|
an_old_pervert:
Ahhh, I see you win the "Antagonistic Fool Award" again today. There is no real competition here, you always win hands down... John "an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... K4YZ wrote: Kim wrote: "John Smith" wrote in message ... Kim: I think a woman "taking a free ride" on her husbands license Big snip to.... OK, back to reality. You are one piece of work. I am pretty convinced that it's ridiculous for me to mention here that you are spewing a whole huge trashcan of idiocy over: A WOMAN TALKING ON HAM RADIO WITH HER HUSBAND AS CONTROL OPERATOR!!!! For friggin' cryin' out loud, dude, get a chill pill. The point, I think, Kim, was that there was, once upon a time, a suggestion to allow the spouse to operate a "unit" of an Amateur Radio station just like CB or GMRS... thepoint is that you are obsessed with the need to control other people. the rules are not being broken, so grow up And ultimately that's what the patitioner was told...Get a GMRS license! I would venture a guess that at least half of under 35 year old women would never stand for a free ride on their husbands license--choosing to make a point they "have what it takes." (today's women are much more competitive) You friggin' nitwit. FIRST, you'd have to get half of the under-35 year old women the slightest bit interested IN HAM RADIO and/or AT LEAST, help them let their wimpy-###ed husbands get into it and get a radio. Uhhhhhhhhhhhhh...A picture of a scantilly clad Schwartzenegger brandishing an HT saying "Don't be a girlie girl....." maybe? more gratuious insults THEN come back to me and discuss this flood of estrogen on YOUR ham bands, k? Where'd y'all drag this one up from? I feel the dropping of CW will open this hobby up to these women. Love it. Hey, Jim? While you're sitting there laughing hysterically ( :o) Get a load of this: "these" women. Even if they are only dating a guy which is in amateur radio, it may be enough to prompt them into studying and grabbing a license of their own--especially if the boyfriend is smart enough to set up a competitive spirit and invoke the challenge. grin John Oh my good Lord. If you were sitting across the table from me, I'd have to see your--uh, Dee, please close your eyes, oh wait, I can put it this way: see your "thing." How tiny is that thing? You are speaking of strong-willed, competive, and--I'll inject here--independent women, of whom it is obvious you have absolutely NO EXPERIENCE. Because THIS strong-willed, competitve, independent woman, would shrivel your mighty little thing up in half-a second and throw you back out to the curb. By the way, if the women you have been around need your permission, or your guidance, to get competitive and have the challenge "invoked," you need to get out of that closet you're in. Kim...if you were in Tennessee right now, or I in Texas, I'd have only two words for a woman with an attitude like that... SADDLE UP! =) =) =) =) more sexism You realy inist on showing all your bigotries in one day don't you Oh my gawsh...now, I am going to go back to normal and get ready for the office--where a *FEW* of us women still get around on our own. My little pal here, to whom I am responding with this post, is obviously surrounded by idiot women, the only types he can deal with. A bit, uuh...dare I say it..."hormonal" are we, today...?!?! more sexism =) 88 Steve, K4YZ all this one the "man" who nevr chases anybody off |
K4YZ wrote:
Jayson Davis wrote: As soon as cw falls, I see the most important step being in "advertising" the fact that cw is no longer a requirement. Spreading the word and helping others to study and pass the written exam will be key in getting the numbers we need at that time. I don't even see that as being a "happening thing", Jayson. Amateur Radio, just like fishing, or NASCAR, or R/C models, etc etc has always attracted a certain "crowd". And a strange line of thought Jayson uses. Kind of like we're supposed to say: "Ham Radio - we don't suck now!" It's not an issue of numbers, it's an issue of why would anyone want to become an amateur radio operator. Really now, why would you want to do that? To talk on repeaters? To work some guy on 20 meters? The whole hobby is passe. To Jayson: Then why the heck do you want us to advertise that the Morse test is gone. I wonder why so many people who hate Ham radio seem to know exactly how Ham radio is supposed to be? So's dropping a line in the water and trying to hook a fish, but millions of folks do it every year...Not because it's the only way to feed their families, but just for fun. Anyone can get into chat rooms or exchange e-mail with folks almost anywhere in the world...but there will still be the thrill of doing it with "wireless". If you want to attract the bright intelligent minds, you better be prepared to challenge them. Challenge them to let them in, challenge them when they get here. Do you think ax.25 is going to attract people? To Jayson again: (Sorry Steve, I didn't see the post until now) Question number 1 - Why do so many people seem to think that the internet is some kind of Hi-Tech wonderland - and that Amateur Radio darn well better emulate it? Side note..... If you think that the Internet is at the cutting edge.... well, we know that you aren't. And yes, mentioning AX. 25 is telling me that. Packet radio is FAIAP not at all about transmission of large amounts of data. It has morphed into APRS, GPS apps, C and C and other areas which do indeed attract bright people who want to experiment. BTW, isn't there a slight contradiction between wanting to attract large number of people, and wanting to attract the bright and intelligent? I suspect it might sound snobbish, but it *is* true that 50 percent of people are below average. Gospel truth! Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeelllp....Markie wil chime in here and say I am "attacking" Lennie, but there's been a no code license for just that very kind of experimentation for 14 years now, and Lennie and hi ilk have been more than welcome to jump right in and develop all the new data protocols they'd like to do. Yet all they whine about is the code test and that 3% of the allocations that do require a code test. Why? Those type hate Hams. Maybe that isn't gospel truth, but its close enough. Because all THEY are interested in is playing on HF...If all those engineering types had any interest in obtaining an Amateur Radio license for "experimenting" purposes, it would be a done deal. Yup. - Mike KB3EIA - |
Kim wrote:
You friggin' nitwit. FIRST, you'd have to get half of the under-35 year old women the slightest bit interested IN HAM RADIO and/or AT LEAST, help them let their wimpy-assed husbands get into it and get a radio. THEN come back to me and discuss this flood of estrogen on YOUR ham bands, k? Where'd y'all drag this one up from? Don't hold back Kim! Let the troll know exactly how you feel! Well put BTW.. 8^) - Mike KB3EIA - |
Troll?
As if you can utter that word and people stay blind to the fact you are one? Get real. Open your eyes, you may have convinced yourself that everyone else is stupid except you--but buddy, you only have yourself believing it... ROFLOL! John "Michael Coslo" wrote in message ... Kim wrote: You friggin' nitwit. FIRST, you'd have to get half of the under-35 year old women the slightest bit interested IN HAM RADIO and/or AT LEAST, help them let their wimpy-assed husbands get into it and get a radio. THEN come back to me and discuss this flood of estrogen on YOUR ham bands, k? Where'd y'all drag this one up from? Don't hold back Kim! Let the troll know exactly how you feel! Well put BTW.. 8^) - Mike KB3EIA - |
K4YZ wrote:
Because all THEY are interested in is playing on HF...If all those engineering types had any interest in obtaining an Amateur Radio license for "experimenting" purposes, it would be a done deal. Rather a sad sign of our times, Steve. We live in an era in which "things" are so simple. NeoCons can attribute ALL problems to the mythical "liberal", who despite being almost nonexistant today, is still somehow responsible for all the ills of society. In the same way, we have a lot of people who are willing to attest every problem, real or imagined, to that dreaded Element 1 test. It is responsible for the "declining number of Hams", etc etc, etc. They will get the chance to put their theory to the test. They will also find out they are wrong. By the way, has no one else noticed that the drop off in numbers is primarily Technicians who were not code tested? Kinda puts the lie to that theory right away doesn't it? There was not that much effort, and those who were not all that interested got their license. Ten years later, they allowed the license to lapse. - Mike KB3EIA - |
From: Michael Coslo on Fri 22 Jul 2005 13:37
K4YZ wrote: Jayson Davis wrote: As soon as cw falls, I see the most important step being in "advertising" the fact that cw is no longer a requirement. Spreading the word and helping others to study and pass the written exam will be key in getting the numbers we need at that time. I don't even see that as being a "happening thing", Jayson. Amateur Radio, just like fishing, or NASCAR, or R/C models, etc etc has always attracted a certain "crowd". And a strange line of thought Jayson uses. Kind of like we're supposed to say: "Ham Radio - we don't suck now!" That would be a REALISTIC beginning... :-) Oh, Michael, we've all seen the "crowd" represented by K4YZ. :-) So, other than the ARS (Archaic Radiotelegraphy Society) thinking their sky has fallen, what would YOU really advertise U.S. amateur radio in its "new beginning" after WT Docket 05-235 turns into an R&O? It's not an issue of numbers, it's an issue of why would anyone want to become an amateur radio operator. Really now, why would you want to do that? To talk on repeaters? To work some guy on 20 meters? The whole hobby is passe. To Jayson: Then why the heck do you want us to advertise that the Morse test is gone. Not the YOU "us," Michael. The ARRL badly needs new membership. They've never had as many as a quarter of all U.S. amateur radio licensees as members and are currently down around just 20% of licensees. ARRL is more business than organization and the business side of the house has to show a profit. I wonder why so many people who hate Ham radio seem to know exactly how Ham radio is supposed to be? Why are you sounding insecure? The FCC defines U.S. amateur radio. You don't define U.S. amateur radio. You are sounding EXACTLY like the "superior OTs" you decry in another message...like everyone MUST accept what YOU accept as a definition. Tsk. So's dropping a line in the water and trying to hook a fish, but millions of folks do it every year...Not because it's the only way to feed their families, but just for fun. Anyone can get into chat rooms or exchange e-mail with folks almost anywhere in the world...but there will still be the thrill of doing it with "wireless". "Thrill?!?" Has Stebie gotten an Orion and having oriongasms? "Wireless" today refers to LANs coupled by radio, not wires. See the acronym WLAN and what the "W" stands for. Almost exactly 50 years ago I picked up a handset in Tokyo and spoke to my counterpart in San Francisco, all a part of the Army network. First time I'd "done DX" on HF. WAs there supposed to be a "thrill" associated with using that 24/7 communications circuit? :-) Perhaps novel is the word, but I already knew the circuit was there 24/7 as were all the other radio circuits. I've used radio to communicate from land, sea, and air. Not a magic thing. If there be "magic" then it was listening to Edward R. Murrow reporting live from London in 1940 in the midst of the London Bombing. "Magic" is a subjective thing. Radio waves and electrons do NOT, nor ever did operate according to human emotional dictates. Try to remember that. If you want to attract the bright intelligent minds, you better be prepared to challenge them. Challenge them to let them in, challenge them when they get here. Do you think ax.25 is going to attract people? To Jayson again: (Sorry Steve, I didn't see the post until now) Question number 1 - Why do so many people seem to think that the internet is some kind of Hi-Tech wonderland - and that Amateur Radio darn well better emulate it? Alternate Question number 1: Why are you getting defensive? Side note..... If you think that the Internet is at the cutting edge.... well, we know that you aren't. And yes, mentioning AX. 25 is telling me that. Packet radio is FAIAP not at all about transmission of large amounts of data. It has morphed into APRS, GPS apps, C and C and other areas which do indeed attract bright people who want to experiment. Aren't you conflicting with yourself on that? "Bright people wanting to experiment" aren't going to fall in love with a radio service demanding all below-30-MHz-privileged individuals demonstrate telegraphy skills...especially when that skill goes back 161 years! :-) BTW, isn't there a slight contradiction between wanting to attract large number of people, and wanting to attract the bright and intelligent? How does a requirement of knowing 161-year-old morsemanship skill attract the "bright and intelligent?" :-) What the six-tiered-class system of old U.S. amateur radio licensing did was attract some people who NEEDED to climb ladders of accomplishment through the classes to get to the top...and then proclaim their "superiority in radio!" :-) Yet all they whine about is the code test and that 3% of the allocations that do require a code test. Why? Those type hate Hams. Maybe that isn't gospel truth, but its close enough. Poor babies...feeling "hated" are you both? Feeling "hated" because so few agree with your self-proclaimed "definitions" of What It Is All About? Yes, it's all a big conspiracy. All those who disagree with you two HATE YOU! Not only that, THEY HATE HAM RADIO...because you two define yourself as "ham radio!" [you two have the conspiracy thing all in a row, lined up...in your minds] Because all THEY are interested in is playing on HF...If all those engineering types had any interest in obtaining an Amateur Radio license for "experimenting" purposes, it would be a done deal. Yup. Tsk. How little you two know of REAL engineering and "experimentation." :-) You two sound like an anvil chorus playing a Newington stage. SRO you ain't. Have fun in the ARS (Archaic Radiotelegraphy Society). [why are you here instead of playing with your HF radios?] bit bit |
