| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
On 22 Aug 2005 19:59:04 -0700, "an_old_friend"
wrote in . com: Frank Gilliland wrote: On 22 Aug 2005 07:51:25 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in massive cut Blah, blah, blah. You've been both outed and spanked. Either fess up or shut up. please don't hold your breath I won't. My guess is that he'll fabricate more lame excuses and/or whine a lot. That tactic might work with his mommy but not with me. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Frank Gilliland wrote: On 22 Aug 2005 07:51:25 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in massive cut Blah, blah, blah. You've been both outed and spanked. Either fess up or shut up. please don't hold your breath ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
From: K4YZ on Aug 22, 4:42 pm
wrote: From: K4YZ on Aug 22, 7:35 am Now YOU NAME this "now-PhD who knew me" back 33 1/2 years ago or admit it was all a weird FABRICATION of yours. Your choice. You haven't given detail One on this fabricated individual other than glossed-over generalities and dire implications. Pfffffffffffffffffffffffffffff?fffft. No fabrication. PURE FABRICATION. YOU LIE. IT'S AS SIMPLE AS THAT...YOU LIE. STEBIE LIES. Sorry you don't like it. It doesn't bother me because your FABRICATION doesn't exist in the real world. You're imaginary creatures take up space in here. Sometimes a few of us feel we have to remind you of your FANTASIES at work and hope you return to reality. I'll give you the name just as soon as I see your "Extra Lite" hit the FCC database, Lennie. YOU CAN'T because that FABRICATION doesn't exist. YOU LIE. IT'S AS SIMPLE AS THAT. Tsk, you've "accused" Frank Gilliland of "making things up" yet that is what YOU have been doing for years in here! Nope. YOU ARE SICK. MENTALLY INCOMPETENT TO EXIST IN REALITY. YOU LIE CONSTANTLY, YOU INSULT OTHERS CONSTANTLY. YOU ARE SICK. IT IS SIMPLE AS THAT. GET HELP. IF NOT FOR YOURSELF, YOUR FAMILY OF TWO. STOP SPAMMING US WITH YOUR FAIRY STORIES, CORPSMAN. YOU ARE A DISCREDIT TO THE USMC, THE MILITARY OF THE UNITED STATES. bye bye |
From: Frank Gilliland on Aug 22, 7:44 pm
On 22 Aug 2005 07:51:25 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in Frank Gilliland wrote: On 21 Aug 2005 16:28:13 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in I know who Col Vinson was and I know where Ft Gordon is. Never served with him/for him/within 100 miles of him. And here is where your lies finally come to an end. If -you- were in avionics in the 80's then you most certainly -DID- 'serve' under "Colonel Vinson"...... who, BTW, is not a real person, and you would have known that if your story was true. VINSON was the crypto system that was used for almost all radio equipment in that era, and EVERY tech -- avionics AND ground -- was trained to do first and second echelon repairs on that equipment. You could have easily replied with "KY-58" (the avionics equivalent of the KY-57), or KYK-13 (key holder used for both). But you didn't even recognize the name VINSON even in context with Ft. Gordon, home of the crypto schools. You had several chances, "Steve"..... you flunked. Flunked badly enough to be terminated without prejudice. I loved that "Colonel Vinson" sentence of yours and was getting tired waiting for Stebie's bluffing reply to show up. :-) Stebie was bluffing along, trying to take advantage of so very few in here knowing anything about military electronics or practices. He's failed to respond to "KIR" and "KIT" that I mentioned a few years ago...apparently NOT knowing that they set the codes for the common IFF transponder on nearly all military aircraft. And BTW, the info above isn't much of a secret since Time magazine put a picture of a KY-57 on the front cover back in '83 -- nice pic of a Beirut Marine next to a jeep with a VRC-12. VERY little of the outside of those "K" boxes have been "secret" nor have the names. Some of the insides are, obviously, but not names or contract numbers for production nor contract monies for those contracts. All public knowledge. Back around 1996 (?) the Army released for PUBLIC DISSEMINATION the "catalog" of land-forces Signal equipment, FM 24-24. It is open for public viewing at the Army's Training and Doctrine Command Digital Library. At least two ham websites have links to those PDF chapters for free downloads. Nearly ALL signal equipment is described in there with pictures and all that. :-) Nowadays, though, COMSEC is being built-in such as in the SIP version of SINCGARS ground-air transceivers and the new AN/PRC-150 IHFR (Improved HF Radio) now under contract to Harris. See