LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old August 26th 05, 01:41 AM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote in message
ups.com...

Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote in message

cut
s

And by that you are infering that I do that, eh? Give me an example.
Besides a quote from Lennie that is.

your own support of proetected segments for CW for one another you
attitutde that new comers must mind there place
all your words not lens

Dan/W4NTI


Well at least I have the gonads to use a real call and name.

First off asking for a CW only segment is not all that far fetched. I
have


After for a CW Only segment and expecting to gte what you want is plain
nuts. look what happend in VHF you got a couple right at the top of 2M
and at the top of some other band

Dang......are you saying we had a CW assignment at the 147.995 range or
something? If we did, I don't remember it.

been trying to work on 40 cw ever since the ARRL came out with the latest
"gentleman's agreement" of allowing digital to operate within the CW
ranges.
Total failure. So why should I expect anything better? Of course BB
you


Total failure meaning CW can't compete as I have beens aying for years


No dummy that is not what I said, or mean. It is the non CW qualified types
that just dump on top of a on-going CW communication....because they have no
idea it is a real communication. Because they can't copy it. Clear now?

And that is exactly what will happen in the event of NOT having a exclusive
CW segement.


wouldn't know that would you? So why not just stick with what you KNOW
about? And do us all a favor.


why don't you grow up and stop asking for protection of your petty
interests?

Why can't you admit that you know NOTHING about the subject and just go
away???


You are obviously a product of the 1960 feel good free love society. You
were most certainly TAUGHT by them. I feel sorry for you. This
actually
explains your problem. So I can't blame you for your "problems".


Naw you have it wrong again. I am a bit too old to taught by the 1960's
folks


Then I really feel sorry for you. You must have grown up in the 60s and
your MaryJane brain is still screwed up from all the sessions.


Don't forget to send in those dues to the ACLU.


No way the ACLU isn't the demon say Bill O'Riealy wants to make them
out as as but they are not folks that I support either


Wow.....so when are you going to start acting right?

Dan/W4NTI


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Seeking comments from Icom PCR1000 Users [email protected] Scanner 6 November 26th 04 01:15 AM
Seeking Comments from Icom PCR1000 Users [email protected] Shortwave 5 November 22nd 04 09:55 PM
Citizens make inappropriate comments? KØHB Policy 21 May 7th 04 03:39 AM
NASWA Draft BPL Comments Joe Buch Shortwave 0 April 22nd 04 05:05 PM
BPL interference - reply comments - YOUR ACTION REQUIRED Rob Kemp Policy 0 July 10th 03 07:09 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017