Glenn A. Baxter K1MAN
 

Looks like Baxter may be in even deeper doo doo. Word is he's being investigated by the Maine and Illinois Boards of Professional Regulation. Seems they got word that Baxter lost his last job cuz he "allegedly" threatened his last boss while he was on the job as a professional engineer, and that's a no no.

What with that $21,000 FCC fine and trouble from two professional boards, what else could go wrong for the broadcasting Bozo?

Oops-- did I forget to mention the IRS?

Til next time,

-Johnny Johnston

PS: Toad, you are a LOSER!

It seems to me that your one of those amateur operators who doesn't
like K1MAN; reason, you don't have a ****ING LIFE. Your one of those
pathetic licensed CB operators who can get it through their ****ing
head that IT'S A HOBBY. But no, instead you harass a person because
simply put, you don't like what that person says or does, your ****ing
life circle around ruining this person's life. But hey after he's
gone you can go out back and blow your ****ing brains out. Because,
once he is gone you will no longer have anything to live for because
you're the one who is a LOSER.

Todd N9OGL

N9OGL:

While I would have chosen different words to have expressed the situation
you did, none-the-less, I believe you managed near 100% accuracy in
describing the situation!

John

On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:00:37 -0700, N9OGL wrote:

It seems to me that your one of those amateur operators who doesn't
like K1MAN; reason, you don't have a ****ING LIFE. Your one of those
pathetic licensed CB operators who can get it through their ****ing
head that IT'S A HOBBY. But no, instead you harass a person because
simply put, you don't like what that person says or does, your ****ing
life circle around ruining this person's life. But hey after he's
gone you can go out back and blow your ****ing brains out. Because,
once he is gone you will no longer have anything to live for because
you're the one who is a LOSER.

Todd N9OGL

Coming from a fag who lives in his parents basement who couldn't even figure out how to file a LPFM application properly and a CBer who couldn't figure out how to pass an FCC test if he tried, I figured you two would be on the "I want to blow Glenn Baxter" bus. Keep crying retards!


Toad and John Smith, you're both LOSERS

"N9OGL" wrote in message
ups.com...

Your one of those pathetic licensed CB operators who
can get it through their ****ing head that IT'S A HOBBY.

Yup, it's a hobby, and K1MAN is trying to turn it into a lucrative career for
himself.

But hey after he's gone you can go out back and blow your ****ing brains out.

No, we'll just hang out here and let you, Brian Burke, and Mark Morgan entertain
us with your broken-english foul-mouthed tirades.

DNE

N9OGL wrote:
It seems to me that your one of those amateur operators who doesn't
like K1MAN; reason, you don't have a ****ING LIFE.

That's the difference between you and most of the rest of us toddieboy.
You have a F***ing life, while we have a real life.

You really are an idiot.

First off I'm not a "fag" nor do I live in my parent's basment. Next
asshole, and I know it will be hard for you to understand with what
little to no brains you have, it was my LPTV applications that were
dismissed because they were not filed during the filing window. The
problem is I had a waiver with all my applications and there is no
filing windows for waivers. Waivers can be filed at anytime and the
courts have stated repeativly that the FCC MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS. So
believe what you and bitches want, the FCC are a bunch of lying
assholes. They go to court claiming all a person has to do is apply for
a license and ask for a waiver, but those SCUMBAGS AT THE FCC don't
consider waivers and as I've stated a BUNCH OF LYING ASSHOLES!!!!!

Todd N9OGL

That's the difference between you and most of the rest of us toddieboy.
You have a F***ing life, while we have a real life.


SURE YOU DO!!!! keep you imagination to yourself.

N9OGL wrote:
Waivers can be filed at anytime and the
courts have stated repeativly that the FCC MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS.

So they considered your waivers and turned you down, just like they
should have done.

N9OGL wrote:
It seems to me that your one of those amateur operators who doesn't
like K1MAN; reason, you don't have a ####ING LIFE.

