|
Loser Len finally tells the truth
|
K4YZ wrote: Dan/W4NTI wrote: wrote: Tried to learn morse for 13 WPM back in the early 60s, reached about 8 W PM, and GAVE UP. Kiss my yes and stick it in yer I/O port. Good boy Lennie, the truth will set you free. Now shut the hell up about it. Just like Lennie to attain mediocrity and then quit. That's why his CV is loaded with jobs, but no real achievements. judgemental as always Just think...Had he gotten an "old" Technician back in the day, that ONE test he took would have been all he needed today. Oh well... 73 another stevie lie Steve, K4YZ |
"K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... Dan/W4NTI wrote: wrote: Tried to learn morse for 13 WPM back in the early 60s, reached about 8 W PM, and GAVE UP. Kiss my yes and stick it in yer I/O port. Good boy Lennie, the truth will set you free. Now shut the hell up about it. Just like Lennie to attain mediocrity and then quit. That's why his CV is loaded with jobs, but no real achievements. Just think...Had he gotten an "old" Technician back in the day, that ONE test he took would have been all he needed today. Oh well... 73 Steve, K4YZ That's right Steve. If Lennie would have "lowered" himself to pass just the 5wpm and the General theory....then he would be a present day General light. With a real old timers W or K call. Then he could be on here bragging about the good old days when he just got into ham radio......on second thought, I'm glad he is a quitter. Dan/W4NTI |
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message hlink.net... "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... Dan/W4NTI wrote: wrote: Tried to learn morse for 13 WPM back in the early 60s, reached about 8 W PM, and GAVE UP. Kiss my yes and stick it in yer I/O port. Good boy Lennie, the truth will set you free. Now shut the hell up about it. Just like Lennie to attain mediocrity and then quit. That's why his CV is loaded with jobs, but no real achievements. Just think...Had he gotten an "old" Technician back in the day, that ONE test he took would have been all he needed today. Oh well... 73 Steve, K4YZ That's right Steve. If Lennie would have "lowered" himself to pass just the 5wpm and the General theory....then he would be a present day General light. With a real old timers W or K call. Then he could be on here bragging about the good old days when he just got into ham radio......on second thought, I'm glad he is a quitter. Dan/W4NTI Dan. Lennie is not worth the waste of effort you are expending. Flush him with the others of his ilk. |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Dan/W4NTI wrote: wrote: Tried to learn morse for 13 WPM back in the early 60s, reached about 8 W PM, and GAVE UP. Kiss my yes and stick it in yer I/O port. Good boy Lennie, the truth will set you free. Now shut the hell up about it. Just like Lennie to attain mediocrity and then quit. That's why his CV is loaded with jobs, but no real achievements. judgemental as always Nope. Just making an observation. He has published his "CV" here several times, yet there's not one significant "achivement", professioanl or otherwise, other than his ultimate retirement. You're welcome to publish a link or provide a reference to some source that proves otherwise if you know of one...Otherwise you're just running YOUR mouth off. Just think...Had he gotten an "old" Technician back in the day, that ONE test he took would have been all he needed today. Oh well... 73 another stevie lie Where? Had Lennie taken the code test when he alleges to have been up to "8 wpm", he would indeed have "all he needed" for an EXTRA today. That is 100% factual. And the "73"...?!?! That wasn't for you, Markie...It was for Dan. Don't be a presumptuous putz and assume any "73" I type is aimed at you. I was responding to DAN'S comments...Not yours. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Dan/W4NTI wrote: wrote: Tried to learn morse for 13 WPM back in the early 60s, reached about 8 W PM, and GAVE UP. Kiss my yes and stick it in yer I/O port. Good boy Lennie, the truth will set you free. Now shut the hell up about it. Just like Lennie to attain mediocrity and then quit. That's why his CV is loaded with jobs, but no real achievements. judgemental as always Nope. judemental as always Just making an observation. and being judemental He has published his "CV" here several times, yet there's not one significant "achivement", professioanl or otherwise, other than his ultimate retirement. IYO You're welcome to publish a link or provide a reference to some source that proves otherwise if you know of one...Otherwise you're just running YOUR mouth off. not at all with your taste for precision I am typing my fingers off not saying a word you have your opinion. Indeed I don't that Len disagress with you on "signifacant achivements, but we all judge things in our own way at least when bigots like you give the chance Just think...Had he gotten an "old" Technician back in the