Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut Uhhhhhhhhhhh...it's against the law. so what? That's exactly what I expect from the Pivot Man of the Feeble Five. the truth glad not to disapoint you that law is wrong No, it's not. sure is as is any law based solely on the medevil concepts evolved by the church indeed I think the morman could get it struck down as unconstitutional using much the same approuch as the gay right folks in striking at Amendment 2 in CO an the anti sodomy law of TX "Morman" "approach" No, they won't, and for the very reasons I stated. that is you opinion, and not likely worth very much We see here your weakness shows up in the Code issue but dominates your life My only "weakness" is my intolerance for liars and deceivers such as yourself. your weakness is your bigotry, but you can't se it of course. A post with nothing that can be called a lie and still you flame and flame However we see YOUR weakness, which is to simply "allow" anything that allows YOU to just do as you darn well please, and to Hell with the consequences. and this a about me NOW? when did that happen I missed it as I have said I don't esp support marraiage at all Nothing may ever be allowed to change Sure it can. not according to you, once set set in law it must stay forever. Jim Crow was once Law too You're trying to perpetuate a LennieLie that has itself been proven wrong over and over and over. why should polygamy be banned? why for that matter shoudl polyandry be banned? Let's start of with inability to support the extended family for one. if that is the issue you add an ecomonic test to the maaraige system, "economic" "marriage" Indeed there should be. I also believe there should be a license to breed. as yes the Facist shows his head However it's statistically proven fact that the more mouths you have to feed the less likely you are to be able to adequately provide for ALL the needs of ALL the members of the family. The number one problem in polygamy-prone communities is abject poverty. Follow that with chronic medical problems associated with in-breeding. no one said anything about striking down other laws about cousins and stuff like that I wish I knew what you were trying to say. no you don't more of Stevie as a religous bigot It's got nothing to do with "religion", Markie. yes it does "Polygamy" is NOT a religion. It IS a "practice" that some religions encourage. never said it was a religion but it is a practice you disapove of for religious reasons and that you seek to maintaina ban becuase it suits your religous bigotry More evidence of Markie running his mouth off. cut Utah before the banning of Polygamy was a stable reasonably properous splace, the towns where they practive it now out of sight lack the resources to support themselve wether mongamy or polygamy is rule "prosperous" "place" "practice" "themselves" "monogamy" They used to be "prosperous" when the economy was almost 90% aggrarian. Not so today. Most of those multi-spousal "families" are nothing more than multiple-dwelling groups where "dad" can stay tonight and procreate yet another mouth to feed. becuase they are forced into marginal land and into hiding to practice what they se as a tenant of their faith Chavez should file charges. Let due process work. BTW, that due process was set up by evil religious people. Ummm, where? Not sure wher Pat is a resident, but in the state where Pat lives is a good place to start Guess you missed the point, Markie... not at all Absolutely at all. I sure do Chav has recourse to the courts if he wishs cut |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
K8CPA Email | CB |