![]() |
BTW Stevie were watch the news lately about NASA
K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: wrote: raped_an_old_friend wrote: I don't think so. it seems she does enjoy hectoring folks, and generaly being a pretier version of Stevie I have to disagree with you on this. Dee is nothing like Steve in her posting manners, she puts me in mind of Steve back when he arrived and I cannot comment on her "prettiness" since I've only seen a photo of Steve. me too I am just giving her sight onseen the benifit of the doubt (what little doubt I have "sight UNseen" "benefit" So what "benefit" is it that YOU think you have to grant, Mark? benifit of the doubt as is obviouss to anyone with a working brain that read the sentence of course that let you out Stevie I think she is much more like Jim; quick to cut off discussion when her logic fails. you may have a point there we shall see likely as not This is funny... your sense of humor needs work, but that is not a new statement Brain suggesting others lack logic... Stevie you don't know the meaning of the word Sheesh.... Steve, K4YZ |
BTW Stevie were watch the news lately about NASA
stole_from_an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: wrote: raped_an_old_friend wrote: I don't think so. it seems she does enjoy hectoring folks, and generaly being a pretier version of Stevie I have to disagree with you on this. Dee is nothing like Steve in her posting manners, she puts me in mind of Steve back when he arrived and I cannot comment on her "prettiness" since I've only seen a photo of Steve. me too I am just giving her sight onseen the benifit of the doubt (what little doubt I have "sight UNseen" "benefit" So what "benefit" is it that YOU think you have to grant, Mark? benifit of the doubt as is obviouss to anyone with a working brain that read the sentence "Benefit" "obvious" Read what? The SENTENCE? Is THAT what that was? Hard to tell, really. You don't know how to construct one properly, so it's hard to tell what was on your mind. of course that let you out Stevie No, Mark, it left YOU out. Your English comprehension and application suck. I think she is much more like Jim; quick to cut off discussion when her logic fails. you may have a point there we shall see likely as not This is funny... your sense of humor needs work, but that is not a new statement Brain suggesting others lack logic... Stevie you don't know the meaning of the word Yes, I do. And I know it does not apply to you. Sheesh.... Steve, K4YZ Again. |
BTW Stevie were watch the news lately about NASA
KØHB wrote: I think belief in magic IS a necessary requirement to really enjoy Amateur Radio. Depends on what you mean by "magic"... I enjoy a good magic show. Penn and Teller are favorites of mine, for a number of reasons, even though they often show how an illusion is done. Of course anyone with sense knows that magicians do not defy the laws of nature. They simply give the illusion of doing so. But what is important for the enjoyment of magic (or many other theatrical forms) is to "suspend disbelief" for a time. And to simply enjoy and wonder at the experience, rather than overanalyze and deconstruct it. Of course, you won't see a question concerning magic or metaphysics on the test you take to obtain your license, but in your heart you will cometo believe in that powerful, intangible force. Indeed! Been there, done that, many times. All of us in the hobby have felt its influence at one time or another. Some night when the band is dead as a doornail you'll be tuning aimlessly, not expecting to hear a single signal because NOTHING could be coming throughat that hour. But then, rising out of the noise like a ghost, there will be a faint call from another stalwart explorer thousands of miles distant. You pounce, establish contact and both of you marvel at the fact that the conversation is taking place at all. A few minutes later, however, the signal vanishes as quickly as it came. Your rational mind will shrug it off as a quirk of propagation, but that little tingle in your gut will tell you otherwise. Yup. Or maybe you really need a particular section or country in a contest. You've been up and down the bands looking, you've tried CQs, had lots of QSOs all around, with no dice. Maybe you even heard one or two but couldn't break the pile. Then, after all but giving up, you come across the needed section or country and work him on the first buzz with no trouble at all. If you could travel back in time to, say 500 years to 1505 AD, you'd probably be burned at the nearest stake for even suggesting that two human beings could communicate with each other over great distances without a physical connection. Even more recently than that - look what happened in Salem for much less. Consider that up until about 200 years ago, almost all human communication moved at the speed of a fast horse (overland) or fast ship (over water). President Andrew Jackson's communications options were not much different than those of Julius Caesar - except the Romans had more paved roads for their horses! Sam Morse changed all that. No doubt they would accuse you of dabbling in magic -- and they'd be right! As Amateur Radio operators, we work feats of magic every day. Many of ushave become jaded about our powers and we tend to dismiss them as commonplace.We hardly think twice when we use our equipment to sommon the elemental forces of the universe. But every so often we need to pause and remind ourselves ofwhat we are really doing. We need to remember the essence of what drew us to our unusual avocation in the first place: the wonderful magic of wireless communications. (With thanks to WB8IMY) Well said, Hans. -- "Hark! I Have Hurled My Words To The Far Corners Of The Earth! What King Of Old Could Do Thus?" --AC6V King? Heck, most of the old religions did not even ascribe the power of near-instant communication to their gods, let alone their kings. Another way to say it is that what amateur radio is really all about is "radio for its own sake". IOW, radio as an end in and of itself, not as a means to other