"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...

nobodys old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
nobodys_old_friend wrote:
Dr.Ace wrote:
"nobodys_old_friend" wrote in message
ups.com...

meaning you agree that Dan mispoke I should think when he claimed,
"He
argues with everyone about everything." the rest is simply a matter
of
opinion, and point of view

Hardly a misrepresentation of your conduct here, Mark.

certainly is everyone and everything are all inclusive terms

I am certain that that meant something to you...

You OTOH say you will agree to discuss something only after
everyone
agrees to agree with you, in advance

I've never seen or heard Dan say any such thing.

then you have not been paying attenion. he claims that he will only
discuss emergency comms when I agree with his disriction of the
nature
and importance of the beliefs he holds

cuting the english cop crap

Reinserting Mark's censorship in order to maintain context:

then you have not been paying attenion. he claims that he will only
discuss emergency comms when I agree with his disriction of the nature
and importance of the beliefs he holds

QUOTE:

"disriction"...?!?!

You can't "discuss" something unless you are utilizing the same
language, the same grammar, and the same meaning of words.

UNQUOTE

in the "hams to resure" thread somwhere before the
religionous...(SNIP)
cuting the english cop crap

Reinserting Mark's censorship to maintain context:

QUOTE:

in the "hams to resure" thread somwhere before the religionous...(SNIP)


Here, for example... "hams to the resure"? "religionous"?

UNQUOTE

You continue to "dismiss" as "speling cop crap" efforts to get you
to use the same words in the same context as others so that we may all
understand each other.

Your "cut" and "speling cop crap" are nothing but censorship.

And you DO remember who was famous for censorship, don't you,
Mark?

discusion, the reference was that I must accept that coms I thinks
are
merely important are vital to safety and recovery of the region.
Indeed, like Stevie is ****ed that I see ARES type comms, by and
large,
as merely preforming the important job of keeping a lot of the small
stuff off the plate of the first responders, as opposed to stuff
affecting the real size and scope of the disaster.

One cannot carry out a meaningful discourse unless there are
certain basic understandings from which to frame that conversation.

you are just plain wrong on that

No, I am not.

As any lingusitics professor, Mark...

guess you don't follow the public debate on much of ANY political issue
in the nation

Sure I do.

And I know that each of the parties concerned use the same words
and in the same context.

BTW, Mark...that was a really WEAK effort at diversion...

So far, you've not demonstrated that you have a real-time frame of
reference on "emergency comms" from which to make an informed opinion.

not needed at all, indeed if I had than I would likely be unable to
discuss the issue with any impartiality, which would seem to be Dan's
(and your's) problem. You all can't what you are talking about becuase
your own egos are involved

It's got nothing to do with ego.

It has to do with disparate parties discussing a common subject
from a common understanding.

"Communication" does NOT occur unless both parties have SOME
common frame of reference from which to understand each otehr.

I have taken accepting as fact the claimed message traffic and comented
on its importance in the over all scheme of thing

That said what?

The latter type certainly did not occour during Katrina, at least in
part becuase for Hams to delver such messages there would have had to
have been somebody to to compose the message and give to us and
Somebody to delviver it to, both ends broke down in Katrina, terribly
limiting our poetencail usefullness as Hams

Your complete ignorance of what has transpired in THIS region,
from your perch on Michigan's Upper Penninsula, is obvious.

I know what is going on there

Obviously not.

you are not in that region either strictly speaking

Sure I am.

you over look the fact that the onlooker sees most of the game, and the
players don't

Ahhhhhh....so from your perch in UP Michigan you know more about
what's going on than those of us who have actually been involved in
it..?!?!

BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
! ! ! ! ! ! !

FYI, not ALL "emergency comms" are formal written traffic. And
not all "emergency comms" involve "Hi Mom, I'm safe And Will Call
Later" traffic.

never said anything of the sort

You aren't capable.
Like I've said before, an_old_fiend is apparently in the same camp
as Todd
(same mindset).
Also since an_old_fiend doesn't have a call sign his opinion in
radio.amateur groups doen't mean much.

