an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:


Stevie you didtort my words wether I type them clearly or not

He torted your words? You might have a legal case. ;-)



nope you just did not bother to read it so I had to repate it

Does that procedure involve a hair transplant?



the choie of the word was alas unforunate, but I am not bound by your
narrowminded vision

It surely was "unforunate" since it wasn't the truth. Of course, you
aren't bound by any narrow minded stuff like truth.


I can any definifation I care to I don't have to choose the same one as
you do

When your "definifations" mean something other than what is commonly
accepted, you make it impossible to communicate with others. Of course
you've pretty much done that with your misspellings and grammatical
abortions.


only to narrow minded people that everything spoon fed to them

Gee, Mark, don't you get it? You are one of the narrow minded people
who wants to be spoon fed. You want amateur radio to be easier in order
to accomodate you. You want explanations about 5 MHz modes to be in
Mark-sized chunks. You want all others to have to try to decipher your
hieroglyphs rather than you doing the work to post messages in
properly-spelled and grammatically correct English. You'd like folks to
guess as to how you'll define terms which have a specific meaning to all
the rest of us.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:


Stevie you didtort my words wether I type them clearly or not

He torted your words? You might have a legal case. ;-)



nope you just did not bother to read it so I had to repate it

Does that procedure involve a hair transplant?



the choie of the word was alas unforunate, but I am not bound by your
narrowminded vision

It surely was "unforunate" since it wasn't the truth. Of course, you
aren't bound by any narrow minded stuff like truth.


I can any definifation I care to I don't have to choose the same one as
you do

When your "definifations" mean something other than what is commonly
accepted, you make it impossible to communicate with others. Of course
you've pretty much done that with your misspellings and grammatical
abortions.


only to narrow minded people that everything spoon fed to them

Gee, Mark, don't you get it? You are one of the narrow minded people
who wants to be spoon fed. You want amateur radio to be easier in order

No not at all, I want the ARs to respect the liberites of all Americans
myself included

you want to deprive american of their rights if they don't jump though
the same hoops you did

I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public
airwaves


to accomodate you. You want explanations about 5 MHz modes to be in

No I want people to answer questions aksed instaed of droning on about
irelavant garbage

Hans has spent a couple of weeks ont eh suject of what is a band that
is waste

Mark-sized chunks. You want all others to have to try to decipher your

can't you read it is a matter of indifference to me read or don't read
at your pleasure

hieroglyphs rather than you doing the work to post messages in


properly-spelled and grammatically correct English. You'd like folks to
guess as to how you'll define terms which have a specific meaning to all
the rest of us.

Really then form Stevie the NBA and NFL are lying ervy years when they
say they are holding a draft

no one has yet to come up with a term other than band to describe 60 m
doesn't stop setvie and hans from going on and on about how wrong it is



Dave K8MN

an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:



Stevie you didtort my words wether I type them clearly or not

He torted your words? You might have a legal case. ;-)




nope you just did not bother to read it so I had to repate it

Does that procedure involve a hair transplant?




the choie of the word was alas unforunate, but I am not bound by your
narrowminded vision

It surely was "unforunate" since it wasn't the truth. Of course, you
aren't bound by any narrow minded stuff like truth.



I can any definifation I care to I don't have to choose the same one as
you do

When your "definifations" mean something other than what is commonly
accepted, you make it impossible to communicate with others. Of course
you've pretty much done that with your misspellings and grammatical
abortions.


only to narrow minded people that everything spoon fed to them

Gee, Mark, don't you get it? You are one of the narrow minded people
who wants to be spoon fed. You want amateur radio to be easier in order


No not at all, I want the ARs to respect the liberites of all Americans
myself included

Manure! Nothing in amateur radio takes away any of the "liberites"
granted by the Constitution.

you want to deprive american of their rights if they don't jump though
the same hoops you did

You have no Constitutional right to an amateur radio license.

I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public
airwaves

I opossum your view.


to accomodate you. You want explanations about 5 MHz modes to be in


No I want people to answer questions aksed instaed of droning on about
irelavant garbage

Everything you needed for an answer was right before you--spelled out.
That, of course, might have been the problem. Next time, ask Hans for
the aural version.

Hans has spent a couple of weeks ont eh suject of what is a band that
is waste

To try explaining it to you was certainly a waste.


Mark-sized chunks. You want all others to have to try to decipher your


can't you read it is a matter of indifference to me read or don't read
at your pleasure


hieroglyphs rather than you doing the work to post messages in



properly-spelled and grammatically correct English. You'd like folks to
guess as to how you'll define terms which have a specific meaning to all
the rest of us.


Really then form Stevie the NBA and NFL are lying ervy years when they
say they are holding a draft

Do you know the difference between a military draft and an NFL or NBA
draft? Were you being drafted by either the NFL or NBA? The definition
of both types of draft is the same, by the way.

no one has yet to come up with a term other than band to describe 60 m
doesn't stop setvie and hans from going on and on about how wrong it is

Hans gave you a term to use. There is no 60m band by definition.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:



Stevie you didtort my words wether I type them clearly or not

He torted your words? You might have a legal case. ;-)




nope you just did not bother to read it so I had to repate it

Does that procedure involve a hair transplant?




the choie of the word was alas unforunate, but I am not bound by your
narrowminded vision

It surely was "unforunate" since it wasn't the truth. Of course, you
aren't bound by any narrow minded stuff like truth.



I can any definifation I care to I don't have to choose the same one as
you do

When your "definifations" mean something other than what is commonly
accepted, you make it impossible to communicate with others. Of course
you've pretty much done that with your misspellings and grammatical
abortions.


only to narrow minded people that everything spoon fed to them

Gee, Mark, don't you get it? You are one of the narrow minded people
who wants to be spoon fed. You want amateur radio to be easier in order


No not at all, I want the ARs to respect the liberites of all Americans
myself included

Manure! Nothing in amateur radio takes away any of the "liberites"
granted by the Constitution.

the code test does indeed do so

you want to deprive american of their rights if they don't jump though
the same hoops you did

You have no Constitutional right to an amateur radio license.

I have a right to anything not denied to me by the constition of the
USa unless regulated by treaty since the constitution of the US and the
treaties we sign are the supreme law of the land

Nothing in the Consittution allows the FCC to cintinue codetesting ,
and nothing in the treaty gives it that power there the power does not
exist in law


I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public
airwaves

I opossum your view.

and the Constitution of the US



to accomodate you. You want explanations about 5 MHz modes to be in


No I want people to answer questions aksed instaed of droning on about
irelavant garbage

Everything you needed for an answer was right before you--spelled out.
That, of course, might have been the problem. Next time, ask Hans for
the aural version.

not it wasn't


Hans has spent a couple of weeks ont eh suject of what is a band that
is waste

To try explaining it to you was certainly a waste.

do understand what I am saying when I type 60m Band or not?




Mark-sized chunks. You want all others to have to try to decipher your


can't you read it is a matter of indifference to me read or don't read
at your pleasure


hieroglyphs rather than you doing the work to post messages in



properly-spelled and grammatically correct English. You'd like folks to
guess as to how you'll define terms which have a specific meaning to all
the rest of us.


Really then form Stevie the NBA and NFL are lying ervy years when they
say they are holding a draft

Do you know the difference between a military draft and an NFL or NBA
draft? Were you being drafted by either the NFL or NBA? The definition
of both types of draft is the same, by the way.

nope it isn't at least ot according to Stevie


no one has yet to come up with a term other than band to describe 60 m
doesn't stop setvie and hans from going on and on about how wrong it is

Hans gave you a term to use. There is no 60m band by definition.

and yet you, steve and Hans know better than the ARRL and W5YI



Dave K8MN

an_old_friend wrote:



Nothing in the Consittution allows the FCC to cintinue codetesting ,
and nothing in the treaty gives it that power there the power does not
exist in law

BZZZZZTTTT!!! Wrong!!! The Constitution has nothing to do with code
testing, and the treaty now says that code testing isn't required. The
FCC certainly can continue to require it if they deem it necessary, only
they are no longer required by treaty to do so.

an_old_friend wrote:


I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public
airwaves


Translation: "I don't want to learn anything technical, or anything
about regulations, or take a test to determine if I am half-way capable
of operating a transmitter responsibably on the ham bands".