On 22 Jul 2005 06:34:18 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhh...A picture of a scantilly clad Schwartzenegger brandishing an HT saying "Don't be a girlie girl....." maybe? A smoking Desert Eagle in .50AE, an HT with a large hole in one side and out the other, and Arnold uttering his excellent line (spoken to a recently deceased Sharon Stone) from the movie Total Recall: "Consider that a divorce!" 73 de John, KC2HMZ |
From: Michael Coslo on Jul 22, 3:06 pm
K4YZ wrote: Because all THEY are interested in is playing on HF...If all those engineering types had any interest in obtaining an Amateur Radio license for "experimenting" purposes, it would be a done deal. Rather a sad sign of our times, Steve. We live in an era in which "things" are so simple. NeoCons can attribute ALL problems to the mythical "liberal", who despite being almost nonexistant today, is still somehow responsible for all the ills of society. Poor babies. Suffering the cynicsm and angst of the middle-aged are you? :-) In the same way, we have a lot of people who are willing to attest every problem, real or imagined, to that dreaded Element 1 test. It is responsible for the "declining number of Hams", etc etc, etc. You two aren't cut out to be forest rangers...you two are unable to see the forest for the trees... :-) Had you bothered to look (outside of your respective insides), you would have seen an INCREASE in amateur radio licenses in the USA between the mid-2000 restructuring change and mid-2003. A three-year period of growth in numbers. Unfortunately, since then there has been a DECREASE in numbers over the last two years. Steady - but small - decrease. That is borne out by the delta between NEW licensees and EXPIRED licenses. About 3,623 in one year's time from the 21 Jul 05 numbers on www.hamdata.com. They will get the chance to put their theory to the test. They will also find out they are wrong. Love those ABSOLUTE predictions! So...well..."predictable!" :-) By the way, has no one else noticed that the drop off in numbers is primarily Technicians who were not code tested? Really? Who wrote that...besides an obvious PCTA, that is...? Joe Speroni said that about 5 years ago. He tried to "prove" it with some number juggling but only made headway with his fellow PCTAs. Kinda puts the lie to that theory right away doesn't it? Kinda puts your statement into a POS without some proof...:-) There was not that much effort, and those who were not all that interested got their license. Ten years later, they allowed the license to lapse. Sunnuvagun! All those no-code-test Techs being "quitters?" NOBODY else left the U.S. ARS? :-) Novice class has been dropping steadily for over five years. They were NEVER "no-code-test" and once heralded as the "entry point" into amateur radio, years ago. "Bunch of quitters," right? :-) Sweetums, go look at the present-day numbers. Technician class now (as of 21 Jul 05) has 40.81% of all individual licensees. That's over twice as many General class licensees (only 20.33%). Together with Technician Plus, they make up 48.46% of all individual licensees. The no-code-test Technician class did not exist in 1990. Since the inception of that class in 1991, those licensees have ADDED about 200 THOUSAND hams to the U.S. numbers. Without them the U.S. amateur radio "community" would have DECREASED markedly over the last 14 years...like DROPPING a whopping 27% compared to today's total individual licenses. But, you don't want to see reality, do you? The fantasies are much more appealing and "it's always someone else's fault," isn't it? bit bit |
John K.
I'd prefer Dee stating, "Don't be no girly-man, Now!!! Then demanding, "Pick up that damn brass key and tap me out an apology, NOW!" (leather and whips are optional, of course) grin John "John Kasupski" wrote in message ... On 22 Jul 2005 06:34:18 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote: Uhhhhhhhhhhhhh...A picture of a scantilly clad Schwartzenegger brandishing an HT saying "Don't be a girlie girl....." maybe? A smoking Desert Eagle in .50AE, an HT with a large hole in one side and out the other, and Arnold uttering his excellent line (spoken to a recently deceased Sharon Stone) from the movie Total Recall: "Consider that a divorce!" 73 de John, KC2HMZ |
friggin' faggots and lesbians that our whole damned world has gone to hell in a handbasket. Yeah, the world's been going to hell in a handbasket for as long as I can remember. Been going there in the 60's, the 70's, the 80's, the 90's and right now. Funny how things haven't really degraded any. |
"John Smith" wrote in message ... Dee: Just could explain why all these cars have taken on an "aerodynamic look" to 'em... yes indeed, I think I can see your hand at work here. If fact, now I look closer, some pretty feline lines grace those rigs! grin Just offhand, I'd bet aerospace was much more interesting... John Actually I have nothing to do with the exterior lines of automobiles. I work for a supplier developing underhood components. Well every job I've had has been interesting when you really dive into it. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Dee:
This is going to sound like a joke (and heaven knows I NEVER JOKE!--but it isn't...), I once heard the little windshield wiper pumps, the ones which spray on the window cleaner were the by-product of nasa technology adopted by the auto industry; you wouldn't know about that, would you? Funny, but that question has stuck in my mind for years. I had made a mental note to ask, if ever given the chance... sometimes doesn't take much to entertain me... frown I actually doubt it... I mean, the cleaner would freeze in the tank in space, immediately freeze and/or crystallize to ice when discharged, etc... or, perhaps they meant the pumps used by nasa were actually for another purpose and just adapted to windshields here on terafirma... John "Dee Flint" wrote in message ... "John Smith" wrote in message ... Dee: Just could explain why all these cars have taken on an "aerodynamic look" to 'em... yes indeed, I think I can see your hand at work here. If fact, now I look closer, some pretty feline lines grace those rigs! grin Just offhand, I'd bet aerospace was much more interesting... John Actually I have nothing to do with the exterior lines of automobiles. I work for a supplier developing underhood components. Well every job I've had has been interesting when you really dive into it. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
"Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... Dan, All kidding aside, I heard he had a heart attack whilst on his tower way back when and that is when he cashed in his chips. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA I'm fully aware of that Jim. Dan/W4NTI |
"John Smith"
