Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kelly:
There has been no challenge of data encryption on amateur bands "by american citizens" that I am aware of... It is quite obvious that data encryption on the internet is both legal and in heavy use. How you can allow one medium and prosecute the same activity on another is insane (the law was constructed for amateur radio before they knew the internet would be developed, and it impossible to stop.) Indeed, I can place a digital voice encryption device on my phone and a friends and hold private conversations (corporations used to do this all the time--BEFORE the internet--now they use the internet), I can also do it on a cell phone (as far as I have been able to determine it is not a "crime.") I am NOT a lawyer, but common sense says that "crime" would be hard to prosecute to get a conviction... also, I'd say there are major constitutional grounds the gov't would have to defeat to convict. I think stand alone encryption is NOT a crime... treason, etc is... Me, I have ignored and encrypted in the past, I continue to do so, but only if it makes sense. Encryption does nothing to speed transmission, it only places an increased burden on it. However, a data compaction algorithm can be choose which naturally encrypts as a secondary effect to compaction, however, not even close to PGP, etc encryption methods. Someday there may come a court case to test if this is a "crime" which can be successfully prosecuted... I feel I have a right to private conversations, no matter what the medium is the communication takes place on. But then, I believe in inalienable rights... one day a repressive, evil gov't may be able to deprive me of those rights... not today... This is simply a matter for each and every individual to decide for themselves, they can act as they so choose... John On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 16:38:13 -0700, kelly wrote: John Smith wrote: N2EY: No sense in attempting to efficiently send data anywhere, unless methods are used which employ efficient data compaction and the use of CRC checksums... it is only there that HS data transmission comes alive... Encryption is good also, unless you want the whole world to know what you are sending... John Uhhh . . John you hopeless noclue check out what Part 97 has to say about hams encrypting their transmissions. w3rv |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lest We Forget | Policy | |||
Doing Battle? Can't Resist Posting? | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | General | |||
Code a Deterrent to a Ham Ticket ?? | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |