Kim:

I think a woman "taking a free ride" on her husbands license are
probably not a significant number to really thwart the benefits which
are possible. Let's face it, marriage too is becoming a thing of the
past, and certainly is no longer a real lifetime commitment for the
younger generations. Gay marriage is probably the final nail in that
coffin.

The younger women of today are a different breed and don't want to be
seen as "getting something for nothing." (which might imply, at least
to some, that they are less able or intelligent)

I would venture a guess that at least half of under 35 year old women
would never stand for a free ride on their husbands license--choosing
to make a point they "have what it takes." (today's women are much
more competitive)

I feel the dropping of CW will open this hobby up to these women.
Even if they are only dating a guy which is in amateur radio, it may
be enough to prompt them into studying and grabbing a license of their
own--especially if the boyfriend is smart enough to set up a
competitive spirit and invoke the challenge. grin

John

"Kim" wrote in message
...
"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-05-143A1.doc


73 de Jim, N2EY


Well now we will see if the Techs are paying attention. If they
are, we
should (but I bet we won't) see a major increase in people taking
element
3
over the next several months as the FCC should have this wrapped up
before
their CSCEs expire.

And now we'll see how many people have been "kept out by the Morse
code".
Of course we'll need to monitor over several years to see if their
is a
trend. A few months won't tell us a thing.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE




I am a TechPlus who never upgraded to General, or any other class.
There
are some considerations that may set me apart from the broad (no pun
intended) population of the ARS:

I am a female
I have a husband who is a General Class (i.e., not sure how many
licensees
are spouses to each other)--and I could, technically, get on HF
General
Class freqs any time I wanted
I enjoy simple ragchewing and emergency communications at a local
level WHEN
I am even "hooked up"
I enjoy the "quiet" mode of communicating--HF makes way too much
noise

There's probably some other differentiating items, and there may be
no
correlation at all.

Kim W5TIT



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via
Encryption =----

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Kim:

I think a woman "taking a free ride" on her husbands license


Oh buhruther, that is almost a scarey comment--but I won't go there


are
probably not a significant number to really thwart the benefits which
are possible.


Hmmmm, yeah, I am not sure how anything would thwart a benefit...(?)


Let's face it, marriage too is becoming a thing of the
past, and certainly is no longer a real lifetime commitment for the
younger generations. Gay marriage is probably the final nail in that
coffin.


Uh oh. Yeah, 'dem gays is ruining everything. It's because of them that
parents don't raise their kids with enough gumption to make smart decisions
on love and marriage, and having kids. It's because of them that skillsets
to handle the baggage of everyday life aren't instilled by our society and,
therefore, our children. It's because of them (gays--to remind everyone)
that parents and educators are too busy getting their pockets lined and so
can't raise kids to have more dignity and respect than to go out as a
teen-ager and get pregnant. It's because of them that, well hell, let's
just lay it out there for everyone to see: it's because of those darned
friggin' faggots and lesbians that our whole damned world has gone to hell
in a handbasket.


The younger women of today are a different breed and don't want to be
seen as "getting something for nothing." (which might imply, at least
to some, that they are less able or intelligent)


OK, so wait a minute. One sentiment you express is that gays have ruined
the institution of marriage. The next, you are saying that "the younger
women of today" (spoken, it seems, as a true male chauvinist asshole, by the
way) have, ummmm, higher standards? Is this the same women who get all
those divorces, screw other womens' husbands, suck their boss'
you-know-whats, etc., as you mentioned above? The very same women who,
today, are so wrapped up in using their bodies and sex to get anything and
anywhere that the workplace has become a disgusting display of seething sex
fashions? Because, I want to make sure we are on the same page...uh, if
that's even possible?

OK, back to reality. You are one piece of work. I am pretty convinced that
it's ridiculous for me to mention here that you are spewing a whole huge
trashcan of idiocy over: A WOMAN TALKING ON HAM RADIO WITH HER HUSBAND AS
CONTROL OPERATOR!!!! For friggin' cryin' out loud, dude, get a chill pill.


I would venture a guess that at least half of under 35 year old women
would never stand for a free ride on their husbands license--choosing
to make a point they "have what it takes." (today's women are much
more competitive)


You friggin' nitwit. FIRST, you'd have to get half of the under-35 year old
women the slightest bit interested IN HAM RADIO and/or AT LEAST, help them
let their wimpy-assed husbands get into it and get a radio. THEN come back
to me and discuss this flood of estrogen on YOUR ham bands, k? Where'd
y'all drag this one up from?


I feel the dropping of CW will open this hobby up to these women.


Love it. Hey, Jim? While you're sitting there laughing hysterically ( )
Get a load of this: "these" women.


Even if they are only dating a guy which is in amateur radio, it may
be enough to prompt them into studying and grabbing a license of their
own--especially if the boyfriend is smart enough to set up a
competitive spirit and invoke the challenge. grin

John


Oh my good Lord. If you were sitting across the table from me, I'd have to
see your--uh, Dee, please close your eyes, oh wait, I can put it this way:
see your "thing." How tiny is that thing? You are speaking of
strong-willed, competive, and--I'll inject here--independent women, of whom
it is obvious you have absolutely NO EXPERIENCE. Because THIS
strong-willed, competitve, independent woman, would shrivel your mighty
little thing up in half-a second and throw you back out to the curb. By the
way, if the women you have been around need your permission, or your
guidance, to get competitive and have the challenge "invoked," you need to
get out of that closet you're in.

Oh my gawsh...now, I am going to go back to normal and get ready for the
office--where a *FEW* of us women still get around on our own. My little
pal here, to whom I am responding with this post, is obviously surrounded by
idiot women, the only types he can deal with.

Kim W5TIT


"Kim" wrote in message
...
"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-05-143A1.doc


73 de Jim, N2EY


Well now we will see if the Techs are paying attention. If they
are, we
should (but I bet we won't) see a major increase in people taking
element
3
over the next several months as the FCC should have this wrapped up
before
their CSCEs expire.

And now we'll see how many people have been "kept out by the Morse
code".
Of course we'll need to monitor over several years to see if their
is a
trend. A few months won't tell us a thing.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE




I am a TechPlus who never upgraded to General, or any other class.
There
are some considerations that may set me apart from the broad (no pun
intended) population of the ARS:

I am a female
I have a husband who is a General Class (i.e., not sure how many
licensees
are spouses to each other)--and I could, technically, get on HF
General
Class freqs any time I wanted
I enjoy simple ragchewing and emergency communications at a local
level WHEN
I am even "hooked up"
I enjoy the "quiet" mode of communicating--HF makes way too much
noise

There's probably some other differentiating items, and there may be
no
correlation at all.

Kim W5TIT



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via
Encryption =----






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Kim wrote:
"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Kim:

I think a woman "taking a free ride" on her husbands license

Big snip to....

OK, back to reality. You are one piece of work. I am pretty convinced that
it's ridiculous for me to mention here that you are spewing a whole huge
trashcan of idiocy over: A WOMAN TALKING ON HAM RADIO WITH HER HUSBAND AS
CONTROL OPERATOR!!!! For friggin' cryin' out loud, dude, get a chill pill.

The point, I think, Kim, was that there was, once upon a time, a
suggestion to allow the spouse to operate a "unit" of an Amateur Radio
station just like CB or GMRS...

And ultimately that's what the patitioner was told...Get a GMRS
license!

I would venture a guess that at least half of under 35 year old women
would never stand for a free ride on their husbands license--choosing
to make a point they "have what it takes." (today's women are much
more competitive)

You friggin' nitwit. FIRST, you'd have to get half of the under-35 year old
women the slightest bit interested IN HAM RADIO and/or AT LEAST, help them
let their wimpy-###ed husbands get into it and get a radio.

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhh...A picture of a scantilly clad Schwartzenegger
brandishing an HT saying "Don't be a girlie girl....." maybe?



THEN come back
to me and discuss this flood of estrogen on YOUR ham bands, k? Where'd
y'all drag this one up from?


I feel the dropping of CW will open this hobby up to these women.


Love it. Hey, Jim? While you're sitting there laughing hysterically ( )
Get a load of this: "these" women.


Even if they are only dating a guy which is in amateur radio, it may
be enough to prompt them into studying and grabbing a license of their
own--especially if the boyfriend is smart enough to set up a
competitive spirit and invoke the challenge. grin

John


Oh my good Lord. If you were sitting across the table from me, I'd have to
see your--uh, Dee, please close your eyes, oh wait, I can put it this way:
see your "thing." How tiny is that thing? You are speaking of
strong-willed, competive, and--I'll inject here--independent women, of whom
it is obvious you have absolutely NO EXPERIENCE. Because THIS
strong-willed, competitve, independent woman, would shrivel your mighty
little thing up in half-a second and throw you back out to the curb. By the
way, if the women you have been around need your permission, or your
guidance, to get competitive and have the challenge "invoked," you need to
get out of that closet you're in.

