| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
September 10th 05, 02:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: Mike Coslo wrote: wrote: I don't make fun of other people's religious faith. So what? Is a persons faith a sacred cow? Should Mormons (the men of course) be allowed to marry as many women as they want? As many as they want? maybe not, as many as they can convince to marry sure, why not? Uhhhhhhhhhhh...it's against the law. so what? That's exactly what I expect from the Pivot Man of the Feeble Five. that law is wrong No, it's not. indeed I think the morman could get it struck down as unconstitutional using much the same approuch as the gay right folks in striking at Amendment 2 in CO an the anti sodomy law of TX "Morman" "approach" No, they won't, and for the very reasons I stated. We see here your weakness shows up in the Code issue but dominates your life My only "weakness" is my intolerance for liars and deceivers such as yourself. However we see YOUR weakness, which is to simply "allow" anything that allows YOU to just do as you darn well please, and to Hell with the consequences. Nothing may ever be allowed to change Sure it can. You're trying to perpetuate a LennieLie that has itself been proven wrong over and over and over. why should polygamy be banned? why for that matter shoudl polyandry be banned? Let's start of with inability to support the extended family for one. if that is the issue you add an ecomonic test to the maaraige system, "economic" "marriage" Indeed there should be. I also believe there should be a license to breed. However it's statistically proven fact that the more mouths you have to feed the less likely you are to be able to adequately provide for ALL the needs of ALL the members of the family. The number one problem in polygamy-prone communities is abject poverty. Follow that with chronic medical problems associated with in-breeding. no one said anything about striking down other laws about cousins and stuff like that I wish I knew what you were trying to say. more of Stevie as a religous bigot It's got nothing to do with "religion", Markie. "Polygamy" is NOT a religion. It IS a "practice" that some religions encourage. More evidence of Markie running his mouth off. further by what right do you dictate the level of economics in a counouity WTF is a "counouity"...?!?! And as for "dictating the level of economics", I didn't. However the various state children's protective agencies draw the poverty line based upon gross income and the number of souls in the family. No mention of religion... Utah before the banning of Polygamy was a stable reasonably properous splace, the towns where they practive it now out of sight lack the resources to support themselve wether mongamy or polygamy is rule "prosperous" "place" "practice" "themselves" "monogamy" They used to be "prosperous" when the economy was almost 90% aggrarian. Not so today. Most of those multi-spousal "families" are nothing more than multiple-dwelling groups where "dad" can stay tonight and procreate yet another mouth to feed. Chavez should file charges. Let due process work. BTW, that due process was set up by evil religious people. Ummm, where? Not sure wher Pat is a resident, but in the state where Pat lives is a good place to start Guess you missed the point, Markie... not at all Absolutely at all. Bravo! I was wondering if you were racist and only hated WASP's that call for Jihad. Where do you get this stuff Brian? I don't like any religion that tries to impress it's beliefs on others, that engages in killing in the name of God, and in general allows people of "faith" to use that faith to cause harm. indeed then you are much a fan of Cristain beliefs then I take it "Christian" "than" cut speeling cop "SPELLING", you nitwit! Sheesh! What an I D I O T ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Steve, K4YZ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| K8CPA Email | CB | |||
Threaded Mode