Looks like the Childrens Band is a perfect fit for you.

an_old_friend wrote:

What power gives the FCC that power NOTHING

The same power that gives the FCC to power to require a test of
technical knowledge and regulations in order for one to operate a
transmitter on the ham bands. IDJIT.

an_old_friend wrote:

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:


I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public
airwaves


Translation: "I don't want to learn anything technical, or anything
about regulations, or take a test to determine if I am half-way capable
of operating a transmitter responsibably on the ham bands".


guess you failed english


Looks like the Childrens Band is a perfect fit for you.



You failed English and spelling. Like I say, you would fit perfectly on
the Chicken Band, they are all on just about your level.

an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:

I can any definifation I care to I don't have to choose the same one as
you do

When your "definifations" mean something other than what is commonly
accepted, you make it impossible to communicate with others. Of course
you've pretty much done that with your misspellings and grammatical
abortions.


only to narrow minded people that everything spoon fed to them

Gee, Mark, don't you get it? You are one of the narrow minded people
who wants to be spoon fed. You want amateur radio to be easier in order


No not at all, I want the ARs to respect the liberites of all Americans
myself included

Manure! Nothing in amateur radio takes away any of the "liberites"
granted by the Constitution.


the code test does indeed do so

As with any number of things of late, you're simply wrong.

you want to deprive american of their rights if they don't jump though
the same hoops you did

You have no Constitutional right to an amateur radio license.


I have a right to anything not denied to me by the constition of the
USa unless regulated by treaty since the constitution of the US and the
treaties we sign are the supreme law of the land

Oh, you have a right to attempt to pass an amateur radio exam but you
aren't guaranteed success. The "constition" doesn't address or regulate
motor car licensing but you still have to pass a test in order to obtain
a driving license. It can be revoked by your state or denied if you
have a medical or mental condition rendering you a hazard to others.
Deal with the fact that you don't a right to something simply because
you want to do it.


Nothing in the Consittution allows the FCC to cintinue codetesting ,
and nothing in the treaty gives it that power there the power does not
exist in law

Nothing in the U.S. Constitution prevents the FCC from administering a
morse code test for amateur radio licensing. You have no right to an
amateur radio license.

I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public
airwaves

I opossum your view.


and the Constitution of the US

Okay, I opossum the Constitution.



to accomodate you. You want explanations about 5 MHz modes to be in


No I want people to answer questions aksed instaed of droning on about
irelavant garbage

Everything you needed for an answer was right before you--spelled out.
That, of course, might have been the problem. Next time, ask Hans for
the aural version.


not it wasn't

Yes, Mark, it was. Your repeated denials of reality are just making you
look stupid.

Hans has spent a couple of weeks ont eh suject of what is a band that
is waste

To try explaining it to you was certainly a waste.


do understand what I am saying when I type 60m Band or not?

Yes, you mean the spot frequencies which are not a band at all.


Mark-sized chunks. You want all others to have to try to decipher your


can't you read it is a matter of indifference to me read or don't read
at your pleasure



hieroglyphs rather than you doing the work to post messages in



properly-spelled and grammatically correct English. You'd like folks to
guess as to how you'll define terms which have a specific meaning to all
the rest of us.


Really then form Stevie the NBA and NFL are lying ervy years when they
say they are holding a draft

Do you know the difference between a military draft and an NFL or NBA
draft? Were you being drafted by either the NFL or NBA? The definition
of both types of draft is the same, by the way.


nope it isn't at least ot according to Stevie

I don't know Steve's views on the NBA or NFL draft. I do know what
you've written previously about being drafted. Now we're to understand
that you didn't actually mean "drafted".


no one has yet to come up with a term other than band to describe 60 m
doesn't stop setvie and hans from going on and on about how wrong it is

Hans gave you a term to use. There is no 60m band by definition.


and yet you, steve and Hans know better than the ARRL and W5YI

Yeah, it surely looks that way. It certainly won't be the first time.

Dave K8MN

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:



Nothing in the Consittution allows the FCC to cintinue codetesting ,
and nothing in the treaty gives it that power there the power does not
exist in law

BZZZZZTTTT!!! Wrong!!! The Constitution has nothing to do with code

Agreed which the FCC has not authority


testing, and the treaty now says that code testing isn't required. The
FCC certainly can continue to require it if they deem it necessary, only

What power gives the FCC that power NOTHING

they are no longer required by treaty to do so.