LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12   Report Post  
Old July 27th 05, 02:18 AM
Dee Flint
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...


Dee Flint wrote:

Perhaps the FCC is wanting to see how this will go for a while and
depending
on the results, reduce the number of classes to two.


I am willing to bet that there will be some arguments made to the
effect that once the code is dropped it WILL become a defacto 2-class
license, and they will just go ahead in this NPRM and do it.

Then how far till 1? Then none?

73

Steve, K4YZ


In the discussion section of the NPRM, the FCC specifically said they would
not address any changes at this time. I think they'll stick to it while
they consider other petitions.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BPL NPRM v. NOI Len Over 21 Policy 149 April 8th 04 01:59 PM
AMATEUR RADIO ENTHUSIASTS COME OUT SWINGING IN OPPOSITION TO NPRM ON BPL Steve Stone Policy 9 March 22nd 04 07:58 PM
Access BPL NPRM versus NOI Len Over 21 Policy 1 March 16th 04 02:38 PM
BPL NPRM Len Over 21 Policy 5 February 23rd 04 04:15 AM
BPL NPRM Approved Keith Shortwave 7 February 20th 04 08:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017