Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim,
Nothing that might happen as aresult of this NPRM will involve changing the written tests. This NPRM as currently put forth ONLY ends Element 1, the code test. Cheers, Bill K2UNK "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... (SNIP of latest statistics analysis on comments) Hello, Len I personally am not concerned about code/no code. My problem is how easy do they wish to make the multiple guess test. Frankly, folks that don't have to work for something seldom appreciate it. Didn't they find that out with welfare? Then again, I might be wrong. If you gave away the licenses with no test at all (no test international?), a lot of folks might well say "no" and a lot of the rest wouldn't appreciate it anyways. Just my humble opinion. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Status of WT Docket 05-235 | Policy | |||
WT Docket 04-140 | Digital | |||
WT Docket 04-140 | Digital | |||
AMATEUR RADIO ENTHUSIASTS COME OUT SWINGING IN OPPOSITION TO NPRM ON BPL | Policy |