Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike:
As usual, you got everything backwards... digital is not analog, end of story. The modem on the mic just points out hams are too lazy, or two limited to even be able to kludge a simple digital project together, when the parts are just laying around. Hell, you have to use such stuff, real digital equip is few are far between and there are so few hams the call for such equip is almost non-existant, and that is sure not much motivation for manufacturers to build any! Your arguments are lame, you are confused, you are just ****ed that some real numbers are going to come to amateur radio. You know the old brass pounders are going to be setting out there chatting with the fewer and fewer of themselves which survive each and every new coming year, time is their enemy and the hope of progress... John On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 09:47:57 -0400, Mike Coslo wrote: Dave Heil wrote: You purport to be an active radio amateur and you didn't even have a realistic idea of how many hams there are in the United States? Do you think the FCC and ARRL are in collusion and they've whipped up some massive coverup of the number of licensees? Sheesh! This approach has been in evidence early on. Facts are of secondary importance to opinion. If we are told that there are not the number of hams claimed on the database, then that is the truth. If that means that the FCC is lying, that is the truth. If we are told that the only thing needed to go digital on HF is to hook up that 56K modem to the rig, then that is the truth. If we are told that Ham radio is dying, then that is true. You can't argue with someone who makes up the facts as they go along, so why do it? - Mike KB3EIA - BTW, CQ has an article on HF digital transmission. Seems that they have got it all wrong too. They have a method that works, but it is pretty slow for images (or files) of any appreciable size. Jim might note that they do some bandwidth tricks in similar manner as he proposed per our conversation in here earlier. Not exact, but along the same lines Hopefully we will see an article from those who know the right way to HF digital soon. 8^) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lest We Forget | Policy | |||
Doing Battle? Can't Resist Posting? | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | General | |||
Code a Deterrent to a Ham Ticket ?? | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |