KY4Z wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
KY4Z wrote:
Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 21 Aug 2005 16:50:37 -0700, "KY4Z" wrote in
.com:


wrote:
snip
More SOP responses from Robeson. He avoids the direct response,
trying to imply that anyone who challenges him is a "fool" or
worse. It's an old tactic in pubs-newsgroup word warfare.

Nope.

It's the "tactic" of truth. Mr Gilliland insinuates that I didn't
serve in the Marines


Wrong. I didn't "insinuate" anything -- I made a clear and blunt
accusation that you are lying about your military service because you
have consistently refused to provide anything substantial to back up
your claims.

Then your claim to have the resources you allege is fraudulent.


Well your claims that you can cause Medical and Legal authorities to
act

I have. That they don't move at the speed-of-light is evident.

11 days sure right they are playing with me and the safety of the
public

why don't you admit your lie? It is easier that way


I've given you (and others here) more than enough to determine
that my "claim" of having served in the United States Marine Corps is
valid.

Not realy another lie on your part

Nope.

not realy


More than enough...Name, grade, DOB, even gave "Frank" my last two
promotion board dates...Still finds excuses to "dismiss" those
resources.

becuase they are not proof that any of it has anything to do with YOU


because he allegedly spoke with a couple of "buds"
who are in the Air Wing.

Wrong again. I didn't say they were in the "Air Wing", although I did
know a few Marines that were stationed at Cherry Point (just a stone's
throw from Geiger -- we used to hang out at the Second Front area).

You said they were in Avionics.

So...How many Avionics Technicians do fleet units have, Frank?

He furthermore drops the name of LtCol
Olivere North, and further insinuates he has significant resources at
his disposal that would, seemingly, indicate that I didn't serve.


I think his name is Oliver, not Olivere.

Excuse me.

and when you going to apolize?

"apolize"...?!?!

I said "excuse me", Markie.

no apology there


Because someone with the experience you claim would have intimate
familiarity with the equipment. You have failed to demonstrate -any-
such familiarity -at all-.

And such familiarity in an Amateur Radio POLICY forum is
neessary...WHY?

It is curious however with your back ground that you don't

Why?

because it tends to show you a liar as has been said many times before

Why do you need everything repeated over and over again

cuting more evasion

So Steve..... how does an avionics tech wind up in not just one but
-seven- such predicaments?

Because Marines do more than what their MOS suggests.

Real marines do

"Marines" is capitalized, Markie.

weall know you can play at speeling cop

And yes, I was a "real" Marine.

but not an honest one




wether that has anything to do with you is another matter

So you think.

of course I do. at one point you were goign on about a sniper now an
avoincs tech

indeed I have to wonder if either has any truth


In other words, BS.

Nope. I just don't discuss military duties here.


You have already discussed your military service here so that excuse
is moot. Try again.

Nope.

Yep more Stevies lies

Nope.

You are the one that tried to demand respect becuase you were a marine

You made it an issue and then you start telling lies


As much as anyone else here, "Frank", you have more than enough
information to validate my service, assuming your insinuations of
intimacy with such notables as LtCol North are accurate.

Not realy

Yes, "realy".

without the SSN which you wisely choose not to provide you can't verify
much of anything, esp with a name like yours

At one time there were no more than 3 Robeson's on active duty in
the USMC. Myself, one who was an ATC in Yuma, and the other fellow who
was African American.

Only one of us named Steve.

none of whish proves you are the Steve

We have inf act no proof you are Steve as opposed to James

You may simply pick out those dates of the selection boards of someone
else

Uh huh...righhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhht.

This is why I do not offer any MORE information than what I have.

Even when I DO provide some irrefuteable third party source,
there's some cowardly excuse as to why it's not "valid".

You have never provided irrefutable proof

In cliaiming you have you are either lying or showing you don't know
the meaning of the word "Proof"

As I have found with OTHERS here, even when you DO give specifics,
the pat answer is "So, we just accept it because you say so?" , and
it's "just one more thing" to add to the flame war. It doesn't matter
how objective or reliable the corroborating source is.

If you had provided anything with any solid basis it might be different

I did.

You advance a Callsign and claim it proves you an expect on MARS

"advance a "callsign"...?!?!

"expect on MARS"...?!?!

If what you MEANT to say that I provided ALL of my callsigns in
various MARS programs at one time or another to verify that I HAD been
an ACTIVE and PARTICIPATING member, you'd be correct.

and the callsgins prove nothing of the kind

they prove you might have been an active member


No where, in ANY post have I EVER suggested I was an "expert" (I
assume that
s what you meant) on the MARS program.

Bull****

I also notice you snipped the line where I suggested you e mail me
directly and I'd provide more than enough information, off group. You
didn't even take the time to answer it HERE, let alone privately.

Why should he?

He says he's a Marine. Why wouldn't he?

avoiding the question. it was and remains "why should he?"

why should he play your games?



This leads me to believe that it's most likely that if you did and
I research the headers, we'll find some close relationship between you
and one of the Infamous Four.

Such Parania Stevie

"paranoia", Markie.

And no, just an observation.

paranoia

like when you accused me of hiring him


Steve, KY4Z