Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
K4YZ:
You only need sit back and see what the Chicken Banders will want when they get here. I think their numbers will rather quickly put ancient hams in the back seat... I expect them to provide a whole different course to the direction of amateur radio, no one here will probably be able to guess how that is going to develop... John On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 08:16:21 -0700, K4YZ wrote: Dee Flint wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... Here's my submission to the FCC. [snip] However I am in favor of allowing access to the HF allocations without the benefit of a Morse Code examination with the restriction that non-Morse tested Amateurs not be allowed access to those parts of the spectrum wherein voice (wideband) modes are not permittted. Without the basic skills of being able to recognize whether or not they are potentially interfering with other communications, the non-Morse tested operator should be restricted to areas wherein they will have less likelyhood of causing such interference. Steve, I have to disagree with you on the concept that only Morse tested operators be allowed to operate Morse. That's not what I said, Dee... I said that non-Morse tested licesees shouldn't be allowed to operate in areas where voice modes are not permitted. There is a difference. If the FCC is going to drop the code requirement (which seems certain now), the operators should be allowed the privileges of the comparable classes of today. Besides you don't have to be familiar with a mode to hear that someone is using the frequency and thus to know that you should go find another. But you need to be able to be able to inquire as to the use of the frequency, etc. Just because I tune to 14.0xxMhz and not hear anything for a minute or so does NOT mean the frequency isn't being used. If they elect to go Code/Extra-NoCode/General, then we should consider some band plan allowances to give the NCG's a place to practice away from the skilled users. However that can be done on a "Gentleperson's Agreement" (notice the PC there...?!?!?!) , not a new "Novice" class license. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|