Ironic...Coming from a lifeless twit living in mommy and daddy's
basement, bombarding newsgroups with "inventions" and playing junior
disc jockey on the Amateur Bands.

And by the way...I didn't see where "Johnny Johnson" signed an
Amateur callsign to his name or tagline.

Your one of those pathetic licensed CB operators...(SNIP)

CB doesn't require a license anymore, Toiddie.

(UNSNIP)...who can get it through their ####ing head that IT'S A HOBBY.

No it's not.

It's a federally regulated radio service that many participate in
AS a hobby.

There are NO radio services in the United States chartered as a
"hobby radio service".

But no, instead you harass a person because
simply put, you don't like what that person says or does, your ####ing
life circle around ruining this person's life.

Glenn Baxter is ruining Glenn Baxter's life. No one else.

But hey after he's
gone you can go out back and blow your ####ing brains out. Because,
once he is gone you will no longer have anything to live for because
you're the one who is a LOSER.

So sayeth the basement dweller.

Steve, K4YZ

N9OGL wrote:
First off I'm not a "fag" nor do I live in my parent's basment.

I wouldn't use the word "fag"...That is to gay people like the "N"
word is to African-Americans. However you are gay AND living at home
with mommy and daddy at the age of 37.

Next
###hole, and I know it will be hard for you to understand with what
little to no brains you have, it was my LPTV applications that were
dismissed because they were not filed during the filing window. The
problem is I had a waiver with all my applications and there is no
filing windows for waivers. Waivers can be filed at anytime and the
courts have stated repeativly that the FCC MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS.

And I am sure they did. Rumour has it that they don't get too
many applications written in crayon with "GIMME MY ####ING LICENSE YOU
MOTHER####ING ###HOLES".

That they denied your license was in the best public interest on
soooooo many levels...

So believe what you and bitches want, the FCC are a bunch of lying
###holes. They go to court claiming all a person has to do is apply for
a license and ask for a waiver, but those SCUMBAGS AT THE FCC don't
consider waivers and as I've stated a BUNCH OF LYING ###HOLES!!!!!

And again, I bet they DID consider your license AND waiver, and
then came to the conclusion that all of us here have...That you're a
ranting, irresponsible, immature little punk who was NOT to be trusted
with the public interest.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
First off I'm not a "fag" nor do I live in my parent's basment.

I wouldn't use the word "fag"...That is to gay people like the "N"
word is to African-Americans. However you are gay AND living at home
with mommy and daddy at the age of 37.

and you are comiting Libel


Next
###hole, and I know it will be hard for you to understand with what
little to no brains you have, it was my LPTV applications that were
dismissed because they were not filed during the filing window. The
problem is I had a waiver with all my applications and there is no
filing windows for waivers. Waivers can be filed at anytime and the
courts have stated repeativly that the FCC MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS.

And I am sure they did. Rumour has it that they don't get too
many applications written in crayon with "GIMME MY ####ING LICENSE YOU
MOTHER####ING ###HOLES".

That they denied your license was in the best public interest on
soooooo many levels...

So believe what you and bitches want, the FCC are a bunch of lying
###holes. They go to court claiming all a person has to do is apply for
a license and ask for a waiver, but those SCUMBAGS AT THE FCC don't
consider waivers and as I've stated a BUNCH OF LYING ###HOLES!!!!!

And again, I bet they DID consider your license AND waiver, and
then came to the conclusion that all of us here have...That you're a
ranting, irresponsible, immature little punk who was NOT to be trusted
with the public interest

Steve, K4YZ

So they considered your waivers and turned you down, just like they
should have done.

no they didn't even look at it.

I wouldn't use the word "fag"...That is to gay people like the "N"
word is to African-Americans. However you are gay AND living at home
with mommy and daddy at the age of 37.

Stebie, my girlfriend would disagree with you there.

And I am sure they did. Rumour has it that they don't get too
many applications written in crayon with "GIMME MY ####ING LICENSE YOU
MOTHER####ING ###HOLES".

Don't believe everything you hear, because they weren't written in
crayon, nor was that statement on the application.

That they denied your license was in the best public interest on
soooooo many levels.

Well stebie, I know for a fact that you butt buddies (FCC) didn't even
look at my application. try again

And again, I bet they DID consider your license AND waiver, and
then came to the conclusion that all of us here have...That you're a
ranting, irresponsible, immature little punk who was NOT to be trusted
with the public interest.

Which raises the question how you got a ham license? a picece of
pondscum low life who sits on a newsgroup spreading his lies, harassing
people and threatening them

Todd N9OGL

K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
It seems to me that your one of those amateur operators who doesn't
like K1MAN; reason, you don't have a ####ING LIFE.

Ironic...Coming from a lifeless twit living in mommy and daddy's
basement, bombarding newsgroups with "inventions" and playing junior
disc jockey on the Amateur Bands.

And by the way...I didn't see where "Johnny Johnson" signed an
Amateur callsign to his name or tagline.

Your one of those pathetic licensed CB operators...(SNIP)

CB doesn't require a license anymore, Toiddie.

(UNSNIP)...who can get it through their ####ing head that IT'S A HOBBY.

No it's not.

It's a federally regulated radio service that many participate in
AS a hobby.

There are NO radio services in the United States chartered as a
"hobby radio service".

But no, instead you harass a person because
simply put, you don't like what that person says or does, your ####ing
life circle around ruining this person's life.


Glenn Baxter is ruining Glenn Baxter's life. No one else.

amusing that you claim that You may freely do what K1MAN is in some
trouble for doing

But hey after he's
gone you can go out back and blow your ####ing brains out. Because,
once he is gone you will no longer have anything to live for because
you're the one who is a LOSER.

So sayeth the basement dweller.

Steve, K4YZ

N9OGL wrote:
I wouldn't use the word "fag"...That is to gay people like the "N"
word is to African-Americans. However you are gay AND living at home
with mommy and daddy at the age of 37.

Stebie, my girlfriend would disagree with you there.

She shares you with a guy?

You and Markie DO have a lot in common!Q

And I am sure they did. Rumour has it that they don't get too
many applications written in crayon with "GIMME MY ####ING LICENSE YOU
MOTHER####ING ###HOLES".

Don't believe everything you hear, because they weren't written in
crayon, nor was that statement on the application.

But I am certain they've had plenty of opportunity to see your
other comments in other forums.

That they denied your license was in the best public interest on
soooooo many levels.

Well stebie, I know for a fact that you butt buddies (FCC) didn't even
look at my application. try again

First of all, other than speaking with Phil Kane in this forum, I
don't have ANY kind of "buddies" at the FCC.

Secondly, how do you know they didn't "look" at your application?

In order to have dismissed it as being out of the filing window,
they had to know when it was filed.

Maybe Carnac the Magnificent read it through the envelope?

And again, I bet they DID consider your license AND waiver, and
then came to the conclusion that all of us here have...That you're a
ranting, irresponsible, immature little punk who was NOT to be trusted
with the public interest.

Which raises the question how you got a ham license?

It certainly wasn't by calling the FCC names in public forums, nor
was it submitting an application in crayon with "GIMME MY ####ING
LICENSE YOU MOTHER####ING ###HOLES" written on it.

a picece of
pondscum low life who sits on a newsgroup spreading his lies, harassing
people and threatening them

I haven't lied, nor have I harrassed or threatened anyone.

You, on the otherhand, have threatened numerous lawsuits, acutally
threatened violence (Markie would be embarrassed...) used gross
profanity, defamed a deceased child, and otherwise have acted
irrationally and irresponsibly.

Not to mention your "inventions" were some of the silliest and
most idiotic concepts to hit the wire!

Steve, K4YZ

an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
First off I'm not a "fag" nor do I live in my parent's basment.

I wouldn't use the word "fag"...That is to gay people like the "N"
word is to African-Americans. However you are gay AND living at home
with mommy and daddy at the age of 37.

and you are comiting Libel

And you don't know what you're talking about.

