Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NPRM 05-143, the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would eliminate
morse code test element 1 from all amateur radio license examinations was supposedly released on 15 July 2005. It is marked "approved" as of 19 July 2005. A scanned copy of that NPRM was marked "received" by date stamp as 20 July 2005 and introduced to WT Docket 05-235 supposedly on 15 July 2005...but did not appear to anyone accessing the ECFS until 21 July 2005. NPRM 05-143 is clearly marked as to the Comment Perior being "60 Days after published in the Federal Register." That's on the first page and page 25 of that 30-page NPRM document. One problem: NPRM 05-143 HAS NOT BEEN PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER AS OF THE MORNING OF 30 AUGUST 2005! A month and a half has elapsed since the middle of July, 1962 Comments have been filed on WT Docket 05-235 as of 29 August 2005. Access the Federal Register Contents page through GPO at: http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/fedreg/frcont05.html Noticeably missing is ANY filed Comment from the ARRL. In fact, NO organization except for one local 23-member "DX club" has filed anything under WT Docket 05-235. No Code International Executive Director Carl Stevenson has stated that NCI will not make any Comment for NCI until after the NPRM has been published in the Federal Register. The ARRL has been very noticeably present at every other amateur radio docket proceding before the FCC...but not yet on NPRM 05-143. The ARRL was opposed to revision of ITU-R Recommendation S25, in particular S25.5 making it mandatory for all administrations to test for morse code proficiency for any license having below-30- MHz operating privileges. The IARU was for the revision, being its principal author of change which was voted in at WRC-03. In the two years since WRC-03 (July of 2003), the ARRL has generally appeared ambivalent on morse code testing with the exception of their Petition RM-10867 of 18 March 2004. RM-10867 called for a retention of morse code testing for Amateur Extra class licensees. RM-10867 was DENIED in NPRM 05-143. From there on, it is speculation. The Comment period on NPRM 05-143 in WT Docket 05-235 has NOT OFFICIALLY STARTED. No notice has yet been made in the Federal Register. There have been 1920 Comments already filed with the FCC on that Docket. Are these to be rendered "useless" for consideration because of no Federal Register notice given before they were filed? [see the Title Block of NPRM 05-143 as well as page 25, item 54, for the period of Comments and Replies to Comments] Further speculation - fueled by suspicion - is that some sort of behind-the-scenes "stonewalling" is going on...perhaps by lobbyists urging the FCC to delay the Federal Register notice. Of all the possible organizations having sufficient "clout" to lobby the FCC, the ARRL is pre-eminent, retaining the services of both a communications-law firm and a professional lobbying firm in the District of Columbia area. Yes, speculation is only speculation, no proof. However, time is elapsing and a month and a half has gone by sine the release of NPRM 05-143 and NO notice in the Federal Register. That is out of the ordinary procedure of the FCC. The legality of such delay is not known. We taxpayers can't peer far enough into the inner workings of the FCC (or its lobbyists) to know for sure. It may be that the failure to make notice in the Federal Register is a human error, a lapse of duty performance. If so, it could be corrected easily...but we ordinary citizens don't know. If so, there still remains a question on whether or not 1920 filed documents will be considered by the FCC on issuing a final Report and Order in regards to that NPRM. Will those be a useless effort by over 1700 citizens commenting? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Docket 05-235 Scorecard | Policy | |||
Status of WT Docket 05-235 | Policy | |||
WT Docket 04-140 | Digital | |||
WT Docket 04-140 | Digital | |||
AMATEUR RADIO ENTHUSIASTS COME OUT SWINGING IN OPPOSITION TO NPRM ON BPL | Policy |