| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
day 5 Stevie Action is missing
well here we are on day 5 of Stevie promised "action"
total results to date, nothing It sure looks like Stevie promise of action was somekind of lie Did he even call anyone? maybe Did any one take him seriously? looks like that is a NO |
an_old_friend wrote: well here we are on day 5 of Stevie promised "action" total results to date, nothing It sure looks like Stevie promise of action was somekind of lie Did he even call anyone? maybe No maybe. Did any one take him seriously? looks like that is a NO Looks like they are taking thier time. Notice anyone looking at you in public? Cars driving by slowly? Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: well here we are on day 5 of Stevie promised "action" total results to date, nothing It sure looks like Stevie promise of action was somekind of lie Did he even call anyone? maybe No maybe. Did any one take him seriously? looks like that is a NO Looks like they are taking thier time. Notice anyone looking at you in public? Cars driving by slowly? taking thier time ya sure No one looking at me public more than normal and anyone driving down my road had better be driving slowly if they value their kidneys It sure looks like no one took you seriously Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: well here we are on day 5 of Stevie promised "action" It sure looks like no one took you seriously Keep telling yourself that over and over and over and..... Steve, K4YZ |
AOF:
Look at your past posts, and those exchanging with you. All you are doing is defending your self against an attack or forced into a counterattack on someone attacking you. You have been effectively side-lined, removed from the real game of constructive comments, ideas and exchanges on amateur policy and future. If that isn't a plan to stop progress, it still effectively functions as such and by past example here, it does seem quite effective. Argue personalities or argue ideas, facts, regs, rules and future, the choice is yours. Arguing personalities is ridiculous, and unproductive. A course one has been following does not need to be continued nor followed to a failed end. Change tactics and you change the outcome. John On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:45:09 -0700, an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: well here we are on day 5 of Stevie promised "action" total results to date, nothing It sure looks like Stevie promise of action was somekind of lie Did he even call anyone? maybe No maybe. Did any one take him seriously? looks like that is a NO Looks like they are taking thier time. Notice anyone looking at you in public? Cars driving by slowly? taking thier time ya sure No one looking at me public more than normal and anyone driving down my road had better be driving slowly if they value their kidneys It sure looks like no one took you seriously Steve, K4YZ |
John Smith wrote: AOF: Look at your past posts, and those exchanging with you. All you are doing is defending your self against an attack or forced into a counterattack on someone attacking you. You have been effectively side-lined, removed from the real game of constructive comments, ideas and exchanges on amateur policy and future. If that isn't a plan to stop progress, it still effectively functions as such and by past example here, it does seem quite effective. Not realy I am partciating in threads with Dee about the future The thread with Dave and DX while rather acrimonious is on target as the ARS, being over what Is and isn't Good Ham practice The thread could be better of course but.. i can only work with what I am given Part of the thread with Dave deals with wether or not Morse Code knowledge is in fact required to use Morse Code for an effective purpose T spend more time on Better threads.... I need better threads to coment on, The quaility lately is pretty poor So not realy sidelined Argue personalities or argue ideas, facts, regs, rules and future, the choice is yours. Arguing personalities is ridiculous, and unproductive. But Pusing back at Stevie Bluffing has resulted in fewer posts from him, and less of the realy bad rethoric from him He has Stopped relently attcking some others, Poster that I find to be more efective than myself tand that I by and large agree with Given my typing problems if I aid other that I agree with in expresing themsleves that is fine by me A course one has been following does not need to be continued nor followed to a failed end. Change tactics and you change the outcome. I have changed Tactics and the outcome is improved, alas the results could be better, but in time hopefullY I will find yet better tactics But yeilding to the threats of petty bully is never a good idea No prefect Solution yet But I keep trying John |
an_old_friend wrote: John Smith wrote: AOF: Look at your past posts, and those exchanging with you. All you are doing is defending your self against an attack or forced into a counterattack on someone attacking you. You have been effectively side-lined, removed from the real game of constructive comments, ideas and exchanges on amateur policy and future. If that isn't a plan to stop progress, it still effectively functions as such and by past example here, it does seem quite effective. Not realy I am partciating in threads with Dee about the future The thread with Dave and DX while rather acrimonious is on target as the ARS, being over what Is and isn't Good Ham practice A subject of which you have no obvious experience in. The thread could be better of course but.. i can only work with what I am given And there it is... "...i can only work with what I am given..." GimmeGimmeGimme..... Uh huh...Nothing new there... Steve, K4YZ |
AOF:
Defending the truth is noble, but obvious. Possibly many have not seen a code reader/sender utilizing a computer. I think it becomes apparent that two stations using code readers/senders at rates 60-70-80+ wpm are out of the league of those copying by ear... sending morse from a pre-existing text file, speeds of hundreds of wpm are easily accomplished... Only those who have never been exposed to such equipment will argue counter... John On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:33:57 -0700, an_old_friend wrote: John Smith wrote: AOF: Look at your past posts, and those exchanging with you. All you are doing is defending your self against an attack or forced into a counterattack on someone attacking you. You have been effectively side-lined, removed from the real game of constructive comments, ideas and exchanges on amateur policy and future. If that isn't a plan to stop progress, it still effectively functions as such and by past example here, it does seem quite effective. Not realy I am partciating in threads with Dee about the future The thread with Dave and DX while rather acrimonious is on target as the ARS, being over what Is and isn't Good Ham practice The thread could be better of course but.. i can only work with what I am given Part of the thread with Dave deals with wether or not Morse Code knowledge is in fact required to use Morse Code for an effective purpose T spend more time on Better threads.... I need better threads to coment on, The quaility lately is pretty poor So not realy sidelined Argue personalities or argue ideas, facts, regs, rules and future, the choice is yours. Arguing personalities is ridiculous, and unproductive. But Pusing back at Stevie Bluffing has resulted in fewer posts from him, and less of the realy bad rethoric from him He has Stopped relently attcking some others, Poster that I find to be more efective than myself tand that I by and large agree with Given my typing problems if I aid other that I agree with in expresing themsleves that is fine by me A course one has been following does not need to be continued nor followed to a failed end. Change tactics and you change the outcome. I have changed Tactics and the outcome is improved, alas the results could be better, but in time hopefullY I will find yet better tactics But yeilding to the threats of petty bully is never a good idea No prefect Solution yet But I keep trying John |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: John Smith wrote: AOF: Look at your past posts, and those exchanging with you. All you are doing is defending your self against an attack or forced into a counterattack on someone attacking you. You have been effectively side-lined, removed from the real game of constructive comments, ideas and exchanges on amateur policy and future. If that isn't a plan to stop progress, it still effectively functions as such and by past example here, it does seem quite effective. Not realy I am partciating in threads with Dee about the future The thread with Dave and DX while rather acrimonious is on target as the ARS, being over what Is and isn't Good Ham practice A subject of which you have no obvious experience in. Gee I have received no NAL from the FCC, that meats so standard of Proof in other areas The thread could be better of course but.. i can only work with what I am given And there it is... "...i can only work with what I am given..." Indeed with 2 people bent on avoiding answering a simple question I can't do much GimmeGimmeGimme..... Uh huh...Nothing new there... Steve, K4YZ |
just doing my best to expose someone to such a concept
besides I like feeling noble John Smith wrote: AOF: Defending the truth is noble, but obvious. Possibly many have not seen a code reader/sender utilizing a computer. I think it becomes apparent that two stations using code readers/senders at rates 60-70-80+ wpm are out of the league of those copying by ear... sending morse from a pre-existing text file, speeds of hundreds of wpm are easily accomplished... Only those who have never been exposed to such equipment will argue counter... John On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:33:57 -0700, an_old_friend wrote: John Smith wrote: AOF: Look at your past posts, and those exchanging with you. All you are doing is defending your self against an attack or forced into a counterattack on someone attacking you. You have been effectively side-lined, removed from the real game of constructive comments, ideas and exchanges on amateur policy and future. If that isn't a plan to stop progress, it still effectively functions as such and by past example here, it does seem quite effective. Not realy I am partciating in threads with Dee about the future The thread with Dave and DX while rather acrimonious is on target as the ARS, being over what Is and isn't Good Ham practice The thread could be better of course but.. i can only work with what I am given Part of the thread with Dave deals with wether or not Morse Code knowledge is in fact required to use Morse Code for an effective purpose T spend more time on Better threads.... I need better threads to coment on, The quaility lately is pretty poor So not realy sidelined Argue personalities or argue ideas, facts, regs, rules and future, the choice is yours. Arguing personalities is ridiculous, and unproductive. But Pusing back at Stevie Bluffing has resulted in fewer posts from him, and less of the realy bad rethoric from him He has Stopped relently attcking some others, Poster that I find to be more efective than myself tand that I by and large agree with Given my typing problems if I aid other that I agree with in expresing themsleves that is fine by me A course one has been following does not need to be continued nor followed to a failed end. Change tactics and you change the outcome. I have changed Tactics and the outcome is improved, alas the results could be better, but in time hopefullY I will find yet better tactics But yeilding to the threats of petty bully is never a good idea No prefect Solution yet But I keep trying John |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:49 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com