Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: "K=D8=88B" on Sun 28 Aug 2005 17:47
wrote So would you support a reasonable set of Morse Code only subbands, Bill? Say, the bottom 10-15% of each HF ham band? There are no such subbands on MF/HF now. Why in heavens name would we est= ablish them at this point? Simple reason: To keep the MINORITY happy, the minority who still believe in the efficacy, the nobility of purpose ascribed to the morse code mode. The claimed efficacy is that "it will get through when nothing else will." In that case it will work THROUGH any QRM and therefore doesn't NEED any exclusivity. The claimed nobility of purpose ("first mode in radio" "must be treasured as traditional") is nothing but a rationalization on the PCTA's part to keep even a vestige of CONTROL over regulations that they've grown accustomed to having. THEY are the "nobility," not the mode and all must bow to THEIR wishes. THEY rule. Not. If morse code cognition is "so easy to learn, all can do it," then WHY MUST THERE BE A FEDERAL TEST REQUIRED FOR IT? Something so "easy" can be taught in code schools OUTSIDE of federal jurisdiction and supervision. NO FEDERAL TEST IS NEEDED FOR PRESERVATION. The PCTA want to retain CONTROL. They want to have their elite EXCLUSIVITY in the radio playground. It makes them feel "happy" to keep "undesireables" out of THEIR turf. They feel they somehow "own" the right to exclusive EM bandspace. They are the Radio Royals. Their blood is bluest of the blue. Blue blood is caused by oxygen deprivation. Oxygen deprivation leads to malfunctioning thinking. QED. Merde. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Headline: Brain Dead Woman Gives Birth To Baby Girl | General | |||
Breaker 1-9 good buddy! I got a Dead Leprechaun on my tail! | CB | |||
Wanted Dead or alive Communications receiver,s and radio equipment | Shortwave |