Todd's 37.

Todd lives with mommy and daddy.

Todd's gay.

It's not libel if it's true.

Steve, K4YZ

N9OGL wrote:
So they considered your waivers and turned you down, just like they
should have done.


no they didn't even look at it.


How do you know?

it is libel YOU ****ING COCKSUCKING BITCH WHORE MOTHER ****ER I AM NOT
GAY YOU ****ING REDARDED MOTHBER ****ER, WHY DON'T YOU JUST EAT ****
AND ****ING DIE!!!!!!!!!!! YOU ****ING ASSHOLE COCKSUCKING
MOTHER****ING BITCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!

THE ****ING ******* STEVE SAID
She shares you with a guy?

NO YOU ****ING COCKING BITCHWHORE BECAUSE YOU ****ING ******* CAN'T GET
IT THROUG YOUR ****ING RETARDED HEAD THAT I'M NOT ****ING GAY.

But I am certain they've had plenty of opportunity to see your
other comments in other forums.

So, if there were here I would tell them exacally what I think of those
lying Cocksucking assholes known as the FCC!!!

First of all, other than speaking with Phil Kane in this forum, I
don't have ANY kind of "buddies" at the FCC.
Secondly, how do you know they didn't "look" at your application?

In order to have dismissed it as being out of the filing window,
they had to know when it was filed.
Maybe Carnac the Magnificent read it through the envelope?

A waiver must either granted or denied, if it is denied the FCC must in
writing explain why it was denied. All facts and finding must be shown
so the applicant if he waiver is denied can file in the US Court of
Appeal. there is a BIG difference between a dissmal and a denial. When
I file the application in the mail on one day and three day's later it
returned well, you get the hint. The MASS MEDIA section of the FCC has
had a long history of not looking at waivers. for example between 1978
to 2000 there was a ban on low power FM however the FCC repeatly stated
that a person can apply for a license and ask for a waiver. In the 22
years of the ban only 2 waivers were ever consider for low power FM,
and that was after the US Court of Appeal told the FCC to consider
them.

It certainly wasn't by calling the FCC names in public forums, nor
was it submitting an application in crayon with "GIMME MY ####ING
LICENSE YOU MOTHER####ING ###HOLES" written on it.

First off dickhead I didn't put that on the application secondly I
became very opinionated about the FCC LONG AFTER I HAD APPLIED FOR A
LOW POWER TV LICENSE.

K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
First off I'm not a "fag" nor do I live in my parent's basment.

I wouldn't use the word "fag"...That is to gay people like the "N"
word is to African-Americans. However you are gay AND living at home
with mommy and daddy at the age of 37.

and you are comiting Libel

And you don't know what you're talking about.

Todd's 37.

may well be

Todd lives with mommy and daddy.

Todd's gay.

no he isn't I know better

I gentlely remind you that Taylorville isn't far from Illiopolis

It's not libel if it's true.

but it isn't true

Steve, K4YZ

N9OGL wrote:
it is libel YOU ####ING ####SUCKING ##### WHORE MOTHER ####ER I AM NOT
GAY YOU ####ING REDARDED MOTHBER ####ER, WHY DON'T YOU JUST EAT ####
AND ####ING DIE!!!!!!!!!!! YOU ####ING ###HOLE ####SUCKING
MOTHER####ING #####!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Well, well, well!

Up nicely from your last of 12.9%, Toiddie, but still not quite a
full 33%

On the bottle again, eh? Or just playing badmouth while mommy and
daddy have left you unsupervised one more..?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
cut

On the bottle again, eh? Or just playing badmouth while mommy and
daddy have left you unsupervised one more..?!?!

more libel

Steve, K4YZ

an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Glenn Baxter is ruining Glenn Baxter's life. No one else.

amusing that you claim that You may freely do what K1MAN is in some
trouble for doing

Oh?

You've seen my name on an NAL for numerous violations of Part 97,
Markie?

THAT'S what K1MAN is in trouble for...