AN/ARC-210 for the SIP (SINCGARS Improvement Program) version of that for aircraft. Again...colorful. Clancyesque. You and fiction seem to get along quite well. Stebie just doesn't know what he thinks he is talking about. :-) He once tried to spew insults about my "not knowing civilian avionics" (despite my having been IN that line of work) and took to task my "faulty" description of civilian VOR. Never mind that VOR (I consider elegant in simplicity for the tube era) was conceived, tested, and found acceptible for the international air community in the 1950s. Likewise, he didn't speak out when I mentioned "Mode 4" for IFF transponders. He just doesn't mention ANYTHING in regards to military radio- electronics systems, no details, no names of any kind. At best he once talked about two civilian radios supposedly at the Okinawa MARS location where he claimed to be "Assistant NCOIC" (as if they had so many that they needed "assistant" titles). That you attempt to diminish my military service simply because I do not wish to discuss it in this forum like Lennie's rantings, or like some drunk at the end of the bar at 3AM only further substantiates MY claim that your motives here have nothing to do with Amateur Radio, have more to do with being argumenative, and are dubious at best. Blah, blah, blah. You've been both outed and spanked. Either fess up or shut up. I predict Stebie will do neither. He can't admit to duplicity (he is too deep now to have any chance of backing out) and he doesn't ever admit to any wrongdoing (his duplicity depends on him giving the impression he is always right). If Stebie LIES about his military "radio experience" then it is almost a sure bet he LIES about amateur radio experience. What we CAN bank on is a series of personal insults directed at his "opponents" that challenge him. Standard Operating Procedure. lie SOP |
From: Frank Gilliland on Aug 22, 7:44 pm
On 22 Aug 2005 07:51:25 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in Frank Gilliland wrote: On 21 Aug 2005 16:28:13 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in I know who Col Vinson was and I know where Ft Gordon is. Never served with him/for him/within 100 miles of him. And here is where your lies finally come to an end. If -you- were in avionics in the 80's then you most certainly -DID- 'serve' under "Colonel Vinson"...... who, BTW, is not a real person, and you would have known that if your story was true. VINSON was the crypto system that was used for almost all radio equipment in that era, and EVERY tech -- avionics AND ground -- was trained to do first and second echelon repairs on that equipment. You could have easily replied with "KY-58" (the avionics equivalent of the KY-57), or KYK-13 (key holder used for both). But you didn't even recognize the name VINSON even in context with Ft. Gordon, home of the crypto schools. You had several chances, "Steve"..... you flunked. Flunked badly enough to be terminated without prejudice. I loved that "Colonel Vinson" sentence of yours and was getting tired waiting for Stebie's bluffing reply to show up. :-) Stebie was bluffing along, trying to take advantage of so very few in here knowing anything about military electronics or practices. He's failed to respond to "KIR" and "KIT" that I mentioned a few years ago...apparently NOT knowing that they set the codes for the common IFF transponder on nearly all military aircraft. And BTW, the info above isn't much of a secret since Time magazine put a picture of a KY-57 on the front cover back in '83 -- nice pic of a Beirut Marine next to a jeep with a VRC-12. VERY little of the outside of those "K" boxes have been "secret" nor have the names. Some of the insides are, obviously, but not names or contract numbers for production nor contract monies for those contracts. All public knowledge. Back around 1996 (?) the Army released for PUBLIC DISSEMINATION the "catalog" of land-forces Signal equipment, FM 24-24. It is open for public viewing at the Army's Training and Doctrine Command Digital Library. At least two ham websites have links to those PDF chapters for free downloads. Nearly ALL signal equipment is described in there with pictures and all that. :-) Nowadays, though, COMSEC is being built-in such as in the SIP version of SINCGARS ground-air transceivers and the new AN/PRC-150 IHFR (Improved HF Radio) now under contract to Harris. See AN/ARC-210 for the SIP (SINCGARS Improvement Program) version of that for aircraft. Again...colorful. Clancyesque. You and fiction seem to get along quite well. Stebie just doesn't know what he thinks he is talking about. :-) He once tried to spew insults about my "not knowing civilian avionics" (despite my having been IN that line of work) and took to task my "faulty" description of civilian VOR. Never mind that VOR (I consider elegant in simplicity for the tube era) was conceived, tested, and found acceptible for the international air community in the 1950s. Likewise, he didn't speak out when I mentioned "Mode 4" for IFF transponders. He just doesn't mention ANYTHING in regards to military radio- electronics systems, no details, no names of any kind. At best he once talked about two civilian radios supposedly at the Okinawa MARS location where he claimed to be "Assistant NCOIC" (as if they had so many that they needed "assistant" titles). That you attempt to diminish my military service simply because I do not wish to discuss it in this forum like Lennie's rantings, or like some drunk at the end of the bar at 3AM only further substantiates MY claim that your motives here have nothing to do with Amateur Radio, have more to do with being argumenative, and are dubious at best. Blah, blah, blah. You've been both outed and spanked. Either fess up or shut up. I predict Stebie will do neither. He can't admit to duplicity (he is too deep now to have any chance of backing out) and he doesn't ever admit to any wrongdoing (his duplicity depends on him giving the impression he is always right). If Stebie LIES about his military "radio experience" then it is almost a sure bet he LIES about amateur radio experience. What we CAN bank on is a series of personal insults directed at his "opponents" that challenge him. Standard Operating Procedure. lie SOP |
Frank Gilliland wrote: On 22 Aug 2005 07:35:29 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in You demonstrate lapses in proper USMC etiquette ......say WHAT? Wink, wink. You're supposed to give Steve a pass because he's a fellow Marine. Yep, you're right..... I bypassed boot camp, went straight to AAVs, stayed there until my discharge, and never spoke to anyone outside the unit. Sure thing, Steve. Right. |
Frank Gilliland wrote: snip Assuming you really -are- who you claim, you sure are setting a -=BAD=- example of the discipline both required and expected of a retired Marine Gunny of 18 years (which is bull**** in and of itself) by wasting so much time engaging in flame wars on Usenet. I can get away with it because I was a ****bird..... but you? Heck, if I was USMC retired and behaving the way you do I'd go outside and kick my -own- ass out of respect for the Corps. And -THAT'S- what Semper Fidelis means, Steve. ;^)) And here is where your lies finally come to an end. If -you- were in avionics in the 80's then you most certainly -DID- 'serve' under "Colonel Vinson"...... who, BTW, is not a real person, and you would have known that if your story was true. VINSON was the crypto system that was used for almost all radio equipment in that era, and EVERY tech -- avionics AND ground -- was trained to do first and second echelon repairs on that equipment. You could have easily replied with "KY-58" (the avionics equivalent of the KY-57), or KYK-13 (key holder used for both). But you didn't even recognize the name VINSON even in context with Ft. Gordon, home of the crypto schools. VINSON! I remember those. The 2ID provided us with aviation, mobile/tactical radios. The kick13 was on a sweatty piece of parachute cord that got passed from shift to shift; had to wear it on my neck. The QRCT HF system also required a ky58, though the depot was Ft Gillem (brac?). What were the little tear-off code pages called? KAC? Authenticate. Haven't thought about that stuff in years. Blah, blah, blah. You've been both outed and spanked. Either fess up or shut up. Thank you. |
On 23 Aug 2005 18:47:00 -0700, wrote in
. com: snip VINSON! I remember those. The 2ID provided us with aviation, mobile/tactical radios. The kick13 was on a sweatty piece of parachute cord that got passed from shift to shift; had to wear it on my neck. The QRCT HF system also required a ky58, though the depot was Ft Gillem (brac?). 1st & 2nd echelon repair (USMC, ground) was taught at MCAGCC; 3rd through 5th was taught at Ft. Gordon for all branches. What were the little tear-off code pages called? Emergency toilet paper? Beats me. I was a tech, not an operator. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Frank Gilliland wrote: On 22 Aug 2005 07:35:29 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: And all your ranting has done nothing to resolve the topic of this discussion. If you can think of anything that would make me believe that you were in the USMC then feel free to speak up. Otherwise, it looks like you are just stalling -- making excuses, obfuscating, changing topics -- in hopes that I'll give up and leave. Oh no, don't leave, "Frank"... Where did I say I was going to leave? I didn't. It was just wishful thinking on your behalf. I guess "sarcasm" is a concept beyond you... It just makes the LennieRants more colorful. Lesssee...You claim I've given you nothing but vague information, yet you refuse to e mail me directly and get "the details"... All I was looking for was a simple tidbit of info that only a Marine would know, but that seems to be beyond your capabilities. But it doesn't matter anymore...... see my other post. Why? It's just as deceitful as these... Furthermore, I've given you MORE than enough to verify my duty without giving you my SSAN to do it with. I don't need your SSN, nor did I ask for it. What's your obsession with your SSn? It's not MY obsession, "Frank"...It's everyone elses... I geive everything EXCEPT my service number and everyone else says taht without that I could be "lying" since noting "precise" can be You demonstrate lapses in proper USMC etiquette ......say WHAT? You heard me ClancyBoy. A fellow Marine would take another's "back" (or at least taken the time to get some verifyable FACTS) until something had been "PROVEN"...You're just another USENET antagonist...Harrassing to harrass. yet try and "dis" my service just because I won't do a LennieRant and give a complete CV of my service here. I don't seem to recall asking for any long-winded rant. Just any bit of information I can use to verify your claim. And I've given it. Markie himself has even re-quoted other information. You CLAIM to have all of these great resources at your disposal, but seem painfully inept at using them. You were in an AAV unit so of course you know EVERYONE who ever served, including a guy who's service ended 13 years ago. Yep, you're right..... I bypassed boot camp, went straight to AAVs, stayed there until my discharge, and never spoke to anyone outside the unit. Sure thing, Steve. WHERE did I say THAT, "Frank"...??? You twist the facts almost as bad as Bush. So far you've not presented any...But in the very paragraph receding this one you do some pretty colorful twisting of your own. Steve, K4YZ |
On 24 Aug 2005 06:28:14 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in
.com: snipola I'm not going to engage you in a flame war, Dudly. You can continue your little charade as long as you want, I really don't care since you've been fully exposed as a USMC imposter -- in fact, you exposed yourself. Get some therapy before you go off the deep end. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Frank Gilliland wrote: On 24 Aug 2005 06:28:14 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: snipola I'm not going to engage you in a flame war, Dudly. Wise decision, PutzBoy. You can continue your little charade as long as you want, I really don't care since you've been fully exposed as a USMC imposter -- in fact, you exposed yourself. Get some therapy before you go off the deep end. And you've exposed YOURself as a liar, an antagonist and unworthy of even the most cautious of trust. More than adequate resources to verify my service in the Marines has been provided. You claim to have resources "beyond (my) understanding". You claim I give only "vague" references, yet you can't seem to make anything "happen" with that data other than to make more noise in here. You have nothing. Shove off, Putz. Ollie's calling. Say's you're double parked. Steve, K4YZ |
From: on Tues 23 Aug 2005 18:19
wrote: From: "K4YZ" on Sun 21 Aug 2005 20:33 Frank Gilliland wrote: On 21 Aug 2005 16:50:37 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in wrote: You have already discussed your military service here so that excuse is moot. Try again. Nope. As much as anyone else here, "Frank", you have more than enough information to validate my service, assuming your insinuations of intimacy with such notables as LtCol North are accurate. "...insinuations of intimacy with..."