LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #37   Report Post  
Old August 3rd 05, 07:11 AM
Alun L. Palmer
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dee Flint" wrote in
:


"an old friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

Alun L. Palmer wrote:
"John Smith" wrote in break
There is one loose end, though. I read the NPRM to say that Tech+
would become closed, so that all new Techs would have to get element
3 to get on HF, but others have read it that all Techs would get
Tech+ privileges. Does
anyone know which is right?


I read it as techs all tech end up with what amounts to what was once
called tech plus,

but anyone that claims to know what the result is likely to prove
themselves a lair


If you are talking about the US proposal, read the NPRM through a
couple of times. They discuss this at great length. Techs will not
get Tech+ privileges. Anyone who wants to increase their privileges
will have to take a test. They specifically state that no one will get
any changes in privileges. That is also consistent with the way the
paragraphs will be reworded as shown in the appendix.

Finally, one of the posters on eHam called the FCC on this and asked
for and got clarification. He was told that Techs will not get Tech+
privileges. It is indeed the FCC's position that anyone desiring more
than their current privileges must take the appropriate written test.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE




That is how I read it too, but it was a little hard to be sure without a
copy of Part 97 in front of me, plus a few people had made posts that
interpreted it the other way.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Utillity freq List; NORMAN TRIANTAFILOS Shortwave 3 May 14th 05 03:31 AM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #705 Tedd Mirgliotta General 0 April 10th 05 09:34 PM
RAC Bulletin - Industry Canada Posts Responses to RAC Recommendations on Morse Code Leo Policy 7 January 21st 05 01:34 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #620 Elmer E Ing Dx 3 July 28th 03 03:52 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #620 Elmer E Ing General 0 July 27th 03 10:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017