Unless someone bootlegs my call, you'll not hear K4YZ broadcasting
on ANY Amateur allocation.

Steve, K4YZ

I guess they don't accept applications filed out in crayon, full of
mispelled words and incomplete sentences.

Well your not a ham because surely they wouldn't give a license to an
asshole.

N9OGL wrote:
it is libel YOU ****ING COCKSUCKING BITCH WHORE MOTHER ****ER I AM NOT
GAY YOU ****ING REDARDED MOTHBER ****ER, WHY DON'T YOU JUST EAT ****
AND ****ING DIE!!!!!!!!!!! YOU ****ING ASSHOLE COCKSUCKING
MOTHER****ING BITCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And the toad once again displays his level of intellegence.

N9OGL wrote:


A waiver must either granted or denied, if it is denied the FCC must in
writing explain why it was denied. All facts and finding must be shown
so the applicant if he waiver is denied can file in the US Court of
Appeal. there is a BIG difference between a dissmal and a denial. When
I file the application in the mail on one day and three day's later it
returned well, you get the hint.

I guess they don't accept applications filed out in crayon, full of
mispelled words and incomplete sentences.

N9OGL wrote:
I guess they don't accept applications filed out in crayon, full of
mispelled words and incomplete sentences.


Well your not a ham because surely they wouldn't give a license to an
asshole.


The fact that they gave you one certainly disproves that theory.

an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
cut

On the bottle again, eh? Or just playing badmouth while mommy and
daddy have left you unsupervised one more..?!?!

more libel

Not if it's true...And by all counts of what you "cut", it
certainly appears so.....

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Glenn Baxter is ruining Glenn Baxter's life. No one else.

amusing that you claim that You may freely do what K1MAN is in some
trouble for doing

Oh?

You've seen my name on an NAL for numerous violations of Part 97,
Markie?

THAT'S what K1MAN is in trouble for...

Unless someone bootlegs my call, you'll not hear K4YZ broadcasting
on ANY Amateur allocation.

Hey Markie...

Any reason you left THIS post unmolested...?!?!

Any reason you can't explain to me the rationale for your last set
of answers? You've made others since.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
cut

On the bottle again, eh? Or just playing badmouth while mommy and
daddy have left you unsupervised one more..?!?!

more libel

Not if it's true...And by all counts of what you "cut", it
certainly appears so.....

not at all

no eveidence it is true

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Glenn Baxter is ruining Glenn Baxter's life. No one else.

amusing that you claim that You may freely do what K1MAN is in some
trouble for doing

Oh?

You've seen my name on an NAL for numerous violations of Part 97,
Markie?

THAT'S what K1MAN is in trouble for...

Unless someone bootlegs my call, you'll not hear K4YZ broadcasting
on ANY Amateur allocation.

Hey Markie...

Any reason you left THIS post unmolested...?!?!

of course

I missed it in all you ****

but it of course is mostly bull****

since the issue is not broadcasting but you claiming the right to
contact other other and "inform them" they are comiting a federal
crime, that landed Baxtae in hot water

and you are claiming the right to contact people tell them they are
comitting a crime, and claiming the right to contact people PERenat and
tell them they are comiting a federal crime by allowing thier sons to
transmit

and you deny that you are threatening Todd, you lying sack of ****


Any reason you can't explain to me the rationale for your last set
of answers? You've made others since.

just missed it that is Usenet for you

as I said before it is NOT rational for you to expect I am going to see
your post in the order you make them, and here in this thread you made
so many so close together I simply missed one

so sorry

Steve, K4YZ

AOF:

Don't get yer panties in a bunch, I only want to be helpful...

Why can't you see the posts in the order they are posted? Are you forced
to read the newsgroup off of a webpage? (I hate those damn pages, if they
are going to do them--they could at least do them correctly!)

Are you using webtv? I can't keep everyone organized as to what
software/hardware they are using, etc. (could be alzheimers frown)

John

On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:09:53 -0700, an_old_friend wrote:


K4YZ wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Glenn Baxter is ruining Glenn Baxter's life. No one else.

amusing that you claim that You may freely do what K1MAN is in some
trouble for doing

Oh?

