LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old August 31st 05, 04:24 AM
Bill Sohl
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim,

Nothing that might happen as aresult of this NPRM will
involve changing the written tests.

This NPRM as currently put forth ONLY ends Element 1,
the code test.

Cheers,
Bill K2UNK

"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...

(SNIP of latest statistics analysis on comments)

Hello, Len
I personally am not concerned about code/no code.
My problem is how easy do
they wish to make the multiple guess test. Frankly, folks that don't have
to work for something seldom appreciate it. Didn't they find that out
with
welfare?

Then again, I might be wrong.

If you gave away the licenses with no test at all (no test
international?),
a lot of folks might well say "no" and a lot of the rest wouldn't
appreciate
it anyways.

Just my humble opinion.

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Status of WT Docket 05-235 [email protected] Policy 7 August 2nd 05 11:37 PM
WT Docket 04-140 Billy Preston Digital 0 July 22nd 04 09:15 AM
WT Docket 04-140 Billy Preston Digital 0 July 22nd 04 09:15 AM
AMATEUR RADIO ENTHUSIASTS COME OUT SWINGING IN OPPOSITION TO NPRM ON BPL Steve Stone Policy 9 March 22nd 04 06:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017