I just choose not to sign it,

unlike some of you I have a life outside Ham radio, I dislike the
common custom of reduceing a person to a callsign

Mark's callsign is K B 9 R Q Z. He is an NCT.

my word 2 true statements in a row I may die of the shock

Don't tease me.

but as I said I have a callsign just chose not to sign to ervything

"everything"...

No...You claimed that you didn't sign your Amateur Radio callsign
to Amateur Radio related posts because "...unlike some of you I have a
life outside Ham radio, I dislike the common custom of reduceing (sic)
a person to a callsign."

(A) Your callsign has EVERYthing to do with "Ham" radio, and (B)
attaching your Amateur Radio callsign no more "reduces" you in an
Amateur Radio forum than using your ISP screen name "reduces" you on
the Internet.

He's spent
countless months telling us of his "disability" and intent to use the
American's with Disabilites Act to "sue" anyone/everyone associated
with his failure to get a coded license.

but you saved by lying again

Nope.

BTW, Mark, WHAT "life" outside of Amateur Radio?

my life is non of YOUR busness unless I chose to share those deatils

You have no life outside Amateur Radio, Mark. As a matter of
fact, you have little life that moves you beyond the four walls of your
house.

You've now created at least three screen names that I count as
"active" in order to get around Google's "daily posting limit" so you
can keep the list loaded with your rhetoric.

so? you count

I don't have to. It's obvious.

You've alleged that I am "obsessive-compulsive" about responding
to RRAP posts, yet YOU are the one who has created the means by which
you can defeat the posting limits so YOU can "pounce" on everyone
else's posts.

and it is ok acording to you for you count my ppost and analyze them
but not for me when I choose to do the same

Doesn't sound like much of a life to me..

Thank you Stevie must mean I am doing something right that you
disaprove

You're a deceitful, lying , pathologically mistruthful sexual
devaiant, Mark.

There's so much about you to disapprove of.

Steve, K4YZ


Anyone that needs to use several screen names is obviously very insecure.
You may indeed have a point here Steve. He is a momma's boy, still living
at home at a point in his life that he should be saving for his retirement
for a career, which he obviously does not have.

He is a pathetic excuse for a ham, let alone for a human being. He is
ashamed of his life, and over compensates by literally begging for
attention here on USENET. That is like jumping into a pond full of
Alligators and wondering why they are chewing you to death. He feels
inferior in life as well as in ham radio. As stated.....A pathetic
excuse.....etc.

Dan/W4NTI

Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...

nobodys old friend wrote:
cut


There's so much about you to disapprove of.

Steve, K4YZ


Anyone that needs to use several screen names is obviously very insecure.
You may indeed have a point here Steve. He is a momma's boy, still living
at home at a point in his life that he should be saving for his retirement
for a career, which he obviously does not have.

"saving for his retirement for a career"

auf Anglish bitte?

I use one screen name an Old friend I use several emails accounts far
more than 3 BTW

I am retired or at least semi reitred

He is a pathetic excuse for a ham, let alone for a human being.

you have no reffernece for either of those statements Dan
He is
ashamed of his life,

Where do you get this ****?

and over compensates by literally begging for
attention here on USENET. That is like jumping into a pond full of
Alligators and wondering why they are chewing you to death. He feels
inferior in life as well as in ham radio.

Inferior? I certainly don't feel inferoir to you or anyone else in
here, Indeed this place is good for boasting ones ego, esp if I am
having a bad day, I can look at the crap folks like you spew out

As stated.....A pathetic
excuse.....etc.

Dan/W4NTI

nobodys old friend wrote:
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...

nobodys old friend wrote:
cut

"cut" = KB9RQZ censorship

There's so much about you to disapprove of.

Steve, K4YZ


Anyone that needs to use several screen names is obviously very insecure.
You may indeed have a point here Steve. He is a momma's boy, still living
at home at a point in his life that he should be saving for his retirement
for a career, which he obviously does not have.

"saving for his retirement for a career"

auf Anglish bitte?

I understood it perfectly.

He said you shouldn't be such a parasite.

I use one screen name an Old friend I use several emails accounts far
more than 3 BTW

I am retired or at least semi reitred

Nope. You're "retarded"

He is a pathetic excuse for a ham, let alone for a human being.

you have no reffernece for either of those statements Dan

I do. A couple e-mails exchanged with the radio club in Illinois.

No wonder you moved.

He is
ashamed of his life,

Where do you get this ####?

From you.

and over compensates by literally begging for
attention here on USENET. That is like jumping into a pond full of
Alligators and wondering why they are chewing you to death. He feels
inferior in life as well as in ham radio.

Inferior? I certainly don't feel inferoir to you or anyone else in
here, Indeed this place is good for boasting ones ego, esp if I am
having a bad day, I can look at the crap folks like you spew out

Mark's getting twisted again, Dan...Notice he can't even spell the
same word correctly within five words?

Yes..."inferior" is a good word. Hence his need to be a
"colonel", etc etc etc...

Steve, K4YZ

Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...

nobodys old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
nobodys_old_friend wrote:
Dr.Ace wrote:
"nobodys_old_friend" wrote in message
ups.com...

meaning you agree that Dan mispoke I should think when he claimed,
"He
argues with everyone about everything." the rest is simply a matter
of
opinion, and point of view

Hardly a misrepresentation of your conduct here, Mark.

certainly is everyone and everything are all inclusive terms

I am certain that that meant something to you...

You OTOH say you will agree to discuss something only after
everyone
agrees to agree with you, in advance

I've never seen or heard Dan say any such thing.

then you have not been paying attenion. he claims that he will only
discuss emergency comms when I agree with his disriction of the
nature
and importance of the beliefs he holds

cuting the english cop crap

Reinserting Mark's censorship in order to maintain context:

then you have not been paying attenion. he claims that he will only
discuss emergency comms when I agree with his disriction of the nature
and importance of the beliefs he holds

QUOTE:

"disriction"...?!?!

You can't "discuss" something unless you are utilizing the same
language, the same grammar, and the same meaning of words.

UNQUOTE

in the "hams to resure" thread somwhere before the
religionous...(SNIP)
cuting the english cop crap

Reinserting Mark's censorship to maintain context:

QUOTE:

in the "hams to resure" thread somwhere before the religionous...(SNIP)


Here, for example... "hams to the resure"? "religionous"?

UNQUOTE

You continue to "dismiss" as "speling cop crap" efforts to get you
to use the same words in the same context as others so that we may all
understand each other.

Your "cut" and "speling cop crap" are nothing but censorship.

And you DO remember who was famous for censorship, don't you,
Mark?

discusion, the reference was that I must accept that coms I thinks
are
merely important are vital to safety and recovery of the region.
Indeed, like Stevie is ****ed that I see ARES type comms, by and
large,
as merely preforming the important job of keeping a lot of the small
stuff off the plate of the first responders, as opposed to stuff
affecting the real size and scope of the disaster.

One cannot carry out a meaningful discourse unless there are
certain basic understandings from which to frame that conversation.

you are just plain wrong on that

No, I am not.

As any lingusitics professor, Mark...

guess you don't follow the public debate on much of ANY political issue
in the nation

Sure I do.

And I know that each of the parties concerned use the same words
and in the same context.

BTW, Mark...that was a really WEAK effort at diversion...

So far, you've not demonstrated that you have a real-time frame of
reference on "emergency comms" from which to make an informed opinion.

not needed at all, indeed if I had than I would likely be unable to
discuss the issue with any impartiality, which would seem to be Dan's
(and your's) problem. You all can't what you are talking about becuase
your own egos are involved

It's got nothing to do with ego.

