####, you are the one making a 'federal case' of it Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind. IYO Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: an_old_friend wrote: I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public airwaves Translation: "I don't want to learn anything technical, or anything about regulations, or take a test to determine if I am half-way capable of operating a transmitter responsibably on the ham bands". guess you failed english Better to "fail" it than bend it over and rape it in broad daylight. break And let's face it, Mark...That IS what you suggest. break no it is not that is another Stevie lie No, it's not. Everything you post about Amateur Radio licensing is about "how can I get more without doing anything"... nope Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics! i may well yet take part in such a suit Morse code test proves nothing about anything technical or any way determine my ability to operate a tranmitter Sure it does. nope It shows you know how to operate an Amateur Radio transmitter in the CW mode. no it does not I can do that right now, and have done so for providing code pratice, I use comptuer to encode and decode Morse Code testing is simply a hazing ritual a frat house game, and you support becuase it is that. Nope. yes it is I support it becasue it's the simplest mode to get on the air and acts as a "level playing field" for Amateurs of all nations and all tongues. so? and withdrwaing your remarks about needing work to earn the license? For the past week you've been refusing to apologize to Hans because he had the temerity to use proper emission designators in response to an inquiry BY you... right I refuse, and you like junkyard dog think you can bully me into doing so You refuse because you're an immoral, selfish, self-centered punk. no I refuse becuase I don't owe one, and I will not be bullied into one even if you had gotten the reason right, doesn't alter the facts you have beentrying to harass and bully me into making it He provided you specific information, but you've since made a "federal case" out of having been "forced" to learn something. "Auf Anglish bitte" is making a "federal case" of it. Your whinings about how he was "condescending" to you by using the very same language the FCC uses was... that was after you made the federal case, he was condsending (as is the FCC and almost the entire govt) You lying sack of ####, you are the one making a 'federal case' of it Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind. IYO Steve, K4YZ |
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
Steveo wrote: Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: You failed English and spelling. Like I say, you would fit perfectly on the Chicken Band, they are all on just about your level. You're no netter than him jj, your drivel is worse than what's on CB. hth Stick to the Childrens Band with the rest of the scum of radio land, you are way out classed here steveio. I certainly am...but not by you, commander buzz-boi. You used to be ok to converse with a year or two ago, 'jj the buzz'. Dunno wtf crawled up your ass enough for you to reference cb'ers so much. (penis envy?) |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics! i may well yet take part in such a suit You'll do no such thing. You're a pathological liar and a coward to boot. When your "lawyer" gets a load of your posts here and sees that your credibility is zilch-point-squat, you won't be able to get him to litigate a case for you even if the Pope swears on CNN Live that you're the "wronged" party. Huge snip. Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind. IYO In the opinions of civilized people. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics! i may well yet take part in such a suit You'll do no such thing. I might not but then I might You're a pathological liar and a coward to boot. not true When your "lawyer" gets a load of your posts here and sees that your credibility is zilch-point-squat, you won't be able to get him to litigate a case for you even if the Pope swears on CNN Live that you're the "wronged" party. stevie it your posts that will be at evidence not mine it is you that have comitted libel Huge snip. Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind. IYO In the opinions of civilized people. if you are civilized then I don't want to be civilized Steve, K4YZ |
an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics! i may well yet take part in such a suit You'll do no such thing. I might not but then I might No...you won't. You're a pathological liar and a coward to boot. not true A B S O L U T E L Y true! When your "lawyer" gets a load of your posts here and sees that your credibility is zilch-point-squat, you won't be able to get him to litigate a case for you even if the Pope swears on CNN Live that you're the "wronged" party. stevie it your posts that will be at evidence not mine Nope. Sorry. I get to bring "evidence" too. And "boyo", have YOU stacked it up! it is you that have comitted libel Nope. Huge snip. Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind. IYO In the opinions of civilized people. if you are civilized then I don't want to be civilized No problem. You've already missed the bus. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics! i may well yet take part in such a suit You'll do no such thing. I might not but then I might No...you won't. I hope I don't have to but depending on event never sure what I will do and I avoid making such decisons till I need to You're a pathological liar and a coward to boot. not true A B S O L U T E L Y true! not at all When your "lawyer" gets a load of your posts here and sees that your credibility is zilch-point-squat, you won't be able to get him to litigate a case for you even if the Pope swears on CNN Live that you're the "wronged" party. stevie it your posts that will be at evidence not mine Nope. Sorry. I get to bring "evidence" too. sure do but only relavant stuff gets into the record and I would not need even to win in order to harm you the cost of defending a suit can run quite high You threatened to kill me you therten everyone here that you disagree with. My own do/would make the case harder but not impossible And "boyo", have YOU stacked it up! you have been stacking it deeper and it is all **** it is you that have comitted libel Nope. yep Huge snip. Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind. IYO In the opinions of civilized people. if you are civilized then I don't want to be civilized No problem. You've already missed the bus. in all truth I think it is you that is uncivliized but suit yourself Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics! i may well yet take part in such a suit You'll do no such thing. I might not but then I might No...you won't. I hope I don't have to You won't. but depending on event never sure what I will do and I avoid making such decisons till I need to You were making those assinine assertions 7 years ago. You lied then, you're lying now. Just like Toiddie, you're one of those wusso's who thinks that all things are solved by threatening to "sue". You're a pathological liar and a coward to boot. not true A B S O L U T E L Y true! not at all Still true. When your "lawyer" gets a load of your posts here and sees that your credibility is zilch-point-squat, you won't be able to get him to litigate a case for you even if the Pope swears on CNN Live that you're the "wronged" party. stevie it your posts that will be at evidence not mine Nope. Sorry. I get to bring "evidence" too. sure do but only relavant stuff gets into the record Your misrepresentations as being a commissioned officer will be enough. We can add in your numerous posts wherein you insist it's "OK" to be a liar will round it out. and I would not need even to win in order to harm you the cost of defending a suit can run quite high I've got lawyers and money in the family, Markie. Knock yourself out, Boyo. You threatened to kill me you therten everyone here that you disagree with. Nope. Not one word of a threat. My own do/would make the case harder but not impossible It most certainly will make the case impossible for you. You have no credibility...Certainly none here. And "boyo", have YOU stacked it up! you have been stacking it deeper and it is all #### Did you know that #### is spelled "M O R G A N" where I come from..?!?! Imagine that! it is you that have comitted libel Nope. yep Where? Huge snip. Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind. IYO In the opinions of civilized people. if you are civilized then I don't want to be civilized No problem. You've already missed the bus. in all truth I think it is you that is uncivliized but suit yourself Nope. You're the one on the outside looking in. Try to stay warm. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics! i may well yet take part in such a suit You'll do no such thing. I might not but then I might No...you won't. I hope I don't have to You won't. then you agree My side on code tesing will win? but depending on event never sure what I will do and I avoid making such decisons till I need to You were making those assinine assertions 7 years ago. You lied then, you're lying now. nope I thought and still think the matter will be resolved as I wish without needing to sue and spend that kind of money it does remain one of those wepaons in the arsenal Just like Toiddie, you're one of those wusso's who thinks that all things are solved by threatening to "sue". nope never threaten to sue merely pointed out the nature of the case You're a pathological liar and a coward to boot. not true A B S O L U T E L Y true! not at all Still true. not pathological nor a coward When your "lawyer" gets a load of your posts here and sees that your credibility is zilch-point-squat, you won't be able to get him to litigate a case for you even if the Pope swears on CNN Live that you're the "wronged" party. stevie it your posts that will be at evidence not mine Nope. Sorry. I get to bring "evidence" too. sure do but only relavant stuff gets into the record Your misrepresentations as being a commissioned officer will be enough. We can add in your numerous posts wherein you insist it's "OK" to be a liar will round it out. but I can say that if I think it will serve to defend myself, as it did you flustered around for days your post that you can attack and harrass anyone you like will sink yours and I would not need even to win in order to harm you the cost of defending a suit can run quite high I've got lawyers and money in the family, Markie. good for you Knock yourself out, Boyo. why? as I have said I'd give real thought tomsuing you if I thought you anything worth taking You do increasingly make me consider doing it anyway, but I doubt it would be worth the bother You threatened to kill me you therten everyone here that you disagree with. Nope. Not one word of a threat. "one shot one kill..." That is a threat My own do/would make the case harder but not impossible It most certainly will make the case impossible for you. You have no credibility...Certainly none here. credibility is not what I would need but you years of attacks should get the judgement but collecting on it well that is always the problem And "boyo", have YOU stacked it up! you have been stacking it deeper and it is all #### Did you know that #### is spelled "M O R G A N" where I come from..?!?! no it is not, #### is Spelled ####, while **** is spelled **** everywhere more stevie lies Imagine that! I can a **** poor joke it is you that have comitted libel Nope. yep Where? in you fist post Gay pagan ...to wed todd that was libel Huge snip. Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind. IYO In the opinions of civilized people. if you are civilized then I don't want to be civilized No problem. You've already missed the bus. in all truth I think it is you that is uncivliized but suit yourself Nope. You're the one on the outside looking in. like i said suit yourself Try to stay warm. Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics! i may well yet take part in such a suit You'll do no such thing. I might not but then I might No...you won't. I hope I don't have to You won't. then you agree My side on code tesing will win? There's nothing to discuss about "your" side. Code testing or not, the majority of people will not tolerate a feebleminded coward who's mouth looks like an ad for Porta-Potties. Either way, you lose. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics! i may well yet take part in such a suit You'll do no such thing. I might not but then I might No...you won't. I hope I don't have to You won't. then you agree My side on code tesing will win? There's nothing to discuss about "your" side. right you have nothing to offer Code testing or not, the majority of people will not tolerate a feebleminded coward who's mouth looks like an ad for Porta-Potties. not feeble minded no resmeblence Either way, you lose. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics! i may well yet take part in such a suit You'll do no such thing. I might not but then I might No...you won't. I hope I don't have to You won't. then you agree My side on code tesing will win? There's nothing to discuss about "your" side. right you have nothing to offer Code testing or not, the majority of people will not tolerate a feebleminded coward who's mouth looks like an ad for Porta-Potties. not feeble minded no resmeblence Either way, you lose. I can't lose Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Code testing or not, the majority of people will not tolerate a feebleminded coward who's mouth looks like an ad for Porta-Potties. not feeble minded no resmeblence Not only do you resemble it, you're teh poster boy for it! Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Code testing or not, the majority of people will not tolerate a feebleminded coward who's mouth looks like an ad for Porta-Potties. not feeble minded no resmeblence Not only do you resemble it, you're teh poster boy for it! teh poster boy Steve, K4YZ |
an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Code testing or not, the majority of people will not tolerate a feebleminded coward who's mouth looks like an ad for Porta-Potties. not feeble minded no resmeblence Not only do you resemble it, you're teh poster boy for it! teh poster boy My bad on the "teh" However the previous commetn stands: You're poster boy for the potty mouthed. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Code testing or not, the majority of people will not tolerate a feebleminded coward who's mouth looks like an ad for Porta-Potties. not feeble minded no resmeblence Not only do you resemble it, you're teh poster boy for it! teh poster boy My bad on the "teh" However the previous commetn stands: You're poster boy for the potty mouthed. not at all there are far worse Steve, K4YZ |
an old friend wrote:
(see subject) Mark establishes himself as a Gearvakf (the "f" is silent) fan. It would seem that your sole purpose is to foul the newsgroup, Mark. Dave K8MN |
an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Code testing or not, the majority of people will not tolerate a feebleminded coward who's mouth looks like an ad for Porta-Potties. not feeble minded no resmeblence Not only do you resemble it, you're teh poster boy for it! teh poster boy My bad on the "teh" However the previous comment stands: You're poster boy for the potty mouthed. not at all there are far worse If there are, they aren't HERE. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Code testing or not, the majority of people will not tolerate a feebleminded coward who's mouth looks like an ad for Porta-Potties. not feeble minded no resmeblence Not only do you resemble it, you're teh poster boy for it! teh poster boy My bad on the "teh" However the previous comment stands: You're poster boy for the potty mouthed. not at all there are far worse If there are, they aren't HERE. so Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Code testing or not, the majority of people will not tolerate a feebleminded coward who's mouth looks like an ad for Porta-Potties. not feeble minded no resmeblence Not only do you resemble it, you're teh poster boy for it! teh poster boy My bad on the "teh" However the previous comment stands: You're poster boy for the potty mouthed. not at all there are far worse If there are, they aren't HERE. so Steve, K4YZ |
Thanks, Mark!
