Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning
KØHB wrote:
"an Old friend" wrote I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example ??????????????????????? His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation. You explained it to the club official and I explained it to the club official--but he didn't really want to know. The local club gang must have been tlaking hypodermically. Dave K8MN |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning
Dave Heil wrote: KØHB wrote: "an Old friend" wrote I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example ??????????????????????? His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation. not at all I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks would go about local band planing all the bitching about the Off topic stuff |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning
an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: KØHB wrote: "an Old friend" wrote I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example ??????????????????????? His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation. not at all I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks would go about local band planing all the bitching about the Off topic stuff Is mostly coming from you, stupid. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: KØHB wrote: "an Old friend" wrote I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example ??????????????????????? His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation. not at all I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks would go about local band planing It is "band planning", Mark and it isn't done on a local basis. It is done on a national and regional basis. If we decided to implement a local band plan for 2m here, the 2m users in Pittsburgh, Morgantown, Parkersburg, Marietta and Columbus would be in a dither. You told us of your lack of knowledge of where 6m AM activity might be found. A couple of us told you. Now you'll undoubtedly string us along for a number of posts as you did over the 60m "band". Dave K8MN all the bitching about the Off topic stuff |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning
Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: KØHB wrote: "an Old friend" wrote I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example ??????????????????????? His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation. not at all I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks would go about local band planing It is "band planning", Mark and it isn't done on a local basis. according the ARRL it can be It is done on a national and regional basis. If we decided to implement a local band plan for 2m here, the 2m users in Pittsburgh, Morgantown, Parkersburg, Marietta and Columbus would be in a dither. so? You told us of your lack of knowledge of where 6m AM activity might be found. can't you tell the turth about anything A couple of us told you. Now you'll undoubtedly string us along for a number of posts as you did over the 60m "band". Dave K8MN all the bitching about the Off topic stuff |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: KØHB wrote: "an Old friend" wrote I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example ??????????????????????? His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation. not at all I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks would go about local band planing It is "band planning", Mark and it isn't done on a local basis. according the ARRL it can be Really? Here's the url for the ARRL band plans. Please point out the portion dealing with local variations. http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/reg.../bandplan.html It is done on a national and regional basis. If we decided to implement a local band plan for 2m here, the 2m users in Pittsburgh, Morgantown, Parkersburg, Marietta and Columbus would be in a dither. so? Whaddya mean, "so"? If everyone takes it upon himself to implement a "local band plan" then there isn't any band plan. FM ops interfere with SSB ops, packet ops interfere with FM repeater operation and repeaters interfere with each other. Where's that IQ of 248 that you've claimed? While we're on that topic, there's some interesting info to be found at: http://www.ufomind.com/misc/1997/dec/d28-001.shtml It say, in part: "To answer your question, we can simply pickup a 1989 copy of the Guinness Book of World Records . Marilyn Vos Savant is listed on page 26 as having the highest recorded IQ . It says '...as a ten year old she achieved a ceiling score for 23-year-olds, thus giving her an IQ of 228.' Her record was retired to the guinness hall of fame because scores that high are no longer possible due to a lowering of test score ceilings. (As I'm sure you're already guessing it's because scores that high weren't very valid in the first place.) Most other reference books state Marilyn Vos Savant's, IQ at 190, and still the highest ever recorded." That'd make your claim preposterous. You told us of your lack of knowledge of where 6m AM activity might be found. can't you tell the turth about anything Here's the "turth", the whole "turth" and nothing but the "turth": "been chatting with some locals interested in some AM stuff on 6M and prehaps elsewhere planety of really unsed rf 'real estate' but little mention of anything but ssb cw and Fm on the bandplans" --Mark Morgan There you go, Colonel. "Planety" of material on "unsed" rf real estate for you to chew on. A couple of us told you. Now you'll undoubtedly string us along for a number of posts as you did over the 60m "band". ....and you've already begun! Dave K8MN |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning
Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: KØHB wrote: "an Old friend" wrote I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example ??????????????????????? His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation. not at all I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks would go about local band planing It is "band planning", Mark and it isn't done on a local basis. It can be on vhf and above frequencies. You just need to open your mind a little, a very little. It is done on a national and regional basis. If we decided to implement a local band plan for 2m here, the 2m users in Pittsburgh, Morgantown, Parkersburg, Marietta and Columbus would be in a dither. There is still room for local variation in a regional plan. You told us of your lack of knowledge of where 6m AM activity might be found. A couple of us told you. Now you'll undoubtedly string us along for a number of posts as you did over the 60m "band". Dave K8MN Perhaps he and other associates have no 6M crystal for where the AM activity might be found and wants a local variation. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 04:52:41 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: KØHB wrote: "an Old friend" wrote I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example ??????????????????????? His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation. not at all I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks would go about local band planing It is "band planning", Mark and it isn't done on a local basis. It can be on vhf and above frequencies. You just need to open your mind a little, a very little. It can't be done locally if there is any chance of interfering with other regional repeaters. more pronucements from on high the MM's have spoken If you are coordinating to avoid putting your local machine with one 50 or 75 miles away, you aren't dealing with local band planning. You're dealing with regional band planning. not according to the ARRL you are being pretty certain about the meaning of words the ARRL says local bandplaning is possible Now, what do your comments have to do with 6m AM operation? why does it have to? the topic was local band planing as described in the ARRL repeater guide as possible It is done on a national and regional basis. If we decided to implement a local band plan for 2m here, the 2m users in Pittsburgh, Morgantown, Parkersburg, Marietta and Columbus would be in a dither. There is still room for local variation in a regional plan. ...not if there is any chance of interfering with other repeaters in your region, there isn't. You told us of your lack of knowledge of where 6m AM activity might be found. A couple of us told you. Now you'll undoubtedly string us along for a number of posts as you did over the 60m "band". Perhaps he and other associates have no 6M crystal for where the AM activity might be found and wants a local variation. Yeah, that not being able to buy a crystal would be a significant hurdle. Sheesh. Dave K8MN _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Pool | Policy | |||
New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
The Pool | Policy | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |