Baxter: Life Imitates Art
 

On the Mary Tyler Moore show, Ted Baxter is an incompetent shell of a man. He's selfish, inflated, overblown, egotistical, insecure, and very very dumb.

Baxter's role model is Walter Cronkite. Although devoted to his wife, Baxter has reproductive "issues." We're never told but my guess is, he's impotent. Baxter is the proverbial talking air-head - no one respects him.

So why did we enjoy following Baxter's antics?

It's simple. His idiocy made us laugh. He was the quintessential clown; the court jester; the fool.

I'll miss our amateur radio version of Ted Baxter. In less than two weeks his license will expire, and although he'll undoubtedly try to get his license renewed, there's a huge doubt as to whether we'll ever hear another original "broadcast."

I often wonder if Baxter, like another tragic clown, Pagliacci, is crying on the inside. The comedy is nearly ended, and we may never know.

This has been an editorial by John Johnston.

"John Johnston" wrote in message
...

On the Mary Tyler Moore show, Ted Baxter is an incompetent shell of a
man. He's selfish, inflated, overblown, egotistical, insecure, and very
very dumb.

Baxter's role model is Walter Cronkite. Although devoted to his wife,
Baxter has reproductive "issues." We're never told but my guess is,
he's impotent. Baxter is the proverbial talking air-head - no one
respects him.

So why did we enjoy following Baxter's antics?

It's simple. His idiocy made us laugh. He was the quintessential clown;
the court jester; the fool.

I'll miss our amateur radio version of Ted Baxter. In less than two
weeks his license will expire, and although he'll undoubtedly try to
get his license renewed, there's a huge doubt as to whether we'll ever
hear another original "broadcast."

I often wonder if Baxter, like another tragic clown, Pagliacci, is
crying on the inside. The comedy is nearly ended, and we may never
know.

This has been an editorial by John Johnston.


--
John Johnston

However, the comparison to Pagliacci is not entirely fair to Pagliacci.
Baxter created all his own problems by knowingly violating the rules. On
the other hand, Pagliacci, although brought down by his own unreasoning
jealousy, did not create the initial problem of his wife's unfaithfulness.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

Dee Flint wrote:
"John Johnston" wrote in message
...

On the Mary Tyler Moore show, Ted Baxter is an incompetent shell of a
man. He's selfish, inflated, overblown, egotistical, insecure, and very
very dumb.

Baxter's role model is Walter Cronkite. Although devoted to his wife,
Baxter has reproductive "issues." We're never told but my guess is,
he's impotent. Baxter is the proverbial talking air-head - no one
respects him.

So why did we enjoy following Baxter's antics?

It's simple. His idiocy made us laugh. He was the quintessential clown;
the court jester; the fool.

I'll miss our amateur radio version of Ted Baxter. In less than two
weeks his license will expire, and although he'll undoubtedly try to
get his license renewed, there's a huge doubt as to whether we'll ever
hear another original "broadcast."

I often wonder if Baxter, like another tragic clown, Pagliacci, is
crying on the inside. The comedy is nearly ended, and we may never
know.

This has been an editorial by John Johnston.


--
John Johnston

However, the comparison to Pagliacci is not entirely fair to Pagliacci.
Baxter created all his own problems by knowingly violating the rules. On
the other hand, Pagliacci, although brought down by his own unreasoning
jealousy, did not create the initial problem of his wife's unfaithfulness.

stating that K1MAN has knowingly violated the rules could be considered
slander. Indeed it is my impression that he does not see the rules the
same way as say you do, and in some of the cases he may have a point

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
"John Johnston" wrote in
message
...

On the Mary Tyler Moore show, Ted Baxter is an incompetent shell of a
man. He's selfish, inflated, overblown, egotistical, insecure, and very
very dumb.

Baxter's role model is Walter Cronkite. Although devoted to his wife,
Baxter has reproductive "issues." We're never told but my guess is,
he's impotent. Baxter is the proverbial talking air-head - no one
respects him.

So why did we enjoy following Baxter's antics?

It's simple. His idiocy made us laugh. He was the quintessential clown;
the court jester; the fool.

I'll miss our amateur radio version of Ted Baxter. In less than two
weeks his license will expire, and although he'll undoubtedly try to
get his license renewed, there's a huge doubt as to whether we'll ever
hear another original "broadcast."

I often wonder if Baxter, like another tragic clown, Pagliacci, is
crying on the inside. The comedy is nearly ended, and we may never
know.

