Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Comments submitted to the FCC,
advocating ARRL administration of Morse license endorsment: ------------------- 18 Aug. 2005 WT Docket 05-235, Amateur Radio Morse Code Testing Requirement. I respectfully submit that we can relieve the FCC of the burden and expense of administering Amateur Radio Element One (Morse Code), while preserving a skill which has both a direct bearing on our nation's security and a "global heritage" aspect. We should maintain some level of incentive to preserve and develop skill in Morse Code: * Morse Code is still in use for covert and intelligence operations throughout the world, and will remain so for the foreseeable future. * Morse code transmitters and receivers are simple to make and operate, needing only a handful of low-tech, inexpensive parts, making them available even in less-developed areas of the globe, where expensive and complicated "hi-tech" systems are unavailable and, if present, are subject to multiple failure modes. * The only ready and sizable reservoir of trained Morse operators is the Amateur Radio community. If we remove any incentive to develop Morse skill, this valuable asset will quickly cease to exist. There is also a global historic and "Heritage of Humanity" aspect to this issue. Morse Code has served as a reliable means of communications for one and a half centuries. It has been a primary tool in life-saving and part of the great communication web that has knit us together, first spanning neighborhoods, then continents, and finally the world. As a tool in the evolution of the global community, it ranks with the sailing ship, steam ship, railroad and telephone. We preserve early examples of these other means of connecting with the larger world; Morse Code surely deserves at least a modest effort at preservation, just as we preserve these other "touch-stones" of our progress. Without some form of incentive, this important skill will be lost to us. We can accomplish this while removing the burden and expense from the FCC. I respectfully suggest the following steps be adopted: 1. Drop the Element One (Morse Code) testing requirement from Amateur Radio regulations. The FCC would no longer be responsible for, or need to allocate resources to, this task. 2. Reallocate the bottom 10 kiloHertz of each Amateur Radio spectrum allocation to exclusive Morse Code use. This is a small window, but is easily sufficient bandwidth for skilled Morse operators. It provides an "historic preserve," protected from new and wider-bandwidth modes and will have no impact on the development and use of new techniques. 3. Authorize the American Radio Relay League (ARRL) to administer and issue, through the Volunteer Examiner program, a license endorsement, attachable to any class of Amateur Radio license, awarded for demonstration of Morse skill at 5 WPM or better. Only those Amateur operators with the endorsement could operate their stations in the 10 kHz "historic preserves." The ARRL could establish premiums for contesting and skill certifications earned within the "preserves." Continue to allow Morse Code use throughout the remaining Amateur spectrum, subject to present rules and/or future reallocations. These modest steps will preserve this valuable and historic skill, while removing the administrative burden from the FCC. I respectfully submit them for your consideration. Kind Regards, David L. Stinson AB5S Field Engineer Wylie, Texas |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Seeking comments from Icom PCR1000 Users | Scanner | |||
Seeking Comments from Icom PCR1000 Users | Shortwave | |||
Citizens make inappropriate comments? | Policy | |||
NASWA Draft BPL Comments | Shortwave | |||
BPL interference - reply comments - YOUR ACTION REQUIRED | Policy |