You've seen my name on an NAL for numerous violations of Part 97,
Markie?

THAT'S what K1MAN is in trouble for...

Unless someone bootlegs my call, you'll not hear K4YZ broadcasting
on ANY Amateur allocation.

Hey Markie...

Any reason you left THIS post unmolested...?!?!

of course

I missed it in all you ****

but it of course is mostly bull****

since the issue is not broadcasting but you claiming the right to
contact other other and "inform them" they are comiting a federal
crime, that landed Baxtae in hot water

and you are claiming the right to contact people tell them they are
comitting a crime, and claiming the right to contact people PERenat and
tell them they are comiting a federal crime by allowing thier sons to
transmit

and you deny that you are threatening Todd, you lying sack of ****


Any reason you can't explain to me the rationale for your last set
of answers? You've made others since.

just missed it that is Usenet for you

as I said before it is NOT rational for you to expect I am going to see
your post in the order you make them, and here in this thread you made
so many so close together I simply missed one

so sorry

Steve, K4YZ

John Smith wrote:
AOF:

Don't get yer panties in a bunch, I only want to be helpful...

Why can't you see the posts in the order they are posted? Are you forced

well mostly becuase if you post as much as stevie you can lose one or
two thinking you have answered all his ****

to read the newsgroup off of a webpage? (I hate those damn pages, if they
are going to do them--they could at least do them correctly!)

I use google these days free and easy enough

Are you using webtv? I can't keep everyone organized as to what
software/hardware they are using, etc. (could be alzheimers frown)

John

On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:09:53 -0700, an_old_friend wrote:


K4YZ wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Glenn Baxter is ruining Glenn Baxter's life. No one else.

amusing that you claim that You may freely do what K1MAN is in some
trouble for doing

Oh?

You've seen my name on an NAL for numerous violations of Part 97,
Markie?

THAT'S what K1MAN is in trouble for...

Unless someone bootlegs my call, you'll not hear K4YZ broadcasting
on ANY Amateur allocation.

Hey Markie...

Any reason you left THIS post unmolested...?!?!

of course

I missed it in all you ****

but it of course is mostly bull****

since the issue is not broadcasting but you claiming the right to
contact other other and "inform them" they are comiting a federal
crime, that landed Baxtae in hot water

and you are claiming the right to contact people tell them they are
comitting a crime, and claiming the right to contact people PERenat and
tell them they are comiting a federal crime by allowing thier sons to
transmit

and you deny that you are threatening Todd, you lying sack of ****


Any reason you can't explain to me the rationale for your last set
of answers? You've made others since.

just missed it that is Usenet for you

as I said before it is NOT rational for you to expect I am going to see
your post in the order you make them, and here in this thread you made
so many so close together I simply missed one

so sorry

Steve, K4YZ

Is this one of your "opinions" that you claim you have a right to broadcast?

Dan/W4NTI

"N9OGL" wrote in message
ups.com...
It seems to me that your one of those amateur operators who doesn't
like K1MAN; reason, you don't have a ****ING LIFE. Your one of those
pathetic licensed CB operators who can get it through their ****ing
head that IT'S A HOBBY. But no, instead you harass a person because
simply put, you don't like what that person says or does, your ****ing
life circle around ruining this person's life. But hey after he's
gone you can go out back and blow your ****ing brains out. Because,
once he is gone you will no longer have anything to live for because
you're the one who is a LOSER.

Todd N9OGL

Dan/W4NTI wrote:
Is this one of your "opinions" that you claim you have a right to broadcast?

nope that he has the Right to transmit and informational bullitin same
as you do

Dan/W4NTI
pruning

"an_old_friend" wrote


nope that he has the Right to transmit and informational bullitin same
as you do


Here's a "bullitin" for you!