Kim...if you were in Tennessee right now, or I in Texas, I'd have
only two words for a woman with an attitude like that...

SADDLE UP! =) =) =) =)

Oh my gawsh...now, I am going to go back to normal and get ready for the
office--where a *FEW* of us women still get around on our own. My little
pal here, to whom I am responding with this post, is obviously surrounded by
idiot women, the only types he can deal with.

A bit, uuh...dare I say it..."hormonal" are we, today...?!?!

=)

88

Steve, K4YZ

On 22 Jul 2005 06:34:18 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhh...A picture of a scantilly clad Schwartzenegger
brandishing an HT saying "Don't be a girlie girl....." maybe?

A smoking Desert Eagle in .50AE, an HT with a large hole in one side
and out the other, and Arnold uttering his excellent line (spoken to a
recently deceased Sharon Stone) from the movie Total Recall: "Consider
that a divorce!"

73 de John, KC2HMZ

John K.

I'd prefer Dee stating, "Don't be no girly-man, Now!!!

Then demanding, "Pick up that damn brass key and tap me out an
apology, NOW!" (leather and whips are optional, of course)
grin

John

"John Kasupski" wrote in message
...
On 22 Jul 2005 06:34:18 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhh...A picture of a scantilly clad Schwartzenegger
brandishing an HT saying "Don't be a girlie girl....." maybe?

A smoking Desert Eagle in .50AE, an HT with a large hole in one side
and out the other, and Arnold uttering his excellent line (spoken to
a
recently deceased Sharon Stone) from the movie Total Recall:
"Consider
that a divorce!"

73 de John, KC2HMZ

Kim:

I expected as much, a women libber who isn't a libber at all.

Rather a spoiled female brat which wants all the perks of being female
and none of the responsibility.

And, you are right, gays marrying makes a mockery out of marriage. Two
butt buddies (or two lesbian lick masters) are ridiculous and should
be give mental health to repair their suffering mental conditions...

You wouldn't know a real female if she ran up and bit ya on yer bum.
Already you are whinning because your tricks ain't going to work here.

Screw off, you are just a new age wacko and they are a dime a dozen!
You are too used to people kissing yer bum to be politically correct,
ain't gonna happen here--I have too much respect for myself.

If you want to stay focused on ham issues good. If you want to argue
being politically correct or I have to suffer your opinions and
views--chuck it girl!

John

"Kim" wrote in message
...
"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Kim:

I think a woman "taking a free ride" on her husbands license


Oh buhruther, that is almost a scarey comment--but I won't go there


are
probably not a significant number to really thwart the benefits
which
are possible.


Hmmmm, yeah, I am not sure how anything would thwart a benefit...(?)


Let's face it, marriage too is becoming a thing of the
past, and certainly is no longer a real lifetime commitment for the
younger generations. Gay marriage is probably the final nail in
that
coffin.


Uh oh. Yeah, 'dem gays is ruining everything. It's because of them
that
parents don't raise their kids with enough gumption to make smart
decisions
on love and marriage, and having kids. It's because of them that
skillsets
to handle the baggage of everyday life aren't instilled by our
society and,
therefore, our children. It's because of them (gays--to remind
everyone)
that parents and educators are too busy getting their pockets lined
and so
can't raise kids to have more dignity and respect than to go out as
a
teen-ager and get pregnant. It's because of them that, well hell,
let's
just lay it out there for everyone to see: it's because of those
darned
friggin' faggots and lesbians that our whole damned world has gone
to hell
in a handbasket.


The younger women of today are a different breed and don't want to
be
seen as "getting something for nothing." (which might imply, at
least
to some, that they are less able or intelligent)


OK, so wait a minute. One sentiment you express is that gays have
ruined
the institution of marriage. The next, you are saying that "the
younger
women of today" (spoken, it seems, as a true male chauvinist
asshole, by the
way) have, ummmm, higher standards? Is this the same women who get
all
those divorces, screw other womens' husbands, suck their boss'
you-know-whats, etc., as you mentioned above? The very same women
who,
today, are so wrapped up in using their bodies and sex to get
anything and
anywhere that the workplace has become a disgusting display of
seething sex
fashions? Because, I want to make sure we are on the same
page...uh, if
that's even possible?

OK, back to reality. You are one piece of work. I am pretty
convinced that
it's ridiculous for me to mention here that you are spewing a whole
huge
trashcan of idiocy over: A WOMAN TALKING ON HAM RADIO WITH HER
HUSBAND AS
CONTROL OPERATOR!!!! For friggin' cryin' out loud, dude, get a
chill pill.


I would venture a guess that at least half of under 35 year old
women
would never stand for a free ride on their husbands
license--choosing
to make a point they "have what it takes." (today's women are much
more competitive)


You friggin' nitwit. FIRST, you'd have to get half of the under-35
year old
women the slightest bit interested IN HAM RADIO and/or AT LEAST,
help them
let their wimpy-assed husbands get into it and get a radio. THEN
come back
to me and discuss this flood of estrogen on YOUR ham bands, k?
Where'd
y'all drag this one up from?


I feel the dropping of CW will open this hobby up to these women.


Love it. Hey, Jim? While you're sitting there laughing
hysterically ( )
Get a load of this: "these" women.


Even if they are only dating a guy which is in amateur radio, it
may
be enough to prompt them into studying and grabbing a license of
their
own--especially if the boyfriend is smart enough to set up a
competitive spirit and invoke the challenge. grin

John


Oh my good Lord. If you were sitting across the table from me, I'd
have to
see your--uh, Dee, please close your eyes, oh wait, I can put it
this way:
see your "thing." How tiny is that thing? You are speaking of
strong-willed, competive, and--I'll inject here--independent women,
of whom
it is obvious you have absolutely NO EXPERIENCE. Because THIS
strong-willed, competitve, independent woman, would shrivel your
mighty
little thing up in half-a second and throw you back out to the curb.
By the
way, if the women you have been around need your permission, or your
guidance, to get competitive and have the challenge "invoked," you
need to
get out of that closet you're in.

Oh my gawsh...now, I am going to go back to normal and get ready for
the
office--where a *FEW* of us women still get around on our own. My
little
pal here, to whom I am responding with this post, is obviously
surrounded by
idiot women, the only types he can deal with.

Kim W5TIT


"Kim" wrote in message
...
"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-05-143A1.doc


73 de Jim, N2EY


Well now we will see if the Techs are paying attention. If they
are, we
should (but I bet we won't) see a major increase in people
taking
element
3
over the next several months as the FCC should have this wrapped
up
before
their CSCEs expire.

And now we'll see how many people have been "kept out by the
Morse
code".
Of course we'll need to monitor over several years to see if
their
is a
trend. A few months won't tell us a thing.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE




I am a TechPlus who never upgraded to General, or any other
class.
There
are some considerations that may set me apart from the broad (no
pun
intended) population of the ARS:

I am a female
I have a husband who is a General Class (i.e., not sure how many
licensees
are spouses to each other)--and I could, technically, get on HF
General
Class freqs any time I wanted
I enjoy simple ragchewing and emergency communications at a local
level WHEN
I am even "hooked up"
I enjoy the "quiet" mode of communicating--HF makes way too much
noise

There's probably some other differentiating items, and there may
be
no
correlation at all.

Kim W5TIT



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure
Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via
Encryption =----






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via
Encryption =----

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Kim:

I expected as much, a women libber who isn't a libber at all.


And you are showing your real ignorance. I am far, far from being a
Pansy-ass women's libber. I disagree with most Women's Liberation Theology,
I disagree with the tenent of being a Women's Liberation victim (yes, I said
victim); and I think most of the Women's Libbers I've met are about as
misrepresentative of everyday life as they can possibly be.

I think women should be as capable as anyone else. I try not to see this as
a male/female world, because I think that is very devisive and
nonproductive. I will get into the ring of life along with anyone else, and
I don't look to anyone else to live it for me. If you call that "bad," it's
my opinion that you are threatened by that. I don't need any man's
permission for thing, nor would I ever allow a man to think I did.


Rather a spoiled female brat which wants all the perks of being female
and none of the responsibility.


Hardly. I can't think of a perk that I'm interested in.


And, you are right, gays marrying makes a mockery out of marriage. Two
butt buddies (or two lesbian lick masters) are ridiculous and should
be give mental health to repair their suffering mental conditions...


Nope. That isn't right at all--at least not from my perspective. I was
cutting into the tragic philosophy that you have. I notice you didn't say
much about any of the shortcomings we have as people who aren't gay or
lesbian. I believe you are quite mistaken about your beliefs. But, you are
entitled to your thoughts on the matter.


You wouldn't know a real female if she ran up and bit ya on yer bum.
Already you are whinning because your tricks ain't going to work here.


Mmm. Your perverted thoughts of women's body parts is noted. And, what
tricks are you speaking of? You just can't handle a woman who is quite
capable of holding her own. Like I said, that thing your packin' is pretty
worthless.


Screw off, you are just a new age wacko and they are a dime a dozen!
You are too used to people kissing yer bum to be politically correct,
ain't gonna happen here--I have too much respect for myself.


I am not the slightest bit interested in anyone kissing my ass...right now
in particular: you. And, I doubt you have "too much" respect for yourself.
Your actions say otherwise. I'd pretty much come to the decision that you
are a man in peril with himself.


If you want to stay focused on ham issues good. If you want to argue
being politically correct or I have to suffer your opinions and
views--chuck it girl!

John


Oh, yeah. I see the "ham issues" you're discussing. ROFLMAO... What a
friggin' weanie... When you get to be HALF the irritant that Larry Roll is,
come back and see me.

Kim W5TIT



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

look, what you think, what you expect, what you want--don't waste your
time or mine telling me--get it or don't, I am here neither to stop
you nor assist you...

.... next, if you have to go though quoting each and ever line and/or
paragraph you are responding to, and you cannot organize your thought
and create your own text without intermingling it with mine--don't
expect me to read it, I don't have the time to be wading though a
bunch of text I have written myself--create a work of your own which
can stand on its own two feet! I know you have seen others incapable
of free thought and an attention span shorter than their thumb do
it--but dependence on another to weed through that mess you create is
way too much to ask for!

So, you proclaim yourself neither a libber nor to follow what was a
conventional woman's behavior from before--ok, big deal, free world,
you waste my time, don't tell me about it do it!!! I find such
proclamation neither new, original or threatening... perhaps boring, I
have been doing it since I was born!

I note you wish to argue, can you stay focused, what is it you are
saying here, use your own text... don't cut and paste mine or others,
if you can't write--take a class!

If you have anything real to say, I'll be here...

John

"Kim" wrote in message
...
"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Kim:

I expected as much, a women libber who isn't a libber at all.


And you are showing your real ignorance. I am far, far from being a
Pansy-ass women's libber. I disagree with most Women's Liberation
Theology,
I disagree with the tenent of being a Women's Liberation victim
(yes, I said
victim); and I think most of the Women's Libbers I've met are about
as
misrepresentative of everyday life as they can possibly be.

I think women should be as capable as anyone else. I try not to see
this as
a male/female world, because I think that is very devisive and
nonproductive. I will get into the ring of life along with anyone
else, and
I don't look to anyone else to live it for me. If you call that
"bad," it's
my opinion that you are threatened by that. I don't need any man's
permission for thing, nor would I ever allow a man to think I did.


Rather a spoiled female brat which wants all the perks of being
female
and none of the responsibility.


Hardly. I can't think of a perk that I'm interested in.


And, you are right, gays marrying makes a mockery out of marriage.
Two
butt buddies (or two lesbian lick masters) are ridiculous and
should
be give mental health to repair their suffering mental
conditions...


Nope. That isn't right at all--at least not from my perspective. I
was
cutting into the tragic philosophy that you have. I notice you
didn't say
much about any of the shortcomings we have as people who aren't gay
or
lesbian. I believe you are quite mistaken about your beliefs. But,
you are
entitled to your thoughts on the matter.


You wouldn't know a real female if she ran up and bit ya on yer
bum.
Already you are whinning because your tricks ain't going to work
here.


Mmm. Your perverted thoughts of women's body parts is noted. And,
what
tricks are you speaking of? You just can't handle a woman who is
quite
capable of holding her own. Like I said, that thing your packin' is
pretty
worthless.


Screw off, you are just a new age wacko and they are a dime a
dozen!
You are too used to people kissing yer bum to be politically
correct,
ain't gonna happen here--I have too much respect for myself.


I am not the slightest bit interested in anyone kissing my
ass...right now
in particular: you. And, I doubt you have "too much" respect for
yourself.
Your actions say otherwise. I'd pretty much come to the decision
that you
are a man in peril with himself.


If you want to stay focused on ham issues good. If you want to
argue
being politically correct or I have to suffer your opinions and
views--chuck it girl!

John


Oh, yeah. I see the "ham issues" you're discussing. ROFLMAO...
What a
friggin' weanie... When you get to be HALF the irritant that Larry
Roll is,
come back and see me.

Kim W5TIT



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via
Encryption =----

Are you drunk? Or, is it drugs?

Kim W5TIT



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Geesh...

Kim, I don't have time... neither for drugs, alcohol or you...

John

"Kim" wrote in message
...
Are you drunk? Or, is it drugs?

Kim W5TIT



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via
Encryption =----