This has been an editorial by John Johnston.


--
John Johnston

However, the comparison to Pagliacci is not entirely fair to Pagliacci.
Baxter created all his own problems by knowingly violating the rules. On
the other hand, Pagliacci, although brought down by his own unreasoning
jealousy, did not create the initial problem of his wife's
unfaithfulness.

stating that K1MAN has knowingly violated the rules could be considered
slander. Indeed it is my impression that he does not see the rules the
same way as say you do, and in some of the cases he may have a point

My comments are based on the various warnings, inspections, and other
run-ins with the FCC that Baxter has had. It certainly gives the impression
that he chooses to see how far he can push the FCC.

He could have asked the FCC for an opinion on the things he wanted to do
before he did them rather than taking an approach that appears
confrontational.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

Dee Flint wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
"John Johnston" wrote in
message
...

On the Mary Tyler Moore show, Ted Baxter is an incompetent shell of a
man. He's selfish, inflated, overblown, egotistical, insecure, and very
very dumb.

Baxter's role model is Walter Cronkite. Although devoted to his wife,
Baxter has reproductive "issues." We're never told but my guess is,
he's impotent. Baxter is the proverbial talking air-head - no one
respects him.

So why did we enjoy following Baxter's antics?

It's simple. His idiocy made us laugh. He was the quintessential clown;
the court jester; the fool.

I'll miss our amateur radio version of Ted Baxter. In less than two
weeks his license will expire, and although he'll undoubtedly try to
get his license renewed, there's a huge doubt as to whether we'll ever
hear another original "broadcast."

I often wonder if Baxter, like another tragic clown, Pagliacci, is
crying on the inside. The comedy is nearly ended, and we may never
know.

This has been an editorial by John Johnston.


--
John Johnston

However, the comparison to Pagliacci is not entirely fair to Pagliacci.
Baxter created all his own problems by knowingly violating the rules. On
the other hand, Pagliacci, although brought down by his own unreasoning
jealousy, did not create the initial problem of his wife's
unfaithfulness.

stating that K1MAN has knowingly violated the rules could be considered
slander. Indeed it is my impression that he does not see the rules the
same way as say you do, and in some of the cases he may have a point

My comments are based on the various warnings, inspections, and other
run-ins with the FCC that Baxter has had. It certainly gives the impression
that he chooses to see how far he can push the FCC.

well even if your revised stament is true that is different than saying
he has knowingly violated the rules

the later is slander without knowledge neither of us has


He could have asked the FCC for an opinion on the things he wanted to do
before he did them rather than taking an approach that appears
confrontational.

he could choosen to do so

he is not required to

he has the right to choose to be confrontational, if he chooses

again with your appearant efforts to deny that others have the right to
exercise their rights

If you are turely not going to "converse with me" then don't, but don't
complain when you chose to do so

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

One thing good if baxter is tossed out all the little anti baxter
people won't have nothing to bitch about anymore, Their little pathetic
life will come to a end....hmmmm only 12 MORE DAYS :)

I kind of hope he fights it and wins then a will laugh my ass off at
you Anti-Baxter's morons

Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW
THE VOICE OF AMATEUR RADIO

Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:


stating that K1MAN has knowingly violated the rules could be considered
slander. Indeed it is my impression that he does not see the rules the
same way as say you do, and in some of the cases he may have a point


Just when I think you could not become any more ignorant, you prove me
wrong again.

What a strange opinion from someone (Mark) that repeatedly claims that
Steve stalks him. Someone that claims that spelling correction is
censorship.

Yet stating an opinion on documented behavior is slander?

- Mike KB3EIA -

Mike Coslo wrote:
Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:


stating that K1MAN has knowingly violated the rules could be considered
slander. Indeed it is my impression that he does not see the rules the
same way as say you do, and in some of the cases he may have a point


Just when I think you could not become any more ignorant, you prove me
wrong again.

What a strange opinion from someone (Mark) that repeatedly claims that
Steve stalks him.

because he does he has for years

Someone that claims that spelling correction is
censorship.

I never claimed any such thing

Yet stating an opinion on documented behavior is slander?

wrong again boyo stating one you can't possibly support may be slander

- Mike KB3EIA -

an_old_friend wrote:


stating that K1MAN has knowingly violated the rules could be considered
slander. Indeed it is my impression that he does not see the rules the
same way as say you do, and in some of the cases he may have a point

Just when I think you could not become any more ignorant, you prove me
wrong again.

