LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12   Report Post  
Old August 10th 05, 01:18 AM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kelly:

There has been no challenge of data encryption on amateur bands "by
american citizens" that I am aware of...

It is quite obvious that data encryption on the internet is both legal and
in heavy use. How you can allow one medium and prosecute the same
activity on another is insane (the law was constructed for amateur radio
before they knew the internet would be developed, and it impossible to
stop.)

Indeed, I can place a digital voice encryption device on my phone
and a friends and hold private conversations (corporations used to do
this all the time--BEFORE the internet--now they use the internet), I can
also do it on a cell phone (as far as I have been able to determine it is
not a "crime.")

I am NOT a lawyer, but common sense says that "crime" would be hard to
prosecute to get a conviction... also, I'd say there are major
constitutional grounds the gov't would have to defeat to convict. I think
stand alone encryption is NOT a crime... treason, etc is...

Me, I have ignored and encrypted in the past, I continue to do so, but
only if it makes sense. Encryption does nothing to speed transmission, it
only places an increased burden on it. However, a data compaction
algorithm can be choose which naturally encrypts as a secondary effect to
compaction, however, not even close to PGP, etc encryption methods.
Someday there may come a court case to test if this is a "crime" which can
be successfully prosecuted... I feel I have a right to private
conversations, no matter what the medium is the communication takes place
on. But then, I believe in inalienable rights... one day a repressive,
evil gov't may be able to deprive me of those rights... not today...

This is simply a matter for each and every individual to decide for
themselves, they can act as they so choose...

John

On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 16:38:13 -0700, kelly wrote:


John Smith wrote:
N2EY:

No sense in attempting to efficiently send data anywhere, unless methods
are used which employ efficient data compaction and the use of CRC
checksums... it is only there that HS data transmission comes alive...

Encryption is good also, unless you want the whole world to know what you
are sending...

John


Uhhh . . John you hopeless noclue check out what Part 97 has to say
about hams encrypting their transmissions.

w3rv


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lest We Forget [email protected] Policy 151 April 24th 05 09:45 PM
Doing Battle? Can't Resist Posting? Steve Robeson K4CAP Policy 148 October 29th 04 01:26 AM
Why You Don't Like The ARRL Louis C. LeVine General 206 January 6th 04 01:12 PM
Code a Deterrent to a Ham Ticket ?? N2EY Policy 25 August 4th 03 10:17 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017