LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #30   Report Post  
Old August 3rd 05, 03:25 AM
Mike Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John Smith wrote:
Mike:

At this point, amateur is just NOT that technical...

However, it still can fill one of its' directives it was given, and the hams be
ambassadors of goodwill...

Hey, it is a hobby, perfect for the CB'ers. It can be technical--and perfect
for the computer communications people. It can go anywhere from here, and
probably be multiuse without a problem...


My whole beef is not exactly how technical the hobby is or isn't. I have
problems with the idea that is trotted out from time to time, about how
relaxation or elimination, or whatever, of some technical aspect of
licensing is going to attract technical people.

I'd give them a lot more credibility if they said:
We're tired of all the whining about the Morse code test. So Element one
goes away. Now would you people get on with your life?"

That would be intellectually honest.

- Mike KB3EIA -


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BPL NPRM v. NOI Len Over 21 Policy 149 April 8th 04 12:59 PM
AMATEUR RADIO ENTHUSIASTS COME OUT SWINGING IN OPPOSITION TO NPRM ON BPL Steve Stone Policy 9 March 22nd 04 06:58 PM
Access BPL NPRM versus NOI Len Over 21 Policy 1 March 16th 04 01:38 PM
BPL NPRM Len Over 21 Policy 5 February 23rd 04 03:15 AM
BPL NPRM Approved Keith Shortwave 7 February 20th 04 07:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017