Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Walking was developed way before man ever thought of riding a horse, camel, oxen, donkey, etc. Indeed, the automobile is only a very recent development in mankinds' history, even predated by the bicycle... Yet, few keep horses today as a reliable means of transportation... Covert operations are mainly don't via the web... But, nice bit of inaccurate obfuscation... CW will die with ancient amateurs, however, there is always some faction which will use it, people still ride oxen... John On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:04:53 +0000, David Stinson wrote: Comments submitted to the FCC, advocating ARRL administration of Morse license endorsment: ------------------- 18 Aug. 2005 WT Docket 05-235, Amateur Radio Morse Code Testing Requirement. I respectfully submit that we can relieve the FCC of the burden and expense of administering Amateur Radio Element One (Morse Code), while preserving a skill which has both a direct bearing on our nation's security and a "global heritage" aspect. We should maintain some level of incentive to preserve and develop skill in Morse Code: * Morse Code is still in use for covert and intelligence operations throughout the world, and will remain so for the foreseeable future. * Morse code transmitters and receivers are simple to make and operate, needing only a handful of low-tech, inexpensive parts, making them available even in less-developed areas of the globe, where expensive and complicated "hi-tech" systems are unavailable and, if present, are subject to multiple failure modes. * The only ready and sizable reservoir of trained Morse operators is the Amateur Radio community. If we remove any incentive to develop Morse skill, this valuable asset will quickly cease to exist. There is also a global historic and "Heritage of Humanity" aspect to this issue. Morse Code has served as a reliable means of communications for one and a half centuries. It has been a primary tool in life-saving and part of the great communication web that has knit us together, first spanning neighborhoods, then continents, and finally the world. As a tool in the evolution of the global community, it ranks with the sailing ship, steam ship, railroad and telephone. We preserve early examples of these other means of connecting with the larger world; Morse Code surely deserves at least a modest effort at preservation, just as we preserve these other "touch-stones" of our progress. Without some form of incentive, this important skill will be lost to us. We can accomplish this while removing the burden and expense from the FCC. I respectfully suggest the following steps be adopted: 1. Drop the Element One (Morse Code) testing requirement from Amateur Radio regulations. The FCC would no longer be responsible for, or need to allocate resources to, this task. 2. Reallocate the bottom 10 kiloHertz of each Amateur Radio spectrum allocation to exclusive Morse Code use. This is a small window, but is easily sufficient bandwidth for skilled Morse operators. It provides an "historic preserve," protected from new and wider-bandwidth modes and will have no impact on the development and use of new techniques. 3. Authorize the American Radio Relay League (ARRL) to administer and issue, through the Volunteer Examiner program, a license endorsement, attachable to any class of Amateur Radio license, awarded for demonstration of Morse skill at 5 WPM or better. Only those Amateur operators with the endorsement could operate their stations in the 10 kHz "historic preserves." The ARRL could establish premiums for contesting and skill certifications earned within the "preserves." Continue to allow Morse Code use throughout the remaining Amateur spectrum, subject to present rules and/or future reallocations. These modest steps will preserve this valuable and historic skill, while removing the administrative burden from the FCC. I respectfully submit them for your consideration. Kind Regards, David L. Stinson AB5S Field Engineer Wylie, Texas |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
John Smith wrote:
Yet, few keep horses today as a reliable means of transportation... That is a very U.S.- centric comment. Horses are still very much a "reliable means of transportation" over a great deal of the world, as are oxen. Your comments indicate you place no value on the large segment of humanity that lacks your wealth. There is no "web" in ItchyScratchyStan, nor money for $250,000 portable sat downlinks in other such places; if they have one, it stays broken most of the time from one of dozens of failure modes. But one can usually get hold of a few parts to piece together a CW rig, *if* they have been wise enough to encourage the preservation of the skill. The United States is not the whole world, and it's past time we remembered that. D.S. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
David:
Excellent argument for taking the USA to the "rest-of-the-world" and not the opposite... if they want it, if not, let 'em ride the oxen... John On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 18:31:04 +0000, David Stinson wrote: John Smith wrote: Yet, few keep horses today as a reliable means of transportation... That is a very U.S.- centric comment. Horses are still very much a "reliable means of transportation" over a great deal of the world, as are oxen. Your comments indicate you place no value on the large segment of humanity that lacks your wealth. There is no "web" in ItchyScratchyStan, nor money for $250,000 portable sat downlinks in other such places; if they have one, it stays broken most of the time from one of dozens of failure modes. But one can usually get hold of a few parts to piece together a CW rig, *if* they have been wise enough to encourage the preservation of the skill. The United States is not the whole world, and it's past time we remembered that. D.S. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
