Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith wrote:
Mike: At this point, amateur is just NOT that technical... However, it still can fill one of its' directives it was given, and the hams be ambassadors of goodwill... Hey, it is a hobby, perfect for the CB'ers. It can be technical--and perfect for the computer communications people. It can go anywhere from here, and probably be multiuse without a problem... My whole beef is not exactly how technical the hobby is or isn't. I have problems with the idea that is trotted out from time to time, about how relaxation or elimination, or whatever, of some technical aspect of licensing is going to attract technical people. I'd give them a lot more credibility if they said: We're tired of all the whining about the Morse code test. So Element one goes away. Now would you people get on with your life?" That would be intellectually honest. - Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BPL NPRM v. NOI | Policy | |||
AMATEUR RADIO ENTHUSIASTS COME OUT SWINGING IN OPPOSITION TO NPRM ON BPL | Policy | |||
Access BPL NPRM versus NOI | Policy | |||
BPL NPRM | Policy | |||
BPL NPRM Approved | Shortwave |