N9OGL wrote:
One thing good if baxter is tossed out all the little anti baxter
people won't have nothing to bitch about anymore, Their little pathetic
life will come to a end....hmmmm only 12 MORE DAYS :)

Oh, we will still have you to kick around toddyboy, but having you go
away would be a blessing as well.

hmmmm cornwhore, last time I check this wasn't your newsgroup....so
keep dreaming

Awww, Toadie, you won't get any new dates being that way........The
Commander would even spring for dinner and a movie if you'd talk nice
to him. FAGGOT!

Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:


stating that K1MAN has knowingly violated the rules could be considered
slander. Indeed it is my impression that he does not see the rules the
same way as say you do, and in some of the cases he may have a point

Just when I think you could not become any more ignorant, you prove me
wrong again.

gee and from a statement that is entirely accurate

even if K1MAN were knowingly violating... it can be slander/libel (if
the libel/slander is true it does become harder to make the case but
still possible) and from the mass of stuff out there it seem to me and
others that he has a case on many of the points against esp the
"braodcasting" realted charges

an old friend wrote:
Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:


stating that K1MAN has knowingly violated the rules could be considered
slander. Indeed it is my impression that he does not see the rules the
same way as say you do, and in some of the cases he may have a point

Just when I think you could not become any more ignorant, you prove me
wrong again.


gee and from a statement that is entirely accurate

even if K1MAN were knowingly violating... it can be slander/libel (if
the libel/slander is true it does become harder to make the case but
still possible) and from the mass of stuff out there it seem to me and
others that he has a case on many of the points against esp the
"braodcasting" realted charges


You're absolutely "stuck in stupid".

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
an old friend wrote:
Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

cut
even if K1MAN were knowingly violating... it can be slander/libel (if
the libel/slander is true it does become harder to make the case but
still possible) and from the mass of stuff out there it seem to me and
others that he has a case on many of the points against esp the
"braodcasting" realted charges


You're absolutely "stuck in stupid".

nope you are stuck in ignorant

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
an old friend wrote:
Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

cut
even if K1MAN were knowingly violating... it can be slander/libel (if
the libel/slander is true it does become harder to make the case but
still possible) and from the mass of stuff out there it seem to me and
others that he has a case on many of the points against esp the
"braodcasting" realted charges


You're absolutely "stuck in stupid".

nope you are stuck in ignorant

I have stated nothing but facts ole boy

nobodys_old_friend wrote:
Dee Flint wrote:
"nobodys_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
"John Johnston" wrote in
message
...

stating that K1MAN has knowingly violated the rules could be considered
slander. Indeed it is my impression that he does not see the rules the
same way as say you do, and in some of the cases he may have a point

My comments are based on the various warnings, inspections, and other
run-ins with the FCC that Baxter has had. It certainly gives the impression
that he chooses to see how far he can push the FCC.

well even if your revised stament is true that is different than saying
he has knowingly violated the rules

It's not slander.

Baxter has been KNOWINGLY violating FCC rules and regulations for
years. HE has said as much. He's said so in public, in print and on
the air.

the later is slander without knowledge neither of us has

Baxter said it. He's brazenly invited conflict with the FCC. He
got what he asked for. Now he's in hac with the FCC for thousands of
dollars, and my bet's on the FCC not backing off this time.

He could have asked the FCC for an opinion on the things he wanted to do
before he did them rather than taking an approach that appears
confrontational.

he could choosen to do so

he is not required to

Sure he is.

EVERY FCC licensee, regardless of what service they are in, is
REQUIRED by law to ensure that they are operating thier station in
accordance with the rules of their particular service.

No one, in ANY radio service, is (legally) permitted to do what
they want then ask later, with the sole exception of true
life-threatening situations.

he has the right to choose to be confrontational, if he chooses

No, he does not.

He DOES have the right to PROTEST that which he considers unfair
and he DOES have the right to seek redress. Both are guarantees of the
Constitution.

again with your appearant efforts to deny that others have the right to
exercise their rights

"apparent"

What IS apparent, Mark, is your inadequate English comprehension
skills.

He has NO right to wantonly violate published rules and
regulations which he has agreed to abide by as condition of licensure.
And it's not as if he's a "newbie" operator.

If you are turely not going to "converse with me" then don't, but don't
complain when you chose to do so

"truly"

No one converses "WITH" you, Mark...It's more like wading through
the mire trying to find the occassional pearl stuck between your
toes...Only there's no pearls.

