Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Who Says Nobody Builds Any More?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
wrote http://www.classeradio.org/ Quoted from the site: "One of the major goals of the class E project is to facilitate the construction, by Amateurs with only a modest background in construction, of a high power, good sounding AM transmitter using modern, readily available components and at a reasonable cost. " Where was this guy back in 1935 when hams were clamoring for a "good sounding AM transmitter" project? 73, de Hans, K0HB -- Homepage: http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb Member: ARRL http://www.arrl.org SOC http://www.qsl.net/soc VWOA http://www.vwoa.org A-1 Operator Club http://www.arrl.org/awards/a1-op/ TCDXA http://www.tcdxa.org MWA http://www.w0aa.org TCFMC http://www.tcfmc.org FISTS http://www.fists.org LVDXA http://www.upstel.net/borken/lvdxa.htm NCI http://www.nocode.org |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
K=D8HB wrote:
Quoted from the site: "One of the major goals of the class E project is to facilitate the construction, by Amateurs with only a modest background in construction, of a high power, good sounding AM transmitter using modern, readily available components and at a reasonable cost. " Ain't that great? Where was this guy back in 1935 when hams were clamoring for a "good sounding AM transmitter" project? Probably the same place as you and I, Hans - hadn't even been born yet. Some interesting info there. Definitely not run-of-the-mill Ikensu stuff! Do you consider those projects to be "tinkering"? 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
wrote Ain't that great? Yes and No. Yes because the project encourages and nurtures the spirit of experimentation in something "different". Class E isn't your uncles old technology. No because the project emphasizes AM, an old spectrum-hog mode which ought to have been retired about 1965. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:50:18 GMT, "KØHB"
wrote in . net: No because the project emphasizes AM, an old spectrum-hog mode which ought to have been retired about 1965. I don't hear too many pileups these days...... ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
K=D8HB wrote:
wrote Ain't that great? Yes and No. Yes because the project encourages and nurtures the spirit of experimentation in something "different". Class E isn't your uncles old technology. I agree 100%. And it's not just Class E - there's the Class H modulator... No because the project emphasizes AM, an old spectrum-hog mode which ou= ght to have been retired about 1965. Why? AM is a legal mode, with advantages and disadvantages. One of the key elements of the spirit of experimentation in something "different" is not being constrained by what is considered electropolitically correct. Besides, the Class E technology can be adapted to a variety of modes. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
wrote No because the project emphasizes AM, an old spectrum-hog mode which ought to have been retired about 1965. Why? AM is a legal mode, with advantages and disadvantages. AM is a relic, inefficient in it's use of spectrum, and inefficient in it's use of power (only half of the transmitted power contains intelligence and half of that half is discarded at the receiver!). One of the key elements of the spirit of experimentation in something "different" is not being constrained by what is considered electropolitically correct. I don't know WTF the phrase "electropolitically correct" is even supposed to mean. Besides, the Class E technology can be adapted to a variety of modes. Yes, it certainly can. Which makes it all the more puzzling that they'd showcase it with a doddering old mode like AM. Class E is technologically interesting, and kind of "electro-sexy". Showcasing it in an "AM suit" is equivalent to showcasing Jessica Simpson in a fully secured HAZMAT suit. Incidentally, the technology is a little older than Jessica. See "Class-E, A New Class of High-Efficiency Tuned, Single-Ended Switching Power Amplifiers", IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, Vol SC-10, June 1975, pp. 168-175. Beep beep de Hans, K0HB |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
KØHB wrote:
wrote Ain't that great? Yes and No. Yes because the project encourages and nurtures the spirit of experimentation in something "different". Class E isn't your uncles old technology. No because the project emphasizes AM, an old spectrum-hog mode which ought to have been retired about 1965. Next thing ya know, someone will be building dipoles with ladder line! ;^). Then (shudder) things with tubes!!!! Room for Morse CW, room for A.M. IMO. - Mike KB3EIA - |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
KØHB wrote:
wrote No because the project emphasizes AM, an old spectrum-hog mode which ought to have been retired about 1965. Why? AM is a legal mode, with advantages and disadvantages. AM is a relic, inefficient in it's use of spectrum, and inefficient in it's use of power (only half of the transmitted power contains intelligence and half of that half is discarded at the receiver!). So are SUV's. IIRC, you kinda like those! One of the key elements of the spirit of experimentation in something "different" is not being constrained by what is considered electropolitically correct. I don't know WTF the phrase "electropolitically correct" is even supposed to mean. I think he means that you will think it's an inefficient mode in it's use of spectrum. and power. Besides, the Class E technology can be adapted to a variety of modes. Yes, it certainly can. Which makes it all the more puzzling that they'd showcase it with a doddering old mode like AM. Class E is technologically interesting, and kind of "electro-sexy". Showcasing it in an "AM suit" is equivalent to showcasing Jessica Simpson in a fully secured HAZMAT suit. It is an easy to understand project. And I suggest that Jessica might wear that Hazmat suit a little nicer than say, me! Incidentally, the technology is a little older than Jessica. See "Class-E, A New Class of High-Efficiency Tuned, Single-Ended Switching Power Amplifiers", IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, Vol SC-10, June 1975, pp. 168-175. - Mike KB3EIA - |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
mopeydopey's frustration builds by the minute! | CB |