| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree, that way he can get his butt kicked in real style. Live on the
air. Dan/W4NTI "John Smith" wrote in message news ![]() Len: I would like to encourage you to an amateur license, it is men like you who will restore the caliber of the hobby... in some ways, your text reminds me of the "old phart" who coached me on how to be a decent "old phart." (well, I have been indecent too, but only around those of the opposite sex--with their permission mind you! grin) John On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:34:35 -0700, LenAnderson wrote: Len: You might have said, I missed it if that is the case, when/if CW is dead, are you going to grab your extra ticket? Maybe, maybe not. That's MY option, not based on the puerile taunts of middle-schoolers who are of middle age going "nyah, nyah, can't get a ticket, can't get a ticket!!!" :-) Hmmm...I started out in HF communications with much more "action" than the average, doing 24/7 comms with high-power (up to 40 KW) transmitters shooting across the Pacific, plus doing VHF, UHF, and - finally - multi-channel microwave radio relay over a half century ago...winding up as an operations and maintenance supervisor NCO. Then, on release from active duty, getting a First 'Phone at an FCC field office (no COLEMs then) and working four broadcast stations as vacation relief or on weekends or full time for WREX-TV to gain enough money to come out west...having already interviewed for and secured a job at Hughes Aircraft. That led to a whole career, major major change to electronics engineering winding up as senior staff in design. I'm supposed to get a ham license to "prove I know something about radio?!?!?" I don't have anything to "prove" to a bunch of yokels who want to recreate the 1930s and 1940s in radiotelegraphy! Geezus, gimme a break from those neanderthallers! What the fork do think a ham license IS...some kind of Nobel Award for Science?!? :-) Amateur radio is fun, a recreational avocation done not for money but for personal pleasure. It involves NO different radio physics than any other radio service but it allows all the choice of buying state-of-the-art radios to use or in building them from their own designs. It requires a license to transmit RF due to a federal law (an act of Congress) that created a federal regulatory agency for ALL civil radio. The mindset of many hase been "conditioned" by a certain membership organization to be much, much more, a virtual lifestyle that has gotten too deep into the myth and fantasy of long-ago times and dreams of glory and heroism that never happened. One argument is that "a ham can have their OWN station." Yes, I've had "my own station" or properly, one-third of it in a business partnership with two others. I've built/converted three "stations" and checked them thoroughly befoe selling them, never once "using" them or caring to use them. I've designed and built two other transceivers for CB, one a prototype for a CB company in Burbank that went bankrupt when faced with off-shore CB products cut them out of profit action. "I can work the world on radio with an amateur license!!!" Yes, and I could pick up a handset in Tokyo, at ADA Control, and talk to Seattle, Anchorage, San Francisco, Hawaii, or Okinawa any time of the day or night, as I did for a while in 1955...without any "license" or even any specific HF with/without SSB schooling of any kind. I can "talk" to the rest of the world any time I want to on the Internet, and have, plus being able to share images with dozens of long-time friends (from pre-Internet days) faster than by surface mail, uninterrupted by vagaries of the ionosphere. "I can explore new radio territory and advance the state of the radio art" with a ham license. What the fork do some of these cretins think I was DOING FOR A LIVING since 1956? Without a ham license I've legally transmitted RF on frequencies ranging through EM bands from LF into EHF, on up to 4mm wavelengths. Gotten one patent as sole inventor, had a terrific time in the labs and in the field, still do it once in a while. I once "worked a station" ON the moon. No moonbounce stuff. I have to learn morse code in order to do THAT as an amateur?!? (I don't have to test for morse code at VHF and up, just for frequencies below 30 MHz...where I began doing HF communications a half century before...without having to know or use morse code then or any time afterwards) If so, ya wanna meet down on 3.840 and give art a run for his money--in a gentlemanly way of course. Don't go with disruptive actions myself... debate and argument yes, trouble no... suspect you might be the same... could be fun, ya never know... grin No. If anyplace on ham bands, it would be on 20m where a bunch of ex-RCA Corporation folks hang out on Saturday mornings. Talk there is shared-interest stuff, not the personal