Steve, K4YZ

N9OGL wrote:

One thing good if baxter is tossed out all the little anti baxter
people won't have nothing to bitch about anymore, Their little pathetic
life will come to a end....hmmmm only 12 MORE DAYS

I find it interesting that no one here talks about Baxter unless a
Baxter-wannabe, such as yourself, brings it up. He's pretty much
personna-non-gratis in Amateur Radio.

I kind of hope he fights it and wins then a will laugh my @@@ off...(SNIP)

That will have to be a LOT of laughing to laugh THAT one off,
Toidie.

at you Anti-Baxter's morons

Your English skills are worsening, if that was at all possible.

Todd N9OGL

That's the only thing you got right.

THE N9OGL SHOW

Still illegally broadcasting on Amateur Radio, eh, Toiddie...?!?!

THE VOICE OF AMATEUR RADIO

No, you're not.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:

One thing good if baxter is tossed out all the little anti baxter
people won't have nothing to bitch about anymore, Their little pathetic
life will come to a end....hmmmm only 12 MORE DAYS

I find it interesting that no one here talks about Baxter unless a
Baxter-wannabe, such as yourself, brings it up. He's pretty much
personna-non-gratis in Amateur Radio.

there you have it Stevie admit to being no one

cut

I find it interesting that no one here talks about Baxter unless a
Baxter-wannabe, such as yourself, brings it up. He's pretty much
personna-non-gratis in Amateur Radio.

Hey dumb ****, I wasn't the one who started this thread, it was started
by an Anti-baxter lover. But let me get this straight a person who
hates baxter can post messages on here but a person who disagrees
can't, Sound to me like Censorship

Still illegally broadcasting on Amateur Radio, eh, Toiddie...?!?!

Sure am who going to stop me?? you??
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW!

I find it interesting that no one here talks about Baxter unless a
Baxter-wannabe, such as yourself, brings it up. He's pretty much
personna-non-gratis in Amateur Radio.

Hey dumb ****, I wasn't the one who started this thread, it was started
by an Anti-baxter lover. But let me get this straight a person who
hates baxter can post messages on here but a person who disagrees
can't, Sound to me like Censorship

Still illegally broadcasting on Amateur Radio, eh, Toiddie...?!?!

Sure am who going to stop me?? you??
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW!

"N9OGL" wrote in message
oups.com...
I find it interesting that no one here talks about Baxter unless a
Baxter-wannabe, such as yourself, brings it up. He's pretty much
personna-non-gratis in Amateur Radio.

Hey dumb ****, I wasn't the one who started this thread, it was started
by an Anti-baxter lover. But let me get this straight a person who
hates baxter can post messages on here but a person who disagrees
can't, Sound to me like Censorship

Still illegally broadcasting on Amateur Radio, eh, Toiddie...?!?!

Sure am who going to stop me?? you??
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW!


Those that opposed the Blapster are going to stop you. So far all you are
is a funny little boy trying to "impress" others. When you start being a
real problem we will dump on you just like the Blapster.

Oh and your childish cussing needs to stop. It is NOT helping your case
dummy.

Dan/W4NTI

"N9OGL" wrote in message
oups.com...
I find it interesting that no one here talks about Baxter unless a
Baxter-wannabe, such as yourself, brings it up. He's pretty much
personna-non-gratis in Amateur Radio.

Hey dumb ****, I wasn't the one who started this thread, it was started
by an Anti-baxter lover. But let me get this straight a person who
hates baxter can post messages on here but a person who disagrees
can't, Sound to me like Censorship

Still illegally broadcasting on Amateur Radio, eh, Toiddie...?!?!

Sure am who going to stop me?? you??
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW!


Why do you send your rants twice? Do you thing it adds emphasis to your
position? NOT.

Dan/W4NTI

Those that opposed the Blapster are going to stop you. So far all you are
is a funny little boy trying to "impress" others. When you start being a
real problem we will dump on you just like the Blapster.
Oh and your childish cussing needs to stop. It is NOT helping your case
dummy.

well i wish them luck (hahaha) but unlike Baxter I will fight it...

Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW

I didn't danny, googles did.

Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW

nobodys old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:

One thing good if baxter is tossed out all the little anti baxter
people won't have nothing to bitch about anymore, Their little pathetic
life will come to a end....hmmmm only 12 MORE DAYS

I find it interesting that no one here talks about Baxter unless a
Baxter-wannabe, such as yourself, brings it up. He's pretty much
personna-non-gratis in Amateur Radio.

there you have it Stevie admit to being no one

No...