John Smith wrote:
David: Excellent argument for taking the USA to the "rest-of-the-world" and not the opposite... if they want it, if not, let 'em ride the oxen... It's not a matter of them "wanting it;" that is also a U.S.- and Western-centric attitude. People do not generally choose to ride oxen, have high infant mortality and suffer from disease. They do so because they do not have access to the wealth of the West. You indicate that you think everyone can just run right down to Wal-Mart and buy a new cell phone anytime they like. Since they don't have the wealth to do this, should we discard them as human beings? These people need to communicate just as you do, and there will be need for intelligence operations in these communities. Morse is simple, reliable and- despite the protests of indolent and spoiled rich Westerners- easy to learn. My suggestion will preserve only a small cadre' of operators, but that will be enough. The scorned few have always carried the fire for the lazy many. D.S. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
David:
Then your argument must be centered on such as: .. since parts of the world don't have out hospitals, we should abandon them for simpler medical practices. .. americans need more rickshaws. .. we are going digital tv, we should abandon this, as it will be years or decades before some of the world updates. .... get real ... no one should design the world on the least of available technologies. Instead, at every turn of the road, the bar needs raised--challenging those lagging to catch up... John On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 18:44:44 +0000, David Stinson wrote: John Smith wrote: David: Excellent argument for taking the USA to the "rest-of-the-world" and not the opposite... if they want it, if not, let 'em ride the oxen... It's not a matter of them "wanting it;" that is also a U.S.- and Western-centric attitude. People do not generally choose to ride oxen, have high infant mortality and suffer from disease. They do so because they do not have access to the wealth of the West. You indicate that you think everyone can just run right down to Wal-Mart and buy a new cell phone anytime they like. Since they don't have the wealth to do this, should we discard them as human beings? These people need to communicate just as you do, and there will be need for intelligence operations in these communities. Morse is simple, reliable and- despite the protests of indolent and spoiled rich Westerners- easy to learn. My suggestion will preserve only a small cadre' of operators, but that will be enough. The scorned few have always carried the fire for the lazy many. D.S. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
David Stinson wrote: John Smith wrote: David: Excellent argument for taking the USA to the "rest-of-the-world" and not the opposite... if they want it, if not, let 'em ride the oxen... It's not a matter of them "wanting it;" that is also a U.S.- and Western-centric attitude. People do not generally choose to ride oxen, have high infant mortality and suffer from disease. They do so because they do not have access to the wealth of the West. You indicate that you think everyone can just run right down to Wal-Mart and buy a new cell phone anytime they like. Since they don't have the wealth to do this, should we discard them as human beings? These people need to communicate And the US retianing morse will help them How? just as you do, and there will be need for intelligence operations in these communities. Morse is simple, reliable and- despite the protests of indolent and findable to RDF jamable and spoiled rich Westerners- easy to learn. My suggestion will preserve only a small cadre' of operators, but that will be enough. The scorned few have always carried the fire for the lazy many. feel free to try and prsrve the mode of your choice I doubt it will die out. AM hasn't, I doubt Morse Coded CW will either, but at least the rest of us will not have to be emabrashed by the horse and buggy aproach D.S. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
David Stinson wrote: John Smith wrote: Yet, few keep horses today as a reliable means of transportation... That is a very U.S.- centric comment. Horses are still very much a "reliable means of transportation" over a great deal of the world, as are oxen. Your comments indicate you place no value on the large segment of humanity that lacks your wealth. There is no "web" in ItchyScratchyStan, nor money for $250,000 portable sat downlinks Showing your prejudges again but gee I could get a portable self alining up link downlink for a couple of garnd these days,and since it was made in China I suspect that in Uzbekistan they could still get get for under 5 g in other such places; if they have one, it stays broken most of the time from one of dozens of failure modes. But one can usually get hold of a few parts to piece together a CW rig, *if* they have been wise enough to encourage the preservation of the skill. The United States is not the whole world, and it's past time we remembered that. D.S. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Seeking comments from Icom PCR1000 Users | Scanner | |||
Seeking Comments from Icom PCR1000 Users | Shortwave | |||
Citizens make inappropriate comments? | Policy | |||
NASWA Draft BPL Comments | Shortwave | |||
BPL interference - reply comments - YOUR ACTION REQUIRED | Policy |