|
a balst from the past 1998/09/08 form robeson stevie death in the origainl or only a copy off
Mark,
Dumb Mark comment #1: Not FORCING BUT PREVETING you *******, and it is not going anywhere any time real soon. I said: Geez, Mark, and I just thought we were getting to get to be buddies. Guess the engagement's off, huh? Mark said: That is your best shot. I notice that you don't disagree To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! Now it is my turn to call names, Mark. YOU ARE A LIAR!!!!!Yes you have , you siad we Should all Have to suffer Torture by Morse because Morse is an art from, so can BDSM be art form and it is is fun for those that like it, but none say they be forced to endure it either I have never ONCE said anyone should be tortured by ANY means. The only comments I have made that you dug your gimmie gimmie gimmie claws into was that I said code was here for now BUT THAT IT WAS BEING CHANGED. Ever since, you have dug into anything I say making it a "procode" agenda, and there fore "Anit-Mark" What mularkey! For the record, I now make the following statements that yopu MAY quote, and I hope you can get THESE correct!: 1. Mark Morgan is a clueless jerk with no life, therefore he must belittle and berate others, despite the fact he can neither spell his insults correctly, nor can he assemble more than two coherent sentences. He is a boil on the Gluteus Maximus of Life. 2. Mark Morgan will probably die lonely, unfulfilled and desperate because he spent so much time whining about how "we" have so abused him without him trying to get past his front door to go out and find a life. I know so many people who are blind, deaf, missing an appendage, lost children in accidents, etc, and they get on with thier lives. My own daughter is terminally ill. but I don't cry "VICTIM" at every turn! You are a loser punk, Morgan, unworthy of squat. I've tried to be nice, even confidential in some of my comments, but you are such an infuriating twerp that it makes my hair crawl You can't take ANYTHING without trying to make it a rallying point for the "Pro-Victim" crowd, even when it's in your defense! Are you stupid or do you just do this for sport? If you are, you aren't getting any points on the board! |
You're really into "nice tries" today, aren't, you, markie.
I'll leave the bottom intact ehre so folks can re-read the entire post. No threat was made. Having failed to impress anyone with your "a clerk at the ss told me..." story, you try this again. No on threatened you, least of all me. Must be a boring day in Michigan today. Weather got ya pinned down, does it? Steve, K4YZ QUOTE nobody's old friend wrote Mark, Dumb Mark comment #1: Not FORCING BUT PREVETING you *******, and it is not going anywhere any time real soon. I said: Geez, Mark, and I just thought we were getting to get to be buddies. Guess the engagement's off, huh? Mark said: That is your best shot. I notice that you don't disagree To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! Now it is my turn to call names, Mark. YOU ARE A LIAR!!!!!Yes you have , you siad we Should all Have to suffer Torture by Morse because Morse is an art from, so can BDSM be art form and it is is fun for those that like it, but none say they be forced to endure it either I have never ONCE said anyone should be tortured by ANY means. The only comments I have made that you dug your gimmie gimmie gimmie claws into was that I said code was here for now BUT THAT IT WAS BEING CHANGED. Ever since, you have dug into anything I say making it a "procode" agenda, and there fore "Anit-Mark" What mularkey! For the record, I now make the following statements that yopu MAY quote, and I hope you can get THESE correct!: 1. Mark Morgan is a clueless jerk with no life, therefore he must belittle and berate others, despite the fact he can neither spell his insults correctly, nor can he assemble more than two coherent sentences. He is a boil on the Gluteus Maximus of Life. 2. Mark Morgan will probably die lonely, unfulfilled and desperate because he spent so much time whining about how "we" have so abused him without him trying to get past his front door to go out and find a life. I know so many people who are blind, deaf, missing an appendage, lost children in accidents, etc, and they get on with thier lives. My own daughter is terminally ill. but I don't cry "VICTIM" at every turn! You are a loser punk, Morgan, unworthy of squat. I've tried to be nice, even confidential in some of my comments, but you are such an infuriating twerp that it makes my hair crawl You can't take ANYTHING without trying to make it a rallying point for the "Pro-Victim" crowd, even when it's in your defense! Are you stupid or do you just do this for sport? If you are, you aren't getting any points on the board! |
K4YZ wrote:
Mark, cutting I said: Geez, Mark, and I just thought we were getting to get to be buddies. Guess the engagement's off, huh? Stevie making a pass at me Mark said: That is your best shot. I notice that you don't disagree To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! a nice clear death threat no way that is anything but a death threat no tlak by stevie of debate or tlaking at nothing but going on about shooting and killing |