What we have is Mark Morgan demonstrating his lack of English
Comprehension.

Again...

Steve, K4YZ

N9OGL wrote:
I find it interesting that no one here talks about Baxter unless a
Baxter-wannabe, such as yourself, brings it up. He's pretty much
personna-non-gratis in Amateur Radio.

Hey dumb ####...(SNIP)

What, Scumbag?

(UNSNIP)...I wasn't the one who started this thread, it was started
by an Anti-baxter lover.

W H E R E did I even MENTION you as having started it? And
regardless of who DID start the thread, you ARE a Baxter-wannabe, ergo
my statement was (and still is...) correct.

But let me get this straight...(SNIP)

OK...

(UNSNIP)...a person who
hates baxter can post messages on here but a person who disagrees
can't,...(SNIP)

Ya got it wrong...again....

(UNSNIP)...Sound to me like Censorship

You wouldn't know the sound of a Greyhound bus if you were
standing in the terminal, Toiddie.

Still illegally broadcasting on Amateur Radio, eh, Toiddie...?!?!

Sure am....(SNIP)

Thank-you for the acknowledgement after all these months that you
ARE broadcasting.

(UNSNIP)...who going to stop me?? you??

Nope.

Riley.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Get the laughs in now, Toiddie...

BTW...How many burgers do you have to flip to pay for an hour's
worth of your attorney's time to fight a criminal case...?!?!

Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW!

Not for long.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
nobodys old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:

One thing good if baxter is tossed out all the little anti baxter
people won't have nothing to bitch about anymore, Their little pathetic
life will come to a end....hmmmm only 12 MORE DAYS

I find it interesting that no one here talks about Baxter unless a
Baxter-wannabe, such as yourself, brings it up. He's pretty much
personna-non-gratis in Amateur Radio.

there you have it Stevie admit to being no one

No...

What we have is Mark Morgan demonstrating his lack of English
Comprehension.

not at all

but what we see now is that YOU Stevie are not bright enough to make
only legit charge in the matter carefull editing

Again...

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
nobodys old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:

One thing good if baxter is tossed out all the little anti baxter
people won't have nothing to bitch about anymore, Their little pathetic
life will come to a end....hmmmm only 12 MORE DAYS

I find it interesting that no one here talks about Baxter unless a
Baxter-wannabe, such as yourself, brings it up. He's pretty much
personna-non-gratis in Amateur Radio.

there you have it Stevie admit to being no one

No...

What we have is Mark Morgan demonstrating his lack of English
Comprehension.

not at all

but what we see now is that YOU Stevie are not bright enough to make
only legit charge in the matter carefull editing

Again...

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
I find it interesting that no one here talks about Baxter unless a
Baxter-wannabe, such as yourself, brings it up. He's pretty much
personna-non-gratis in Amateur Radio.

Hey dumb ####...(SNIP)
cut
Get the laughs in now, Toiddie...

BTW...How many burgers do you have to flip to pay for an hour's
worth of your attorney's time to fight a criminal case...?!?!

Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW!

Not for long.

Stvie you have been making that promise for months

Steve, K4YZ

Thank-you for the acknowledgement after all these months that you
ARE broadcasting.


(UNSNIP)...who going to stop me?? you??


Nope.

Riley.



HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Get the laughs in now, Toiddie...

BTW...How many burgers do you have to flip to pay for an hour's
worth of your attorney's time to fight a criminal case...?!?!



Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW!


Not for long.

Steve, K4YZ

I wouldn't bet on it Stebie, but I'll like to see you and your little
DOUCHEBAG Rliey TRY to go after me, it will proven my point that the
FCC violated peoples rights to free speech.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW

N9OGL wrote:
Thank-you for the acknowledgement after all these months that you
ARE broadcasting.


(UNSNIP)...who going to stop me?? you??


Nope.

Riley.



HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Get the laughs in now, Toiddie...

BTW...How many burgers do you have to flip to pay for an hour's
worth of your attorney's time to fight a criminal case...?!?!



Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW!


Not for long.

Steve, K4YZ

I wouldn't bet on it Stebie, but I'll like to see you and your little
DOUCHEBAG Rliey TRY to go after me, it will proven my point that the
FCC violated peoples rights to free speech.


be fair Todd Riley is in no way in Stevie pocket I doubt he has even
heard of Stevie

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW

yeah, Stebie lying again

"N9OGL" wrote in message
ups.com...
yeah, Stebie lying again


Gee whiz. Todd.
Perhaps you and your Butt Buddy, Roger, should touch bases.

