Dee Flint wrote:
"John Smith" wrote in message
news

Here the NCI offers proof and spells it out, just in case these old key
tappers are in danger of pulling some wool over your eyes...

http://www.nocode.org/articles/filter.html

As some have noted in the past, "There are liars, and there are DAMN
LIARS!"

John


break
It obviously didn't work did it. Not only is the total number of hams far
greater today than then but as a percent of the population we are more
numerous than then. It simply goes to prove that anyone who wanted to be a
ham could.

proves nothing the sort

the use of the word "proof" is this Newsgroup is shocking (and some
folks complain my use of words is bad i just mispell them rather than
male there meaning)

without consideing the population growth rates when certain changes
were made you can't tell where wed be IF say the FCC (and the US) had
screew the s25 and reducing testing to "---...---" and saying if you
can rudersatnd that means distress you have passed a code test (which
would have met the letter of the treaty) how many ham would swould
there today?

I don't know but a lot more I think, I can't prove it, or course but I
don't use the word "proof" so litely

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE