Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 18th 05, 06:50 AM
Dave Heil
 
Posts: n/a
Default how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning

KØHB wrote:
"an Old friend" wrote


I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example



???????????????????????


His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them
knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation.

You explained it to the club official and I explained it to the club
official--but he didn't really want to know. The local club gang must
have been tlaking hypodermically.

Dave K8MN

  #2   Report Post  
Old October 18th 05, 08:08 PM
an_old_friend
 
Posts: n/a
Default how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning


Dave Heil wrote:
KØHB wrote:
"an Old friend" wrote


I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example



???????????????????????


His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them
knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation.


not at all

I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks
would go about local band planing

all the bitching about the Off topic stuff

  #3   Report Post  
Old October 18th 05, 08:16 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning


an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
KØHB wrote:
"an Old friend" wrote


I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example


???????????????????????


His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them
knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation.


not at all

I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks
would go about local band planing

all the bitching about the Off topic stuff


Is mostly coming from you, stupid.

  #4   Report Post  
Old October 18th 05, 10:10 PM
Dave Heil
 
Posts: n/a
Default how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning

an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

KØHB wrote:

"an Old friend" wrote



I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example


???????????????????????


His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them
knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation.



not at all

I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks
would go about local band planing


It is "band planning", Mark and it isn't done on a local basis. It is
done on a national and regional basis. If we decided to implement a
local band plan for 2m here, the 2m users in Pittsburgh, Morgantown,
Parkersburg, Marietta and Columbus would be in a dither. You told us of
your lack of knowledge of where 6m AM activity might be found. A couple
of us told you. Now you'll undoubtedly string us along for a number of
posts as you did over the 60m "band".

Dave K8MN

all the bitching about the Off topic stuff

  #5   Report Post  
Old October 18th 05, 11:44 PM
an_old_friend
 
Posts: n/a
Default how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning


Dave Heil wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

KØHB wrote:

"an Old friend" wrote



I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example


???????????????????????

His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them
knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation.



not at all

I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks
would go about local band planing


It is "band planning", Mark and it isn't done on a local basis.


according the ARRL it can be

It is
done on a national and regional basis. If we decided to implement a
local band plan for 2m here, the 2m users in Pittsburgh, Morgantown,
Parkersburg, Marietta and Columbus would be in a dither.


so?

You told us of
your lack of knowledge of where 6m AM activity might be found.


can't you tell the turth about anything

A couple
of us told you. Now you'll undoubtedly string us along for a number of
posts as you did over the 60m "band".

Dave K8MN

all the bitching about the Off topic stuff




  #6   Report Post  
Old October 19th 05, 01:35 AM
Dave Heil
 
Posts: n/a
Default how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning

an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


KØHB wrote:


"an Old friend" wrote




I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example


???????????????????????

His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them
knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation.


not at all

I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks
would go about local band planing


It is "band planning", Mark and it isn't done on a local basis.



according the ARRL it can be


Really? Here's the url for the ARRL band plans. Please point out the
portion dealing with local variations.

http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/reg.../bandplan.html



It is
done on a national and regional basis. If we decided to implement a
local band plan for 2m here, the 2m users in Pittsburgh, Morgantown,
Parkersburg, Marietta and Columbus would be in a dither.



so?


Whaddya mean, "so"? If everyone takes it upon himself to implement a
"local band plan" then there isn't any band plan. FM ops interfere with
SSB ops, packet ops interfere with FM repeater operation and repeaters
interfere with each other. Where's that IQ of 248 that you've claimed?

While we're on that topic, there's some interesting info to be found at:

http://www.ufomind.com/misc/1997/dec/d28-001.shtml

It say, in part:

"To answer your question, we can simply pickup a 1989 copy of the
Guinness Book
of World Records . Marilyn Vos Savant is listed on page 26 as having the
highest recorded IQ . It says '...as a ten year old she achieved a ceiling
score for 23-year-olds, thus giving her an IQ of 228.' Her record was
retired
to the guinness hall of fame because scores that high are no longer possible
due to a lowering of test score ceilings. (As I'm sure you're already
guessing
it's because scores that high weren't very valid in the first place.) Most
other reference books state Marilyn Vos Savant's, IQ at 190, and still the
highest ever recorded."

That'd make your claim preposterous.


You told us of
your lack of knowledge of where 6m AM activity might be found.



can't you tell the turth about anything


Here's the "turth", the whole "turth" and nothing but the "turth":

"been chatting with some locals interested in some AM stuff on 6M and
prehaps elsewhere planety of really unsed rf 'real estate' but little
mention of anything but ssb cw and Fm on the bandplans"

--Mark Morgan

There you go, Colonel. "Planety" of material on "unsed" rf real estate
for you to chew on.


A couple
of us told you. Now you'll undoubtedly string us along for a number of
posts as you did over the 60m "band".


....and you've already begun!

Dave K8MN
  #7   Report Post  
Old October 19th 05, 02:03 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning


Dave Heil wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

KØHB wrote:

"an Old friend" wrote

I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example

???????????????????????

His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them
knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation.


not at all

I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks
would go about local band planing


It is "band planning", Mark and it isn't done on a local basis.


It can be on vhf and above frequencies. You just need to open your
mind a little, a very little.

It is
done on a national and regional basis. If we decided to implement a
local band plan for 2m here, the 2m users in Pittsburgh, Morgantown,
Parkersburg, Marietta and Columbus would be in a dither.


There is still room for local variation in a regional plan.

You told us of
your lack of knowledge of where 6m AM activity might be found. A couple
of us told you. Now you'll undoubtedly string us along for a number of
posts as you did over the 60m "band".

Dave K8MN


Perhaps he and other associates have no 6M crystal for where the AM
activity might be found and wants a local variation.

  #8   Report Post  
Old October 19th 05, 02:37 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning

On 18 Oct 2005 18:03:49 -0700, wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

KØHB wrote:

"an Old friend" wrote

I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example

???????????????????????

His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them
knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation.

not at all

I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks
would go about local band planing


It is "band planning", Mark and it isn't done on a local basis.


It can be on vhf and above frequencies. You just need to open your
mind a little, a very little.

It is
done on a national and regional basis. If we decided to implement a
local band plan for 2m here, the 2m users in Pittsburgh, Morgantown,
Parkersburg, Marietta and Columbus would be in a dither.


There is still room for local variation in a regional plan.

You told us of
your lack of knowledge of where 6m AM activity might be found. A couple
of us told you. Now you'll undoubtedly string us along for a number of
posts as you did over the 60m "band".

Dave K8MN


Perhaps he and other associates have no 6M crystal for where the AM
activity might be found and wants a local variation.


or in our case some of us would rather operate where folks will not
come looking for as DX. I have a nice AM tube set (built from the
article in CQ VHF before it shut down) others have have various rigs
and would like to use em more

another area I hear folks around talk about is 440(70cm) since we are
north of the "a" line the national does not serve some folks needs as
well as it could
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account
  #9   Report Post  
Old October 19th 05, 05:52 AM
Dave Heil
 
Posts: n/a
Default how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning

wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


KØHB wrote:


"an Old friend" wrote


I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example

???????????????????????

His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them
knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation.

not at all

I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks
would go about local band planing


It is "band planning", Mark and it isn't done on a local basis.



It can be on vhf and above frequencies. You just need to open your
mind a little, a very little.


It can't be done locally if there is any chance of interfering with
other regional repeaters. If you are coordinating to avoid putting your
local machine with one 50 or 75 miles away, you aren't dealing with
local band planning. You're dealing with regional band planning.

Now, what do your comments have to do with 6m AM operation?

It is
done on a national and regional basis. If we decided to implement a
local band plan for 2m here, the 2m users in Pittsburgh, Morgantown,
Parkersburg, Marietta and Columbus would be in a dither.



There is still room for local variation in a regional plan.


....not if there is any chance of interfering with other repeaters in
your region, there isn't.

You told us of

your lack of knowledge of where 6m AM activity might be found. A couple
of us told you. Now you'll undoubtedly string us along for a number of
posts as you did over the 60m "band".


Perhaps he and other associates have no 6M crystal for where the AM
activity might be found and wants a local variation.


Yeah, that not being able to buy a crystal would be a significant hurdle.

Sheesh.

Dave K8MN
  #10   Report Post  
Old October 19th 05, 06:22 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 04:52:41 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


KØHB wrote:


"an Old friend" wrote


I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example

???????????????????????

His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them
knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation.

not at all

I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks
would go about local band planing

It is "band planning", Mark and it isn't done on a local basis.



It can be on vhf and above frequencies. You just need to open your
mind a little, a very little.


It can't be done locally if there is any chance of interfering with
other regional repeaters.


more pronucements from on high

the MM's have spoken
If you are coordinating to avoid putting your
local machine with one 50 or 75 miles away, you aren't dealing with
local band planning. You're dealing with regional band planning.


not according to the ARRL you are being pretty certain about the
meaning of words

the ARRL says local bandplaning is possible

Now, what do your comments have to do with 6m AM operation?


why does it have to?

the topic was local band planing as described in the ARRL repeater
guide as possible

It is
done on a national and regional basis. If we decided to implement a
local band plan for 2m here, the 2m users in Pittsburgh, Morgantown,
Parkersburg, Marietta and Columbus would be in a dither.



There is still room for local variation in a regional plan.


...not if there is any chance of interfering with other repeaters in
your region, there isn't.

You told us of

your lack of knowledge of where 6m AM activity might be found. A couple
of us told you. Now you'll undoubtedly string us along for a number of
posts as you did over the 60m "band".


Perhaps he and other associates have no 6M crystal for where the AM
activity might be found and wants a local variation.


Yeah, that not being able to buy a crystal would be a significant hurdle.

Sheesh.

Dave K8MN


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Pool Alun Policy 81 June 4th 04 03:30 AM
New ARRL Proposal N2EY Policy 331 March 4th 04 12:02 AM
The Pool N2EY Policy 515 February 22nd 04 03:14 AM
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? Dr. Slick Antenna 140 August 18th 03 08:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017