AB8MQ is similar to you in that he has no friends.

(and neither of you can spell worth a crap...)

He aint my butt buddy, maybe yours....Me I perfer women

"N9OGL" wrote in message
ups.com...
He aint my butt buddy, maybe yours....Me I perfer women

That leaves Roger out.
He prefers Lloyd.

And you, too.

And your a ****ing little troll

On 9 Oct 2005 00:55:41 -0700, "N9OGL" wrote:

He aint my butt buddy, maybe yours....Me I perfer women

Don't you mean a woman with "something extra"?

Uncle Turd wrote:
On 9 Oct 2005 00:55:41 -0700, "N9OGL" wrote:

He aint my butt buddy, maybe yours....Me I perfer women

Don't you mean a woman with "something extra"?

You know all about that sex with shemales, huh, Uncle Turd Davies? You
can't get a normal female.

Arf! Arf! wrote:

Gee whiz. Todd.

"Gee whiz?" BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA What a ****ing square. Only pussies
us the term "gee whiz."

Perhaps you and your Butt Buddy, Roger, should touch bases.

There you go projecting your own homosexuality, "arf!arf!, you are the
one with the history of sex crimes.

AB8MQ is similar to you in that he has no friends.

Says Lardass, weho has to invent about two dozen screen names, and the
only online firned he has is registered Kennett, Missouri pedophile
Steve Holsten.

(and neither of you can spell worth a crap...)

Oh, the irony. Spelling bee champ Arf! Arf!'s **** ups:

English imparied Arf! Arf! fatally blundered as he whined in
Message-ID: :
"Wogie plagiariazed again."

"Wogie" - ArfArf! has a permanent cocksucking lisp.
"plagiariazed" - ArfArf! has never "plagiarized" from the dictionary.
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Arf! Arf! plagiarized a story "lame" in ,
which was also found at Message-ID:

Message-ID:
Message-ID:


Arf!Arf! ****s up as usual ironically calling
somebody else autistic
when the poor thing blathers his autism in :
"Symtoms of Autism"


Illiterate Baby Raper Arf!Arf! stepped in his own **** as
he whined in :
"Grow ya some balls fer oncet in yer life."

"Arf! Arf!" the spelling bee champ
whined
about his womanless status in :
"Sisnce it is Satruday night, it is tiome to ghet a piuzza and make
some
anoinymous poists about Stagger Lee."


Arf!Arf! blissfully unaware of a British variation glady
proclaims his ignorance in :
""Fantasises" That is "fantasizes", Wussman."

Perennial "Loser" Arf!Arf! spell lames but falls on his fatass
in :
"What a losser."

The empty "cavity" that is Arf!Arf!'s skull ****s up again
in :
"either of Roger's moist cavaties."


"Arf! Arf!" Doggie vomited the following
Ebonics in message
...
"Here we go, Rog. I be posting at three a.m."

Arf Arf shows his excitement when he gets his fatass handed to him and
posts in Ebonics,
the poor ill-educated thing never got his G.E.D. as shown
in :
"Curtian Boy"

Monkey boy "Arf! Arf!"
gibbered incoherently when the prospect of fellating a dog is
presented to him
in :
"Whoo hoo hoo hoo!!!"

"Arf! Arf!" the spelling bee champ pondered
the question of
(corn) pone and why phone sound so similar in Message-ID:

"Grab a pone book and pick out a name, any name?"


NeoNAZI RACIST ****tard "Arf! Arf!" shows his
anti-Semetism,
and ignorance about family names and their origins in
:
"Wiseman. That's Jewish, isn't it?"

Eternal ****UP "Arf! Arf!" steps on his dick
again in his "posts" sic
(of "posit") in :
"The trouble is, LRod, that your findings will do little, if anything,
to dissuade or stop
the posts which the two rascals posit as "fact".

Chronic alcoholic and child RAPER "Arf! Arf!"
gets egg on
his "gruesome" face as he blathers more stupidity in
:
"...you're going to have yet more egg all over your guresome little
face"

"Jules" aka Arf!Arf! outs himself in


Arf!Arf! the kiddie raper blathers another lie out of his stupid fat
ass
in :

"I also get a half point for TOS'ing your bogus account with
Google...and got
you tossed from that, too."