It has to do with disparate parties discussing a common subject
from a common understanding.

"Communication" does NOT occur unless both parties have SOME
common frame of reference from which to understand each otehr.

I have taken accepting as fact the claimed message traffic and comented
on its importance in the over all scheme of thing

That said what?

The latter type certainly did not occour during Katrina, at least in
part becuase for Hams to delver such messages there would have had to
have been somebody to to compose the message and give to us and
Somebody to delviver it to, both ends broke down in Katrina, terribly
limiting our poetencail usefullness as Hams

Your complete ignorance of what has transpired in THIS region,
from your perch on Michigan's Upper Penninsula, is obvious.

I know what is going on there

Obviously not.

you are not in that region either strictly speaking

Sure I am.

you over look the fact that the onlooker sees most of the game, and the
players don't

Ahhhhhh....so from your perch in UP Michigan you know more about
what's going on than those of us who have actually been involved in
it..?!?!

BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
! ! ! ! ! ! !

FYI, not ALL "emergency comms" are formal written traffic. And
not all "emergency comms" involve "Hi Mom, I'm safe And Will Call
Later" traffic.

never said anything of the sort

You aren't capable.
Like I've said before, an_old_fiend is apparently in the same camp
as Todd
(same mindset).
Also since an_old_fiend doesn't have a call sign his opinion in
radio.amateur groups doen't mean much.

I just choose not to sign it,

unlike some of you I have a life outside Ham radio, I dislike the
common custom of reduceing a person to a callsign

Mark's callsign is K B 9 R Q Z. He is an NCT.

my word 2 true statements in a row I may die of the shock

Don't tease me.

but as I said I have a callsign just chose not to sign to ervything

"everything"...

No...You claimed that you didn't sign your Amateur Radio callsign
to Amateur Radio related posts because "...unlike some of you I have a
life outside Ham radio, I dislike the common custom of reduceing (sic)
a person to a callsign."

(A) Your callsign has EVERYthing to do with "Ham" radio, and (B)
attaching your Amateur Radio callsign no more "reduces" you in an
Amateur Radio forum than using your ISP screen name "reduces" you on
the Internet.

He's spent
countless months telling us of his "disability" and intent to use the
American's with Disabilites Act to "sue" anyone/everyone associated
with his failure to get a coded license.

but you saved by lying again

Nope.

BTW, Mark, WHAT "life" outside of Amateur Radio?

my life is non of YOUR busness unless I chose to share those deatils

You have no life outside Amateur Radio, Mark. As a matter of
fact, you have little life that moves you beyond the four walls of your
house.

You've now created at least three screen names that I count as
"active" in order to get around Google's "daily posting limit" so you
can keep the list loaded with your rhetoric.

so? you count

I don't have to. It's obvious.

You've alleged that I am "obsessive-compulsive" about responding
to RRAP posts, yet YOU are the one who has created the means by which
you can defeat the posting limits so YOU can "pounce" on everyone
else's posts.

and it is ok acording to you for you count my ppost and analyze them
but not for me when I choose to do the same

Doesn't sound like much of a life to me..

Thank you Stevie must mean I am doing something right that you
disaprove

You're a deceitful, lying , pathologically mistruthful sexual
devaiant, Mark.

There's so much about you to disapprove of.

Steve, K4YZ


Anyone that needs to use several screen names is obviously very insecure.
You may indeed have a point here Steve. He is a momma's boy, still living
at home at a point in his life that he should be saving for his retirement
for a career, which he obviously does not have.

Oh, I don't think it's a matter of being "insecure", Dave...It's
just that Mark is all about being all the things he accuses others
of...

As I specified, Mark has accused me of being
"obsessive-compulsive" and "ready to pounce on my every word" in RRAP
replies...

