Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith wrote:
Len: If this were the 1930's, dan would be a dangerous man. Besides serving hitler in the search for evil jews, he would also be pursuing cb'ers who want an amateur license... There weren't any cb'ers in the 1930's. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well John Smith, you just blew it. So now you are calling me a Nazi. Or
at least a wanabee Nazi. You should be ashamed of yourself. I honestly thought you were made of better stuff. I was wrong. Dan/W4NTI "John Smith" wrote in message news ![]() Len: If this were the 1930's, dan would be a dangerous man. Besides serving hitler in the search for evil jews, he would also be pursuing cb'ers who want an amateur license... John On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:44:01 -0700, wrote: From: John Smith on Aug 23, 8:06 pm Dan: The only difference between cb and amateur is megacycles and "church doctrines." Of course, if you can BS those without a ticket and who do not "CB", then anything you are capable of convincing them of will most likely float--but don't BS a BS'er, it don't work... On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:02:17 +0000, Dan/W4NTI wrote: To help you out 'old friend'....."attitude adjustment" = Leaving all the CB bullcrap where it belongs and pay attention to what is going on with HAM RADIO. They are NOT THE SAME. And instead of trying to change the world of Ham Radio, learn something from those that have been there and done it. SEE? Dan/W4NTI John, Dere you have it. Dan Jeswald IS amateur radio! He RULEZ! "If the dit don't fit, Dan will convict!" - paraphrasing Brian Burke Dannie he say NO ONE CAN CHANGE HAM RADIO!!! He won't allow it! [ farf...snort... ] dan say |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan:
When your "take" on anything deserves any consideration, I'll get let you know... the nazi was an attempt of mine in just trying to be nice, frankly all your text is just simply an attack on CB, CB'ers and anyone not agreeing with you--it is my opinion that only an idiot could consider it anything else... John On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 22:28:21 +0000, Dan/W4NTI wrote: Well John Smith, you just blew it. So now you are calling me a Nazi. Or at least a wanabee Nazi. You should be ashamed of yourself. I honestly thought you were made of better stuff. I was wrong. Dan/W4NTI "John Smith" wrote in message news ![]() Len: If this were the 1930's, dan would be a dangerous man. Besides serving hitler in the search for evil jews, he would also be pursuing cb'ers who want an amateur license... John On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:44:01 -0700, wrote: From: John Smith on Aug 23, 8:06 pm Dan: The only difference between cb and amateur is megacycles and "church doctrines." Of course, if you can BS those without a ticket and who do not "CB", then anything you are capable of convincing them of will most likely float--but don't BS a BS'er, it don't work... On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:02:17 +0000, Dan/W4NTI wrote: To help you out 'old friend'....."attitude adjustment" = Leaving all the CB bullcrap where it belongs and pay attention to what is going on with HAM RADIO. They are NOT THE SAME. And instead of trying to change the world of Ham Radio, learn something from those that have been there and done it. SEE? Dan/W4NTI John, Dere you have it. Dan Jeswald IS amateur radio! He RULEZ! "If the dit don't fit, Dan will convict!" - paraphrasing Brian Burke Dannie he say NO ONE CAN CHANGE HAM RADIO!!! He won't allow it! [ farf...snort... ] dan say |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There you go again "John Smith" calling names again, but this time to
yourself. Dan/W4NTI "John Smith" wrote in message news ![]() Dan: When your "take" on anything deserves any consideration, I'll get let you know... the nazi was an attempt of mine in just trying to be nice, frankly all your text is just simply an attack on CB, CB'ers and anyone not agreeing with you--it is my opinion that only an idiot could consider it anything else... John On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 22:28:21 +0000, Dan/W4NTI wrote: Well John Smith, you just blew it. So now you are calling me a Nazi. Or at least a wanabee Nazi. You should be ashamed of yourself. I honestly thought you were made of better stuff. I was wrong. Dan/W4NTI "John Smith" wrote in message news ![]() Len: If this were the 1930's, dan would be a dangerous man. Besides serving hitler in the search for evil jews, he would also be pursuing cb'ers who want an amateur license... John On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:44:01 -0700, wrote: From: John Smith on Aug 23, 8:06 pm Dan: The only difference between cb and amateur is megacycles and "church doctrines." Of course, if you can BS those without a ticket and who do not "CB", then anything you are capable of convincing them of will most likely float--but don't BS a BS'er, it don't work... On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:02:17 +0000, Dan/W4NTI wrote: To help you out 'old friend'....."attitude adjustment" = Leaving all the CB bullcrap where it belongs and pay attention to what is going on with HAM RADIO. They are NOT THE SAME. And instead of trying to change the world of Ham Radio, learn something from those that have been there and done it. SEE? Dan/W4NTI John, Dere you have it. Dan Jeswald IS amateur radio! He RULEZ! "If the dit don't fit, Dan will convict!" - paraphrasing Brian Burke Dannie he say NO ONE CAN CHANGE HAM RADIO!!! He won't allow it! [ farf...snort... ] dan say |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: John Smith on Wed 24 Aug 2005 19:04
Len: If this were the 1930's, dan would be a dangerous man. Besides serving hitler in the search for evil jews, he would also be pursuing cb'ers who want an amateur license... Cartoon character hero Buzz Corey remarked that there were no CB-ers in the 1930s. Neither was there any "Commander Buzz Corey." :-) Only Buck Rogers and the beginnings of science-fiction writing. Buzzy baby just can't understand any allegories or analogies. The 1930s didn't have a heckuva lot of radio of any kind except broadcast receivers. The number of radio amateurs was small and they made little impact on the radio world then. The "wireless broadcasters," largely wireless coupling of phonographs to AM radios, hadn't even started to pick up yet. Communications radio was largely confined to the maritime world, the (many) radio communications providers and carriers, and governments. SSB was there on HF but nearly all of those SSB were of the 4-voice- channel kind carrying both voice and TTY. A few police departments were experimenting with two-way voice radios for vehicle communications and finding it worthwhile. Aviation radio was almost non-existant (compared to today) and the "radionavigation aids" consisted of the LF two-antenna-lobe "A-N" beacon. In smaller radio stations code was king. The EM spectrum was far from being allocated beyond 30 MHz and there would come many many changes in the near future. Morse code skill was then a necessity in amateur radio since so few radio amateurs had any other mode capability. The Titanic sinking was only 18 to 28 years past the 1930s and the morse myths of "saving lives" (via the new international 500 KHz maritime distress-safety frequency) were in full flower. With the beginning of the Great Depression in 1929, consumer radio was having a tough time in the market, not much left to play around with "technical hobbies" by many. By 1930 over a quarter of the American work force was out of a regular job and had to fend for themselves at whatever they could. The thought of ANY kind of "personal communications radio" was a rare pipe- dream...NOT possible for most of the denizens of this din of inequity. Buzzy-baby was born on the black and white TV tube and never really left that fantasyland. Even today he is only two- dimensional. :-) dim two |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC Announces Lottery for Extra Class Licenses | General | |||
FCC Announces Lottery for Extra Class Licenses | Policy | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | General | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | Policy |