ends. Sure, there are plenty of times when hams use amateur radio as a means to an end, (emergency communications, keeping in touch with friends and family members) and those things are all good. But I think that for most hams, that difficult-to-define-magical-something is what keeps us interested. And it takes many forms, whether it be putting a new rig or antenna on the air, working a new state or country, or just chatting with another radio amateur. Few weeks ago I received word that another Hans, from Great Britain, was here in the USA and had brought one of his unique QRP homebrew rigs with him. So we set up a sked and had a nice QSO on 80 meter CW - he with his 2 watt homebrew-on-a-perfboard rig powered by D cells rolled up in a section of the New York Times, and me with the Southgate Type 7. He made bunch of QSOs, testament to the gain attached to an unusual callsign. Now of course we'd traded many emails before and since. Yet the QSO was special and the emails weren't. Because it was *radio*.... 73 es tnx Hans (both of 'em!) de Jim, N2EY A sunset is just the refraction of light from the sun in certain ways due to differences of air density, humidity, dust, etc. Pure physics, really. Yet many of us consider them beautiful. |
BTW Stevie were watch the news lately about NASA
|
BTW Stevie were watch the news lately about NASA
K4YZ wrote: stole_from_an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: wrote: raped_an_old_friend wrote: I don't think so. it seems she does enjoy hectoring folks, and generaly being a pretier version of Stevie I have to disagree with you on this. Dee is nothing like Steve in her posting manners, she puts me in mind of Steve back when he arrived and I cannot comment on her "prettiness" since I've only seen a photo of Steve. me too I am just giving her sight onseen the benifit of the doubt (what little doubt I have "sight UNseen" "benefit" So what "benefit" is it that YOU think you have to grant, Mark? benifit of the doubt as is obviouss to anyone with a working brain that read the sentence "Benefit" "obvious" Read what? The SENTENCE? Is THAT what that was? the sentence Obviously you were able to make every word that you can't seem to understand it after that must be a problem with your brain Hard to tell, really. You don't know how to construct one properly, so it's hard to tell what was on your mind. of course that let you out Stevie No, Mark, it left YOU out. wrong again batting 000 on accurate statement today Your English comprehension and application suck. I think she is much more like Jim; quick to cut off discussion when her logic fails. you may have a point there we shall see likely as not This is funny... your sense of humor needs work, but that is not a new statement Brain suggesting others lack logic... Stevie you don't know the meaning of the word Yes, I do. not according to your postings. they make it clear you don't know the meaning of the word And I know it does not apply to you. logic as a word aplies to no one myself included (you too for that matter) logical can apply to people, and does apply to me (but not it seems yourself) Sheesh.... Steve, K4YZ Again. |
BTW Stevie were watch the news lately about NASA
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: wrote: KØHB wrote: I think belief in magic IS a necessary requirement to really enjoy Amateur Radio. Depends on what you mean by "magic"... In the earliest days of radio, those who purchased parts and built sets to receive these radio waves were often accused of dabbling in magic. wasn't Faraday accused of it with a Vacum tube I seem to remember a story like that to do with an audio amp |
BTW Stevie were watch the news lately about NASA
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: an old friend wrote: Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: wrote: KØHB wrote: I think belief in magic IS a necessary requirement to really enjoy Amateur Radio. Depends on what you mean by "magic"... In the earliest days of radio, those who purchased parts and built sets to receive these radio waves were often accused of dabbling in magic. wasn't Faraday accused of it with a Vacum tube I seem to remember a story like that to do with an audio amp Michael Faraday experimented with electricity and magnetism, long before the vaccum tube. yea I know but somebdoy I remeber reading an article not don't think it was micheal faraday of the laws and such suchthing like an audion it was cllaed as i recall |
BTW Stevie were watch the news lately about NASA
|
BTW Stevie were watch the news lately about NASA
an old friend wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: wrote: KØHB wrote: I think belief in magic IS a necessary requirement to really enjoy Amateur Radio. Depends on what you mean by "magic"... In the earliest days of radio, those who purchased parts and built sets to receive these radio waves were often accused of dabbling in magic. wasn't Faraday accused of it with a Vacum tube I seem to remember a story like that to do with an audio amp Michael Faraday experimented with electricity and magnetism, long before the vaccum tube. |
BTW Stevie were watch the news lately about NASA
an Old friend wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: an old friend wrote: Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: wrote: KØHB wrote: I think belief in magic IS a necessary requirement to really enjoy Amateur Radio. Depends on what you mean by "magic"... In the earliest days of radio, those who purchased parts and built sets to receive these radio waves were often accused of dabbling in magic. wasn't Faraday accused of it with a Vacum tube I seem to remember a story like that to do with an audio amp Michael Faraday experimented with electricity and magnetism, long before the vaccum tube. yea I know but somebdoy I remeber reading an article not don't think it was micheal faraday of the laws and such suchthing like an audion it was cllaed as i recall De Forest invented the first amplifying vaccum tube in 1906, he call it the 'audion'. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com