K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

It's far more effective to rub an idiots nose in their foolishness
than it is to commit an act of violence against them. Peer pressure
does the rest.

which is of course essencaily a confession that you threaten and
harrass folks

"essentially"

No, it's not.

yes of course it is

Of course it's not.

"It's far more effective to rub an idiots nose in their foolishness
than it is to commit an act of violence against them. Peer pressure
does the rest."

your words

and they are a confession to harrasment

And you continue to avoid answering my question..."What makes you
think that I'd hazard my freedom for a putz like you...?!?!"

and I have answered it becuase you are nuts

That's an answer?

yes it is


cuting stevie rants


more cuting of ranting and raving

Yet here you are stirring the pot.

showing what you were trying was blackmail

I never tried to "blackmail" you.

You need to whip out a legal dictionary and read what constitutes
"blackmail", Markie.

it is mading a demand for gain for a target under threat

cuting libel

And what target? What threat?

me the htreat s are violence, (one shot one kill..) outing Your
demands I comply or youd tell everyone I was gay, your conitued
harrasment unless I do as YOU say

What threats?

you threats
One Shot one kill...

Wasn't a threat seven years ago.

it sure was


It's not a threat today, no matter how many times you repeat it out
of context.

it still is

just an idle one thankfuly


your threats to contact UP officals and (do something)

Why does it concern you that you might be brought to the attention
of

It does not realy concern me other than it could prove anoying

but that of course has nothing to do with wether it is a threat on your
part


your threat to expose me as Gay in the newsgrup those many years ago

I didn't threaten yoy with exposing your deviancy, Mark. Pardon
the choice of words, but you "exposed" yourslf all on your own.

liar Steve

you emailed me your proof and threatened to expose me if I did not stop
posting in the newsgroup

then you revealed it and found to your shock I never denied it


why do you need everything repeated and again and agian

Why can't you type the same word the same way in one sentence?

becuase


And I keep hoping that sooner or later you'll come up with a
viable reason for your unviable assertions.

liar what you realy want is for me to go away again


So far, you haven't done it, so expect to keep getting that same
question asked until you pony-up something that sounds remotely
life-like.

not into horse's stevie

What 'outing (my) demands'...?!?!

You ARE gay, Markie. You stated so yourself in this forum.

but not until after you outed me, you preceeded that action by
threatening to do so unless I complied with your demands

Markie...I DIDN'T OUT YOU! Whoever you THINK was under your saddle
about your deviancy, it wasn't me...You did that
alllllllllllllllllllllll by your self!

lying stevie

nothing but lies on your part

You did the stalking looking for something you found it you tired
blackmail with it and I did not go along then you did it you outed me


that your blackmail was unsucessfull has no bearing on whether or not
your prefromed it

I didn't blackmail you or attempt to blackmail you, ergo it's
irrelevent WHAT was "successful" or not.

lying agian


It is all blackmail

What blackmail?

In order to "prove" blackmail, you have to prove that I stood to
gain from some act or threat of violence against you.

no I don't, however in this case you did stand to gain you demanded I
stop posting in RRAP obviously you valued that

Nope.

yep

And still no proof, Mark.

I have the proof and carefully in a file



No such "blackmail" was caused since no such threat was made nor
did any potential gain exist.

wrong you made the threat and stood to gain

Nope. The ONLY person here who stands to gain anything by you not
posting here is YOU, Mark. Because as long as you post here, you'll be
known as the illiterate lying gay pagan draftee...

another lie

You want me out of here,

very badly

I gain nothing by leaving, not even the end of your harassment


your actions quailify

Not in an AMERICAN court of law they wouldn't.

sure do

Nope.

We will now await your presentation of credentials in
jurisprudence.

Guess you forgot about "cuting" that one....

nope

but it isn't my credentcail that are important


you continue to black mail me

You continue to utter unfounded and hillarious lies in a public
forum.

nope

you are simply an ignorant stalker, and blackmailer.

Nope, nope and nope.

"one shot one kill..." Is a threat

Nope.

Put it back in context, Markie, because that's where it would be
taken from in court.

it is in context Killing was never the subject

I never suggested to kill you.

liar

Nope.

yes you have

you sent the threat out in the gruops more threats in the NG and more
still by email

someone, possibly you called the Cops In illiopolas with some cock and
bull story

you have boasted of finding a picture of my home in those days here
recently



it is a plain and clear threat

To a delusional paranoid personality, perhaps...

no to any reasonable person, which of course lets you out


That's your rampant paranoia.

one shot one kill is a threat

To a delusional paranoid persoanlity, perhaps...

no to any reasonable person, which of course lets you out

you are the delsuional paraniod

any questioning of the PR of the ARS is a personal attack on you that
is paranois and delusional,

it is also a sign of other mental problems


discsion of murder has nothing to do Radio or Morse Code

You're suggesting the "murder" of Morse Code usage in Amateur
Radio.

another Stevie lie I am making no such sugestion

Sure you have.

You've deliberately stated that you'd make all Morse Code usage
stop if you could,

after all Morse code is not a person, only people can be murdered

Then why are you accusing me of trying to murder you?

not even accusing you of that, but of threatening too can't you keep
anything straight?


Threating to speak to Todds folks is a threat

Nope.

sure is

How?

by being one

"by being one" what?

by being a threat


Re-read what you wrote, in response to what I wrote, Mark...

It doesn't make sense.

sure does


you are a low level danger

So NOW you're saying you HAVE been lying about any danger to you
and your "family".

nope I am saying you have prooven you mostly make threats without
backing em up

There's nothing to be "back(ed) up", Markie.

yes there is and you keep making threats

Why do you continue to make and remake this assertion in the face
of evidence to the contrary?

what eveidence?

E X A C T L Y ! ! ! !

N O E V I D E N C E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

right you have presented no eveidence that you are not making threats

I have posted various bit of evidence

therefore you are lying when you say"Why do you continue to make and
remake this assertion in the face of evidence to the contrary?",
becuase you have present no evidence to contrary


YOU have NO EVIDENCE of ANY threat!

I have your admission of sending the first threat, and then ore besides

what more do I need beyond an admission?


cuting another lies


Wether od not you ever had any intention on caring out your threats has
nothing to do your making them

I didn't make any, Markie.

One shot on kill .. is a threat

Nope.

It MEANS, as it meant in the ORIGINAL CONTEXT, was that my
comments "squarely hit" what I "aim" for.

Killing is killing

Not int he context of the comment I made, Mark. It meant then, as
it does now, taht I "hit" what I aim at...In the FULL CONTEXT of the
statement I amde in response to YOUR comments...

Nothing in the context had anything to do with killing, the threat was
out of the blue. The is never a reason to threaten to kill anyone over
the ARS

Indeed what you intended isn't relavant. The standard is would a
reasonable person think they were being threatened


it was and remains a threat

Nope.

sure is


Why do you continue to "force" this lie when it's apparent you're
not telling the truth, Mark?

becuase I am telling the truth

The only reason you don't see it is that you are pretty sick


you are lying in saying otherwise

You are lying in tryng to make it anything more than it was.

nope

Absolutely.

not at all

if it were nothing you would have appologized for the misunderstanding

You might try that now, but I doubt it

if you were manere when it was brought you would have adknowledged the
words to have been illchoosen or something like that

If I was "marere"...?!?!

As for "illchoosen", perhaps YOU should have thought about the
response YOUR

unfinished thought here?

My response was to put you off guard with a simple and harmless lie to
deflect you from your threat, based on your nestfew posts it diverted
you for several days, till I returned home and could take other actions


instead when I did not react as you wish you added various threats of
legal action, repated the thret in various manner and generaly behaved
in a threatening manner

that it was idle matters not

It wasn't a threat..."idle" or otherwise.

sure was

To a delusional paranoid persoanlity, perhaps...

to any reasonable person


You simply make Idles(so far) threats, but you make threats often

Nope.

abolsutely true

Absolutely UNtrue...

But don't let that slow you down...

terorists and balckmailer need to be resited when possible

There's no terrorists or blackmailers here, Markie.

spelling cop cut

yep there is his name is Steve Robeson

Nope. Just Markie Morgan lying in public again.

just Stevie unable to be a man an accept respoiblity for his own
actions, and his own words

Nope. Just Markie Morgan lying in public again.

just Stevie unable to be a man an accept respoiblity for his own
actions, and his own words

nothing is Stevies fault

It's only "Stevies fault" when Stevie does it wrong.

but Stevie never admts to making mistake so accordoing to Stevie
nothing is Stevie fault


So far you've not presented any "evidence" to the contrary except
your childish sandlot "ya-HUH!" arguments.

I have your admissions

I guess a confession to all the elements of the crime isn't good enough
for you


Just Stevie squirming to evade the turth of his bulling personality

Nope. Just Markie Morgan lying in public again...and again...and
again...

cuting a lie
cuting another lie
cuting speling cop

You just can't stand it, can you...cut, cut cut...

yes you do you threatened Tood I saw that, you conitue to threaten me,
idly it seems but you continue
cuting spelling cop

I didn't threaten Todd.

you sure did

you threatened to call his perants you threatened to contact his ISP
(you carried out that threat but it was still a threat

It wasn't a threat.

it sure is

apeartnly it seems an idle one

To a delusional paranoid personality, perhaps...

to any reasonable person


Toddie violated the terms of his TOS. He refused to stop. He got
what he asked for.

but you threatened to do , and apealently did it

"apealently"...?!?!

I told him I wouldn't tolerate his violent, profane and
threatening behaviour towards me.

and thereby threatened him


He thought rules didn't apply to him.

you don't think they apply to you


He found out different.

really?

you were claiming that you had nothing to do with what happened to todd
with his ISp awhile back now you admit it?


have a reason to make a threat doesn't mean you are not threatening him

you realy don't know english do you

cuting speling cop ****

you are a bully and so juvi you can't even take responiblity for YOUR
actions

Sure I do.

you will now proceed to blame Todd for these threats

Nope. Toiddie is responsible for his own actions...And he had to
pay a price for them.

yep as expected and predicted

I am sure there was a point there.

indeed and you made it for me thank you


Care to make it?

I can't you did the job for me


If YOU think that I have made all of these threats against you and
am the "stalker" you accuse me of, please, file a civil or criminal
charge against me, Markie..

I have sought to do so, and there is realy very little I can do short
of traveling to Tenn. and doing so that is one of the problems with the
internet

But...but...but...MARK!

All this past week you were telling us what great financial shape
you're allegedly in...two cars..house...investments...allegedly turned
down a $240K/yr job...

good shape, yes, your point?



Guess that's yet ANOTHER lie we've caught you in.

nope

you really don't read do you.

I have to travel to tennesse at some point to deal with you, spend a
lot of money that you are not worth , to obtain a judgement that you
would not likely be able to pay

I am in good shape because I choose my fights carefully

Unlike you I don't go in full bore without thinking things through


It will be quite satisfying to have you served with the countersuit
and then see who's side holds up better in court.

more threats

Nope.

A promise. You file any "charges" or "suit" against me, and your
ears will whistle for a week with the paper landing in your lap from
summons servers!

that is certainly a lie my ears would not wistle at all

at one point you were going to make a phone call and have me arrested
like that

You realy don't know much about how the world works




Nothing you do is YOUR responiblity

Sure it is.

And I've put my "hand out" with apologies or corrections where
appropriate.

still haven't adknowledged your mistakes about the Brothers Grim

It's "Grimm", Markie.

and still stevie you fail to fess up


Ask around.

No one answers yes you have

You've not asked the question. And I bet most everyone is
ignoring these posts...so ask them directly.

not most everyone other coment on them,

Again your claim you make it

lazy bum

and you lie about it

Nope.

threats to call a prosecuter for my lying online, threats to came to
the UP where I live, threats against Todd, and Len and Brain

What threats?

your threats

What threats?

the threats typed above

What threats?

You keep saying "those threats" and I keep saying "cite them".

All YOU do is say "those threats".