This particular group of misfits with licenses do NOT represent ham radio. Real hams can be found on 20 meters. And that is where I am right now, BTW. Dan/W4NTI "John Smith" wrote in message ... Dee: I am quite serious. Look over all the posts here. I see where most here are rather anti-social, they don't have much ability to get along well with "other children." Frankly, I would be hard pressed to present the group here as a good reason to enter the hobby of amateur radio and to enjoy an exchange of spoken and mental ideas with others... I include myself in that appraisal also, as I have been direct and to the point also... to do less would seem a waste of time, both theirs and mine... Indeed, some may even be able to see why the Chicken Band is preferable some of the time... still, I am hoping the right people can and will change all that--that is what we are really talking about, and these guys know it, and fear it! John "Dee Flint" wrote in message ... "Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message nk.net... wrote in message oups.com... wrote: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-05-143A1.doc Ugly. Really ugly. But who of us in the PCTA camp, realistically, actually had themselves deluded into thinking the FCC would take any other path? This "NPRM" is not "an opportunity to comment", it's an announcement about the way it's absolutely gonna be. Period. They'll go thru the NPRM motions only because the law sez they have to and they'll patiently tap their fingers on the table until the deluge of desparate commnents is over then declare the POS they published today a done deal. I agree with Dee, the only visible impact this latest "restructing" will be is another quickie bubble of upgrades and nothing more then back then the bands as usual. I could care less about any of it at this late date because none of it has any effect at all on me. I've been allowed to beep, yak and PSK my buns off everywhere band edge to band edge ever since I did 13 wpm fast enough for the examiner to make me a General over a half century ago. With an annoying side trip in 1968 to do 20 wpm to reconfirm my abilty to beep good enough to retain my privs under that particular FCC "restructuring" brainfart. Game over, I'm opting out of any further participation in any of this BS. Seeya in the pileups on 14.020. Ya dunno how to do 14.020? Good: Less QRM for me. Eat yer heart out. 73 de Jim, N2EY w3rv Rest assured the FCC is going to do whatever is easiest for THEM. There may be a upward surge of new "Ultra Lite Extra's" (Did I really say that???).....and in a short time the bands will still sound deserted. There is a lot more at work here then just dropping CW. Check out the bands lately? Where are all those new "light" hams anyway? Danged if I can find them. All you that gloat over losing one of the glues that hold/held ham radio together will rue this day. And no I'm not a stuck in the mud, cw only operator, I just see the hand writing on the wall. Lennie is happy now. He can sneak over to a test session and get his General...... Dan/W4NTI Dollars to donuts that he comes up with another excuse not to. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
nk.net... "John Smith" This particular group of misfits with licenses do NOT represent ham radio. Real hams can be found on 20 meters. And that is where I am right now, BTW. Listening on 14020. :-) -- Vy 73 de Bert WA2SI FISTS #9384/CC #1736 QRP ARCI #11782 |
Dan/W4NTI wrote: "John Smith" break This particular group of misfits with licenses do NOT represent ham radio. Real hams can be found on 20 meters. And that is where I am right now, BTW. your statement is proof of why ending codetesting the right way to go Dan/W4NTI "John Smith" wrote in message ... Dee: I am quite serious. Look over all the posts here. I see where most here are rather anti-social, they don't have much ability to get along well with "other children." Frankly, I would be hard pressed to present the group here as a good reason to enter the hobby of amateur radio and to enjoy an exchange of spoken and mental ideas with others... I include myself in that appraisal also, as I have been direct and to the point also... to do less would seem a waste of time, both theirs and mine... Indeed, some may even be able to see why the Chicken Band is preferable some of the time... still, I am hoping the right people can and will change all that--that is what we are really talking about, and these guys know it, and fear it! John "Dee Flint" wrote in message ... "Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message nk.net... wrote in message oups.com... wrote: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-05-143A1.doc Ugly. Really ugly. But who of us in the PCTA camp, realistically, actually had themselves deluded into thinking the FCC would take any other path? This "NPRM" is not "an opportunity to comment", it's an announcement about the way it's absolutely gonna be. Period. They'll go thru the NPRM motions only because the law sez they have to and they'll patiently tap their fingers on the table until the deluge of desparate commnents is over then declare the POS they published today a done deal. I agree with Dee, the only visible impact this latest "restructing" will be is another quickie bubble of upgrades and nothing more then back then the bands as usual. I could care less about any of it at this late date because none of it has any effect at all on me. I've been allowed to beep, yak and PSK my buns off everywhere band edge to band edge ever since I did 13 wpm fast enough for the examiner to make me a General over a half century ago. With an annoying side trip in 1968 to do 20 wpm to reconfirm my abilty to beep good enough to retain my privs under that particular FCC "restructuring" brainfart. Game over, I'm opting out of any further participation in any of this BS. Seeya in the pileups on 14.020. Ya dunno how to do 14.020? Good: Less QRM for me. Eat yer heart out. 73 de Jim, N2EY w3rv Rest assured the FCC is going to do whatever is easiest for THEM. There may be a upward surge of new "Ultra Lite Extra's" (Did I really say that???).....and in a short time the bands will still sound deserted. There is a lot more at work here then just dropping CW. Check out the bands lately? Where are all those new "light" hams anyway? Danged if I can find them. All you that gloat over losing one of the glues that hold/held ham radio together will rue this day. And no I'm not a stuck in the mud, cw only operator, I just see the hand writing on the wall. Lennie is happy now. He can sneak over to a test session and get his General...... Dan/W4NTI Dollars to donuts that he comes up with another excuse not to. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
|
Wait right there, on 20 meters. As soon as CW hits the bucket, I think
I will be able to supply you with students from my night class, soon... John "Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message nk.net... "John Smith" This particular group of misfits with licenses do NOT represent ham radio. Real hams can be found on 20 meters. And that is where I am right now, BTW. Dan/W4NTI "John Smith" wrote in message ... Dee: I am quite serious. Look over all the posts here. I see where most here are rather anti-social, they don't have much ability to get along well with "other children." Frankly, I would be hard pressed to present the group here as a good reason to enter the hobby of amateur radio and to enjoy an exchange of spoken and mental ideas with others... I include myself in that appraisal also, as I have been direct and to the point also... to do less would seem a waste of time, both theirs and mine... Indeed, some may even be able to see why the Chicken Band is preferable some of the time... still, I am hoping the right people can and will change all that--that is what we are really talking about, and these guys know it, and fear it! John "Dee Flint" wrote in message ... "Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message nk.net... wrote in message oups.com... wrote: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-05-143A1.doc Ugly. Really ugly. But who of us in the PCTA camp, realistically, actually had themselves deluded into thinking the FCC would take any other path? This "NPRM" is not "an opportunity to comment", it's an announcement about the way it's absolutely gonna be. Period. They'll go thru the NPRM motions only because the law sez they have to and they'll patiently tap their fingers on the table until the deluge of desparate commnents is over then declare the POS they published today a done deal. I agree with Dee, the only visible impact this latest "restructing" will be is another quickie bubble of upgrades and nothing more then back then the bands as usual. I could care less about any of it at this late date because none of it has any effect at all on me. I've been allowed to beep, yak and PSK my buns off everywhere band edge to band edge ever since I did 13 wpm fast enough for the examiner to make me a General over a half century ago. With an annoying side trip in 1968 to do 20 wpm to reconfirm my abilty to beep good enough to retain my privs under that particular FCC "restructuring" brainfart. Game over, I'm opting out of any further participation in any of this BS. Seeya in the pileups on 14.020. Ya dunno how to do 14.020? Good: Less QRM for me. Eat yer heart out. 73 de Jim, N2EY w3rv Rest assured the FCC is going to do whatever is easiest for THEM. There may be a upward surge of new "Ultra Lite Extra's" (Did I really say that???).....and in a short time the bands will still sound deserted. There is a lot more at work here then just dropping CW. Check out the bands lately? Where are all those new "light" hams anyway? Danged if I can find them. All you that gloat over losing one of the glues that hold/held ham radio together will rue this day. And no I'm not a stuck in the mud, cw only operator, I just see the hand writing on the wall. Lennie is happy now. He can sneak over to a test session and get his General...... Dan/W4NTI Dollars to donuts that he comes up with another excuse not to. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Dee:
Let us both look at this, we both know I have treated you as "one of the guys" here, I have pulled no punches because you are female; you have not only taken it in stride, you have taken it well. Don't feel I do not value your comments, even if my abrasive nature might lead you to that conclusion. Because you are female, you are one of the most valuable voices here--it is just that way, nothing anyone can do about, nor should really (well, encourage more females so there is something resembling a "balance" here.) Hang tough girl, ya got what it takes... warm smile John "Dee Flint" wrote in message ... "John Smith" wrote in message ... Dee: Just could explain why all these cars have taken on an "aerodynamic look" to 'em... yes indeed, I think I can see your hand at work here. If fact, now I look closer, some pretty feline lines grace those rigs! grin Just offhand, I'd bet aerospace was much more interesting... John Actually I have nothing to do with the exterior lines of automobiles. I work for a supplier developing underhood components. Well every job I've had has been interesting when you really dive into it. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
"John Smith" wrote in message
... Kim: I expected as much, a women libber who isn't a libber at all. And you are showing your real ignorance. I am far, far from being a Pansy-ass women's libber. I disagree with most Women's Liberation Theology, I disagree with the tenent of being a Women's Liberation victim (yes, I said victim); and I think most of the Women's Libbers I've met are about as misrepresentative of everyday life as they can possibly be. I think women should be as capable as anyone else. I try not to see this as a male/female world, because I think that is very devisive and nonproductive. I will get into the ring of life along with anyone else, and I don't look to anyone else to live it for me. If you call that "bad," it's my opinion that you are threatened by that. I don't need any man's permission for thing, nor would I ever allow a man to think I did. Rather a spoiled female brat which wants all the perks of being female and none of the responsibility. Hardly. I can't think of a perk that I'm interested in. And, you are right, gays marrying makes a mockery out of marriage. Two butt buddies (or two lesbian lick masters) are ridiculous and should be give mental health to repair their suffering mental conditions... Nope. That isn't right at all--at least not from my perspective. I was cutting into the tragic philosophy that you have. I notice you didn't say much about any of the shortcomings we have as people who aren't gay or lesbian. I believe you are quite mistaken about your beliefs. But, you are entitled to your thoughts on the matter. You wouldn't know a real female if she ran up and bit ya on yer bum. Already you are whinning because your tricks ain't going to work here. Mmm. Your perverted thoughts of women's body parts is noted. And, what tricks are you speaking of? You just can't handle a woman who is quite capable of holding her own. Like I said, that thing your packin' is pretty worthless. Screw off, you are just a new age wacko and they are a dime a dozen! You are too used to people kissing yer bum to be politically correct, ain't gonna happen here--I have too much respect for myself. I am not the slightest bit interested in anyone kissing my ass...right now in particular: you. And, I doubt you have "too much" respect for yourself. Your actions say otherwise. I'd pretty much come to the decision that you are a man in peril with himself. If you want to stay focused on ham issues good. If you want to argue being politically correct or I have to suffer your opinions and views--chuck it girl! John Oh, yeah. I see the "ham issues" you're discussing. ROFLMAO... What a friggin' weanie... When you get to be HALF the irritant that Larry Roll is, come back and see me. Kim W5TIT ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
"Michael Coslo" wrote in message
... Kim wrote: You friggin' nitwit. FIRST, you'd have to get half of the under-35 year old women the slightest bit interested IN HAM RADIO and/or AT LEAST, help them let their wimpy-assed husbands get into it and get a radio. THEN come back to me and discuss this flood of estrogen on YOUR ham bands, k? Where'd y'all drag this one up from? Don't hold back Kim! Let the troll know exactly how you feel! Well put BTW.. 8^) - Mike KB3EIA - LOL, what a twit this freak is!!! He doesn't even realize when he's been eaten for lunch! ;) Kim W5TIT ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
"John Smith" wrote in message
... Dee: Let us both look at this, we both know I have treated you as "one of the guys" here, I have pulled no punches because you are female; you have not only taken it in stride, you have taken it well. Don't feel I do not value your comments, even if my abrasive nature might lead you to that conclusion. Because you are female, you are one of the most valuable voices here--it is just that way, nothing anyone can do about, nor should really (well, encourage more females so there is something resembling a "balance" here.) Hang tough girl, ya got what it takes... warm smile John OHMYGAWD!!!! Hey, Dee? Wanna borrow my pahuke bucket? bleh.... Kim W5TIT ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