Frederick H. Kleber (K9VV) reported Baxter's interference to health and welfare
traffic handling during the Mexico City earthquake
disaster:

"During the third or fourth day of passing health and welfare traffic during the
Mexico City disaster, Mr. Baxter appeared on the primary net frequency and began
to disrupt communications. I vividly recall my frustration due to the
interference he created by insisting he speak with me, even though it was
evident that I was passing traffic. Baxter insisted that his station serve as
net control, in spite of being politely informed that his assistance was not
needed. Baxter's interference became so disruptive that I ultimately called him
on the telephone.

Carlos (XE1HC) and I were speaking in Spanish, and we discussed how to avoid
Baxter's interference. Baxter was insistent on gaining control of the frequency
and running net operations. In between Baxter's transmissions, Carlos and I
managed to communicate, and to change to another traffic frequency. Once we
moved to a new frequency, we were able to resume passing traffic. Baxter
followed us to our new frequency and interrupted us, just as he had before.
Carlos and I were forced to changed frequency several times in order to avoid
Baxter's interference. Each time, Baxter would show up shortly thereafter and
continue to try to gain control of net operations. Becoming increasingly
frustrated with Baxter's interference, I telephoned him again. I attempted to
explain to Baxter that he was interfering with a health and welfare operation.
He did not listen and he interrupted me frequently. In frustration, I finally
hung up and returned to handling health and welfare traffic.

The health and welfare traffic operation lasted approximately a week. During
that period, my partners and I (NJ7E, XE1HC, W9GIG and W7MY) were able to pass
approximately 7,000 pieces of health and welfare traffic. On numerous occasions
over this period, Mr. Baxter operated his radio station in a manner that created
interference to an established Mexico City earthquake relief health and welfare
net. Mr. Baxter was a constant hindrance to the operation and he later attempted
to leverage publicity from the disaster (often inaccurately reported) for his
personal gain. In subsequent "press releases," Mr. Baxter attacked the actual
participants of that health and welfare net."

K=D8HB wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote


nope that he has the Right to transmit and informational bullitin same
as you do



finaly at least something that might be relavant

It would be nice to hear from others about the incident, but at least
this an allegation, no date given though which earthrquake are we
talking about here

If this is another old recylced charge

Here's a "bullitin" for you!

Frederick H. Kleber (K9VV) reported Baxter's interference to health and w=
elfare
traffic handling during the Mexico City earthquake
disaster:

"During the third or fourth day of passing health and welfare traffic dur=
ing the
Mexico City disaster, Mr. Baxter appeared on the primary net frequency an=
d began
to disrupt communications. I vividly recall my frustration due to the
interference he created by insisting he speak with me, even though it was
evident that I was passing traffic. Baxter insisted that his station serv=
e as
net control, in spite of being politely informed that his assistance was =
not
needed. Baxter's interference became so disruptive that I ultimately call=
ed him
on the telephone.

Carlos (XE1HC) and I were speaking in Spanish, and we discussed how to av=
oid
Baxter's interference. Baxter was insistent on gaining control of the fre=
quency
and running net operations. In between Baxter's transmissions, Carlos and=
I
managed to communicate, and to change to another traffic frequency. Once =
we
moved to a new frequency, we were able to resume passing traffic. Baxter
followed us to our new frequency and interrupted us, just as he had befor=
e=2E
Carlos and I were forced to changed frequency several times in order to a=
void
Baxter's interference. Each time, Baxter would show up shortly thereafter=
and
continue to try to gain control of net operations. Becoming increasingly
frustrated with Baxter's interference, I telephoned him again. I attempte=
d to
explain to Baxter that he was interfering with a health and welfare opera=
tion.
He did not listen and he interrupted me frequently. In frustration, I fin=
ally
hung up and returned to handling health and welfare traffic.