There are NO threats.

sure are

Nope.

yep

you have admtted to making them, just denieng that they are threats


not going to retype them and retype em

You can retype the Magna Carta and it won't prove anything.

you even blew that one Stevie it would indeed prove something but of
course Magna Carta has nothing to do with this matter so again you
evade the issue


You'll still have no threats.

I have your admissions


threats to call a prosecuter for my lying online, threats to come to
the UP where I live, threats against Todd, and Len and Brain

What threats?

the one you typed and admitted to typing


cuting stevie evasion

What evasion?

your evasion

WHAT evasion...?!?!

your eveasion

What "eveasion"...?!?!

yours

WHAT EVASION...?!?!?

yours


I have typed it often typed a few examples in this post and will not
repeat just becuase Stevie the BULLY demands I do so

You've retyped nothing except "your threats" and "your evasion",
Markie.

lying agian

I am not lying and I am not an agian.

You are lying, and I never said you are an "again"

so 2 lies one sentence

You've not SUBSTANTIATED either...

you have admited to typing "One shot on kill" that does it right there,
the rest just piles on

That wasn't a threat.

sure was


Wasn't then...isn't now...won't be 100 years from now...

will always be a threat


You keep making accusations that I ask you to substantiate.

yes you do, overlooking the fact it has been done in many case Years
ago, and repaeted again and again

Nope. All we have are your stories of threats. I am surprised we
haven't been treated to any black helo or unmarked vans stories, too.

well if that suprises then yuare of stupid, but we all know that,
everyone but you of course

I love being called "stupid" in a sentence that is so fractured
that it takes several re-readings to figure out that I was "insulted".

then where is your thank you

You flushed it after your last bowel movement, Markie.

more **** form you stevie


cuting another stevie evasion distrotion

cuting speling cop



You couldn't have cut a distortion because there wasn't one there.

sure was

Nope.

Oh?

Exercising my rights to travel freely within the United States is
now a "threat"...?!?!

when cuopled with your other behavoir certainly is

"cuopled"

"behavoir"

What "behaviour" do you refer to?

your make threats

What threats?

yours
admitted to and documented more than once


by the way It is infact ilegal for you to came HERE since you have been
informed your are unwelcome

It would be illegal for me to knock on your front door or violate
your privacy.

it is ilegal for you to enter my land


It would NOT be illegal for me to come to Michigan...ANYwhere in
Michigan.

wrong It is ilegal for you to come to my Land

and would allow me to use deadly force if I choose


Nor would it be illegal for me to speak with local law enforcement
or mental health case workers about you, being careful to express my
concerns as just that...concerns.

HMM seem you were threatening me if I contacted Tennesse about my
concerns

those laws do work both ways


threatening action with various parties

What threats?

asked and answered

Avoided and evaded by you.

asked and answered

Avoided and evaded by you.


asked and answered
stop harassing people

I'm not harrassing people.

liar

Nope.

you harrass everyone here that you disgaree with, You harrass folks on
the Air, by what I hear from other hams

Oh?

Then you've proven that you're "hearing voices", Markie.

nope

I have hear Hams call you a Papa Oscar serria on the air

"heard"

"Sierra"

I am sure you hear a LOT of voices doing that, Markie...

Only during a good opening to tennesse

is it so hard to admit there are other hams that don't like you?


All part of your delusional mindset, Markie.

nope it is part of yours I fear


You post, I respond. Period.

Sorry you don't like the comments, but then the comments I was
responding to were pretty stupid to start with, so what did you expect?

liar you are not a bit sorry

Not a liar and sure I'm sorry.

2 lies with one sentence

Nope.

why do you tell such obvious lies

Why do you put words in others mouths and try to pass them off as
truthful?

that is your gig stevie

Nope.

As usual, you're welcome to TRY and "prove" that, however you'll
not be successful.

already have many times

No...you've CLAIMED that you have tried...

that too of course

but I have your repeated confessions that is about all I really need



All you do is make sandlot taunts.