"John Smith" wrote in message ... Dee: This is going to sound like a joke (and heaven knows I NEVER JOKE!--but it isn't...), I once heard the little windshield wiper pumps, the ones which spray on the window cleaner were the by-product of nasa technology adopted by the auto industry; you wouldn't know about that, would you? Funny, but that question has stuck in my mind for years. I had made a mental note to ask, if ever given the chance... sometimes doesn't take much to entertain me... frown I actually doubt it... I mean, the cleaner would freeze in the tank in space, immediately freeze and/or crystallize to ice when discharged, etc... or, perhaps they meant the pumps used by nasa were actually for another purpose and just adapted to windshields here on terafirma... John Don't know about the pumps unfortunately. However it is amazing some of the things that came out of the space program. The original ball point pen was one. In the form developed for NASA, they would write in any position and did not have to rely on gravity feed for the ink (more of a capillary action or some such and took very high quality ink). This was then commercialized in a much cheaper form for the public. These are the pens that would cease to write if you had the point higher than the body. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
"John Smith" wrote in message ... Dee: Let us both look at this, we both know I have treated you as "one of the guys" here, I have pulled no punches because you are female; you have not only taken it in stride, you have taken it well. Don't feel I do not value your comments, even if my abrasive nature might lead you to that conclusion. Because you are female, you are one of the most valuable voices here--it is just that way, nothing anyone can do about, nor should really (well, encourage more females so there is something resembling a "balance" here.) Hang tough girl, ya got what it takes... warm smile John Thank you. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
John Smith wrote:
Kim: I expected as much, a women libber who isn't a libber at all. Rather a spoiled female brat which wants all the perks of being female and none of the responsibility. And, you are right, gays marrying makes a mockery out of marriage. Two butt buddies (or two lesbian lick masters) are ridiculous and should be give mental health to repair their suffering mental conditions... You wouldn't know a real female if she ran up and bit ya on yer bum. Already you are whinning because your tricks ain't going to work here. Screw off, you are just a new age wacko and they are a dime a dozen! You are too used to people kissing yer bum to be politically correct, ain't gonna happen here--I have too much respect for myself. If you want to stay focused on ham issues good. If you want to argue being politically correct or I have to suffer your opinions and views--chuck it girl! John LOL!!! Gotta luv it! Why do you think she got that call John? She needs attention. |
"Kim" wrote in message ... "John Smith" wrote in message ... Dee: Let us both look at this, we both know I have treated you as "one of the guys" here, I have pulled no punches because you are female; you have not only taken it in stride, you have taken it well. Don't feel I do not value your comments, even if my abrasive nature might lead you to that conclusion. Because you are female, you are one of the most valuable voices here--it is just that way, nothing anyone can do about, nor should really (well, encourage more females so there is something resembling a "balance" here.) Hang tough girl, ya got what it takes... warm smile John OHMYGAWD!!!! Hey, Dee? Wanna borrow my pahuke bucket? bleh.... Kim W5TIT I'm not too worried about it as I'm a very mellow person. I accept it as the compliment that it appears to have been intended to be. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
"Dee Flint" wrote in message
... "John Smith" wrote in message ... Dee: Let us both look at this, we both know I have treated you as "one of the guys" here, I have pulled no punches because you are female; you have not only taken it in stride, you have taken it well. Don't feel I do not value your comments, even if my abrasive nature might lead you to that conclusion. Because you are female, you are one of the most valuable voices here--it is just that way, nothing anyone can do about, nor should really (well, encourage more females so there is something resembling a "balance" here.) Hang tough girl, ya got what it takes... warm smile John Thank you. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE I am shocked, Dee. You actually think this attitude is OK from a guy? Kim W5TIT ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
look, what you think, what you expect, what you want--don't waste your
time or mine telling me--get it or don't, I am here neither to stop you nor assist you... .... next, if you have to go though quoting each and ever line and/or paragraph you are responding to, and you cannot organize your thought and create your own text without intermingling it with mine--don't expect me to read it, I don't have the time to be wading though a bunch of text I have written myself--create a work of your own which can stand on its own two feet! I know you have seen others incapable of free thought and an attention span shorter than their thumb do it--but dependence on another to weed through that mess you create is way too much to ask for! So, you proclaim yourself neither a libber nor to follow what was a conventional woman's behavior from before--ok, big deal, free world, you waste my time, don't tell me about it do it!!! I find such proclamation neither new, original or threatening... perhaps boring, I have been doing it since I was born! I note you wish to argue, can you stay focused, what is it you are saying here, use your own text... don't cut and paste mine or others, if you can't write--take a class! If you have anything real to say, I'll be here... John "Kim" wrote in message ... "John Smith" wrote in message ... Kim: I expected as much, a women libber who isn't a libber at all. And you are showing your real ignorance. I am far, far from being a Pansy-ass women's libber. I disagree with most Women's Liberation Theology, I disagree with the tenent of being a Women's Liberation victim (yes, I said victim); and I think most of the Women's Libbers I've met are about as misrepresentative of everyday life as they can possibly be. I think women should be as capable as anyone else. I try not to see this as a male/female world, because I think that is very devisive and nonproductive. I will get into the ring of life along with anyone else, and I don't look to anyone else to live it for me. If you call that "bad," it's my opinion that you are threatened by that. I don't need any man's permission for thing, nor would I ever allow a man to think I did. Rather a spoiled female brat which wants all the perks of being female and none of the responsibility. Hardly. I can't think of a perk that I'm interested in. And, you are right, gays marrying makes a mockery out of marriage. Two butt buddies (or two lesbian lick masters) are ridiculous and should be give mental health to repair their suffering mental conditions... Nope. That isn't right at all--at least not from my perspective. I was cutting into the tragic philosophy that you have. I notice you didn't say much about any of the shortcomings we have as people who aren't gay or lesbian. I believe you are quite mistaken about your beliefs. But, you are entitled to your thoughts on the matter. You wouldn't know a real female if she ran up and bit ya on yer bum. Already you are whinning because your tricks ain't going to work here. Mmm. Your perverted thoughts of women's body parts is noted. And, what tricks are you speaking of? You just can't handle a woman who is quite capable of holding her own. Like I said, that thing your packin' is pretty worthless. Screw off, you are just a new age wacko and they are a dime a dozen! You are too used to people kissing yer bum to be politically correct, ain't gonna happen here--I have too much respect for myself. I am not the slightest bit interested in anyone kissing my ass...right now in particular: you. And, I doubt you have "too much" respect for yourself. Your actions say otherwise. I'd pretty much come to the decision that you are a man in peril with himself. If you want to stay focused on ham issues good. If you want to argue being politically correct or I have to suffer your opinions and views--chuck it girl! John Oh, yeah. I see the "ham issues" you're discussing. ROFLMAO... What a friggin' weanie... When you get to be HALF the irritant that Larry Roll is, come back and see me. Kim W5TIT ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