However HE is the one who needs multiple screen names to defeat
Google's posting limits in order to get his multiple-multiple responses
in in one day.

He is a pathetic excuse for a ham, let alone for a human being.

No doubt. I never see "KB9RQZ" in any of the activity reports in
any of the magazines. He alleges to have been a second operator at a
couple of Field Day activities, and I have no doubt that that pretty
much summates his "operating experience".

He is ashamed of his life, and over compensates by literally begging for
attention here on USENET.

He should be ashamed. He'a a pitiful liar. I say pitiful since
he can't even lie effectively, then admits to being a liar on top of
it. His "I am a Colonel" story was classic, but then his insistence
that he's not a mental health patient followed-up by his admissions of
having been in the system are a hoot.

He's blatantly stated he'd teach his children to lie. That in and
of itself qualifies him for a castration before he can procreate any
further. I say "further" because he has, in the past, made allusion to
an ex-wife who was "stalking" him for child support...No doubt another
of his failures. I am divorced but no one ever had to "stalk" me to
make good on my obligations to my daughter and son.

That is like jumping into a pond full of
Alligators and wondering why they are chewing you to death. He feels
inferior in life as well as in ham radio. As stated.....A pathetic
excuse.....etc.

Hear hear.

73

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...

nobodys old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
nobodys_old_friend wrote:
Dr.Ace wrote:
"nobodys_old_friend" wrote in message
ups.com...

meaning you agree that Dan mispoke I should think when he claimed,
"He
argues with everyone about everything." the rest is simply a matter
of
opinion, and point of view

Hardly a misrepresentation of your conduct here, Mark.

certainly is everyone and everything are all inclusive terms

I am certain that that meant something to you...

You OTOH say you will agree to discuss something only after
everyone
agrees to agree with you, in advance

I've never seen or heard Dan say any such thing.

then you have not been paying attenion. he claims that he will only
discuss emergency comms when I agree with his disriction of the
nature
and importance of the beliefs he holds

cuting the english cop crap
cut



There's so much about you to disapprove of.

Steve, K4YZ


Anyone that needs to use several screen names is obviously very insecure.
You may indeed have a point here Steve. He is a momma's boy, still living
at home at a point in his life that he should be saving for his retirement
for a career, which he obviously does not have.

Oh, I don't think it's a matter of being "insecure", Dave...It's
just that Mark is all about being all the things he accuses others
of...

then you are wrong again I am not a homophobe you are.. etc
cut
He is a pathetic excuse for a ham, let alone for a human being.

No doubt. I never see "KB9RQZ" in any of the activity reports in

another lie frommyou Stevie you even sent me a note on something in CQ
or was it CQ VHF

any of the magazines. He alleges to have been a second operator at a
couple of Field Day activities,

nope an a second operator

and I have no doubt that that pretty
much summates his "operating experience".

then of course you are wrong as is normal for you

He is ashamed of his life, and over compensates by literally begging for
attention here on USENET.

He should be ashamed.

OTOH I am not, so

He'a a pitiful liar. I say pitiful since
he can't even lie effectively, then admits to being a liar on top of
it. His "I am a Colonel" story was classic, but then his insistence
that he's not a mental health patient followed-up by his admissions of
having been in the system are a hoot.

you can't deal with Tenses very well

He's blatantly stated he'd teach his children to lie. That in and
of itself qualifies him for a castration before he can procreate any
further.

showing that you do not respect diverity of opinion


I say "further" because he has, in the past, made allusion to
an ex-wife who was "stalking" him for child support...No doubt another
of his failures.

Another lie never said it had anything to do with child support

I am divorced but no one ever had to "stalk" me to
make good on my obligations to my daughter and son.

no one would want to

but you now admitt a failed marriage

That is like jumping into a pond full of
Alligators and wondering why they are chewing you to death. He feels
inferior in life as well as in ham radio. As stated.....A pathetic
excuse.....etc.

Hear hear.

73

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...
cut

Oh, I don't think it's a matter of being "insecure", Dave...It's
just that Mark is all about being all the things he accuses others
of...

nope I am not a homophobic hate monger like yourself


As I specified, Mark has accused me of being
"obsessive-compulsive" and "ready to pounce on my every word" in RRAP
replies...

However HE is the one who needs multiple screen names to defeat
Google's posting limits in order to get his multiple-multiple responses
in in one day.

He is a pathetic excuse for a ham, let alone for a human being.

No doubt. I never see "KB9RQZ" in any of the activity reports in
any of the magazines. He alleges to have been a second operator at a
couple of Field Day activities, and I have no doubt that that pretty
much summates his "operating experience".

back to your elist bull**** anyone different than you isn't a ham

grow up please

He is ashamed of his life, and over compensates by literally begging for
attention here on USENET.

He should be ashamed. He'a a pitiful liar. I say pitiful since
he can't even lie effectively, then admits to being a liar on top of
it. His "I am a Colonel" story was classic, but then his insistence
that he's not a mental health patient followed-up by his admissions of
having been in the system are a hoot.

He's blatantly stated he'd teach his children to lie. That in and
of itself qualifies him for a castration before he can procreate any
further. I say "further" because he has, in the past, made allusion to
an ex-wife who was "stalking" him for child support...No doubt another
of his failures. I am divorced but no one ever had to "stalk" me to
make good on my obligations to my daughter and son.

at the propper yes I will theach them to lie again you refuse to accept
that people can have different views than yourself

you also show yourself to be of the same ilk as the Nazi's


That is like jumping into a pond full of
Alligators and wondering why they are chewing you to death. He feels
inferior in life as well as in ham radio. As stated.....A pathetic
excuse.....etc.

Hear hear.

73

Steve, K4YZ

an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...
cut

"cut" = censorship

Why does a guy who whines about "Freedom of Speech" constantly
censor others?

Oh, I don't think it's a matter of being "insecure", Dave...It's
just that Mark is all about being all the things he accuses others
of...

nope I am not a homophobic hate monger like yourself

Keep repeating that to yourself over and over, Mark.

It will make you warm and fuzzy to say it, but it won't be any
more "true".

As I specified, Mark has accused me of being
"obsessive-compulsive" and "ready to pounce on my every word" in RRAP
replies...

However HE is the one who needs multiple screen names to defeat
Google's posting limits in order to get his multiple-multiple responses
in in one day.

He is a pathetic excuse for a ham, let alone for a human being.

No doubt. I never see "KB9RQZ" in any of the activity reports in
any of the magazines. He alleges to have been a second operator at a
couple of Field Day activities, and I have no doubt that that pretty
much summates his "operating experience".

back to your elist bull#### anyone different than you isn't a ham

grow up please

It's all about you allegedly being a ham, Mark.

You claim you are a partticipant, and indeed you have a license,
but you've haven't done a single thing worthwhile in Amatuer Radio.

He is ashamed of his life, and over compensates by literally begging for
attention here on USENET.

He should be ashamed. He'a a pitiful liar. I say pitiful since
he can't even lie effectively, then admits to being a liar on top of
it. His "I am a Colonel" story was classic, but then his insistence
that he's not a mental health patient followed-up by his admissions of
having been in the system are a hoot.

He's blatantly stated he'd teach his children to lie. That in and
of itself qualifies him for a castration before he can procreate any
further. I say "further" because he has, in the past, made allusion to
an ex-wife who was "stalking" him for child support...No doubt another
of his failures. I am divorced but no one ever had to "stalk" me to
make good on my obligations to my daughter and son.

at the propper yes I will theach them to lie again you refuse to accept
that people can have different views than yourself

"teach"

Teaching children to lie is not "different views".

It's child abuse.

you also show yourself to be of the same ilk as the Nazi's

Nope.

