Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "TOM" wrote in message ... Dan/W4NTI wrote in message ink.net... [snip] I wonder how this FRS service with toy radio's is going to talk past the end of their block? Oh with that useless ham stuff? On Vhf/Uhf.....uh....Oh I get it, FRS and V/UHF ham radio will be the emergency channel and then carrier pigeon will take care of the long haul stuff. One thing about it....Ya just cain't fix stupid. Dan/W4NTI It's already being done... CERT http://training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/CERT/ communities are using FRS to organize their efforts in reponse to disaster preparedness or simply community watch and its working quite well. The idea that a ham is needed to supply communications is somewhat outdated---hams have out-geeked themselves. If a CERT member has a radio that doesn't work just throw it away and get another. What really matters is organization and team skills and communities have plenty of indviduals professionally trained in all manner of skills besides a token ham or two. Some CERT teams are guarded about disclosing their capabilities and SOP... Besides, who's to say that repeaters won't become available to extend the range of FRS radios---if there is a need anything is possible. What about GMRS? Take a look at what the Aussies have done with their UHF CB allocations http://www.alphalink.com.au/~parkerp/cb.htm The issue with the future of FRS-type communications should be carefully considered. I think that amateur long-haul coms are becoming less important compared to short range communications networks---especially within communties. Considering the ease of getting FRS communications the amateur service has little to offer---unless amateurs can re-invent themselves. Maybe... just maybe... stupid can be fixed. There is nothing at all wrong with using FRS, GMRS or any of the citizen accessible radio systems. But there is NO REASON to re-invent the wheel. Ham radio can and does provide long haul and short haul communications. Why throw away that capability (HF) to put all the eggs in a repeater system that can, does and likely will fail when most needed. Furthermore I am trying to show you that once communications is established, ham, FRS, CB, GMRS, whatever then how is this link sent further down the line? Such as what happened recently on the Gulf Coast. I.E. Red Cross requests amateur radio assistance. Hundreds go to their help. They say we only want you for "shelter communications". VHF will do fine. NO WAY TO PASS IT FURTHER DOWN THE LINE as in ....how to get commo from Montgomery Red Cross to the shelters and back? Ham Radio High Frequency on the ESTABLISHED ARRL National Traffic System nets. Which were ready, willing, and able to do so. It is NOT Amateur radios fault that the Red Cross apparently chose to sit on their hands and NOT UTILIZE the system. Dan/W4NTI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402  June 25, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402  June 25, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400  June 11, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400  June 11, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1353 – July 18, 2003 | Policy |