"Dee Flint" wrote in message
... "Kim" wrote in message ... "John Smith" wrote in message ... Dee: Let us both look at this, we both know I have treated you as "one of the guys" here, I have pulled no punches because you are female; you have not only taken it in stride, you have taken it well. Don't feel I do not value your comments, even if my abrasive nature might lead you to that conclusion. Because you are female, you are one of the most valuable voices here--it is just that way, nothing anyone can do about, nor should really (well, encourage more females so there is something resembling a "balance" here.) Hang tough girl, ya got what it takes... warm smile John OHMYGAWD!!!! Hey, Dee? Wanna borrow my pahuke bucket? bleh.... Kim W5TIT I'm not too worried about it as I'm a very mellow person. I accept it as the compliment that it appears to have been intended to be. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE hmmmmm, appearances are nearly always, always deceiving. Kim W5TIT ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
From: Mike Coslo on Jul 22, 4:01 pm
wrote: From: Michael Coslo on Fri 22 Jul 2005 13:37 K4YZ wrote: Jayson Davis wrote: And a strange line of thought Jayson uses. Kind of like we're supposed to say: "Ham Radio - we don't suck now!" That would be a REALISTIC beginning... :-) Oh, Michael, we've all seen the "crowd" represented by K4YZ. :-) Steve represents mostly himself. I've seen a lot of people who represent a lot of things. Ahhhh...but to merely disagree with K4YZ is to HATE HAM RADIO! Ergo, he IS ham radio! :-) To Jayson: Then why the heck do you want us to advertise that the Morse test is gone. Not the YOU "us," Michael. The ARRL badly needs new membership. They've never had as many as a quarter of all U.S. amateur radio licensees as members and are currently down around just 20% of licensees. ARR? I wrote "ARRL" sweetums...and it comes back as "ARRL." ARRL is more business than organization and the business side of the house has to show a profit. I wonder why so many people who hate Ham radio seem to know exactly how Ham radio is supposed to be? Why are you sounding insecure? The FCC defines U.S. amateur radio. You don't define U.S. amateur radio. Insecure? So are the others who *know* how it is to be defined also insecure? Tsk. Don't try that ploy. THE FCC DEFINES AMATEUR RADIO IN THE UNITED STATES. Period. They grant the licenses for same. Others merely INTERPRET what THEY THINK it is about. You are sounding EXACTLY like the "superior OTs" you decry in another message...like everyone MUST accept what YOU accept as a definition. Tsk. Tsk indeed. My question is a simple one. Its a rough equivalent of the US basing our economic policy on what a group of olde tyme Russian communists think it should be. They didn't like us much at all. I bet they had some "good ideas" on how we should run things though... "Russian communists" have NOTHING to do with this NPRM. Try to stay focussed. "Bright people wanting to experiment" aren't going to fall in love with a radio service demanding all below-30-MHz-privileged individuals demonstrate telegraphy skills...especially when that skill goes back 161 years! :-) Lots of bright students don't want to learn anything that they don't think is relevant. Har! That's one of the WEAKEST arguments mumbled by so many. The FCC is NOT an academic institution and licensees are NOT "students"...NOT even prospective licensees going for a test. Actually, that "argument" is total bull**** OUT of the academic arena. ALL the OTHER radio services (except maritime radio on the Great Lakes) have GIVEN UP on morse code for communications. It simply hasn't proven to be "better" than other modes, takes longer, and no longer "gets through" better. All you are doing with that "argument" is really enforcing a sort of tribal myth, aka a "hazing" ritual. Note: The FCC isn't a fraternity house either. BTW, isn't there a slight contradiction between wanting to attract large number of people, and wanting to attract the bright and intelligent? How does a requirement of knowing 161-year-old morsemanship skill attract the "bright and intelligent?" :-) non sequitur. I wasn't writing of Morse code. Hello? See that Subject Line up on the Header? This whole thread is about the NPRM in WT Docket 05-235...which is about DROPPING the MORSE CODE TEST. I really do NOT know what YOU are writing about...some of the time. Yet all they whine about is the code test and that 3% of the allocations that do require a code test. Why? Those type hate Hams. Maybe that isn't gospel truth, but its close enough. Poor babies...feeling "hated" are you both? Everyone is hated by someone. If a person allows themselves to be bothered by it, they are a poor baby indeed. No, sweetums, YOU got the non-sequitur. Note what I said about K4YZ: Anyone simply disagreeing with him is ACCUSED to be HATING HAM RADIO! Search all you want through Google and you will find him using that "phrase of hate." Do YOU want to be like him? Feeling "hated" because so few agree with your self-proclaimed "definitions" of What It Is All About? If 50 million people believe a foolish thing is true, it remains a foolish thing. "50 million people in WHAT?" Where are you dreaming today? Hello? Concentrate on the thread subject. Yes, it's all a big conspiracy. All those who disagree with you two HATE YOU! Not only that, THEY HATE HAM RADIO...because you two define yourself as "ham radio!" [you two have the conspiracy thing all in a row, lined up...in your minds] Easy there, don't get the B.P. up! Are you now a "nurse?" My "beep" is as close to 120 over 80 as an adult male can get. Tsk, Michael, your "visual hearing" is suffering from "visual tinnitus" also. Or its your ego getting in the way of logical objectivity. Try to understand that YOU do NOT define U.S. amateur radio...the FCC does. Just because others don't accept your interpretation does NOT mean they "hate ham radio." Tsk. How little you two know of REAL engineering and "experimentation." :-) So what you are saying is that those who do know about REAL engineering and "experimentation" won't do it unless only everything is to their exact liking? Otherwise they will simply wait until everything is to their exact liking? No, I'm just saying you two don't know dink about REAL engineering...or experimentation. :-) You both like to posture as if you do, but neither does. :-) Have fun in the ARS (Archaic Radiotelegraphy Society). [why are you here instead of playing with your HF radios?] I am here *while* I'm playing with my HF radio. BS. At a little after 1:30 on a Friday afternoon you should be WORKING at your place of employment. You only work 4 days a week? Tsk, NOT the Capitalist Way! At the close of FCC business in DC on 22 Jul 05, the Comments on WT Docket 05-235 are running about 2:1 in favor of dropping the code test. [just a little reminder] Stay "tuned." On your "HF radio" or your computer. [don't get them mixed up] bit bit |
Are you drunk? Or, is it drugs?