None of them effective or accurate.

confessions are quite effective


"First Amendment", Markie...

you don't have any right to threaten people

I haven't threatened anyone.

lying again

Nope.

yes One shot one kill is a threat

Nope.

sure is


A prosecuter won't touch your "claim" based upon the original
context and in response to your own words, Markie.

there is no context in which it isn't a threat


I have seen you threaten Todd and BB and you have threatened me

Nope, nope and nope.

yep yep and yep

Nope, nope and nope.

sure have and I have posted and reported


And no matter how many times you wish to carry that one out, it
still won't be true.

Huh?

It is ture that you have threatened me, both publicaly and in private
email

it is ture that you have harrased me publicaly and privately

You have threatened Todd Her I have seen that.

You ahve harrassed Todd I have seen that myself

You have admitng to conducting what Len discribes as harrassing IMing
of him on AOL

You harrass and Threaten BB in this forum


when 4 people tell you are doing something an inteligent man would
start to wonder if there wasn't something to it, but of course that
lets you out

Any discussion group wherein YOU profess to be an "inteligent"
(intelligent) man is a conversation mispent.

more evasion

Nope.

You accused me of not being "inteligent". I corrected your error
and answerd the claim.

not at all I questioned it I still do, since you do not ACT like an
inteligent human being

let alone an adult one

you also did not address the point


No evasion.

Not addressing the point is an evasion stevie



the 1st amendment does cover that

No, it does not.

QUOTE:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

UNQUOTE:

What IS the

so what?

The assertions YOU cut from the quote were NOT covered by a single
word of the First Amendment.

Let's put this BACK into context since you snipped all of that
out...
cuting out your evasive waste of bandwidth

Now, I'd appreciate it if you'd acknowldge your "respoinblty" to
TAKE "respoinblty" for your mistake.

no mistake

A bit mistake...on your part. The one wherein you think you can
keep blustering your way through your inappropriate claims.

not at all


you keep trying to divert the issue

No I don't.

sure do


you have NO right to threaten people

I don't.

agreed you don't have the right so stop doing it


you have NO right to harrass people

I don't.

agreed you don't have the right so stop doing it


you have NO right to stalk people

I don't.

agreed you don't have the right so stop doing it


The first amendent does not give the right to do ilgeal things

You again express your obvious misunderstanding of what is said in
the First Amendment to the Constitution, Markie.

I understand it clearly your mind is fogged on that subject and many
others


nor does any other part of the Constitution

And there is nothing in ANY part of the Constitution that is
"violated" by our exchanges here, Mark....

never said that it was

What I said is that constitution does not give the right to threaten or
harrass people



a key word in the ruling of the court is peaceably

The fact remains that the First Amendment does NOT say what you
alleged it to say.

i was simply using your quoting of the text

You simply did not.

sure did


You tried to take ONE word from it and apply it contrary to it's
use in THAT Amendement.

nope not at all


You failed.

Not realy but then I wasn't doing what said I was doing and faling at
it, this rambling on and on is part of your SOP here, wander all over
the place


that is why threatening people ois ilegal that it why the hate speech
have a legs to stand on

"ois ilegal"

What were you trying to say?

What "hate speech"...?!?!

your bashing of people for being gay or pagan or just different

I don't "bash" you, Mark, and certainly NOT for any of those
reasons.

lying again Stevie


You keep getting your nose tweeked because you keep getting caught
lying.

And in fact you've LIED about all of those things.

nope


You claimed you WEREN'T gay, but it's since been proven with your
own words that you are.

well i ambisexual you are not up on the facts

You claimed you weren't pagan, but it's since been proven with your
own words that you are.

nope


And you've claimed that you're not "dffrent" when it's CLEARLY
evident that you are!

another lie stevie


you are guilty of threats and hate speech

Nope. Not even close.

sure are I posted awhile back some example form just your titles

And none of them were "hate speech" as defined by the Civil Rights
Act.

sure are

Try again.

cuting stevie off target rant


You're the one with the honesty issues...said so yourself on
numerous occassions.

stop making threats stopp harassing folks

I'm doing neither.

you keep doing it you lying SoS

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...here's the anger...Can't get your way so let's
go back to insinuating profanites....

not realy you are a lying sack of ####, just calling you on it

More anger. Even spelled it out this time.

nope you would have to be angery to use the word ####. I use when I
deem it proper, very calmly

Profanity is the tool of a violent mind, Markie.

