Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:25:53 GMT, "Bill Sohl"
wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... Bill Sohl wrote: cut do you agree with my statement that a for a truly new arguement that the FCC would wait and study awhile? IF (big IF) some new compelling reason was identified to justify keeping code testing, then yes, I think the FCC might look deeper or perhaps rethink their proposal...BUT, as we both appear to agree, no such new and compelling reason(s) have been offered up by anyone. Even after several major widespread emergencies (Katrina, etc) no additional arguments or even anecdotal evidence has surfaced that points to any need for code knowledge. I agree no new reason has been presented, w may disagree in that i think if someone just came up with something truely NEW they would delay and study it but I don't expect even that Cheers, Bill K2UNK _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Docket 05-235 Scorecard | Policy | |||
Stonewalling on WT Docket 05-235? | Policy | |||
Stonewalling WT Docket 05-235? | Policy | |||
Status of WT Docket 05-235 | Policy | |||
WT Docket 04-140 | Digital |