day, that ONE test he took would have been all he needed today. Oh well... 73 another stevie lie Where? the 73 you have no regard for him Had Lennie taken the code test when he alleges to have been up to "8 wpm", he would indeed have "all he needed" for an EXTRA today. That is 100% factual. And the "73"...?!?! That wasn't for you, Markie...It was for Dan. Don't be a presumptuous putz and assume any "73" I type is aimed at you. I was responding to DAN'S comments...Not yours. nope another lie Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: He has published his "CV" here several times, yet there's not one significant "achivement", professioanl or otherwise, other than his ultimate retirement. IYO In fact. He's not even produced any achievments. You're welcome to publish a link or provide a reference to some source that proves otherwise if you know of one...Otherwise you're just running YOUR mouth off. not at all with your taste for precision I am typing my fingers off not saying a word you have your opinion. Indeed I don't that Len disagress with you on "signifacant achivements, but we all judge things in our own way at least when bigots like you give the chance He's had eight years of chances. Just think...Had he gotten an "old" Technician back in the day, that ONE test he took would have been all he needed today. Oh well... 73 another stevie lie Where? the 73 you have no regard for him For him, I have pleant of "regard"... For you..?!?! Squat. Had Lennie taken the code test when he alleges to have been up to "8 wpm", he would indeed have "all he needed" for an EXTRA today. That is 100% factual. And the "73"...?!?! That wasn't for you, Markie...It was for Dan. Don't be a presumptuous putz and assume any "73" I type is aimed at you. I was responding to DAN'S comments...Not yours. nope another lie Not a lie, not another lie... Fact. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: He has published his "CV" here several times, yet there's not one significant "achivement", professioanl or otherwise, other than his ultimate retirement. IYO In fact. IYO He's not even produced any achievments. even if true so what You're welcome to publish a link or provide a reference to some source that proves otherwise if you know of one...Otherwise you're just running YOUR mouth off. not at all with your taste for precision I am typing my fingers off not saying a word you have your opinion. Indeed I don't that Len disagress with you on "signifacant achivements, but we all judge things in our own way at least when bigots like you give the chance He's had eight years of chances. and another would impress you without being morse tested so why bother to try and impress a peice of **** yourself Just think...Had he gotten an "old" Technician back in the day, that ONE test he took would have been all he needed today. Oh well... 73 another stevie lie Where? the 73 you have no regard for him For him, I have pleant of "regard"... pleant? speling cop For you..?!?! Squat. Had Lennie taken the code test when he alleges to have been up to "8 wpm", he would indeed have "all he needed" for an EXTRA today. That is 100% factual. And the "73"...?!?! That wasn't for you, Markie...It was for Dan. Don't be a presumptuous putz and assume any "73" I type is aimed at you. I was responding to DAN'S comments...Not yours. nope another lie Not a lie, not another lie... another lie Fact. you don't know the meaning of the word fact Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: He has published his "CV" here several times, yet there's not one significant "achivement", professioanl or otherwise, other than his ultimate retirement. IYO In fact. IYO In fact. You're welcome to read the archives if you like. He's not even produced any achievments. even if true so what It proves that his claims of superiority as a "professional in radio" are unsubstantiated...Squat...Zilch...Nada... You're welcome to publish a link or provide a reference to some source that proves otherwise if you know of one...Otherwise you're just running YOUR mouth off. not at all with your taste for precision I am typing my fingers off not saying a word you have your opinion. Indeed I don't that Len disagress with you on "signifacant achivements, but we all judge things in our own way at least when bigots like you give the chance He's had eight years of chances. and another would impress you without being morse tested so why bother to try and impress a peice of #### yourself I am trying to figure out what yuo said here, other than to again refer to me with a profanity, but I can't make heads or tails out of it. Just think...Had he gotten an "old" Technician back in the day, that ONE test he took would have been all he needed today. Oh well... 73 another stevie lie Where? the 73 you have no regard for him For him, I have pleant of "regard"... pleant? speling cop Yep. "speling" cop yourself, Markie... For you..?!?! Squat. Had Lennie taken the code test when he alleges to have been up to "8 wpm", he would indeed have "all he needed" for an EXTRA today. That is 100% factual. And the "73"...?!?! That wasn't for you, Markie...It was for Dan. Don't be a presumptuous putz and assume any "73" I type is aimed at you. I was responding to DAN'S comments...Not yours. nope another lie Not a lie, not another lie... another lie Where? You insist I don't have "best regards" for Dan..?!?! Prove it. Fact. you don't know the meaning of the word fact Sure I do. It's what you don't have any of. Your whole life is lies, Markie, and you try, but fail, to pass them on here... Sorry.. We're smarter than you. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: He has published his "CV" here several times, yet there's not one significant "achivement", professioanl or otherwise, other than his ultimate retirement. IYO In fact. IYO In fact. Bull**** Stevie it your opinion. If I had happened to see it might be my opinion too but neither makes it a fact You're welcome to read the archives if you like. mighty generous of you He's not even produced any achievments. even if true so what It proves that his claims of superiority as a "professional in radio" are unsubstantiated...Squat...Zilch...Nada... well it makes them unsupproted just like all your claims that you provide no prove of You're welcome to publish a link or provide a reference to some source that proves otherwise if you know of one...Otherwise you're just running YOUR mouth off. not at all with your taste for precision I am typing my fingers off not saying a word you have your opinion. Indeed I don't that Len disagress with you on "signifacant achivements, but we all judge things in our own way at least when bigots like you give the chance He's had eight years of chances. and another would impress you without being morse tested so why bother to try and impress a peice of #### yourself I am trying to figure out what yuo said here, other than to again refer to me with a profanity, but I can't make heads or tails out of it. Lie you are not trying to figure it out Just think...Had he gotten an "old" Technician back in the day, that ONE test he took would have been all he needed today. Oh well... 73 another stevie lie Where? the 73 you have no regard for him For him, I have pleant of "regard"... pleant? speling cop Yep. "speling" cop yourself, Markie... I only do it for you For you..?!?! Squat. Had Lennie taken the code test when he alleges to have been up to "8 wpm", he would indeed have "all he needed" for an EXTRA today. That is 100% factual. And the "73"...?!?! That wasn't for you, Markie...It was for Dan. Don't be a presumptuous putz and assume any "73" I type is aimed at you. I was responding to DAN'S comments...Not yours. nope another lie Not a lie, not another lie... another lie Where? there You insist I don't have "best regards" for Dan..?!?! Prove it. don't have to Fact. you don't know the meaning of the word fact Sure I do. nope It's what you don't have any of. lie Your whole life is lies, Markie, and you try, but fail, to pass them on here... irelavant Sorry.. another lie We're smarter than you. We depends on we you are just one of those dumb hillbilly like the hatfeild , Mcoy bakers and white's ready to kill over preceieved slights Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: He has published his "CV" here several times, yet there's not one significant "achivement", professioanl or otherwise, other than his ultimate retirement. IYO In fact. IYO In fact. Bull#### Stevie it your opinion. If I had happened to see it might be my opinion too but neither makes it a fact That he published his CV here is FACT, MArkie...No matter how much profanity you use or how YOU re-reationalize the argument. You're welcome to read the archives if you like. mighty generous of you Anything to help a less-mentally capable person along, Markie. It proves that his claims of superiority as a "professional in radio" are unsubstantiated...Squat...Zilch...Nada... well it makes them unsupproted just like all your claims that you provide no prove of With the exception of certain parts of my military service, there's nothing here I've stated that I've not been able to provide corroborating information for. I am trying to figure out what yuo said here, other than to again refer to me with a profanity, but I can't make heads or tails out of it. Lie you are not trying to figure it out Sure I am. But you just keep making it more difficult with ever changing spellings of even the most common words. For him, I have pleant of "regard"... pleant? speling cop Yep. "speling" cop yourself, Markie... I only do it for you Oh, don't be bashful, Markie... There's more than that that you do for me! We're smarter than you. We depends on we you are just one of those dumb hillbilly like the hatfeild , Mcoy bakers and white's ready to kill over preceieved slights And you keep trying to use ethnic sleights that don't apply to me, Markie. Why? Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: He has published his "CV" here several times, yet there's not one significant "achivement", professioanl or otherwise, other than his ultimate retirement. IYO In fact. IYO In fact. Bull#### Stevie it your opinion. If I had happened to see it might be my opinion too but neither makes it a fact That he published his CV here is FACT, MArkie...No matter how much profanity you use or how YOU re-reationalize the argument. I don't rationlize or rerationalize I state the simple fact that you are judgmental and are expressing your opinion of his CV, that you hold a given opinion does not make it fact You're welcome to read the archives if you like. mighty generous of you Anything to help a less-mentally capable person along, Markie. right more venom and hate It proves that his claims of superiority as a "professional in radio" are unsubstantiated...Squat...Zilch...Nada... well it makes them unsupproted just like all your claims that you provide no prove of With the exception of certain parts of my military service, there's nothing here I've stated that I've not been able to provide corroborating information for. bigg whopping lie have have never corroborated anything that I have seen I am trying to figure out what yuo said here, other than to again refer to me with a profanity, but I can't make heads or tails out of it. Lie you are not trying to figure it out Sure I am. But you just keep making it more difficult with ever changing spellings of even the most common words. nope For him, I have pleant of "regard"... pleant? speling cop Yep. "speling" cop yourself, Markie... I only do it for you Oh, don't be bashful, Markie... not at all There's more than that that you do for me! like whom? We're smarter than you. We depends on we you are just one of those dumb hillbilly like the hatfeild , Mcoy bakers and white's ready to kill over preceieved slights And you keep trying to use ethnic sleights that don't apply to me, Markie. Why? they do apply and not ethnic at all you have engaged in a 7 year feud over what? lying and who I may sleep with? Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: He has published his "CV" here several times, yet there's not one significant "achivement", professioanl or otherwise, other than his ultimate retirement. IYO In fact. IYO In fact. Bull#### Stevie it your opinion. If I had happened to see it might be my opinion too but neither makes it a fact That he published his CV here is FACT, Markie...No matter how much profanity you use or how YOU re-reationalize the argument. I don't rationlize or rerationalize I state the simple fact that you are judgmental and are expressing your opinion of his CV, that you hold a given opinion does not make it fact It's not an opinion. It's fact. You're welcome to read the archives if you like. mighty generous of you Anything to help a less-mentally capable person along, Markie. right more venom and hate Only if you think so, but only because you don't know the difference. It proves that his claims of superiority as a "professional in radio" are unsubstantiated...Squat...Zilch...Nada... well it makes them unsupproted just like all your claims that you provide no prove of With the exception of certain parts of my military service, there's nothing here I've stated that I've not been able to provide corroborating information for. bigg whopping lie have have never corroborated anything that I have seen Then there YOU go with a "bigg whopping lie I am trying to figure out what yuo said here, other than to again refer to me with a profanity, but I can't make heads or tails out of it. Lie you are not trying to figure it out Sure I am. But you just keep making it more difficult with ever changing spellings of even the most common words. nope Yep. For him, I have pleant of "regard"... pleant? speling cop Yep. "speling" cop yourself, Markie... I only do it for you Oh, don't be bashful, Markie... not at all There's more than that that you do for me! like whom? Not "whom", DeviantBoy..."what"... We're smarter than you. We depends on we you are just one of those dumb hillbilly like the hatfeild , Mcoy bakers and white's ready to kill over preceieved slights And you keep trying to use ethnic sleights that don't apply to me, Markie. Why? they do apply and not ethnic at all Nope. And yes it IS "ethnic". you have engaged in a 7 year feud over what? lying and who I may sleep with? I've not been in a 7 year fued...And as for whom you sleep with, if they have so little self respect as to absorb the body fluids of a deviant and public liar, then I guess that makes them just slightly worse than YOU, Markie! Make's ya feel a bit better about yourself, doesn't it...?!?! Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Dan/W4NTI wrote: wrote: Tried to learn morse for 13 WPM back in the early 60s, reached about 8 W PM, and GAVE UP. Kiss my yes and stick it in yer I/O port. Good boy Lennie, the truth will set you free. Now shut the hell up about it. Just like Lennie to attain mediocrity and then quit. That's why his CV is loaded with jobs, but no real achievements. judgemental as always Nope. yes it is Your are judegemntal, not that being judgemental is always a bad thing, but you can't even face that fact Just making an observation. and being judgemental at the same time He has published his "CV" here several times, yet there's not one significant "achivement", professioanl or otherwise, other than his ultimate retirement. so that is your opinion might even be his or mine You're welcome to publish a link or provide a reference to some source that proves otherwise if you know of one...Otherwise you're just running YOUR mouth off. not claiming anything about len's bio I am pointing out your behavoir about lens bio Just think...Had he gotten an "old" Technician back in the day, that ONE test he took would have been all he needed today. Oh well... 73 another stevie lie Where? Had Lennie taken the code test when he alleges to have been up to "8 wpm", he would indeed have "all he needed" for an EXTRA today. That is 100% factual. which has nothing to do with what I was saying And the "73"...?!?! That wasn't for you, Markie...It was for Dan. Don't be a presumptuous putz and assume any "73" I type is aimed at you. I was responding to DAN'S comments...Not yours. It is pumpous to assume that when you addrss your Subject to me by name it is not for me Lying sack of **** Steve, K4YZ |
an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: That wasn't for you, Markie...It was for Dan. Don't be a presumptuous putz and assume any "73" I type is aimed at you. I was responding to DAN'S comments...Not yours. It is pumpous to assume that when you addrss your Subject to me by name it is not for me It's pompous for YOU to assume that just because your name was in the subject line, that ALL the comments therein were for you. A secondgrader could follow the attributes, DeviantBoy. Lying sack of #### Yes, you are, Markie. What are you going to do about it? Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: That wasn't for you, Markie...It was for Dan. Don't be a presumptuous putz and assume any "73" I type is aimed at you. I was responding to DAN'S comments...Not yours. It is pumpous to assume that when you addrss your Subject to me by name it is not for me It's pompous for YOU to assume that just because your name was in the subject line, that ALL the comments therein were for you. not at all A secondgrader could follow the attributes, DeviantBoy. more **** Lying sack of #### Yes, you are, Markie. not at all What are you going to do about it? forunately for me little I can do about it You are a lying sack of **** you are sick and in desperate need of help Steve, K4YZ |
an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: That wasn't for you, Markie...It was for Dan. Don't be a presumptuous putz and assume any "73" I type is aimed at you. I was responding to DAN'S comments...Not yours. It is pumpous to assume that when you addrss your Subject to me by name it is not for me It's pompous for YOU to assume that just because your name was in the subject line, that ALL the comments therein were for you. not at all A secondgrader could follow the attributes, DeviantBoy. more **** Lying sack of #### Yes, you are, Markie. not at all What are you going to do about it? forunately for me little I can do about it You are a lying sack of **** you are sick and in desperate need of help So, do you drink a lot after taking a dip in Lake Superior to warm up or to get your brain chugging along on one cylinder again? |
wrote: an old friend wrote: You are a lying sack of **** you are sick and in desperate need of help So, do you drink a lot after taking a dip in Lake Superior to warm up or to get your brain chugging along on one cylinder again? no wHy do you ask? it doesn't take much brain power to keep up with stevie |
an_old_friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: You are a lying sack of **** you are sick and in desperate need of help So, do you drink a lot after taking a dip in Lake Superior to warm up or to get your brain chugging along on one cylinder again? no wHy do you ask? it doesn't take much brain power to keep up with stevie Good thing for you yours is limited to a picowatt. |