IYO

Nope.

In the opinion of those "pros" you always refer to.

now you are just lying agian


I do assert my free right to use such words as I choose as long I as I
don't violate the rights of others

By re-titling these posts "stvie ####" you violate MY right to not
be called a profane word or to have my "intellectual property"
defiled...

you have no such right

Hence the "Markie Mularkie" posts in kind.



so another lie

Nope.

I am not angery with I am disguted by you

You are disgusted by getting your nose rubbed in your mistruths
and deceit?

No I am disgusted by your manner your hypocrazy, your stupidity

Then you're focusing on the wrong things. You should be disgusted
by the fact that you are a decietful liar who can't post a word without
errors being laid bare.

more lies from stevie


Then stop doing it.

more off tager Bull####

What a "tager"...?!?!

been doing it for years

cuting stvie distoring context
cuting speling cop

cutng spelling cop

cuting spelling cop

threats harrasment trying to intimadate people

Your "threats" to "sue" were never deemed even remotely plausible.

never made one

Sure you did.

Said you were going to use the ADA to force the FCC's hand to give
you a free ride on the code test.

Lie I said a case could be made

A case CAN be made for your deceitfulness and dishonesty.

So as I said earlier, if you think a case can be made against me,
file it.

If Thought It would yeild anything I would do so but I don't think you
have to money to pay the judgement so it is not worth doing

Uh huh.

What you DON'T have are (1) sufficent grounds and (2) what it would
take to pay your OWN "judgement" for the false suit charge that would
be appended.

I said it was a hard case at that time with the treaty lang in place

So what?

A M E R I C A N law allowed for alterations to the treaty as did
caveats IN the treaty that gave administrations some leeway.

Indeed

but the treaty lang made the ADA case much harder

No it didn't.

sure did


If anything, the ADA made it EASIER to make your argument viable.

Stvie you have lost it

ADA made the case possible, the treaty made the case harder

what your last stament has to do with the matter I don't know


I also said It could be VERY expensive and more than I cared to venture

Then obviously not enough dedication.

if you like

Nope...If YOU like...Obviously you don't have the heart for it.

If it is what I like well I did not care to spend the money or time at
what I was sure would be won otherwise

indeed it apears that My discussing the possible case, may have
influneced NCI to include the ADA case arguement in there threat to the
FCC one they seem to caved on

So It seems other used the case as another wedge


you don't understand the difference between saying something could be
done and it will be done , or that it will be attepted

Sure I do.

then you must be willfully lying when you make these claims

Nope.

sure do since you lie about what was said



that you confuse tense and moods is part of the process where you so
often distrot and twist a true stament someone has made, into lie of
YOUR making

No lie made here.

You made threats of lawsuits under ADA.

nope

Yep.

nope


I discussed the posiblity

You said your "laywr" was preparing your brief".

no never said said anything about "laywr"


I discussed the pros and cons

I decided against it

One of the very few wise things you ever did...or should I say
DIDN'T do...?!?!

you lie whan you make the staement "You made threats of lawsuits under
ADA."

Nope.

yes have have lied and contiue to do so


I have pointed that you are vulernable to one, never threatened to do
it you have got anything worth talking

I am not "vunerable" to any suit brought by you!

sure are If Just filed it id would cost a fair amount of money

The cost would be yours twice over, Markie.

prehaps which does not alter the factual statement I just made

going to court is such a crap shoot

In YOUR case it would be...

in all cases it is


Your initial filing against me, then your defense expenses for the
countersuit.

nope no doubling there I'd be handle one level on contingincy youd be
paying out of pocket the whole way mostlikely, or at least in your
defense

First of all, no lawyer is going to take a "he said/she said" case
"on contingency" unless it's against Wal-Mart, one of the Big Three in
Detroit, etc. In those cases they at least hope to win "shut up" money
and probably will.

again you are misinformed


Secondly, as I told you before, I have the resources to overcome
any legal case YOU could hopre to mount from Michigan. At the most,
I'd have to pony-up filing fees...No big deal...