? :-) Whenever Steve sees two mens names side by side, he see a love connection. Hope he never visits the Vietnam War Memorial. ...or comes within a klick of any group of BSA. As I have found with OTHERS here, even when you DO give specifics, the pat answer is "So, we just accept it because you say so?" , and it's "just one more thing" to add to the flame war. It doesn't matter how objective or reliable the corroborating source is. Tsk, tsk, tsk. We all "must" accept Stebie's "word" on HIS service, yet all he can do is shout "call the VA!" :-) "It doesn't matter how objective or reliable the corroborating source is..." if its against what Stebie said or if Stebie no like it, it is a "LIE." :-) Poor Stebie...he can't stand up to scrutiny and his "respone" is to heap abuse on the personals of his challengers. Steve is finally getting the attention that he seeks. It's a sick, sociopathic way of getting attention. I also notice you snipped the line where I suggested you e mail me directly and I'd provide more than enough information, off group. You didn't even take the time to answer it HERE, let alone privately. Stebie, it takes as much time to write a single private e-mail as it does to write a PUBLIC posting in here. Just write your response IN PUBLIC if you want to be believed. That way anyone can check it out as they wish. If it is verifiable, it will be be believed. If it isn't verifiable, then you are just making with a Confidence Game piece of BS. He can't. After his widespread claims of seven hostile actions, he'll never be able to show his records because they will prove that there were no hostile actions. They will prove HE wasn't in them. Between 1974 and 1992 the USA was involved in MORE than 7 hostile actions. This leads me to believe that it's most likely that if you did and I research the headers, we'll find some close relationship between you and one of the Infamous Four. "...close relationship?!?" :-) Probably a love quadrangle. Heh heh heh heh. I'll call up my friend, the independent writer, to see if he wants to contribute another "news item" to the National Enquirer. :-) Anyone can "research headers" and find the ISP of a poster, and that's about IT. :-) Sorry, little Stebie, but nobody has hacked the IEEE website for the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers professional association. I may be the only one with that "header origin." I have NO "relationship" with Frank, with Mark or with Brian Burke, or Todd, don't know them personally, haven't met them, don't even live close to them (don't know where Frank lives, but that is irrelevant). WE all SHARE a feeling that all you do is lay down a Snow Job, A Con Game Scam, lots of BS, and a bunch of other nefarious braggadoccio. shrug A hugely useless effort because none of it is credible. Credible? It isn't even edible. Lastly, I find it curious (and certainly lends significant credence to doubting you and YOUR stories...) that you show up from no where in an Amateur Radio forum, CLAIM to be a former Marine with impeccable "references", yet have absolutely nothing to say ABOUT Amateur Radio policy. Tell us how the USMC "career" of Stebie Robeson "affects amateur radio policy?" :-) Tell us how the Civil Air Patrol "pilot in command" experience relates to amateur radio policy? :-) Tell us how being "A" NCOIC (or probably not being "A" NCOIC) of Okinawa MARS relates to amateur radio policy? To quote: "Sorry, Hans, MARS IS amateur radio!" :-) Add that to language in your posts that sounds hauntingly like Lennie Anderson and I'd say your accusations of fraud belong in your own lap. Poor baby, feeling worried are you? Steve knows that Frank knows his game. WE all know his "game" by now. YOU just POST some verifiable REAL claims to your statements in order to be believed. So far all you've done is shout "call the VA!" [the VA will NOT divulge details unless one is a family member or a reputable, verifiable personnel department of a company or a verifiable agent of a police force] You could digitize your DD214 and have it available for private e-mail (this newsgroup doesn't carry binaries) to PROVE your military release from active duty. It's only one page long. But, you won't, claiming some "personal outrage" at having to do such a thing! Oh, my. We are all supposed to BELIEVE you, right? While everyone else not believing you LIES?" :-) I don't beleive him. Too much sewage under the bridge. Well, we've now got a NEW name for the sewage: "Dudly." Thanks to Frank for emphasizing that. Too bad that Ernest K. Gann isn't around to write that up much better now. sew age |
Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 24 Aug 2005 06:28:14 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: snipola I'm not going to engage you in a flame war, Dudly. You can continue your little charade as long as you want, I really don't care since you've been fully exposed as a USMC imposter -- in fact, you exposed yourself. Get some therapy before you go off the deep end. Frankly, Frank, your attempt at setting yourself up as an expert on who is or isn't a Marine falls a little short. Dave K8MN |
Dave Heil wrote:
Frank Gilliland wrote: On 24 Aug 2005 06:28:14 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: snipola I'm not going to engage you in a flame war, Dudly. You can continue your little charade as long as you want, I really don't care since you've been fully exposed as a USMC imposter -- in fact, you exposed yourself. Get some therapy before you go off the deep end. Frankly, Frank, your attempt at setting yourself up as an expert on who is or isn't a Marine falls a little short. Dave K8MN Frank setting himself up as an expert on anything falls a little short. |
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 20:08:50 -0700, Cmdr Buzz Corey
wrote in : Dave Heil wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote: On 24 Aug 2005 06:28:14 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: snipola I'm not going to engage you in a flame war, Dudly. You can continue your little charade as long as you want, I really don't care since you've been fully exposed as a USMC imposter -- in fact, you exposed yourself. Get some therapy before you go off the deep end. Frankly, Frank, your attempt at setting yourself up as an expert on who is or isn't a Marine falls a little short. Dave K8MN Frank setting himself up as an expert on anything falls a little short. It's the Cavalry to the rescue! Kind of ironic (and suspicious) that you two suddenly come to defend Gunny Dudly from a ****bird PFC, isn't it? But hey, birds of a feather..... ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Frank of Silliland wrote: On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 20:08:50 -0700, Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote in : Dave Heil wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote: On 24 Aug 2005 06:28:14 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: snipola I'm not going to engage you in a flame war, Dudly. You can continue your little charade as long as you want, I really don't care since you've been fully exposed as a USMC imposter -- in fact, you exposed yourself. Get some therapy before you go off the deep end. Frankly, Frank, your attempt at setting yourself up as an expert on who is or isn't a Marine falls a little short. Frank setting himself up as an expert on anything falls a little short. It's the Cavalry to the rescue! Kind of ironic (and suspicious) that you two suddenly come to defend Gunny Dudly from a ####bird PFC, isn't it? But hey, birds of a feather..... Well...there we have it. Some lowlife who never made it to an NCO rank taking those swipes at a SNCO, albeit no longer on active duty, that he never would have dared while he WAS on active duty.... And now making allegeations that the comments of others is "suspicious" because it flies in the face of his "grand entrance"... The SUSPICIOUS part, Frankie, is why you suddenly show up in an Amateur Radio newsgroup with no other agenda than trying to undermine my credibility with lame suggestions that YOU are a "credible" source and that YOUR take is one of validity. I think your own self-assessment of "####bird PFC" says it all, Frankie my boy! Frank...You have singlehandedly managed, just like Lennie and his crew, to put yourself where you belong...In the "Liar and Loser" category. Make yourself at home. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: Frank of Silliland wrote: On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 20:08:50 -0700, Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote in : cut It's the Cavalry to the rescue! Kind of ironic (and suspicious) that you two suddenly come to defend Gunny Dudly from a ####bird PFC, isn't it? But hey, birds of a feather..... Well...there we have it. Some lowlife who never made it to an NCO rank taking those swipes at a SNCO, albeit no longer on active duty, that he never would have dared while he WAS on active duty.... stevie claiming the basic building block of the armed forces is a lowlife cuting Stvie paranoia Make yourself at home. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote:
The SUSPICIOUS part, Frankie, is why you suddenly show up in an Amateur Radio newsgroup with no other agenda than trying to undermine my credibility with lame suggestions that YOU are a "credible" source and that YOUR take is one of validity. And the best he can do is cb. |
Stevie showing his lack of charter as an NCO "character" Don't address me about "character" issues, "Colonel". You haven't earned that right. nobodys old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Some lowlife who never made it to an NCO rank taking those swipes at a SNCO, albeit no longer on active duty, that he never would have dared while he WAS on active duty.... stevie claiming the basic building block of the armed forces is a lowlife You wouldn't know what the "basic building blocks" are, Markie. And please note that Frankie himself refered to PFC's as a "####bird" cuting Stvie paranoia "cutting" "Stevie" Idiot. Steve, K4YZ |