an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: That wasn't for you, Markie...It was for Dan. Don't be a presumptuous putz and assume any "73" I type is aimed at you. I was responding to DAN'S comments...Not yours. It is pumpous to assume that when you addrss your Subject to me by name it is not for me It's pompous for YOU to assume that just because your name was in the subject line, that ALL the comments therein were for you. not at all Yes, "at all". A secondgrader could follow the attributes, DeviantBoy. more #### Only for me to rub your nose in, Markie. Lying sack of #### Yes, you are, Markie. not at all Absolutely at all.... What are you going to do about it? forunately for me little I can do about it "fournately"... You are a lying sack of #### And you're just a documented pathological lair with a sexual deviance history... you are sick and in desperate need of help Not according to any licensed physicians I know. And I know a LOT of them. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: That wasn't for you, Markie...It was for Dan. Don't be a presumptuous putz and assume any "73" I type is aimed at you. I was responding to DAN'S comments...Not yours. It is pumpous to assume that when you addrss your Subject to me by name it is not for me It's pompous for YOU to assume that just because your name was in the subject line, that ALL the comments therein were for you. not at all Yes, "at all". more **** A secondgrader could follow the attributes, DeviantBoy. more #### Only for me to rub your nose in, Markie. more **** Lying sack of #### Yes, you are, Markie. not at all Absolutely at all.... meaning what You are a lying sack of **** plain and simple What are you going to do about it? forunately for me little I can do about it "fournately"... You are a lying sack of #### And you're just a documented pathological lair with a sexual deviance history... more lies stevie you are sick and in desperate need of help Not according to any licensed physicians I know. you may be right there, I am sure like most sick folks you can cover it to some extent but you are sick and in need of help And I know a LOT of them. Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: It's pompous for YOU to assume that just because your name was in the subject line, that ALL the comments therein were for you. not at all Yes, "at all". more #### More evidence that you don't have a defensible argument. A secondgrader could follow the attributes, DeviantBoy. more #### Only for me to rub your nose in, Markie. more #### Still more evidence that you don't have a defensible argument. Lying sack of #### Yes, you are, Markie. not at all Absolutely at all.... meaning what You are a lying sack of #### plain and simple Nope. That you are. You've even admitted to BEING a liar. So why do you recoil from it now...?!?! What are you going to do about it? forunately for me little I can do about it "fournately"... You are a lying sack of #### And you're just a documented pathological lair with a sexual deviance history... more lies stevie Nope. Why do you call your OWN admissions a "lie", Markie...?!?! you are sick and in desperate need of help Not according to any licensed physicians I know. you may be right there, I am sure like most sick folks you can cover it to some extent Cover what? but you are sick and in need of help No, I'm not. Why do you keep making assertions of fact that are clearly unsubstantiated, Markie? The first time is an error. The second time is a mistake. The third time is a lie. You're on 357,986,555,089. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: It's pompous for YOU to assume that just because your name was in the subject line, that ALL the comments therein were for you. not at all Yes, "at all". more #### More evidence that you don't have a defensible argument. not realy but then you nothing of evidence either A secondgrader could follow the attributes, DeviantBoy. more #### Only for me to rub your nose in, Markie. more #### Still more evidence that you don't have a defensible argument. not realy but then you nothing of evidence either Lying sack of #### Yes, you are, Markie. not at all Absolutely at all.... meaning what You are a lying sack of #### plain and simple Nope. yes you are That you are. You've even admitted to BEING a liar. which has nothing to do with the fact you are a lying sack of **** So why do you recoil from it now...?!?! I don't more stevie lies What are you going to do about it? forunately for me little I can do about it "fournately"... You are a lying sack of #### And you're just a documented pathological lair with a sexual deviance history... more lies stevie Nope. yes indeed I am not a "documented pathological lair" A compentant medcial person would have to make that decision nor am I a sexual devaint I fall within the normal range of behavoir Why do you call your OWN admissions a "lie", Markie...?!?! I don't you lying sack of **** I call what you add to my admssions a lie you are sick and in desperate need of help Not according to any licensed physicians I know. you may be right there, I am sure like most sick folks you can cover it to some extent Cover what? your obsessive complusive behanvoir but you are sick and in need of help No, I'm not. sure are Why do you keep making assertions of fact that are clearly unsubstantiated, Markie? why do you lie so much? They are facts You are clearly obsessed with me The first time is an error. more bull **** The second time is a mistake. still more bull**** The third time is a lie. even more bull**** You're on 357,986,555,089. absolutly full of **** Steve, K4YZ |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com