that applies to you or anyone for that matter

Yep...And they can countersue too.

yea never said otherwise

But you, like Toiddie, throw "I'LL SUE! I'LL SUE" around as if in
doing so you are the only one who can use legal resourse.

no another lie on your part, or is it delusions again


As I have clearly demonstrated here, however, you'll quickly find
out that you are NOT the only person who can bring a suit.

more threats


It is easy to sue in America

Finally you get the idea...

no it has taken you several years to get that


not so easy to collect

Bravo.

which is why sueing you is not worth while


You sure do like flattering yourself!

more evidence that stevie does not have metal contact with the real
world

There's no metal in my body, Markie.

How would I have metal contact withn the world?

and of plausible to whom? You well that is more than likely right, a
real crout that is another matter

cuting spelling cop

Congratulations. Only 33 1/3% error rate that time.

Your semi-literate dreck can be considered "harrassing" in it's
own way.

really someone is making you read it?

If I want to try an understand what you're saying.

you don't want to understand you are just hunting for things you can
twist

There's nothing to "twist". Your comments are twisted right out
of the box, Markie...I jsut ahve fun with them!

I think learning Serbo-Croation by braille might be easier.

more bashing of the Disabled, the blind in this case

Nope.

Are you NOW alleging that only the blind can use Braille?

nope

but you are of course bashing the disabled

Nope.

sure are


Serbo-Croation is a difficult language. I tried. Gave up.

not really Russian now that is one is bad


And I can't differentiate the characters in Braille adequately to
use it.

you just didn't want to bad enough


No bashing occured.

sure did

with your clear lack of human compassion why did you become a nurse?

What "clear lack of human compassion"...?!?!

your clear lack

Clear lack of what?

human compassion


You mean not being a soft touch for every self-appreciating,
self-victimizing jerk that tries to take advantge of others compassion,
Markie?

Nope I mean your mean sprited obcessive bulling

cutting more spelling cop

If I were that, every hospital in every community would be filed
to the rafters 24/7 with no hope for ever seeing an empty bed again.

more lies this time about the number of hospital you could affect

It's got nothing to do with me.

then you lied when you typed " If I were that, every hospital in every
community would be filed to the rafters 24/7 with no hope for ever
seeing an empty bed again."

You typed the I not me



It's got to do with Nurses not being a "soft touch" as I stated
above.

no you stated something else


And trust me when I say that every ER I ahve worked in, East,
West, North and South has it's share of "frequent flyers"...system
abusers just like you, Markie.

more libel


was it another power play?

By saying "another" powert play, you're suggesting an ORIGINAL
"power play".

yea

And it was...?!?!?

What would have been the first.

not sure what power play was the first you go on about so many

You've not named one so far.

sure have

Your actions as VE in denieing a properly issued code waiver for one

your efforts to control the posting of Todd, BB, Len and Me

And people like you never "intimadate" anyone. Humor them,
sure...

not trying to intimadate I would not horn on your territory steve, not
that you arre any good at it

cutin spelling cop

Still 33 1/3%, however this time you ever mispelled your mispelled
word!

I'm not trying to intimidate anyone, Markie.

liar you admited to it in the post I am responding to

No I didn't.

sure did

Sheesh.

Where, Markie. WHERE did I say "I am trying to intimidate you",
Markie?

never said you stated that I siad you were doing it


Quote the line where you alledge I say "I am trying to intimidate
you", Markie...

no claim of such a an exact was ever made

Oh, but it was!

nope

QUOTE

I'm not trying to intimidate anyone, Markie.

liar you admited to it in the post I am responding to

UNQUOTE

So...where's this alleged admission, Markie?

in the post I was repsoning to as stated


No quote = Markie Lying.

nope


You've rendered more than your fair share of laughs here!

But you HAVE left us laughing!

comenting on your words

"Commenting"

Haven't you haerd about what it means when you talk to yourself

"heard"

I am not "talking to (my)self"...

I am talking ABOUT you.

Still.

now you are talking to yourself

look at the lines

Steve, K4YZ