K4YZ wrote: You're really into "nice tries" today, aren't, you, markie. I'll leave the bottom intact ehre so folks can re-read the entire post. No threat was made. Bul**** quoting you To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! Unquote the last sentence is particularly ilumanting Having failed to impress anyone with your "a clerk at the ss told me..." story, you try this again. No on threatened you, least of all me. Liar Must be a boring day in Michigan today. Weather got ya pinned down, does it? Steve, K4YZ |
an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Mark, cutting I said: Geez, Mark, and I just thought we were getting to get to be buddies. Guess the engagement's off, huh? Stevie making a pass at me Mark said: That is your best shot. I notice that you don't disagree To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! a nice clear death threat no way that is anything but a death threat no tlak by stevie of debate or tlaking at nothing but going on about shooting and killing Steve loves charades. His favorite is the "I'm almost going to make a threat, but I am going to make you think I made a threat" charade. |
an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Mark, cutting I said: Geez, Mark, and I just thought we were getting to get to be buddies. Guess the engagement's off, huh? Stevie making a pass at me Nope. Mark said: That is your best shot. I notice that you don't disagree To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! a nice clear death threat Nope. no way that is anything but a death threat It's a lot of things...A death threat isn't one of them. no tlak by stevie of debate or tlaking at nothing but going on about shooting and killing "tlak" "tlaking" Just responding to your "is that your best shot" comment in kind. "...I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change!..." And STILL no death threat! Give it up, DelusionBoy! That was no more a "death threat" than your "I am a Colonel in the Army Chemical Corps" was true! Steve, K4YZ |
an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: You're really into "nice tries" today, aren't, you, markie. I'll leave the bottom intact ehre so folks can re-read the entire post. No threat was made. Bul**** "bull####", Markie. And no threat was made. quoting you To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! Unquote the last sentence is particularly ilumanting "illuminating" No, it wasn't. Seven years later and it's STILL no threat. Having failed to impress anyone with your "a clerk at the ss told me..." story, you try this again. No on threatened you, least of all me. Liar Nope. Must be a boring day in Michigan today. Weather got ya pinned down, does it? Obviously it's impaired his comprehension skills. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Mark, cutting I said: Geez, Mark, and I just thought we were getting to get to be buddies. Guess the engagement's off, huh? Stevie making a pass at me Nope. yep you are in plain langauge Mark said: That is your best shot. I notice that you don't disagree To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! a nice clear death threat Nope. sure is no way that is anything but a death threat It's a lot of things...A death threat isn't one of them. It can only be a death threat It has nothing to do with hamradio nothing to with the topic "Cw it more than just a mode" it is and remains a death threat no tlak by stevie of debate or tlaking at nothing but going on about shooting and killing "tlak" "tlaking" Just responding to your "is that your best shot" comment in kind. "...I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change!..." And STILL no death threat! sure is Give it up, DelusionBoy! That was no more a "death threat" than your "I am a Colonel in the Army Chemical Corps" was true! Steve, K4YZ |
nobodys old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Mark, cutting I said: Geez, Mark, and I just thought we were getting to get to be buddies. Guess the engagement's off, huh? Stevie making a pass at me Nope. yep you are in plain langauge Nope. More of your delusions of grandeur, Markie. Mark said: That is your best shot. I notice that you don't disagree To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! a nice clear death threat Nope. sure is Nope. Not then...Not today... no way that is anything but a death threat It's a lot of things...A death threat isn't one of them. It can only be a death threat Nope. It has nothing to do with hamradio The what were YOU doing making your own "best shot" comments? nothing to with the topic "Cw it more than just a mode" What were you doing making slanderous comments? it is and remains a death threat Nope. Double nope. no tlak by stevie of debate or tlaking at nothing but going on about shooting and killing "tlak" "tlaking" Just responding to your "is that your best shot" comment in kind. "...I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change!..." And STILL no death threat! sure is Nope. Just more of your "self victimization" role. Give it up, DelusionBoy! That was no more a "death threat" than your "I am a Colonel in the Army Chemical Corps" was true! Repeated for emphasis. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Mark, cutting I said: Geez, Mark, and I just thought we were getting to get to be buddies. Guess the engagement's off, huh? Stevie making a pass at me Nope. yep you are in plain langauge Nope. More of your delusions of grandeur, Markie. nope more of you your sexual harassment Mark said: That is your best shot. I notice that you don't disagree To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! a nice clear death threat Nope. sure is Nope. Not then...Not today... was then and remains today no way that is anything but a death threat It's a lot of things...A death threat isn't one of them. It can only be a death threat Nope. It has nothing to do with hamradio The what were YOU doing making your own "best shot" comments? shots do not always involve gun or killing nothing to with the topic "Cw it more than just a mode" What were you doing making slanderous comments? I was not making one can't have been I could have been making libelous one, but I was doing that either |
nobodys old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Mark, cutting I said: Geez, Mark, and I just thought we were getting to get to be buddies. Guess the engagement's off, huh? Stevie making a pass at me Nope. yep you are in plain langauge Nope. More of your delusions of grandeur, Markie. nope more of you your sexual harassment What "sexual harrassment"...?!?! Mark said: That is your best shot. I notice that you don't disagree To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! a nice clear death threat Nope. sure is Nope. Not then...Not today... was then and remains today Nope and nope. But your continuous ranting about it certainly substantiates my claims that you are paranoid. no way that is anything but a death threat It's a lot of things...A death threat isn't one of them. It can only be a death threat Nope. It has nothing to do with hamradio The what were YOU doing making your own "best shot" comments? shots do not always involve gun or killing No, they don't. But afterall, Markie, YOU have stated it's not what the "spaeker" intended, but what YOU perceived... A "shot" in the context you made YOUR comment, especially considering my military service, either meant a firearm or a punch...In either case, a violent act. nothing to with the topic "Cw it more than just a mode" What were you doing making slanderous comments? I was not making one Here we are again, Markie. YOU have stated it's not what the "spaeker" intended, but what (YOU) perceived... So...does that concept NOT apply to YOU...?!?! can't have been I could have been making libelous one, but I was doing that either Sure you were... The tone, content and delivery of your comments were ALL meant to incite and inflame. No more...no less... Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Mark, cutting I said: Geez, Mark, and I just thought we were getting to get to be buddies. Guess the engagement's off, huh? Stevie making a pass at me Nope. yep you are in plain langauge Nope. More of your delusions of grandeur, Markie. nope more of you your sexual harassment What "sexual harrassment"...?!?! yours Mark said: That is your best shot. I notice that you don't disagree To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! a nice clear death threat Nope. sure is Nope. Not then...Not today... was then and remains today Nope and nope. sure a death and no one invites a death threat just like no one invites rape or any other crime |
Wondering if Markie will answer this question:
"Hey Markie...Do The "Rules" Not Apply To You Too...?!?!" nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: What "sexual harrassment"...?!?! yours I repeat the question since you didn't answer it... What "sexual harrassment"...?!?! Mark said: That is your best shot. I notice that you don't disagree To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! a nice clear death threat Nope. sure is Nope. Not then...Not today... was then and remains today Nope and nope. sure a death "sure a death"...?!?! That wasn't English. Try again. and no one invites a death threat For once something we can agree on. just like no one invites rape or any other crime Who invited what crime? Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: Wondering if Markie will answer this question: "Hey Markie...Do The "Rules" Not Apply To You Too...?!?!" no question there nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: What "sexual harrassment"...?!?! yours I repeat the question since you didn't answer it... I did you just did notlike the answer What "sexual harrassment"...?!?! Mark said: That is your best shot. I notice that you don't disagree To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! a nice clear death threat Nope. sure is Nope. Not then...Not today... was then and remains today Nope and nope. sure a death "sure a death"...?!?! That wasn't English. Try again. and no one invites a death threat For once something we can agree on. then you were lying in saying I invited it just like no one invites rape or any other crime Who invited what crime? any crime Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote:
