K=D8HB wrote:
"an_old_friend"

simple Bull**** Hans equality in rights does not mean
one gives up the right to the be different

You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and we a=
ll
agree with it.

obvioulsy not Hans or I guess you haven't been reading Dan lately, he
has been dening I have the same rights as Him. In addition Steve, Dee,
Dave Heil, even most recently some one neamed "ace" and others making
claims based on various nonsense that I don't have the same rights as
they do

But I wasn't talking about "rights". I was talking about the flawed not=
ion
that "all men are CREATED equal". We all have different physical attribu=
tes,
different levels of intelligence, different native skills and abilities, =
etc.,
etc., etc. Clearly we are NOT created equal. As an example, you may hav=
e a
great sense of pitch and rythm along with a good voice, so might become a=
famous
singer. I on the other hand, can't carry a tune in a tow sack. Clear t=
o all
but deaf observers, we are NOT equal. The same analogy can be applied to=
any
human attribute you wish to examine, yet politicians (even though they do=
n't
practice it themselves) still feed the masses this "created equal" myth, =
and the
masses still buy into it.


If you want to explore the results of real human equality,
read Kurt Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron"
at http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/hb.html

why since the line of "Reasoning" is GIGO

I recommended it because KV does a much better job than I in illustrating=
the
issue.
well in this case itis not the issue I am interested in, so it would
still be GIGO, just for different reason
=20
Beep beep
de Hans, K0HB