Kim W5TIT ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Kim:
Don't even imagine you have earned such a "peace offering" yet... ROFLOL!!! John "Kim" wrote in message ... "John Smith" wrote in message ... Dee: Let us both look at this, we both know I have treated you as "one of the guys" here, I have pulled no punches because you are female; you have not only taken it in stride, you have taken it well. Don't feel I do not value your comments, even if my abrasive nature might lead you to that conclusion. Because you are female, you are one of the most valuable voices here--it is just that way, nothing anyone can do about, nor should really (well, encourage more females so there is something resembling a "balance" here.) Hang tough girl, ya got what it takes... warm smile John OHMYGAWD!!!! Hey, Dee? Wanna borrow my pahuke bucket? bleh.... Kim W5TIT ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Kim:
When I view your text a peculiar thing happens... the letters rearrange themselves and end up spelling: "'CHIT STIRRER" Ahhh, maybe I need new glasses... grin John "Kim" wrote in message ... "Dee Flint" wrote in message ... "Kim" wrote in message ... "John Smith" wrote in message ... Dee: Let us both look at this, we both know I have treated you as "one of the guys" here, I have pulled no punches because you are female; you have not only taken it in stride, you have taken it well. Don't feel I do not value your comments, even if my abrasive nature might lead you to that conclusion. Because you are female, you are one of the most valuable voices here--it is just that way, nothing anyone can do about, nor should really (well, encourage more females so there is something resembling a "balance" here.) Hang tough girl, ya got what it takes... warm smile John OHMYGAWD!!!! Hey, Dee? Wanna borrow my pahuke bucket? bleh.... Kim W5TIT I'm not too worried about it as I'm a very mellow person. I accept it as the compliment that it appears to have been intended to be. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE hmmmmm, appearances are nearly always, always deceiving. Kim W5TIT ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Dee:
You are quite welcome, and deserving... thank you for being so gracious... John "Dee Flint" wrote in message ... "John Smith" wrote in message ... Dee: Let us both look at this, we both know I have treated you as "one of the guys" here, I have pulled no punches because you are female; you have not only taken it in stride, you have taken it well. Don't feel I do not value your comments, even if my abrasive nature might lead you to that conclusion. Because you are female, you are one of the most valuable voices here--it is just that way, nothing anyone can do about, nor should really (well, encourage more females so there is something resembling a "balance" here.) Hang tough girl, ya got what it takes... warm smile John Thank you. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Kim:
Do you ever wonder how deep my "perversion" goes, the one you accused me of--in that mess you made by intermingling my text with yours? Well, don't, I am sitting here undressing you with my eyes!!! ROFLOL!!!!! John "Kim" wrote in message ... "Dee Flint" wrote in message ... "John Smith" wrote in message ... Dee: Let us both look at this, we both know I have treated you as "one of the guys" here, I have pulled no punches because you are female; you have not only taken it in stride, you have taken it well. Don't feel I do not value your comments, even if my abrasive nature might lead you to that conclusion. Because you are female, you are one of the most valuable voices here--it is just that way, nothing anyone can do about, nor should really (well, encourage more females so there is something resembling a "balance" here.) Hang tough girl, ya got what it takes... warm smile John Thank you. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE I am shocked, Dee. You actually think this attitude is OK from a guy? Kim W5TIT ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Geesh...
Kim, I don't have time... neither for drugs, alcohol or you... John "Kim" wrote in message ... Are you drunk? Or, is it drugs? Kim W5TIT ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
John Smith wrote:
Cmdr Buzz: Hey, did you really think--I think, she really has 5 size W boobs? disappointed-look-on-face John Don't know but you probably don't want to mentally undress her unless you can take being scared half to death. |
Cmdr Buzz:
Hey, did you really think--I think, she really has 5 size W boobs? disappointed-look-on-face John "Cmdr Buzz Corey" wrote in message ... John Smith wrote: Kim: I expected as much, a women libber who isn't a libber at all. Rather a spoiled female brat which wants all the perks of being female and none of the responsibility. And, you are right, gays marrying makes a mockery out of marriage. Two butt buddies (or two lesbian lick masters) are ridiculous and should be give mental health to repair their suffering mental conditions... You wouldn't know a real female if she ran up and bit ya on yer bum. Already you are whinning because your tricks ain't going to work here. Screw off, you are just a new age wacko and they are a dime a dozen! You are too used to people kissing yer bum to be politically correct, ain't gonna happen here--I have too much respect for myself. If you want to stay focused on ham issues good. If you want to argue being politically correct or I have to suffer your opinions and views--chuck it girl! John LOL!!! Gotta luv it! Why do you think she got that call John? She needs attention. |
commander:
I would consider it to be as likely I like the woman, as not, if I ever meet her... These news threads are hardly "real life." (just be disappointed if she doesn't really have five size w boobs! Can you just imagine the bra which would hold those puppies!!!!) joking-grin John "Cmdr Buzz Corey" wrote in message ... John Smith wrote: Cmdr Buzz: Hey, did you really think--I think, she really has 5 size W boobs? disappointed-look-on-face John Don't know but you probably don't want to mentally undress her unless you can take being scared half to death. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com