The health and welfare traffic operation lasted approximately a week. Dur=
ing
that period, my partners and I (NJ7E, XE1HC, W9GIG and W7MY) were able to=
pass
approximately 7,000 pieces of health and welfare traffic. On numerous occ=
asions
over this period, Mr. Baxter operated his radio station in a manner that =
created
interference to an established Mexico City earthquake relief health and w=
elfare
net. Mr. Baxter was a constant hindrance to the operation and he later at=
tempted
to leverage publicity from the disaster (often inaccurately reported) for=
his
personal gain. In subsequent "press releases," Mr. Baxter attacked the ac=
tual
participants of that health and welfare net."

an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Glenn Baxter is ruining Glenn Baxter's life. No one else.

amusing that you claim that You may freely do what K1MAN is in some
trouble for doing

Oh?

You've seen my name on an NAL for numerous violations of Part 97,
Markie?

THAT'S what K1MAN is in trouble for...

Unless someone bootlegs my call, you'll not hear K4YZ broadcasting
on ANY Amateur allocation.

Hey Markie...

Any reason you left THIS post unmolested...?!?!

of course

I missed it in all you ####

but it of course is mostly bull####

It's nothing of the sort.

since the issue is not broadcasting but you claiming the right to
contact other other and "inform them" they are comiting a federal
crime, that landed Baxtae in hot water

Again, you are misinformed.

Read the NAL, Markie.

THAT'S what he's in trouble for.

and you are claiming the right to contact people tell them they are
comitting a crime, and claiming the right to contact people PERenat and
tell them they are comiting a federal crime by allowing thier sons to
transmit

You're more confused than I thought.

You've got Toiddie's profanities, threats and other ONLINE
misbehaviour confused with Baxter's ON-THE-AIR high jinx, antics which
have now endangered his furture license status, not to mention possible
financial viability.

and you deny that you are threatening Todd, you lying sack of ####

Markie...Watch those "anger issues", boyo.

Any reason you can't explain to me the rationale for your last set
of answers? You've made others since.

just missed it that is Usenet for you

No...That was Markie not wanting to answer embarrassing questions.

as I said before it is NOT rational for you to expect I am going to see
your post in the order you make them, and here in this thread you made
so many so close together I simply missed one

so sorry

Yes. You are.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Glenn Baxter is ruining Glenn Baxter's life. No one else.

amusing that you claim that You may freely do what K1MAN is in some
trouble for doing

Oh?

You've seen my name on an NAL for numerous violations of Part 97,
Markie?

THAT'S what K1MAN is in trouble for...

Unless someone bootlegs my call, you'll not hear K4YZ broadcasting
on ANY Amateur allocation.

Hey Markie...

Any reason you left THIS post unmolested...?!?!

of course

I missed it in all you ####

but it of course is mostly bull####

It's nothing of the sort.

it sure is bull****

since the issue is not broadcasting but you claiming the right to
contact other other and "inform them" they are comiting a federal
crime, that landed Baxtae in hot water

Again, you are misinformed.

nope you are not reading


Read the NAL, Markie.

THAT'S what he's in trouble for.

and you are claiming the right to contact people tell them they are
comitting a crime, and claiming the right to contact people PERenat and
tell them they are comiting a federal crime by allowing thier sons to
transmit

You're more confused than I thought.

You've got Toiddie's profanities, threats and other ONLINE
misbehaviour confused with Baxter's ON-THE-AIR high jinx, antics which
have now endangered his furture license status, not to mention possible
financial viability.

Liar again

You have threaten to contact Todd perant and tell them their son in
violating federal law

one the thing that has people not happey with Baxter

and you deny that you are threatening Todd, you lying sack of ####

Markie...Watch those "anger issues", boyo.

why?

if you have any prove of your claims of mental illiness take to the
proper authorites

Put up or shut up


Any reason you can't explain to me the rationale for your last set
of answers? You've made others since.

just missed it that is Usenet for you

No...That was Markie not wanting to answer embarrassing questions.

no just missed it in you flood of ****


as I said before it is NOT rational for you to expect I am going to see
your post in the order you make them, and here in this thread you made
so many so close together I simply missed one

so sorry

Yes. You are.

put up or shut up

Steve, K4YZ