Frank Gilliland wrote: On 23 Aug 2005 18:47:00 -0700, wrote in . com: snip VINSON! I remember those. The 2ID provided us with aviation, mobile/tactical radios. The kick13 was on a sweatty piece of parachute cord that got passed from shift to shift; had to wear it on my neck. The QRCT HF system also required a ky58, though the depot was Ft Gillem (brac?). 1st & 2nd echelon repair (USMC, ground) was taught at MCAGCC; Where dat? 3rd through 5th was taught at Ft. Gordon for all branches. What were the little tear-off code pages called? Emergency toilet paper? Beats me. I was a tech, not an operator. Speaking of the world's greatest radio op, Heil was just bragging about his use of the STU. Hi! |
K4YZ wrote: Stevie showing his lack of charter as an NCO "character" Don't address me about "character" issues, "Colonel". You haven't earned that right. more of Stevie bull**** everyone has the right stevie just shows his lack of moral fiber nobodys old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Some lowlife who never made it to an NCO rank taking those swipes at a SNCO, albeit no longer on active duty, that he never would have dared while he WAS on active duty.... stevie claiming the basic building block of the armed forces is a lowlife You wouldn't know what the "basic building blocks" are, Markie. I sure do guess you don't And please note that Frankie himself refered to PFC's as a "####bird" no he did not refer to himself as "####bird" that is what you altered his word to cuting Stvie paranoia cut Steve, K4YZ |
nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Stevie showing his lack of charter as an NCO "character" Don't address me about "character" issues, "Colonel". You haven't earned that right. more of Stevie bull#### In order to have "more" 'bull####' there would have had to ahve been BS in the first place. everyone has the right Not on "character issues" wherein you and the Armed Forces are a part of the discussion in the same breath. stevie just shows his lack of moral fiber You're an admitted liar and sexual deviant, Markie. "Moral fiber" is yet another issue on which you have no legs to stand. nobodys old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Some lowlife who never made it to an NCO rank taking those swipes at a SNCO, albeit no longer on active duty, that he never would have dared while he WAS on active duty.... stevie claiming the basic building block of the armed forces is a lowlife You wouldn't know what the "basic building blocks" are, Markie. I sure do guess you don't I do. Unlike you I was one of those "basic buidling blocks" once. And please note that Frankie himself refered to PFC's as a "####bird" no he did not refer to himself as "####bird" that is what you altered his word to I care to not repeat the profanity. Yet the point remains...Frankie himself had no respect for himself, his Honor, or the United States Marine Corps/ cuting Stvie paranoia cut Uncut. "cutting" "Stevie" And you're STILL an idiot. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Stevie showing his lack of charter as an NCO "character" Don't address me about "character" issues, "Colonel". You haven't earned that right. more of Stevie bull#### In order to have "more" 'bull####' there would have had to ahve been BS in the first place. It is bull**** I have the right to question your character You remark is and remains Bull**** everyone has the right Not on "character issues" wherein you and the Armed Forces are a part of the discussion in the same breath. I certainly do dispite your lies and obfucation stevie just shows his lack of moral fiber cuting again stevie sex refferences which have NOTHING to do with my character "Moral fiber" is yet another issue on which you have no legs to stand. Sure do better than yours nobodys old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Some lowlife who never made it to an NCO rank taking those swipes at a SNCO, albeit no longer on active duty, that he never would have dared while he WAS on active duty.... stevie claiming the basic building block of the armed forces is a lowlife You wouldn't know what the "basic building blocks" are, Markie. I sure do guess you don't I do. Unlike you I was one of those "basic buidling blocks" once. more lies And please note that Frankie himself refered to PFC's as a "####bird" no he did not refer to himself as "####bird" that is what you altered his word to I care to not repeat the profanity. but you violated HIS property rights indeed you have comitted fraud in making the change cuting rant |
nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Stevie showing his lack of charter as an NCO "character" Don't address me about "character" issues, "Colonel". You haven't earned that right. more of Stevie bull#### In order to have "more" 'bull####' there would have had to have been BS in the first place. It is bull#### Yes, you are. I have the right to question your character Not on issues regarding the Armed Forces you don't, "Colonel". You remark is and remains Bull#### No, it isn't. everyone has the right Not on "character issues" wherein you and the Armed Forces are a part of the discussion in the same breath. I certainly do Nope. dispite your lies and obfucation "despite" No lies. No "obfuscation". stevie just shows his lack of moral fiber cuting again stevie sex refferences which have NOTHING to do with my character You ARE a sexual deviant, Markie, and no matter HOW badly you'd like to think otherwise your "lifestyle" choices ARE directly related to your "character". "Moral fiber" is yet another issue on which you have no legs to stand. Sure do better than yours Nope. nobodys old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Some lowlife who never made it to an NCO rank taking those swipes at a SNCO, albeit no longer on active duty, that he never would have dared while he WAS on active duty.... stevie claiming the basic building block of the armed forces is a lowlife You wouldn't know what the "basic building blocks" are, Markie. I sure do guess you don't I do. Unlike you I was one of those "basic buidling blocks" once. more lies Nope. Hit the Yellow Footprints at MCRD San Diego on 03 September 1974. You just had yellow going down your spine. And please note that Frankie himself refered to PFC's as a "####bird" no he did not refer to himself as "####bird" that is what you altered his word to I care to not repeat the profanity. but you violated HIS property rights indeed you have comitted fraud in making the change It's no fraud. I choose to not perpetuate a profanity in a public forum. cuting rant There was no "rant". Yet the point remains...Frankie himself had no respect for himself, his Honor, or the United States Marine Corps. This is truth, Markie. Frankie himslef has admitted his failure as a Marine. cuting Stvie paranoia cut Uncut. "cutting" "Stevie" And you're STILL an idiot. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Stevie showing his lack of charter as an NCO "character" Don't address me about "character" issues, "Colonel". You haven't earned that right. more of Stevie bull#### In order to have "more" 'bull####' there would have had to have been BS in the first place. It is bull#### Yes, you are. I have the right to question your character Not on issues regarding the Armed Forces you don't, "Colonel". I certainly do Stevie You have no standing to challenge anyone after making death threats on here You remark is and remains Bull**** No, it isn't. Sure is everyone has the right Not on "character issues" wherein you and the Armed Forces are a part of the discussion in the same breath. I certainly do Nope. Yes I do grow up dispite your lies and obfucation cuting spelling cop stevie just shows his lack of moral fiber cuting again stevie sex refferences which have NOTHING to do with my character cuting more irelavant sexual references "Moral fiber" is yet another issue on which you have no legs to stand. Sure do better than yours Nope. sure is I am far more honest than you nobodys old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Some lowlife who never made it to an NCO rank taking those swipes at a SNCO, albeit no longer on active duty, that he never would have dared while he WAS on active duty.... stevie claiming the basic building block of the armed forces is a lowlife You wouldn't know what the "basic building blocks" are, Markie. I sure do guess you don't I do. Unlike you I was one of those "basic buidling blocks" once. more lies cuting irrelavant response Yep was and remains a lie cuting simple rant And please note that Frankie himself refered to PFC's as a "####bird" no he did not refer to himself as "####bird" that is what you altered his word to I care to not repeat the profanity. but you violated HIS property rights indeed you have comitted fraud in making the change It's no fraud. It is fraud I choose to not perpetuate a profanity in a public forum. by comitting fraud cuting rant recutting the rant cuting Stvie paranoia cut |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:57 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com