You can't argue with Brian Burke. He has his mind made up and no matter
what you say he comes back with the same ole dry BS. Why bother?

Dan/W4NTI

"K4YZ" wrote in message
ups.com...

an_old_friend wrote:
wrote:
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
cut Tell you what Jim, listen during a RTTY contest weekend.
Like when the
NAQP CW is on this winter season.

That's a different story.

It is just an example of what it will be like with massive
digital action.
Just watch and see.

All the more reason to have a reasonable Morse Code only subband. Say
7000 to 7050.

why?

why is it that Morse Code supporter are always insisting that Morse
Code needs props in order to survive?

Nope.

It needs reasonable bandwidth in order to avoid interference. OOK
signals to not mix well with digital and modes such as PSK31

are plenty of spaces left in a natural state and protected
for those "hobbyists". Why not for Morse Code?

They are not left just for theose hobbists. Many hunderd acres ar ein
this area and never hiked to preserve the tree and lifefroms like deer
and wolves and Mtn lions

"those" "hobbyist" "lifeforms"

Sure they are left for "hobbyists", although in your example
"naturalists" is the appropriate term.

the question is why is Morse Code entitled to a such a preserve all to
itself?

Why not?

The ONLY mode that OOK is compatable with is Single Side Band.

And why if it is Such an EFECTIVE mode does it need the protection?

"EFFECTIVE"

We could ask the same about who needs the ADA, Mark.

Steve, K4YZ