Appreciate your cooperation! Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: Thanks, Mark! Appreciate your cooperation! Steve, K4YZ realy losing it stevie cant find anything to leave |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Thanks, Mark! Appreciate your cooperation! Steve, K4YZ realy losing it stevie cant find anything to leave Haven't lost anything, Markie. And what's to "leave"? Just more of your silly "nope" to things you've already admitted to then try to say you DIDN'T say..?!?! You're an admitted liar, Morgan. You're a disgrace to your family name and ought to have your picture nailed to phone poles all over town warning people that you're a danger to society and yourself (especially children that you'd intentionally teach to lie...) Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm...I've got a few days off coming up...Maybe I'll do just that....I've always wanted to see upstate Michigan... Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Thanks, Mark! Appreciate your cooperation! Steve, K4YZ realy losing it stevie cant find anything to leave Haven't lost anything, Markie. so you never had a mind to lose stevie And what's to "leave"? Just more of your silly "nope" to things you've already admitted to then try to say you DIDN'T say..?!?! all you can do is lie and threaten you are as bad as the freuders of the past of your region, You're an admitted liar, Morgan. You're a disgrace to your family name and ought to have your picture nailed to phone poles all over town warning people that you're a danger to society and yourself (especially children that you'd intentionally teach to lie...) obsessive compulsive Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm...I've got a few days off coming up...Maybe I'll do just that....I've always wanted to see upstate Michigan... more threats Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Thanks, Mark! Appreciate your cooperation! Steve, K4YZ realy losing it stevie cant find anything to leave Haven't lost anything, Markie. so you never had a mind to lose stevie I ahve more "mind" behind the left eye than you do in the entire cranial cavity, Markie. And what's to "leave"? Just more of your silly "nope" to things you've already admitted to then try to say you DIDN'T say..?!?! all you can do is lie and threaten you are as bad as the freuders of the past of your region, "...freuders..." You trying to make some silly reference to the Hatfields and McCoys, Markie? You better do some history on where that all took place them look up Winchester, TN on Mapquest. You're an admitted liar, Morgan. You're a disgrace to your family name and ought to have your picture nailed to phone poles all over town warning people that you're a danger to society and yourself (especially children that you'd intentionally teach to lie...) obsessive compulsive Yes, yes you are, Markie! Come out of your shell! Good step Boyo! Now DO something about your problem! Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm...I've got a few days off coming up...Maybe I'll do just that....I've always wanted to see upstate Michigan... more threats Nope...just a whimful idea on how to spend a few days off. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Thanks, Mark! Appreciate your cooperation! Steve, K4YZ realy losing it stevie cant find anything to leave Haven't lost anything, Markie. so you never had a mind to lose stevie I ahve more "mind" behind the left eye than you do in the entire cranial cavity, Markie. then use it And what's to "leave"? well if you are repling to something you need something to reply too Just more of your silly "nope" to things you've already admitted to then try to say you DIDN'T say..?!?! all you can do is lie and threaten you are as bad as the freuders of the past of your region, "...freuders..." You trying to make some silly reference to the Hatfields and McCoys, Markie? not at all silly you sure sound like the type You better do some history on where that all took place them look up Winchester, TN on Mapquest. TN KY and then the folks spread out over the state so they would not kill each othe roff sounds about right to me Indeed watched something in which bad feelings presist in the Bakers about the actions of the Whites a hunderd years ago You're an admitted liar, Morgan. You're a disgrace to your family name and ought to have your picture nailed to phone poles all over town warning people that you're a danger to society and yourself (especially children that you'd intentionally teach to lie...) obsessive compulsive Yes, yes you are, Markie! Come out of your shell! Good step Boyo! you are the obsessive compulsive Now DO something about your problem! my problem is frankly you lets see I can ask you to grow up Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm...I've got a few days off coming up...Maybe I'll do just that....I've always wanted to see upstate Michigan... more threats Nope...just a whimful idea on how to spend a few days off. more threats Steve, K4YZ |
an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Thanks, Mark! Appreciate your cooperation! Steve, K4YZ realy losing it stevie cant find anything to leave Haven't lost anything, Markie. so you never had a mind to lose stevie I have more "mind" behind the left eye than you do in the entire cranial cavity, Markie. then use it I do. That's why I won't let you lie uncontested. And what's to "leave"? well if you are repling to something you need something to reply too "repling"..?!?! Just more of your silly "nope" to things you've already admitted to then try to say you DIDN'T say..?!?! all you can do is lie and threaten you are as bad as the freuders of the past of your region, "...freuders..." You trying to make some silly reference to the Hatfields and McCoys, Markie? not at all silly you sure sound like the type Then what "freuders" do you refer to? You better do some history on where that all took place them look up Winchester, TN on Mapquest. TN KY and then the folks spread out over the state so they would not kill each othe roff sounds about right to me Then you're as ignorant of Southern history as you are Amateur Radio. And that's pretty ignorant. Indeed watched something in which bad feelings presist in the Bakers about the actions of the Whites a hunderd years ago You're an admitted liar, Morgan. You're a disgrace to your family name and ought to have your picture nailed to phone poles all over town warning people that you're a danger to society and yourself (especially children that you'd intentionally teach to lie...) obsessive compulsive Yes, yes you are, Markie! Come out of your shell! Good step Boyo! you are the obsessive compulsive Nope. You are. Youa dmitted it right there. Now DO something about your problem! my problem is frankly you Then you have a big problem. Because MY problem is you and your lying. Stop lying and making assinine accusations and your "problem" will disappear. lets see I can ask you to grow up I turn 50 in September, Markie...Already there. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm...I've got a few days off coming up...Maybe I'll do just that....I've always wanted to see upstate Michigan... more threats Nope...just a whimful idea on how to spend a few days off. more threats Nope. Steve, K4YZ |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com