YOU do.

They (the Nazis) made a whole "society" based upon lies. You and
your "kids" would have been right at home in the NSDAP. Especially
with your already prevelent use of censorship. Pure lies and
cowardice.

Steve, K4YZ

"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...

an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...
cut

"cut" = censorship

Why does a guy who whines about "Freedom of Speech" constantly
censor others?

Oh, I don't think it's a matter of being "insecure", Dave...It's
just that Mark is all about being all the things he accuses others
of...

nope I am not a homophobic hate monger like yourself

Keep repeating that to yourself over and over, Mark.

It will make you warm and fuzzy to say it, but it won't be any
more "true".

As I specified, Mark has accused me of being
"obsessive-compulsive" and "ready to pounce on my every word" in RRAP
replies...

However HE is the one who needs multiple screen names to defeat
Google's posting limits in order to get his multiple-multiple responses
in in one day.

He is a pathetic excuse for a ham, let alone for a human being.

No doubt. I never see "KB9RQZ" in any of the activity reports in
any of the magazines. He alleges to have been a second operator at a
couple of Field Day activities, and I have no doubt that that pretty
much summates his "operating experience".

back to your elist bull#### anyone different than you isn't a ham

grow up please

It's all about you allegedly being a ham, Mark.

You claim you are a partticipant, and indeed you have a license,
but you've haven't done a single thing worthwhile in Amatuer Radio.

He is ashamed of his life, and over compensates by literally begging
for
attention here on USENET.

He should be ashamed. He'a a pitiful liar. I say pitiful since
he can't even lie effectively, then admits to being a liar on top of
it. His "I am a Colonel" story was classic, but then his insistence
that he's not a mental health patient followed-up by his admissions of
having been in the system are a hoot.

He's blatantly stated he'd teach his children to lie. That in and
of itself qualifies him for a castration before he can procreate any
further. I say "further" because he has, in the past, made allusion to
an ex-wife who was "stalking" him for child support...No doubt another
of his failures. I am divorced but no one ever had to "stalk" me to
make good on my obligations to my daughter and son.

at the propper yes I will theach them to lie again you refuse to accept
that people can have different views than yourself

"teach"

Teaching children to lie is not "different views".

It's child abuse.

you also show yourself to be of the same ilk as the Nazi's

Nope.

YOU do.

They (the Nazis) made a whole "society" based upon lies. You and
your "kids" would have been right at home in the NSDAP. Especially
with your already prevelent use of censorship. Pure lies and
cowardice.

Steve, K4YZ


I take abuse of Children quite seriously. Way beyond the pale, so to
speak...I think it is time to call the Social Service types in his area.
Put him on the radar at least.

Dan/W4NTI

Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...


cut
Steve, K4YZ


I take abuse of Children quite seriously. Way beyond the pale, so to
speak...I think it is time to call the Social Service types in his area.
Put him on the radar at least.

Stevie Claims he has done that, I am not sure I believe him, but he
claimed to have taken such action

He has by his own admission email folks in the last radio before this I
belonged ( and by the reports I have those email called me a pedophile,
pyschopath and more besides)

he has appearntly has sent eamil to most of the hams in the UP( perhaps
just the western UP) with findable email adresses saying much the same
thing

Dan/W4NTI

"an old friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...


cut
Steve, K4YZ


I take abuse of Children quite seriously. Way beyond the pale, so to
speak...I think it is time to call the Social Service types in his area.
Put him on the radar at least.

Stevie Claims he has done that, I am not sure I believe him, but he
claimed to have taken such action

He has by his own admission email folks in the last radio before this I
belonged ( and by the reports I have those email called me a pedophile,
pyschopath and more besides)

he has appearntly has sent eamil to most of the hams in the UP( perhaps
just the western UP) with findable email adresses saying much the same
thing

Dan/W4NTI


Great !!!
Freedom of speech rules in this case.
Ace - WH2T