Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 1st 05, 12:40 AM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

N9OGL:

I think my view on it was given away with the question (subject) of this
thread...

Simply ignore the FCC rule, as long as you are an american and using encryption
for a VALID PURPOSE (and that means NOT for terrorist activities), a valid
purpose would be so no one (that included the gov't (think BIG BROTHER here) is
listening in.

In any court of law, I do not see where it could be argued that radio is such a
unique threat that encryption cannot be allowed there, yet can be done on the
internet without regulation (other than you cannot share high security
encryption software with other nations--and "God" himself knows that regulation
is not violated!)

If you are a terrorist, they can hang you for your activities, and very rightly
so...

John

"N9OGL" wrote in message
oups.com...
JOHN:

My point is simply that there is better ways that terrorist and
other criminal elements can communicate, amateur radio isn't on of
them. The encryption rules in the amateur radio service (as written)
are not need (or need to be modified) and in fact may hold amateur
radio back, because there are some encryption technology that is more
spectrum effecient.

Todd N9OGL



  #2   Report Post  
Old August 1st 05, 04:38 AM
N9OGL
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John:

Well the problem is the rules, the rules are so obscure that many
amateurs believe that encrytion isn't allowed on the amateur bands.
however, really this isn't the case. 97.113(a)(4) states:

"=2E.... messages in codes or ciphers intended to obscure the meaning
thereof, except as otherwise provided herein..."

and many amateur operators will tell you that amateur's operators are
not allowed to do any form of coding. however, if you read 97.309(b) it
states:

"=2E...b) Where authorized by =A7=A797.305(c) and 97.307(f) of this Part, a
station may transmit a RTTY or data emission using an unspecified
digital code, except to a station in a country with which the United
States does not have an agreement permitting the code to be used. RTTY
and data emissions using unspecified digital codes must not be
transmitted for the purpose of obscuring the meaning of any
communication. When deemed necessary by an EIC to assure compliance
with the FCC Rules, a station must:


(1) Cease the transmission using the unspecified digital code;
(2) Restrict transmissions of any digital code to the extent
instructed;

(3) Maintain a record, convertible to the original information, of all
digital communications transmitted"

So unspecified digital codes are allowed as long as they are not there
to obscure or hide the meaning.

Todd N9OGL

  #3   Report Post  
Old August 1st 05, 05:40 AM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

N9OGL:

That was enlightening, I have never read that part... I had started believing
what everyone has "said" for decades... thanks.

John

"N9OGL" wrote in message
oups.com...
John:

Well the problem is the rules, the rules are so obscure that many
amateurs believe that encrytion isn't allowed on the amateur bands.
however, really this isn't the case. 97.113(a)(4) states:

"..... messages in codes or ciphers intended to obscure the meaning
thereof, except as otherwise provided herein..."

and many amateur operators will tell you that amateur's operators are
not allowed to do any form of coding. however, if you read 97.309(b) it
states:

"....b) Where authorized by §§97.305(c) and 97.307(f) of this Part, a
station may transmit a RTTY or data emission using an unspecified
digital code, except to a station in a country with which the United
States does not have an agreement permitting the code to be used. RTTY
and data emissions using unspecified digital codes must not be
transmitted for the purpose of obscuring the meaning of any
communication. When deemed necessary by an EIC to assure compliance
with the FCC Rules, a station must:


(1) Cease the transmission using the unspecified digital code;
(2) Restrict transmissions of any digital code to the extent
instructed;

(3) Maintain a record, convertible to the original information, of all
digital communications transmitted"

So unspecified digital codes are allowed as long as they are not there
to obscure or hide the meaning.

Todd N9OGL


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415 ­ September 24, 2004 Radionews Broadcasting 0 September 26th 04 08:09 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 June 25th 04 08:28 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400 ­ June 11, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 June 16th 04 09:34 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400 ­ June 11, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 June 16th 04 09:34 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews Shortwave 0 January 18th 04 10:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017