Wondering if Markie will answer this question: "Hey Markie...Do The "Rules" Not Apply To You Too...?!?!" no question there nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: What "sexual harrassment"...?!?! yours I repeat the question since you didn't answer it... I did you just did notlike the answer - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What "sexual harrassment"...?!?! Mark said: That is your best shot. I notice that you don't disagree To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! a nice clear death threat Nope. sure is Nope. Not then...Not today... was then and remains today Nope and nope. sure a death "sure a death"...?!?! That wasn't English. Try again. and no one invites a death threat For once something we can agree on. then you were lying in saying I invited it - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - just like no one invites rape or any other crime Who invited what crime? any crime Steve, K4YZ |
|
an_old_friend wrote: wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Mark, cut no tlak by stevie of debate or tlaking at nothing but going on about shooting and killing Steve loves charades. His favorite is the "I'm almost going to make a threat, but I am going to make you think I made a threat" charade. --------------------- Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking." Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that it be perceived as such." -------------------- Steve only has to perceive a threat, but he says the rest of us have to have the courts decide. In all fairness I beleive Stevie allows this power also the MMM Ah, those Morsemen. The Mighty Macho Morsemen! As long as they realize that the Dud (as in UXO) has bestowed such privelege upon them. |
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote: quoting you stevie To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! Unquote the last sentence is particularly ilumanting wrote: wrote: cut --------------------- Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking." Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that it be perceived as such." -------------------- Steve only has to perceive a threat, but he says the rest of us have to have the courts decide. and therefore according to stevie as the one who received the threat I decide if it was threatening |
an Old friend wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: quoting you stevie To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! Unquote the last sentence is particularly ilumanting wrote: wrote: cut --------------------- Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking." Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that it be perceived as such." -------------------- Steve only has to perceive a threat, but he says the rest of us have to have the courts decide. and therefore according to stevie as the one who received the threat I decide if it was threatening It would appear that way. But there's always a double-standard at work in this newsgripe, so the usual rules of logic don't always work. |
wrote: an Old friend wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: quoting you stevie To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! Unquote the last sentence is particularly ilumanting wrote: wrote: cut --------------------- Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking." Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that it be perceived as such." -------------------- Steve only has to perceive a threat, but he says the rest of us have to have the courts decide. and therefore according to stevie as the one who received the threat I decide if it was threatening It would appear that way. But there's always a double-standard at work in this newsgripe, so the usual rules of logic don't always work. I wonder if if realy the NG do we have any eveidence that lgic ever works on stevie BTW did you catch Stevie that he never cliamed to be an expert on anything? |
an_old_friend wrote: wrote: an Old friend wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: quoting you stevie To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the participants at the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better, then have at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want something shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I don't waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of consequence. YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE subject to change! Unquote the last sentence is particularly ilumanting wrote: wrote: cut --------------------- Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking." Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that it be perceived as such." -------------------- Steve only has to perceive a threat, but he says the rest of us have to have the courts decide. and therefore according to stevie as the one who received the threat I decide if it was threatening It would appear that way. But there's always a double-standard at work in this newsgripe, so the usual rules of logic don't always work. I wonder if if realy the NG do we have any eveidence that lgic ever works on stevie BTW did you catch Stevie that he never cliamed to be an expert on anything? Yeh, not worth arguing his obvious contradictions. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com