|
John Smith wrote: AOF: Hey! You got proof the FCC is interested in an amateurs equipment? What, is it a gay organization now? John not at all they are as interested in Feamle hams equipment as well as, male hams, nothing gay there. a Bit nosey prehaps not gay On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 20:40:09 -0700, an_old_friend wrote: robert casey wrote: Because you can never be certain that the ham will NOT ever build anything. Additionally, all hams have technical responsibility for their stations and the RF signals they transmit. If the FCC is to trust us with the legal ability to pop the covers off our transmitters and make adjustments and modifications, we need to have passed tests to show that we have basic knowledge of RF and such. That we'd know how to run and maintain a clean operation. It's quite rare that the FCC busts a ham for faulty equipment anymore. you know the last time the FCC busted a ham for faulty equipment |
Dave Heil wrote: John Smith wrote: Kelly: I wish your mother would have told you it is not only pointless to attempt to control others, it is also impolite... not to mention fruitless... you guys, which attempt this meaningless control, make me ponder on what type of idiots you have surrounded yourself with, which would take orders? What do you call your little group, "Kellys' dummies?" Or, are you just pulling a fast one on us, and truth is they ignore you and march to their own drum? Are you sure you are an official in charge, or just self-appointed? Who is asking? I mean this all seems quite ridiculous, are you sure the world revolves upon your commands? I try to keep an open mind, even when ridiculous posturing people pose preposterous ideas. Well, there you go, "John". I'm trying to keep an open mind in reading your material. It isn't easy. Easy? It's impossible. Even Don Quixote would write this strange unit off as a loon. Dave K8MN w3rv |
Dave:
I don't agree with bush on a lot, but don't want to focus on running for president either. Wasn't really happy with some teachers my son had, but didn't want to go full-time academic either. I really don't like the way the garbage men handle the trash, but refrain from that line of work also... Really, make sense, drop the BS and out-right crap... John On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 05:58:40 +0000, Dave Heil wrote: John Smith wrote: Dave: When the arrl sees fit to serve amateur radio to its' best purpose, and the purpose of this country and its' citizens, I would be a fool not to be a member... I await future times... Sure, "John", let someone else do it all for you. Dave K8MN John On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 03:31:56 +0000, Dave Heil wrote: John Smith wrote: Len: I await the day when the arrl (ancient retarded religious league) goes the way of the dodo, or else, is taken over by under 40 year olds! We need someone to crack a window and let some fresh air in! We? Are you an ARRL member? Len certainly isn't. Dave K8MN |
Dave:
I am only thankful the others don't have such difficulty as you. Have you checked into medication, I hear they have something for alzheimers these days... have a nice day... John On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 06:01:10 +0000, Dave Heil wrote: John Smith wrote: Kelly: I wish your mother would have told you it is not only pointless to attempt to control others, it is also impolite... not to mention fruitless... you guys, which attempt this meaningless control, make me ponder on what type of idiots you have surrounded yourself with, which would take orders? What do you call your little group, "Kellys' dummies?" Or, are you just pulling a fast one on us, and truth is they ignore you and march to their own drum? Are you sure you are an official in charge, or just self-appointed? Who is asking? I mean this all seems quite ridiculous, are you sure the world revolves upon your commands? I try to keep an open mind, even when ridiculous posturing people pose preposterous ideas. Well, there you go, "John". I'm trying to keep an open mind in reading your material. It isn't easy. Dave K8MN John On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 20:22:53 -0700, kelly wrote: John Smith wrote: Dee: I was a boy scout leader in my late 20's into my early 30's, it was hard, my job made some allowances, heck, some of the people over me had kids in my troop. I think it can be done alright... Old pharts shine in positions like supreme court justices, you don't need the constitution to change all that much, indeed, in over 200 years it has been a real benefit NOT having much change at all... you just have to realize where you need young minds and where you need old ones... It's like this "John": The ARRL is run by an elected, unpaid volunteer BoD. In any practical sense the ARRL cannot be changed from the outside but it can and has been changed from the inside. The "solution" is rather obvious isn't it "John"? So go round up all your ARRL like-minded member buddies and campaign to get one elected to the BoD to kick off the "revolution". In other words "John" "lead, follow or quit whining, trolling and sucking up pointless bandwidth" on the topic. John w3rv On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 21:43:33 -0400, Dee Flint wrote: "John Smith" wrote in message ... Len: I await the day when the arrl (ancient retarded religious league) goes the way of the dodo, or else, is taken over by under 40 year olds! We need someone to crack a window and let some fresh air in! John They won't get to it until they are over 40 themselves. Right now they are building their careers and raising families. Doesn't leave much time for the major commitment of being in charge of the ARRL. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
AOF:
Frankly, I have been much more interested in the lady hams equipment myself... I think the FCC got that one right! John On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 23:19:28 -0700, an_old_friend wrote: John Smith wrote: AOF: Hey! You got proof the FCC is interested in an amateurs equipment? What, is it a gay organization now? John not at all they are as interested in Feamle hams equipment as well as, male hams, nothing gay there. a Bit nosey prehaps not gay On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 20:40:09 -0700, an_old_friend wrote: robert casey wrote: Because you can never be certain that the ham will NOT ever build anything. Additionally, all hams have technical responsibility for their stations and the RF signals they transmit. If the FCC is to trust us with the legal ability to pop the covers off our transmitters and make adjustments and modifications, we need to have passed tests to show that we have basic knowledge of RF and such. That we'd know how to run and maintain a clean operation. It's quite rare that the FCC busts a ham for faulty equipment anymore. you know the last time the FCC busted a ham for faulty equipment |
Kelly:
You make a pathetic antagonist, also... John On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 23:40:35 -0700, kelly wrote: Dave Heil wrote: John Smith wrote: Kelly: I wish your mother would have told you it is not only pointless to attempt to control others, it is also impolite... not to mention fruitless... you guys, which attempt this meaningless control, make me ponder on what type of idiots you have surrounded yourself with, which would take orders? What do you call your little group, "Kellys' dummies?" Or, are you just pulling a fast one on us, and truth is they ignore you and march to their own drum? Are you sure you are an official in charge, or just self-appointed? Who is asking? I mean this all seems quite ridiculous, are you sure the world revolves upon your commands? I try to keep an open mind, even when ridiculous posturing people pose preposterous ideas. Well, there you go, "John". I'm trying to keep an open mind in reading your material. It isn't easy. Easy? It's impossible. Even Don Quixote would write this strange unit off as a loon. Dave K8MN w3rv |
|
John Smith wrote: AOF: Frankly, I have been much more interested in the lady hams equipment myself... I think the FCC got that one right! John these days I am payng more attention to a certain future lady ham's equipment myself although I would not care to share her with the FCC an aside It would be nice if you pruned some the endless stuff is piling up at the end of your post, slows down my conection something feirce indeed tonight I have felt like I was back on Dailup shudder |
Unclaimed Mysteries wrote:
wrote in part: *Besides* eliminating the code test, what would *you* change about the license tests? I think the swimsuit competition needs to go. HOWL! Ohhh, just the thought! - I concur - - Mike KB3EIA - |
Dave Heil wrote:
I don't know if John is a loon or if, as I orginally surmised, he is simply a troll. He is strange and he has bonded with Leonard. Water always seeks its own level. With no anon-a-mousie comments or anything! - Mike KB3EIA - |
an old friend wrote: John Smith wrote: AOF: Frankly, I have been much more interested in the lady hams equipment myself... I think the FCC got that one right! John these days I am payng more attention to a certain future lady ham's equipment myself although I would not care to share her with the FCC Oh? Your "partner" has a sister? Lucky him. an aside It would be nice if you pruned some the endless stuff is piling up at the end of your post, slows down my conection something feirce indeed tonight I have felt like I was back on Dailup shudder Geeze... Even when YOU repost six-exchanges worth of re-quotes, it still only takes me a split second to get the page up. I imagine what slows down YOUR connection is trying to read what we write. It's in English, and yours is...well..NOT English...Or not much like it, any way... Steve, K4YZ |
John Smith wrote: Kelly: You make a pathetic antagonist, also... Well yes "John", thank you for the compliment. Particularly as it comes from you "John", the latest master of mindless antagonism to pass thru our neighborhood. I bow to your expertise in the field. John w3rv |
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: Well, there you go, "John". I'm trying to keep an open mind in reading your material. It isn't easy. Easy? It's impossible. Even Don Quixote would write this strange unit off as a loon. I don't know if John is a loon or if, as I orginally surmised, he is simply a troll. He's obviously just another transparent USENET master baiter and nothing more. He is strange and he has bonded with Leonard. Water always seeks its own level. Wash my mouf' but Sweetums stays on topic at least once in awhile. This whatever-he-is "John" thingey is a whole 'nother ballgame who swims much deeper in the muck than Sweetums does . . Dave K8MN w3rv |
|
Michael Coslo wrote: wrote: In other words "John" "lead, follow or quit whining, trolling and sucking up pointless bandwidth" on the topic. Like that is going to happen! 8^P Sounds like an interesting idea though. An anonymous leader...... Heh. Yeah, like the lion in The Wizard of Oz. - Mike KB3EIA - w3rv |
Mike Coslo wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Mike Coslo wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Mike Coslo wrote: Bill Sohl wrote: cuting then you need to read some the treaty requirements, the same treaty that has been the only keeping code testing the ARS for a couple of decades Didn't we cover this before somewhere? There is a long history of dancing around the treaty requirements. Like medical waivers for starters.... nope you are simply in error. The waivers (only for speeds above 5wpm) needed no dance Oops! I am indeed in error on that! most gracious of you to adknowledge that and so rare on the newsgroup - Mike KB3EIA - |
K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: John Smith wrote: AOF: Frankly, I have been much more interested in the lady hams equipment myself... I think the FCC got that one right! John these days I am payng more attention to a certain future lady ham's equipment myself although I would not care to share her with the FCC Oh? Your "partner" has a sister? Lucky him. still can't keep the genders straight no my partner, my current partner is female, what the gender of the next one may be well who knows. I'll deal with that when I need to an aside It would be nice if you pruned some the endless stuff is piling up at the end of your post, slows down my conection something feirce indeed tonight I have felt like I was back on Dailup shudder Geeze... Even when YOU repost six-exchanges worth of re-quotes, it still only takes me a split second to get the page up. I imagine what slows down YOUR connection is trying to read what you imagine some realy strangethings stvie but we all know that , except of course you we write. It's in English, and yours is...well..NOT English...Or not much like it, any way... at last my replies have something to do with the topic, unlike many of yours Steve, K4YZ |
|
an_old_friend wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Mike Coslo wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Mike Coslo wrote: Bill Sohl wrote: cuting then you need to read some the treaty requirements, the same treaty that has been the only keeping code testing the ARS for a couple of decades Didn't we cover this before somewhere? There is a long history of dancing around the treaty requirements. Like medical waivers for starters.... nope you are simply in error. The waivers (only for speeds above 5wpm) needed no dance Oops! I am indeed in error on that! most gracious of you to adknowledge that No problem Mark. I really didn't do my homework on that one. - Mike KB3EIA - |
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... Bill Sohl wrote: "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... (SNIP) I raise these questions because there are some pretty powerful tools available to people who feel otherwise. What pretty powerful tools are you thinking of and for what use? You lost me on that last comment. Yeah, after rereading it I wasn't very clear, Bill. I just fear that some of the Anti-Morse arguments might be adapted to gain other, less desirable changes in Amateur radio. - Mike KB3EIA - OK, I understand your thoughts but so far we've not seen any such move and, if we do, count me on your side in opposition to such changes. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
Kelly:
You "antagonist" is anyone not agreeing with you, I'd venture they seem without end... John On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 07:21:25 -0700, kelly wrote: John Smith wrote: Kelly: You make a pathetic antagonist, also... Well yes "John", thank you for the compliment. Particularly as it comes from you "John", the latest master of mindless antagonism to pass thru our neighborhood. I bow to your expertise in the field. John w3rv |
AOF:
I have nothing but words of encouragement, to court that ladies fondness... and step into the light... John On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 23:59:05 -0700, an old friend wrote: John Smith wrote: AOF: Frankly, I have been much more interested in the lady hams equipment myself... I think the FCC got that one right! John these days I am payng more attention to a certain future lady ham's equipment myself although I would not care to share her with the FCC an aside It would be nice if you pruned some the endless stuff is piling up at the end of your post, slows down my conection something feirce indeed tonight I have felt like I was back on Dailup shudder |
"K4YZ" wrote Well, well, well.................... Well, well, well, indeed! For the first time in my memory Steve makes a comment to FCC on a new NPRM, then pounds his chest in pride and prematurely chides others for not following his lead. Well, well, well! beep beep de Hans, K0HB |