polemics of self-propelled radio potentates. Listen for KD6JG and W6MJN, among others. I know them by their real names, not callsigns. "I can be FEDERALLY-AUTHORIZED with MY OWN CALLSIGN if I get a ham license!!!" Wow, ain't that something (like I've already done that, but not with a ham license). I know where to get a good ham sandwich nearby, the vendors needing only a Health Department license to operate. [great pastrami at one place] I DO need to renew my Poetic License. Time to study for Mores Goad. :-) buy buy |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message nk.net... I agree, that way he can get his butt kicked in real style. Live on the air. Dan/W4NTI "John Smith" wrote in message news ![]() Len: I would like to encourage you to an amateur license, it is men like you who will restore the caliber of the hobby... in some ways, your text reminds me of the "old phart" who coached me on how to be a decent "old phart." (well, I have been indecent too, but only around those of the opposite sex--with their permission mind you! grin) John No decent "old phart" resorts to derogatory diminutives in his dealings with other people as Mr. Anderson has habitually done. You might want to think carefully about who you would really want to emulate when you become one yourself. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dee:
From the text and exchanges here, I honestly wonder how most here got their tickets! Then, they have the audacity to act like judges on who should have tickets--I hope you all stick together, you are all you guys have got! John On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 19:24:56 -0400, Dee Flint wrote: "Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message nk.net... I agree, that way he can get his butt kicked in real style. Live on the air. Dan/W4NTI "John Smith" wrote in message news ![]() Len: I would like to encourage you to an amateur license, it is men like you who will restore the caliber of the hobby... in some ways, your text reminds me of the "old phart" who coached me on how to be a decent "old phart." (well, I have been indecent too, but only around those of the opposite sex--with their permission mind you! grin) John No decent "old phart" resorts to derogatory diminutives in his dealings with other people as Mr. Anderson has habitually done. You might want to think carefully about who you would really want to emulate when you become one yourself. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
From: John Smith on Aug 24, 7:08 pm
Dee: From the text and exchanges here, I honestly wonder how most here got their tickets! Then, they have the audacity to act like judges on who should have tickets--I hope you all stick together, you are all you guys have got! Lissen up, witeboy, dey gots da 'HOOD organ-ized! Nobody mess wif no homeboys, you got dat yanno? ^^^^^ - That's the way they come across. On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 19:24:56 -0400, Dee Flint wrote: No decent "old phart" resorts to derogatory diminutives in his dealings with other people as Mr. Anderson has habitually done. Tsk. Poor Dee is miffed and a half because I didn't liberally apply nice-nice oil to her transcript of recorded ARRL maxims some time ago. Her feelings are still hurt. Boo hoo. You might want to think carefully about who you would really want to emulate when you become one yourself. Tsk. Dee's vision suffers extreme League-induced astigmatism. The PCTA are about as OLDE-PHARTE as one can possibly be. Look at them: A middle-aged-going-on-ninety "renowned historian" desperately wanting to come across as numero uno guru; a nearly past middle-aged snarlygram-spouting "veteran of the holy foreign service" who thinks his velvet glove is an iron fist; a middle-aged "veteran of foreign wars" spouting off like it was well-drink time at the Legion Hall; a past-middle-age hoagie-muncher who shot bears for navel intelligence. Then we have the female acolyte worshiping at the Church of St. Hiram repeating the beloved maxims of the order as if she were mama superior. All must do as they DICTATE. In a hobby. All who do not obey are sub-human for they believe intelligence only shines through morsemanship. All will have fun whether we like it or not... Wow. Show some individuality, some freedom of expression, some free thinking OUTSIDE of the cloister and they become unglued, unable to cope with new thoughts, new ideas, differing opinions. All must be as ordained by the Ancients, never ever to be changed... Amen. all sam |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Seeking comments from Icom PCR1000 Users | Scanner | |||
| Seeking Comments from Icom PCR1000 Users | Shortwave | |||
| Citizens make inappropriate comments? | Policy | |||
| NASWA Draft BPL Comments | Shortwave | |||
| BPL interference - reply comments - YOUR ACTION REQUIRED | Policy | |||