K=D8HB wrote: "K4YZ" wrote Well, well, well.................... Well, well, well, indeed! For the first time in my memory Steve makes a comment to FCC on a new NPR= M, then pounds his chest in pride and prematurely chides others for not following= his lead. check your memory again, didn't he do that is the last time too? I think so but well that was a few years ago =20 Well, well, well! =20 beep beep de Hans, K0HB |
K=D8HB wrote: "K4YZ" wrote Well, well, well.................... Well, well, well, indeed! For the first time in my memory Steve makes a comment to FCC on a new NPR= M, then pounds his chest in pride and prematurely chides others for not following= his lead. Well, well, well! =20 beep beep de Hans, K0HB He's an idiot. |
b=2Eb. wrote: K=D8HB wrote: "K4YZ" wrote Well, well, well.................... Well, well, well, indeed! For the first time in my memory Steve makes a comment to FCC on a new N= PRM, then pounds his chest in pride and prematurely chides others for not followi= ng his lead. Well, well, well! Hans hasn't been paying attention. He's an idiot. Oh, gee, Brain, after all we've meant to each other, you want to go and be "that way"... Of course pathological liars such as yourself have a need to hide behind others...And you DO have a lot to hide... As for the comments...It's not as if there hasn't been a seven year plus history of this NG IRT the Code test, Hans...One might draw the conclusion that this group had a predetermined interest in the subject and had make decisions on what to say. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: b.b. wrote: K=D8HB wrote: "K4YZ" wrote Well, well, well.................... Well, well, well, indeed! For the first time in my memory Steve makes a comment to FCC on a new= NPRM, then pounds his chest in pride and prematurely chides others for not follo= wing his lead. Well, well, well! Hans hasn't been paying attention. well guess that is another admition that you will of course deny making He's an idiot. Oh, gee, Brain, after all we've meant to each other, you want to go and be "that way"... Of course pathological liars such as yourself have a need to hide behind others...And you DO have a lot to hide... As for the comments...It's not as if there hasn't been a seven year plus history of this NG IRT the Code test, Hans...One might draw the conclusion that this group had a predetermined interest in the subject and had make decisions on what to say. =20 Steve, K4YZ |
"K4YZ" wrote One might draw the conclusion that this group had a predetermined interest in the subject and had make decisions on what to say. One might, or then again, one might not. Since the Docket responds to 18 different petitions and runs to 30 pages in length with over 200 footnote references, one might take the time to thoughtfully review the FCC discussion in an unhurried (but timely) fashion. Having done that, my comments have been submitted to FCC. beep beep de Hans, K0HB |
Since Fred has sold his interest in "W5YI Group" VEC, how is it that he
would have occasion comment for NCVEC? |
"KØHB" wrote in message ink.net... "K4YZ" wrote One might draw the conclusion that this group had a predetermined interest in the subject and had make decisions on what to say. One might, or then again, one might not. Since the Docket responds to 18 different petitions and runs to 30 pages in length with over 200 footnote references, one might take the time to thoughtfully review the FCC discussion in an unhurried (but timely) fashion. Having done that, my comments have been submitted to FCC. beep beep de Hans, K0HB It does indeed require a slow and thoughtful reading to digest the whole thing. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
K4YZ wrote: b.b. wrote: K=D8HB wrote: "K4YZ" wrote Well, well, well.................... Well, well, well, indeed! For the first time in my memory Steve makes a comment to FCC on a new= NPRM, then pounds his chest in pride and prematurely chides others for not follo= wing his lead. Well, well, well! Hans hasn't been paying attention. He's an idiot. Oh, gee, Brain, after all we've meant to each other, you want to go and be "that way"... Whatever "way" I might wish to be, changes not the fact that you're an idiot. Of course pathological liars such as yourself have a need to hide behind others...And you DO have a lot to hide... Looks like a clear case of projection. As for the comments...It's not as if there hasn't been a seven year plus history of this NG IRT the Code test, Hans...One might draw the conclusion that this group had a predetermined interest in the subject and had make decisions on what to say. "had make???" Heil would stumble all over that one. =20 Steve, K4YZ Yes, yes. "Groupthink." Hi! |
"KØHB" wrote in message ink.net... "K4YZ" wrote One might draw the conclusion that this group had a predetermined interest in the subject and had make decisions on what to say. One might, or then again, one might not. Since the Docket responds to 18 different petitions and runs to 30 pages in length with over 200 footnote references, one might take the time to thoughtfully review the FCC discussion in an unhurried (but timely) fashion. Having done that, my comments have been submitted to FCC. beep beep de Hans, K0HB Hans, I made my comments short and sweet. Basically asked them to leave a little room for CW. The handwriting is on the wall my friend. Dan/W4NTI |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com